Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

performing-api-inventory-and-discovery(performing API inventory AND discovery 搜索)

用于辅助 API 设计、接口文档、请求响应结构和服务集成说明。它适合让 Agent 梳理 endpoint、生成 OpenAPI 草稿、检查字段命名、整理错误码或辅助前后端联调。使用时需要确认真实业务语义、鉴权方式、分页和错误处理规则;涉及生成接口文档时,应避免凭空补字段,最好从现有代码、schema 或接口样例中提取事实。

performing-api-inventory-and-discovery 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 57,638。

总安装 428周安装 18GitHub Stars 5,920下载 150核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:performing-api-inventory-and-discovery(performing API inventory AND discovery 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills
仓库路径:skills/performing-api-inventory-and-discovery
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill performing-api-inventory-and-discovery
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill performing-api-inventory-and-discovery

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于辅助 API 设计、接口文档和请求响应结构说明。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中梳理 endpoint 或生成 OpenAPI 草稿。使用时需确认真实业务语义、鉴权方式和错误处理规则,避免凭空补字段。最好从现有代码或接口样例中提取事实,确保文档准确性。

performing-api-inventory-and-discovery 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/performing-api-inventory-and-discovery

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skil…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

performing-api-inventory-and-discovery 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill performi…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

performing-api-inventory-and-discovery 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

performing-api-inventory-and-discovery 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

performing-api-inventory-and-discovery 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

performing-api-inventory-and-discovery 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 428 次,近一周安装 18 次,下载 150 次,GitHub 5,920 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

performing-api-inventory-and-discovery 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 来源仓库有 5,920 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
performing-api-inventory-and-discovery

performing API inventory AND discovery 搜索 · 本页

4285,920接触敏感数据未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Performing API Inventory and Discovery

When to Use

  • Mapping the complete API attack surface of an organization before a security assessment
  • Identifying shadow APIs deployed by development teams without security review
  • Discovering deprecated or zombie API versions that remain accessible but unmaintained
  • Finding undocumented API endpoints exposed through mobile applications, SPAs, or microservices
  • Building an API inventory for compliance requirements (PCI-DSS, SOC2, GDPR)

Do not use without written authorization. API discovery involves scanning network infrastructure and analyzing traffic.

Prerequisites

  • Written authorization specifying the target domains and network ranges
  • Passive traffic capture capability (network tap, proxy, or cloud traffic mirroring)
  • Active scanning tools: Amass, subfinder, httpx, and nuclei
  • JavaScript analysis tools: LinkFinder, JS-Miner, or custom parsers
  • Access to cloud console (AWS, Azure, GCP) for API gateway inventory
  • Burp Suite Professional for passive API endpoint discovery

Workflow

Step 1: Passive API Discovery from Traffic Analysis

import re
import json
from collections import defaultdict

# Parse HAR file from browser developer tools or proxy
def analyze_har_for_apis(har_file_path):
    """Extract API endpoints from HTTP Archive (HAR) file."""
    with open(har_file_path) as f:
        har = json.load(f)

    api_endpoints = defaultdict(lambda: {
        "methods": set(), "content_types": set(),
        "auth_types": set(), "count": 0
    })

    for entry in har["log"]["entries"]:
        url = entry["request"]["url"]
        method = entry["request"]["method"]

        # Identify API patterns
        api_patterns = [
            r'/api/', r'/v\d+/', r'/graphql', r'/rest/',
            r'/ws/', r'/rpc/', r'/grpc', r'/json',
        ]

        if any(re.search(p, url) for p in api_patterns):
            # Normalize the URL (remove query params and IDs)
            normalized = re.sub(r'\?.*$', '', url)
            normalized = re.sub(r'/\d+(/|$)', '/{id}\\1', normalized)
            normalized = re.sub(
                r'/[0-9a-f]{8}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{12}',
                '/{uuid}', normalized)

            ep = api_endpoints[normalized]
            ep["methods"].add(method)
            ep["count"] += 1

            # Detect authentication type
            for header in entry["request"]["headers"]:
                name = header["name"].lower()
                if name == "authorization":
                    if "bearer" in header["value"].lower():
                        ep["auth_types"].add("Bearer/JWT")
                    elif "basic" in header["value"].lower():
                        ep["auth_types"].add("Basic")
                elif name == "x-api-key":
                    ep["auth_types"].add("API Key")

            # Detect content type
            content_type = next(
                (h["value"] for h in entry["request"]["headers"]
                 if h["name"].lower() == "content-type"), None)
            if content_type:
                ep["content_types"].add(content_type.split(";")[0])

    print(f"Discovered {len(api_endpoints)} unique API endpoints:\n")
    for url, info in sorted(api_endpoints.items()):
        methods = ", ".join(sorted(info["methods"]))
        auth = ", ".join(info["auth_types"]) or "None"
        print(f"  [{methods}] {url}")
        print(f"    Auth: {auth} | Requests: {info['count']}")

    return api_endpoints

Step 2: Active API Endpoint Discovery

# DNS enumeration for API subdomains
amass enum -d example.com -o amass_results.txt
subfinder -d example.com -o subfinder_results.txt

# Filter for API-related subdomains
grep -iE '(api|rest|graphql|ws|gateway|backend|internal|staging|dev|v1|v2)' \
    amass_results.txt subfinder_results.txt | sort -u > api_subdomains.txt

# Check which subdomains are alive
cat api_subdomains.txt | httpx -status-code -content-length -title \
    -tech-detect -o live_apis.txt

# Probe common API paths on each live subdomain
cat api_subdomains.txt | while read domain; do
    for path in /api /api/v1 /api/v2 /graphql /swagger.json /openapi.json \
                /api-docs /docs /health /status /metrics /actuator; do
        curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code} %{url_effective}\n" \
            "https://${domain}${path}" 2>/dev/null | grep -v "^404"
    done
done
import requests
import concurrent.futures

def discover_api_endpoints(base_domains):
    """Actively probe for API endpoints across discovered domains."""

    # Common API paths to test
    API_PATHS = [
        "/api", "/api/v1", "/api/v2", "/api/v3",
        "/graphql", "/gql", "/query",
        "/rest", "/json", "/rpc",
        "/swagger.json", "/swagger/v1/swagger.json",
        "/openapi.json", "/openapi.yaml", "/api-docs",
        "/docs", "/redoc", "/explorer",
        "/.well-known/openid-configuration",
        "/health", "/healthz", "/ready",
        "/status", "/info", "/version",
        "/metrics", "/prometheus",
        "/actuator", "/actuator/health", "/actuator/info",
        "/admin", "/admin/api", "/internal",
        "/debug", "/debug/vars", "/debug/pprof",
        "/ws", "/websocket", "/socket.io",
        "/grpc", "/twirp",
    ]

    discovered = []

    def check_endpoint(domain, path):
        for scheme in ["https", "http"]:
            url = f"{scheme}://{domain}{path}"
            try:
                resp = requests.get(url, timeout=5, allow_redirects=False,
                                  verify=False)  # TLS verification disabled for discovery; enable in production
                if resp.status_code not in (404, 502, 503):
                    return {
                        "url": url,
                        "status": resp.status_code,
                        "content_type": resp.headers.get("Content-Type", ""),
                        "server": resp.headers.get("Server", ""),
                        "size": len(resp.content),
                    }
            except requests.exceptions.RequestException:
                pass
        return None

    with concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=20) as executor:
        futures = {}
        for domain in base_domains:
            for path in API_PATHS:
                future = executor.submit(check_endpoint, domain, path)
                futures[future] = (domain, path)

        for future in concurrent.futures.as_completed(futures):
            result = future.result()
            if result:
                discovered.append(result)
                print(f"  [FOUND] {result['url']} -> {result['status']} ({result['content_type']})")

    return discovered

Step 3: JavaScript Source Analysis for API Endpoints

import re
import requests

def extract_apis_from_javascript(js_urls):
    """Extract API endpoints from JavaScript source files."""
    api_pattern = re.compile(
        r'''(?:['"`])((?:/api/|/v[0-9]+/|/graphql|/rest/)[^'"`\s<>{}]+)(?:['"`])''',
        re.IGNORECASE
    )
    url_pattern = re.compile(
        r'''(?:['"`])(https?://[a-zA-Z0-9._-]+(?:\.[a-zA-Z]{2,})+(?:/[^'"`\s<>{}]*)?)(?:['"`])'''
    )
    fetch_pattern = re.compile(
        r'''(?:fetch|axios|ajax|XMLHttpRequest|\.get|\.post|\.put|\.delete|\.patch)\s*\(\s*(?:['"`])([^'"`]+)'''
    )

    all_endpoints = set()

    for js_url in js_urls:
        try:
            resp = requests.get(js_url, timeout=10)
            content = resp.text

            # Extract relative API paths
            for match in api_pattern.findall(content):
                all_endpoints.add(("relative", match))

            # Extract absolute URLs
            for match in url_pattern.findall(content):
                if any(kw in match.lower() for kw in ["/api", "/v1", "/v2", "graphql"]):
                    all_endpoints.add(("absolute", match))

            # Extract from fetch/axios calls
            for match in fetch_pattern.findall(content):
                all_endpoints.add(("fetch", match))

        except requests.exceptions.RequestException:
            pass

    print(f"\nAPI endpoints discovered from JavaScript ({len(all_endpoints)}):")
    for source, endpoint in sorted(all_endpoints):
        print(f"  [{source}] {endpoint}")

    return all_endpoints

# Find JavaScript files from the target domain
def find_js_files(domain):
    """Discover JavaScript files from a web application."""
    resp = requests.get(f"https://{domain}", timeout=10)
    js_files = re.findall(r'src=["\']([^"\']+\.js[^"\']*)', resp.text)
    full_urls = []
    for js in js_files:
        if js.startswith("http"):
            full_urls.append(js)
        elif js.startswith("//"):
            full_urls.append(f"https:{js}")
        elif js.startswith("/"):
            full_urls.append(f"https://{domain}{js}")
    return full_urls

Step 4: Cloud API Gateway Inventory

import boto3

def inventory_aws_apis():
    """Inventory all APIs in AWS API Gateway."""
    apigw = boto3.client('apigateway')
    apigwv2 = boto3.client('apigatewayv2')

    apis = []

    # REST APIs (API Gateway v1)
    rest_apis = apigw.get_rest_apis()
    for api in rest_apis['items']:
        resources = apigw.get_resources(restApiId=api['id'])
        stages = apigw.get_stages(restApiId=api['id'])

        for stage in stages['item']:
            for resource in resources['items']:
                for method in resource.get('resourceMethods', {}).keys():
                    apis.append({
                        "type": "REST",
                        "name": api['name'],
                        "stage": stage['stageName'],
                        "path": resource['path'],
                        "method": method,
                        "url": f"https://{api['id']}.execute-api.{boto3.session.Session().region_name}.amazonaws.com/{stage['stageName']}{resource['path']}",
                        "created": str(api.get('createdDate', '')),
                    })

    # HTTP APIs (API Gateway v2)
    http_apis = apigwv2.get_apis()
    for api in http_apis['Items']:
        routes = apigwv2.get_routes(ApiId=api['ApiId'])
        stages = apigwv2.get_stages(ApiId=api['ApiId'])

        for route in routes['Items']:
            apis.append({
                "type": "HTTP",
                "name": api['Name'],
                "route": route['RouteKey'],
                "api_id": api['ApiId'],
                "protocol": api['ProtocolType'],
            })

    print(f"\nAWS API Inventory ({len(apis)} endpoints):")
    for api in apis:
        print(f"  [{api['type']}] {api.get('name')} - {api.get('method', '')} {api.get('path', api.get('route', ''))}")

    return apis

Step 5: API Version and Shadow API Detection

def detect_shadow_and_zombie_apis(discovered_endpoints, documented_endpoints):
    """Compare discovered APIs against documented inventory."""

    # Normalize endpoints for comparison
    def normalize(ep):
        ep = re.sub(r'/v\d+/', '/vX/', ep)
        ep = re.sub(r'/\d+', '/{id}', ep)
        return ep.lower().rstrip('/')

    documented_normalized = {normalize(ep) for ep in documented_endpoints}

    shadow_apis = []  # Discovered but not documented
    zombie_apis = []  # Old versions still accessible

    for ep in discovered_endpoints:
        normalized = normalize(ep["url"])

        if normalized not in documented_normalized:
            # Check if it is an old version of a documented API
            if re.search(r'/v[0-9]+/', ep["url"]):
                zombie_apis.append(ep)
            else:
                shadow_apis.append(ep)

    print(f"\nShadow APIs (undocumented): {len(shadow_apis)}")
    for api in shadow_apis:
        print(f"  [SHADOW] {api['url']} -> {api['status']}")

    print(f"\nZombie APIs (deprecated versions): {len(zombie_apis)}")
    for api in zombie_apis:
        print(f"  [ZOMBIE] {api['url']} -> {api['status']}")

    # Check if zombie APIs lack security controls
    for api in zombie_apis:
        resp = requests.get(api["url"], timeout=5)
        if resp.status_code not in (401, 403):
            print(f"  [CRITICAL] Zombie API accessible without auth: {api['url']}")

    return shadow_apis, zombie_apis

Key Concepts

TermDefinition
Shadow APIAn API deployed by a development team without going through the official API management or security review process
Zombie APIA deprecated or old API version that remains accessible and running but is no longer maintained or monitored
API InventoryA comprehensive catalog of all APIs in an organization including endpoint URLs, owners, versions, authentication methods, and data classifications
Improper Inventory ManagementOWASP API9:2023 - failure to maintain an accurate API inventory, leading to unmonitored and unprotected API endpoints
Attack SurfaceThe total set of API endpoints, methods, and parameters that an attacker can potentially interact with
API SprawlThe uncontrolled proliferation of APIs in an organization, often resulting from microservice adoption without centralized governance

Tools & Systems

  • Amass: OWASP tool for attack surface mapping through DNS enumeration, web scraping, and API discovery
  • httpx: Fast HTTP probing tool for validating discovered domains and identifying live API endpoints
  • nuclei: Template-based scanner for detecting exposed API documentation, debug endpoints, and misconfigured services
  • Swagger UI Detector: Tool for finding exposed Swagger/OpenAPI documentation endpoints across the organization
  • Akto: API security platform that discovers APIs through traffic analysis and maintains an automated inventory

Common Scenarios

Scenario: Enterprise API Attack Surface Assessment

Context: A large enterprise has 200+ development teams using microservices. The security team suspects many undocumented APIs are exposed to the internet. A comprehensive API inventory is needed for a security audit.

Approach:

  1. DNS enumeration discovers 340 subdomains, 45 contain API-related keywords (api, rest, gateway, backend)
  2. Active probing of all subdomains with API path wordlist discovers 127 live API endpoints
  3. JavaScript analysis of the main web application reveals 34 API endpoints, 8 of which point to undocumented internal services
  4. AWS API Gateway inventory shows 67 REST APIs and 23 HTTP APIs across 12 accounts
  5. Cross-referencing against the official API catalog: 31 shadow APIs (undocumented), 14 zombie APIs (deprecated versions)
  6. 3 zombie APIs have no authentication, exposing customer data through endpoints that were supposed to be decommissioned
  7. 2 shadow APIs expose internal admin functions to the internet without authorization

Pitfalls:

  • Only checking documented API endpoints and missing shadow APIs deployed outside the API gateway
  • Not scanning JavaScript bundles where frontend applications hardcode API endpoint URLs
  • Missing APIs behind non-standard ports or subpaths
  • Not checking for multiple API versions where older versions may lack security controls
  • Assuming all APIs go through the API gateway when some may be directly exposed

Output Format

## API Inventory and Discovery Report

**Organization**: Example Corp
**Assessment Date**: 2024-12-15
**Domains Scanned**: 340

### Summary

| Category | Count |
|----------|-------|
| Total APIs Discovered | 127 |
| Documented APIs | 82 |
| Shadow APIs (undocumented) | 31 |
| Zombie APIs (deprecated) | 14 |
| APIs Without Authentication | 8 |
| APIs Exposing Sensitive Data | 5 |

### Critical Findings

1. **Zombie API**: api-v1.example.com/api/v1/users - Deprecated in 2022,
   still accessible, no authentication required, returns full user data
2. **Shadow API**: internal-tools.example.com/api/admin - Admin functions
   exposed to internet without authorization
3. **Exposed Documentation**: 12 Swagger UI instances accessible publicly,
   revealing full API schema and endpoint details

平台分布

Codex

37.51%
按下载量换算56

Claude

30.41%
按下载量换算46

Cursor

18.24%
按下载量换算27

Gemini CLI

11.11%
按下载量换算17

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

可疑

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills