Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

self-learning-agent(自学习 Agent)

self-learning-agent 用于记录任务执行中的错误、用户纠正、经验和能力缺口,适合在 OpenClaw 中希望让 Agent 持续沉淀问题、修正和最佳实践时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

self-learning-agent 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 19,328。

总安装 5,657周安装 243GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 1,983核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.1

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:self-learning-agent(自学习 Agent)
来源仓库:https://github.com/solomonneas/self-learning-agent
安装命令:
openclaw skills install self-learning-agent
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install self-learning-agent

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

基于语义搜索的知识卡记忆系统,使 Agent 在每次会话中都能调用过往经验。适用于长期记忆密集型任务,如客户服务或技术咨询。通过 OpenClaw 安装,需评估其知识卡数量与检索延迟对性能的影响。注意 YAML frontmatter 格式兼容性,避免解析错误导致记忆失效。

self-learning-agent 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install self-learning-agent;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

self-learning-agent 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install self-learning-agent。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

self-learning-agent 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

self-learning-agent 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

self-learning-agent 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

self-learning-agent 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 5,657 次,近一周安装 243 次,下载 1,983 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

self-learning-agent 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
self-learning-agent

自学习 Agent · 本页

5,657—接触敏感数据MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
self-learning-agent
version
1.0.0
description
Knowledge card memory system with semantic search. Agents wake up fresh each session but remember everything through atomic ~350-token cards with YAML frontmatter, daily logs, and a slim master index. Captures lessons, corrections, preferences, and facts automatically. Built for agents that need persistent memory across sessions.
tags
category
agent

Self-Learning Agent — Knowledge Card Memory System

A production-tested memory architecture for AI agents that wake up fresh each session. Instead of one monolithic memory file that grows until it's unusable, this system uses atomic knowledge cards (~350 tokens each) searched semantically, daily logs for raw notes, and a slim master index loaded every session.

Architecture

workspace/
├── MEMORY.md              # Master index (~2KB, loaded every session)
├── memory/
│   ├── cards/             # Knowledge cards (~350 tokens each)
│   │   ├── topic-name.md  # One topic per file, YAML frontmatter
│   │   ├── another-topic.md
│   │   └── ...
│   └── YYYY-MM-DD.md      # Daily session logs (raw notes)

Why This Works

  • MEMORY.md is tiny (~2KB). It loads fast, gives the agent orientation, and points to everything else.
  • Knowledge cards are atomic. Each one covers ONE topic in ~350 tokens. Semantic search finds the right cards without loading everything.
  • Daily logs are append-only scratch pads. Raw session notes, not curated.
  • Cards are curated wisdom. Daily logs are raw data. The agent periodically distills daily logs into cards during maintenance.

Setup

1. Create the directory structure

mkdir -p memory/cards

2. Create MEMORY.md (master index)

This file is loaded every session. Keep it under 2KB. It should contain:

# MEMORY.md — Master Index

## How Memory Works
- **This file:** Slim index (~2KB). Loaded every main session.
- **Knowledge cards:** `memory/cards/*.md` (~N cards, ~350 tokens each). Searched semantically.
- **Daily logs:** `memory/YYYY-MM-DD.md`. Raw session notes.
- **DO NOT** dump everything here. Write knowledge cards instead.

## Identity
[Agent name, model, owner, key facts]

## Quick Context
[2-3 lines of what matters right now]

## Card Categories
[Table mapping categories to card topics]

## Current Priorities
[What's actively being worked on]

3. Add to your AGENTS.md / system prompt

## Every Session
1. Read MEMORY.md (slim index)
2. Search `memory_search` for context relevant to the current task
3. Skim today + yesterday daily logs for recent context
4. Start working

## Memory Rules
- "Mental notes" don't survive session restarts. Files do.
- When someone says "remember this" → write a knowledge card
- When you learn a lesson → write a knowledge card
- When you make a mistake → document it so future-you doesn't repeat it

Knowledge Card Format

Every card has YAML frontmatter and dense content:

---
topic: Descriptive Topic Name
category: system|human|infrastructure|tools|workflow|projects|lessons|career|security|models
tags: [tag1, tag2, tag3]
created: YYYY-MM-DD
updated: YYYY-MM-DD
---

The actual content. Dense, factual, no fluff.
Write for future-you who has zero context.
Include specific commands, paths, config values.
Keep under 350 tokens.

Card Quality Rules

  1. ONE topic per card. Three insights = three cards.
  2. ~350 tokens max. Dense beats verbose.
  3. Zero-context readable. Include specifics (commands, paths, values).
  4. Tags are searchable keywords. Lowercase, hyphenated.
  5. Update, don't duplicate. If a card exists for the topic, merge new info into it.
  6. No fluff. Every sentence should contain a fact, a command, or a decision.

Good Card Example

---
topic: Cortex CSRF Automation
category: infrastructure
tags: [cortex, csrf, thehive, api, security]
created: 2026-03-19
updated: 2026-03-19
---

Cortex 3.1.8 uses non-standard CSRF. Cookie: CORTEX-XSRF-TOKEN, header: X-CORTEX-XSRF-TOKEN.
Standard Play Framework bypass headers (Csrf-Token: nocheck) do NOT work.

Flow: Login → GET any endpoint with session cookie → capture CORTEX-XSRF-TOKEN from Set-Cookie →
send as both cookie AND X-CORTEX-XSRF-TOKEN header on all POST/PUT/DELETE.

Shortcut: After generating first API key, use Authorization: Bearer which bypasses CSRF entirely.
First-user POST /api/user (no auth) only works when zero users exist in DB.

Bad Card Example

---
topic: Stuff I Learned Today
---

Today I learned a bunch of things about Cortex and TheHive. The CSRF thing was really tricky
and took a while to figure out. I also learned about how to set up organizations and users.
It was a productive session overall.

(Too vague, no specifics, no actionable info, multiple topics in one card)

Capture Triggers

Automatic (agent should capture without being asked)

  • Hard-won debugging lessons (3+ attempts to fix something)
  • Configuration gotchas (things that work differently than expected)
  • User corrections ("no, do it THIS way")
  • Non-obvious facts about infrastructure, people, or projects
  • Workflow improvements discovered during a task

Manual

  • User says /learn, "remember this", or "save this"
  • User explicitly corrects the agent's approach

What NOT to Capture

  • Obvious/trivial information
  • Temporary context (one-time fixes that won't recur)
  • Things already in existing cards
  • Conversation summaries (that's what daily logs are for)

Daily Log Format

Append to memory/YYYY-MM-DD.md:

## HH:MM — Brief Title

What happened, what was decided, what was learned.
Link to any cards created: `→ card: topic-name`

Memory Maintenance

Periodically (every few days), the agent should:

  1. Read recent daily logs
  2. Identify significant events worth preserving long-term
  3. Create or update knowledge cards from insights
  4. Remove outdated info from MEMORY.md
  5. Update the card categories table in MEMORY.md

Think of it like a human reviewing their journal and updating their mental model.

Promotion Rules

When the same lesson appears 3+ times in cards:

  • Promote it to AGENTS.md as a permanent rule
  • Mark the original card as "promoted"
  • This prevents the agent from re-learning the same lesson

Session Workflow

Session Start
    │
    ├── Read MEMORY.md (always, ~2KB)
    ├── memory_search for task-relevant cards
    ├── Skim today + yesterday daily logs
    │
    ├── [Do work]
    │
    ├── Capture insights → knowledge cards
    ├── Log session → daily log
    │
Session End

Scaling

This system has been tested with:

  • ~36 knowledge cards (~350 tokens each = ~12.6K tokens total)
  • Daily logs spanning months
  • Semantic search via embeddings (qwen3-embedding or similar)

At this scale, semantic search finds relevant cards in <100ms. The master index stays under 2KB. The agent loads only what it needs.

If you hit 100+ cards, consider:

  • Archiving cards older than 6 months that haven't been accessed
  • Splitting categories into subdirectories
  • Adding a card index file per category

Comparison with Monolithic Memory

Monolithic (one big file)Knowledge Cards
Load timeGrows foreverConstant (~2KB index)
SearchFull-text scanSemantic vector search
UpdatesAppend-only chaosAtomic card updates
Noise ratioHigh (old + new mixed)Low (curated cards)
Session costTokens scale with historyTokens stay flat

平台分布

OpenClaw

72.71%
按下载量换算1,442

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills