Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

self-learning(自学)

self-learning 用于记录任务执行中的错误、用户纠正、经验和能力缺口,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中希望让 Agent 持续沉淀问题、修正和最佳实践时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

self-learning 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 48,042。

总安装 706周安装 30GitHub Stars 1下载 247核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:self-learning(自学)
来源仓库:https://github.com/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents
仓库路径:skills/self-learning
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents --skill self-learning
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents --skill self-learning

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

self-learning 用于记录任务执行中的错误、用户纠正和经验缺口,适合让 Agent 持续沉淀问题和修正最佳实践。适用于学习过程的信息记录与优化,可结合任务场景使用。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装,需确认权限范围和维护状态。

安装前建议确认是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写等操作边界。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/self-learning

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents --skill self-…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

self-learning 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents --skill self-learning。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

self-learning 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

self-learning 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

self-learning 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

self-learning 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 706 次,近一周安装 30 次,下载 247 次,GitHub 1 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

self-learning 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
self-learning

自学 · 本页

7061接触敏感数据未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Overview

The self-learning skill automatically discovers, understands, and persists project context across sessions. It builds a mental model of the codebase, tech stack, conventions, and team preferences by scanning actual project artifacts. Without self-learning, every session starts from zero — with it, the agent accumulates institutional knowledge that improves accuracy and reduces errors over time.

Announce at start: "I'm using the self-learning skill to understand this project."


Phase 1: Trigger Identification

Determine which trigger activated this skill:

TriggerContextAction
New projectNo memory files existFull discovery (Phases 2-5)
Unfamiliar areaWorking in unknown part of codebaseTargeted discovery (Phase 2-3 for that area)
User correctionUser says "that's wrong" or corrects an assumptionCorrection protocol (Phase 6)
Explicit /learnUser invokes the commandFull discovery (Phases 2-5)
Session startMemory files exist but may be staleLoad and validate memory (Phase 7)
STOP: Identify your trigger before proceeding. Different triggers require different phases.

Phase 2: Project Structure Scan

Use Explore agents to examine these files in order of priority:

File/DirectoryWhat It RevealsPriority
package.json / pyproject.toml / go.mod / Cargo.toml / composer.jsonTech stack, dependencies, scriptsCritical
README.md / CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.mdProject purpose, conventions, rulesCritical
Directory structure (top 2 levels)Architecture pattern (monorepo, MVC, hexagonal, etc.)Critical
tsconfig.json / eslint.config.* / .prettierrc / phpstan.neonCoding standards, strictness levelHigh
.gitignoreWhat is excluded, deployment hintsHigh
docker-compose.yml / DockerfileInfrastructure, servicesMedium
.github/workflows/ / .gitlab-ci.ymlCI/CD setup, required checksMedium
.env.exampleEnvironment variables, external servicesMedium
specs/ / docs/Existing specifications and documentationMedium

Action: For each file found, extract key facts. Do NOT read every file — scan strategically.

STOP: Complete the structure scan before analyzing code patterns.

Phase 3: Code Pattern Analysis

Examine 3-5 representative files to identify patterns:

Pattern CategoryWhat to Look ForExample Indicators
Naming conventionsVariable/function/file namingcamelCase, snake_case, kebab-case, PascalCase
Import/exportModule organizationBarrel exports, relative vs absolute paths, path aliases
Error handlingHow failures are managedtry/catch, Result types, error boundaries, custom exceptions
Testing patternsTest framework and styleFile naming (*.test.ts vs *.spec.ts), structure (describe/it vs test)
State managementHow data flowsRedux, Zustand, Context, Vuex, Pinia, Livewire
API patternsCommunication styleREST, GraphQL, tRPC, RPC, WebSocket
Database accessData layer approachORM (Prisma, Eloquent, TypeORM), raw SQL, query builder
Component patternsUI structureAtomic design, feature folders, co-located styles

Action: Open 3-5 files from different areas of the codebase. Record observed patterns with specific examples.


Phase 4: Git History Analysis

git log --oneline -20          # Recent commits — development velocity, commit style
git shortlog -sn -20           # Active contributors
git branch -a                  # Branching strategy
git log --diff-filter=A --name-only --pretty=format: -10 | head -30  # Recently added files

Extract: Development velocity, commit message conventions, branching strategy, active areas.

STOP: Complete all discovery phases before persisting to memory.

Phase 5: Persist to Memory

Update the following memory files (create if they do not exist, append if they do):

memory/project-context.md

# Project Context
<!-- Updated by self-learning skill -->
<!-- Last updated: YYYY-MM-DD -->

## Purpose
[What this project does, who it is for]

## Tech Stack
- Language: [e.g., TypeScript 5.x]
- Framework: [e.g., Next.js 15]
- Database: [e.g., PostgreSQL via Prisma]
- Testing: [e.g., Vitest + Playwright]
- CI/CD: [e.g., GitHub Actions]

## Architecture
[e.g., Monorepo with apps/ and packages/]
[Key directories and their purposes]

## Key Dependencies
[Critical libraries and their roles]

memory/learned-patterns.md

# Learned Patterns
<!-- Updated by self-learning skill -->
<!-- Last updated: YYYY-MM-DD -->

## Naming Conventions
[What was observed with specific examples]

## Code Organization
[Import patterns, file structure, module boundaries]

## Error Handling
[How errors are handled in this project with examples]

## Testing Approach
[Framework, patterns, naming, coverage expectations]

memory/user-preferences.md

# User Preferences
<!-- Updated by self-learning skill -->
<!-- Last updated: YYYY-MM-DD -->

## Communication Style
[Terse? Detailed? Prefers code over explanation?]

## Workflow Preferences
[PR workflow? Branch naming? Commit style?]

## Review Preferences
[What they focus on in reviews?]

memory/decisions-log.md

# Decisions Log
<!-- Updated by self-learning and brainstorming skills -->

## YYYY-MM-DD: [Decision Title]
**Decision:** [What was decided]
**Context:** [Why this came up]
**Rationale:** [Why this was chosen over alternatives]
**Alternatives considered:** [What else was considered]

Phase 6: Correction Protocol

When the user corrects an assumption:

  1. Acknowledge the correction immediately — do not defend the wrong assumption
  2. Identify which memory file should be updated
  3. Update the memory file with the correction, including date and context
  4. Apply the correction to current work immediately
  5. Propagate — check if the correction invalidates other assumptions in memory
Correction TypeMemory File to UpdateExample
Naming convention wronglearned-patterns.md"We use snake_case, not camelCase"
Tech stack wrongproject-context.md"We use Vitest, not Jest"
Workflow preferenceuser-preferences.md"Always create PRs, never push to main"
Architecture misunderstandingproject-context.md"That is a microservice, not a monolith"
Decision contextdecisions-log.md"We chose X because of Y, not Z"
Do NOT skip the memory update. Corrections that are not persisted will be repeated.

Phase 7: Session Start — Memory Validation

When memory files already exist:

  1. Load all memory files from memory/ directory
  2. Check Last updated dates — flag anything older than 30 days
  3. Spot-check 2-3 facts against current codebase (e.g., does package.json still list the same framework?)
  4. If discrepancies found, run a targeted re-scan of the changed area
  5. Update stale entries with current information

Decision Table: Discovery Depth

SituationDiscovery DepthTime Budget
Brand new project, no memory filesFull (all phases)3-5 minutes
New area of known projectTargeted (Phase 2-3 for that area only)1-2 minutes
User correctionCorrection protocol only (Phase 6)30 seconds
Session start with existing memoryValidation only (Phase 7)1 minute
Major refactor detected (many changed files)Full re-scan3-5 minutes

Anti-Patterns / Common Mistakes

What NOT to DoWhy It FailsWhat to Do Instead
Read every file in the projectWastes context window, slowScan strategically: config files first, then 3-5 representative code files
Assume conventions from one fileOne file may be an outlierVerify patterns across 2+ files before persisting
Overwrite memory files completelyLoses historical context and user correctionsAppend or update specific sections, preserve history
Skip git historyMisses development velocity and team patternsAlways check recent commits and contributors
Persist guesses as factsPoisons future sessions with wrong contextOnly persist observations backed by evidence
Ignore user correctionsRepeats the same mistakesCorrections override observations immediately
Deep-dive into implementation detailsLoses the forest for the treesFocus on patterns and conventions, not specific logic
Skip memory validation on session startUses stale contextAlways spot-check memory against current codebase

Anti-Rationalization Guards

ThoughtReality
"I already know this framework"You do not know THIS project's conventions. Scan.
"The memory files are recent enough"Spot-check anyway. Code changes fast.
"This correction is minor"Minor corrections prevent major errors. Persist it.
"I will remember this without writing it down"You will not. Sessions are independent. Persist to memory.
"Scanning will take too long"Not scanning leads to wrong assumptions that take longer to fix.
Do NOT skip memory persistence. If you discovered it, write it down.

Integration Points

SkillRelationship
using-toolkitTriggers self-learning at session start
brainstormingLoads project context before idea generation
planningUses learned patterns to propose consistent approaches
code-reviewChecks code against learned conventions
auto-improvementRecords discovery effectiveness metrics
resilient-executionFailure patterns inform future approach selection

Concrete Examples

Discovery Command Sequence

# Step 1: Identify tech stack
cat package.json | head -50
# or
cat composer.json | head -50
# or
cat pyproject.toml

# Step 2: Check project structure
ls -la
ls -la src/ || ls -la app/ || ls -la lib/

# Step 3: Examine coding standards
cat tsconfig.json 2>/dev/null || cat phpstan.neon 2>/dev/null
cat .eslintrc* 2>/dev/null || cat .prettierrc* 2>/dev/null

# Step 4: Git activity
git log --oneline -20
git shortlog -sn -20

Memory Update After Correction

## 2026-03-15: Naming Convention Correction
**Previous assumption:** Project uses camelCase for database columns
**Correction:** Project uses snake_case for database columns (user corrected)
**Evidence:** Checked `migrations/` directory — all columns use snake_case
**Updated:** learned-patterns.md, Naming Conventions section

Key Principles

  • Observe, do not assume — base learnings on evidence from the codebase
  • Incremental updates — append to memory files, do not overwrite
  • Verify before persisting — double-check observations with 2+ examples
  • Respect corrections — user corrections override observations immediately
  • Stay current — re-scan when significant changes occur

Skill Type

RIGID — Discovery phases must be followed in order. Memory persistence is mandatory. Corrections must be recorded immediately. Do not skip phases or rationalize away the need to scan.

平台分布

Codex

36.19%
按下载量换算89

Claude

30.6%
按下载量换算76

Cursor

18.94%
按下载量换算47

Gemini CLI

9.48%
按下载量换算23

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills