Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索敏感数据github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

self-learning自学

Agent Skill

self-learning 用于记录任务执行中的错误、用户纠正、经验和能力缺口,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中希望让 Agent 持续沉淀问题、修正和最佳实践时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

706

周安装

30

GitHub Stars

1

下载量

247
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:self-learning(自学)
来源仓库:https://github.com/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents
仓库路径:skills/self-learning
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents --skill self-learning
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents --skill self-learning

简介

self-learning 用于记录任务执行中的错误、用户纠正和经验缺口,适合让 Agent 持续沉淀问题和修正最佳实践。

  • 适用于学习过程的信息记录与优化,可结合任务场景使用。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装,需确认权限范围和维护状态。
  • 安装前建议确认是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写等操作边界。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

Overview

The self-learning skill automatically discovers, understands, and persists project context across sessions. It builds a mental model of the codebase, tech stack, conventions, and team preferences by scanning actual project artifacts. Without self-learning, every session starts from zero — with it, the agent accumulates institutional knowledge that improves accuracy and reduces errors over time.

Announce at start: "I'm using the self-learning skill to understand this project."


Phase 1: Trigger Identification

Determine which trigger activated this skill:

TriggerContextAction
New projectNo memory files existFull discovery (Phases 2-5)
Unfamiliar areaWorking in unknown part of codebaseTargeted discovery (Phase 2-3 for that area)
User correctionUser says "that's wrong" or corrects an assumptionCorrection protocol (Phase 6)
Explicit /learnUser invokes the commandFull discovery (Phases 2-5)
Session startMemory files exist but may be staleLoad and validate memory (Phase 7)
STOP: Identify your trigger before proceeding. Different triggers require different phases.

Phase 2: Project Structure Scan

Use Explore agents to examine these files in order of priority:

File/DirectoryWhat It RevealsPriority
package.json / pyproject.toml / go.mod / Cargo.toml / composer.jsonTech stack, dependencies, scriptsCritical
README.md / CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.mdProject purpose, conventions, rulesCritical
Directory structure (top 2 levels)Architecture pattern (monorepo, MVC, hexagonal, etc.)Critical
tsconfig.json / eslint.config.* / .prettierrc / phpstan.neonCoding standards, strictness levelHigh
.gitignoreWhat is excluded, deployment hintsHigh
docker-compose.yml / DockerfileInfrastructure, servicesMedium
.github/workflows/ / .gitlab-ci.ymlCI/CD setup, required checksMedium
.env.exampleEnvironment variables, external servicesMedium
specs/ / docs/Existing specifications and documentationMedium

Action: For each file found, extract key facts. Do NOT read every file — scan strategically.

STOP: Complete the structure scan before analyzing code patterns.

Phase 3: Code Pattern Analysis

Examine 3-5 representative files to identify patterns:

Pattern CategoryWhat to Look ForExample Indicators
Naming conventionsVariable/function/file namingcamelCase, snake_case, kebab-case, PascalCase
Import/exportModule organizationBarrel exports, relative vs absolute paths, path aliases
Error handlingHow failures are managedtry/catch, Result types, error boundaries, custom exceptions
Testing patternsTest framework and styleFile naming (*.test.ts vs *.spec.ts), structure (describe/it vs test)
State managementHow data flowsRedux, Zustand, Context, Vuex, Pinia, Livewire
API patternsCommunication styleREST, GraphQL, tRPC, RPC, WebSocket
Database accessData layer approachORM (Prisma, Eloquent, TypeORM), raw SQL, query builder
Component patternsUI structureAtomic design, feature folders, co-located styles

Action: Open 3-5 files from different areas of the codebase. Record observed patterns with specific examples.


Phase 4: Git History Analysis

git log --oneline -20          # Recent commits — development velocity, commit style
git shortlog -sn -20           # Active contributors
git branch -a                  # Branching strategy
git log --diff-filter=A --name-only --pretty=format: -10 | head -30  # Recently added files

Extract: Development velocity, commit message conventions, branching strategy, active areas.

STOP: Complete all discovery phases before persisting to memory.

Phase 5: Persist to Memory

Update the following memory files (create if they do not exist, append if they do):

memory/project-context.md

# Project Context
<!-- Updated by self-learning skill -->
<!-- Last updated: YYYY-MM-DD -->

## Purpose
[What this project does, who it is for]

## Tech Stack
- Language: [e.g., TypeScript 5.x]
- Framework: [e.g., Next.js 15]
- Database: [e.g., PostgreSQL via Prisma]
- Testing: [e.g., Vitest + Playwright]
- CI/CD: [e.g., GitHub Actions]

## Architecture
[e.g., Monorepo with apps/ and packages/]
[Key directories and their purposes]

## Key Dependencies
[Critical libraries and their roles]

memory/learned-patterns.md

# Learned Patterns
<!-- Updated by self-learning skill -->
<!-- Last updated: YYYY-MM-DD -->

## Naming Conventions
[What was observed with specific examples]

## Code Organization
[Import patterns, file structure, module boundaries]

## Error Handling
[How errors are handled in this project with examples]

## Testing Approach
[Framework, patterns, naming, coverage expectations]

memory/user-preferences.md

# User Preferences
<!-- Updated by self-learning skill -->
<!-- Last updated: YYYY-MM-DD -->

## Communication Style
[Terse? Detailed? Prefers code over explanation?]

## Workflow Preferences
[PR workflow? Branch naming? Commit style?]

## Review Preferences
[What they focus on in reviews?]

memory/decisions-log.md

# Decisions Log
<!-- Updated by self-learning and brainstorming skills -->

## YYYY-MM-DD: [Decision Title]
**Decision:** [What was decided]
**Context:** [Why this came up]
**Rationale:** [Why this was chosen over alternatives]
**Alternatives considered:** [What else was considered]

Phase 6: Correction Protocol

When the user corrects an assumption:

  1. Acknowledge the correction immediately — do not defend the wrong assumption
  2. Identify which memory file should be updated
  3. Update the memory file with the correction, including date and context
  4. Apply the correction to current work immediately
  5. Propagate — check if the correction invalidates other assumptions in memory
Correction TypeMemory File to UpdateExample
Naming convention wronglearned-patterns.md"We use snake_case, not camelCase"
Tech stack wrongproject-context.md"We use Vitest, not Jest"
Workflow preferenceuser-preferences.md"Always create PRs, never push to main"
Architecture misunderstandingproject-context.md"That is a microservice, not a monolith"
Decision contextdecisions-log.md"We chose X because of Y, not Z"
Do NOT skip the memory update. Corrections that are not persisted will be repeated.

Phase 7: Session Start — Memory Validation

When memory files already exist:

  1. Load all memory files from memory/ directory
  2. Check Last updated dates — flag anything older than 30 days
  3. Spot-check 2-3 facts against current codebase (e.g., does package.json still list the same framework?)
  4. If discrepancies found, run a targeted re-scan of the changed area
  5. Update stale entries with current information

Decision Table: Discovery Depth

SituationDiscovery DepthTime Budget
Brand new project, no memory filesFull (all phases)3-5 minutes
New area of known projectTargeted (Phase 2-3 for that area only)1-2 minutes
User correctionCorrection protocol only (Phase 6)30 seconds
Session start with existing memoryValidation only (Phase 7)1 minute
Major refactor detected (many changed files)Full re-scan3-5 minutes

Anti-Patterns / Common Mistakes

What NOT to DoWhy It FailsWhat to Do Instead
Read every file in the projectWastes context window, slowScan strategically: config files first, then 3-5 representative code files
Assume conventions from one fileOne file may be an outlierVerify patterns across 2+ files before persisting
Overwrite memory files completelyLoses historical context and user correctionsAppend or update specific sections, preserve history
Skip git historyMisses development velocity and team patternsAlways check recent commits and contributors
Persist guesses as factsPoisons future sessions with wrong contextOnly persist observations backed by evidence
Ignore user correctionsRepeats the same mistakesCorrections override observations immediately
Deep-dive into implementation detailsLoses the forest for the treesFocus on patterns and conventions, not specific logic
Skip memory validation on session startUses stale contextAlways spot-check memory against current codebase

Anti-Rationalization Guards

ThoughtReality
"I already know this framework"You do not know THIS project's conventions. Scan.
"The memory files are recent enough"Spot-check anyway. Code changes fast.
"This correction is minor"Minor corrections prevent major errors. Persist it.
"I will remember this without writing it down"You will not. Sessions are independent. Persist to memory.
"Scanning will take too long"Not scanning leads to wrong assumptions that take longer to fix.
Do NOT skip memory persistence. If you discovered it, write it down.

Integration Points

SkillRelationship
using-toolkitTriggers self-learning at session start
brainstormingLoads project context before idea generation
planningUses learned patterns to propose consistent approaches
code-reviewChecks code against learned conventions
auto-improvementRecords discovery effectiveness metrics
resilient-executionFailure patterns inform future approach selection

Concrete Examples

Discovery Command Sequence

# Step 1: Identify tech stack
cat package.json | head -50
# or
cat composer.json | head -50
# or
cat pyproject.toml

# Step 2: Check project structure
ls -la
ls -la src/ || ls -la app/ || ls -la lib/

# Step 3: Examine coding standards
cat tsconfig.json 2>/dev/null || cat phpstan.neon 2>/dev/null
cat .eslintrc* 2>/dev/null || cat .prettierrc* 2>/dev/null

# Step 4: Git activity
git log --oneline -20
git shortlog -sn -20

Memory Update After Correction

## 2026-03-15: Naming Convention Correction
**Previous assumption:** Project uses camelCase for database columns
**Correction:** Project uses snake_case for database columns (user corrected)
**Evidence:** Checked `migrations/` directory — all columns use snake_case
**Updated:** learned-patterns.md, Naming Conventions section

Key Principles

  • Observe, do not assume — base learnings on evidence from the codebase
  • Incremental updates — append to memory files, do not overwrite
  • Verify before persisting — double-check observations with 2+ examples
  • Respect corrections — user corrections override observations immediately
  • Stay current — re-scan when significant changes occur

Skill Type

RIGID — Discovery phases must be followed in order. Memory persistence is mandatory. Corrections must be recorded immediately. Do not skip phases or rationalize away the need to scan.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

36.19%
按下载量换算89

Claude

30.6%
按下载量换算76

Cursor

18.94%
按下载量换算47

Gemini CLI

9.48%
按下载量换算23

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills