Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

performing-api-fuzzing-with-restler(performing API fuzzing with restler 搜索)

用于辅助 API 设计、接口文档、请求响应结构和服务集成说明。它适合让 Agent 梳理 endpoint、生成 OpenAPI 草稿、检查字段命名、整理错误码或辅助前后端联调。使用时需要确认真实业务语义、鉴权方式、分页和错误处理规则;涉及生成接口文档时,应避免凭空补字段,最好从现有代码、schema 或接口样例中提取事实。

performing-api-fuzzing-with-restler 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 60,488。

总安装 367周安装 15GitHub Stars 5,915下载 118核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:performing-api-fuzzing-with-restler(performing API fuzzing with restler 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills
仓库路径:skills/performing-api-fuzzing-with-restler
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill performing-api-fuzzing-with-restler
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill performing-api-fuzzing-with-restler

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于辅助 API 设计、接口文档和请求响应结构说明。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中梳理 endpoint 或生成 OpenAPI 草稿。使用时需确认真实业务语义、鉴权方式和错误处理规则,避免凭空补字段。最好从现有代码或接口样例中提取事实,确保文档准确性。

performing-api-fuzzing-with-restler 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/performing-api-fuzzing-with-restler

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skil…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

performing-api-fuzzing-with-restler 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill performi…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

performing-api-fuzzing-with-restler 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

performing-api-fuzzing-with-restler 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

performing-api-fuzzing-with-restler 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

performing-api-fuzzing-with-restler 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 367 次,近一周安装 15 次,下载 118 次,GitHub 5,915 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

performing-api-fuzzing-with-restler 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 来源仓库有 5,915 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
performing-api-fuzzing-with-restler

performing API fuzzing with restler 搜索 · 本页

3675,915接触敏感数据未明确未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Performing API Fuzzing with RESTler

When to Use

  • Performing automated security testing of REST APIs using their OpenAPI/Swagger specifications
  • Discovering bugs that only manifest through specific sequences of API calls (stateful testing)
  • Finding 500 Internal Server Error responses that indicate unhandled exceptions or crash conditions
  • Testing API input validation by fuzzing parameters with malformed, boundary, and injection payloads
  • Running continuous security regression testing in CI/CD pipelines for API changes

Do not use against production environments without explicit authorization and monitoring. RESTler creates and deletes resources aggressively during fuzzing.

Prerequisites

  • Written authorization specifying the target API and acceptable testing scope
  • Python 3.12+ and.NET 8.0 runtime installed
  • RESTler downloaded from https://github.com/microsoft/restler-fuzzer
  • OpenAPI/Swagger specification (v2 or v3) for the target API
  • API authentication credentials (tokens, API keys, or OAuth credentials)
  • Isolated test/staging environment (RESTler can create thousands of resources per hour)

Workflow

Step 1: RESTler Installation and Setup

# Clone and build RESTler
git clone https://github.com/microsoft/restler-fuzzer.git
cd restler-fuzzer

# Build RESTler
python3 ./build-restler.py --dest_dir /opt/restler

# Verify installation
/opt/restler/restler/Restler --help

# Alternative: Use pre-built release
# Download from https://github.com/microsoft/restler-fuzzer/releases

Step 2: Compile the API Specification

# Compile the OpenAPI spec into a RESTler fuzzing grammar
/opt/restler/restler/Restler compile \
    --api_spec /path/to/openapi.yaml

# Output directory structure:
# Compile/
#   grammar.py          - Generated fuzzing grammar
#   grammar.json        - Grammar in JSON format
#   dict.json           - Custom dictionary for fuzzing values
#   engine_settings.json - Engine configuration
#   config.json         - Compilation config

Custom dictionary for targeted fuzzing (dict.json):

{
    "restler_fuzzable_string": [
        "fuzzstring",
        "' OR '1'='1",
        "\" OR \"1\"=\"1",
        "<script>alert(1)</script>",
        "../../../etc/passwd",
        "${7*7}",
        "{{7*7}}",
        "a]UNION SELECT 1,2,3--",
        "\"; cat /etc/passwd; echo \"",
        "AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA"
    ],
    "restler_fuzzable_int": [
        "0",
        "-1",
        "999999999",
        "2147483647",
        "-2147483648"
    ],
    "restler_fuzzable_bool": ["true", "false", "null", "1", "0"],
    "restler_fuzzable_datetime": [
        "2024-01-01T00:00:00Z",
        "0000-00-00T00:00:00Z",
        "9999-12-31T23:59:59Z",
        "invalid-date"
    ],
    "restler_fuzzable_uuid4": [
        "00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000",
        "aaaaaaaa-aaaa-aaaa-aaaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa"
    ],
    "restler_custom_payload": {
        "/users/{userId}": ["1", "0", "-1", "admin", "' OR 1=1--"],
        "/orders/{orderId}": ["1", "0", "999999999"]
    }
}

Step 3: Configure Authentication

# authentication_token.py - RESTler authentication module
import requests
import json
import time

class AuthenticationProvider:
    def __init__(self):
        self.token = None
        self.token_expiry = 0
        self.auth_url = "https://target-api.example.com/api/v1/auth/login"
        self.credentials = {
            "email": "fuzzer@test.com",
            "password": "FuzzerPass123!"
        }

    def get_token(self):
        """Get or refresh authentication token."""
        current_time = time.time()
        if self.token and current_time < self.token_expiry - 60:
            return self.token

        resp = requests.post(self.auth_url, json=self.credentials)
        if resp.status_code == 200:
            data = resp.json()
            self.token = data["access_token"]
            self.token_expiry = current_time + 3600  # Assume 1-hour TTL
            return self.token
        else:
            raise Exception(f"Authentication failed: {resp.status_code}")

    def get_auth_header(self):
        """Return the authentication header for RESTler."""
        token = self.get_token()
        return f"Authorization: Bearer {token}"

# Export the token refresh command for RESTler
auth = AuthenticationProvider()
print(auth.get_auth_header())

Engine settings for authentication (engine_settings.json):

{
    "authentication": {
        "token": {
            "token_refresh_interval": 300,
            "token_refresh_cmd": "python3 /path/to/authentication_token.py"
        }
    },
    "max_combinations": 20,
    "max_request_execution_time": 30,
    "global_producer_timing_delay": 2,
    "no_ssl": false,
    "host": "target-api.example.com",
    "target_port": 443,
    "garbage_collection_interval": 300,
    "max_sequence_length": 10
}

Step 4: Run RESTler in Test Mode (Smoke Test)

# Test mode: Quick validation that all endpoints are reachable
/opt/restler/restler/Restler test \
    --grammar_file Compile/grammar.py \
    --dictionary_file Compile/dict.json \
    --settings Compile/engine_settings.json \
    --no_ssl \
    --target_ip target-api.example.com \
    --target_port 443

# Review test results
cat Test/ResponseBuckets/runSummary.json
# Parse test results
import json

with open("Test/ResponseBuckets/runSummary.json") as f:
    summary = json.load(f)

print("Test Mode Summary:")
print(f"  Total requests: {summary.get('total_requests_sent', {}).get('num_requests', 0)}")
print(f"  Successful (2xx): {summary.get('num_fully_valid', 0)}")
print(f"  Client errors (4xx): {summary.get('num_invalid', 0)}")
print(f"  Server errors (5xx): {summary.get('num_server_error', 0)}")

# Identify uncovered endpoints
covered = summary.get('covered_endpoints', [])
total = summary.get('total_endpoints', [])
uncovered = set(total) - set(covered)
if uncovered:
    print(f"\nUncovered endpoints ({len(uncovered)}):")
    for ep in uncovered:
        print(f"  - {ep}")

Step 5: Run Fuzz-Lean Mode

# Fuzz-lean: One pass through all endpoints with security checkers enabled
/opt/restler/restler/Restler fuzz-lean \
    --grammar_file Compile/grammar.py \
    --dictionary_file Compile/dict.json \
    --settings Compile/engine_settings.json \
    --target_ip target-api.example.com \
    --target_port 443 \
    --time_budget 1  # 1 hour max

# Checkers automatically enabled in fuzz-lean:
# - UseAfterFree: Tests accessing resources after deletion
# - NamespaceRule: Tests accessing resources across namespaces/tenants
# - ResourceHierarchy: Tests child resources with wrong parent IDs
# - LeakageRule: Tests for information disclosure in error responses
# - InvalidDynamicObject: Tests with malformed dynamic object IDs

Step 6: Run Full Fuzzing Mode

# Full fuzz mode: Extended fuzzing for comprehensive coverage
/opt/restler/restler/Restler fuzz \
    --grammar_file Compile/grammar.py \
    --dictionary_file Compile/dict.json \
    --settings Compile/engine_settings.json \
    --target_ip target-api.example.com \
    --target_port 443 \
    --time_budget 4 \
    --enable_checkers UseAfterFree NamespaceRule ResourceHierarchy LeakageRule InvalidDynamicObject PayloadBody

# Analyze fuzzing results
python3 <<'EOF'
import json
import os

results_dir = "Fuzz/ResponseBuckets"
bugs_dir = "Fuzz/bug_buckets"

# Parse bug buckets
if os.path.exists(bugs_dir):
    for bug_file in os.listdir(bugs_dir):
        if bug_file.endswith(".txt"):
            with open(os.path.join(bugs_dir, bug_file)) as f:
                content = f.read()
            print(f"\n=== Bug: {bug_file} ===")
            print(content[:500])

# Parse response summary
summary_file = os.path.join(results_dir, "runSummary.json")
if os.path.exists(summary_file):
    with open(summary_file) as f:
        summary = json.load(f)
    print(f"\nFuzz Summary:")
    print(f"  Duration: {summary.get('time_budget_hours', 0)} hours")
    print(f"  Total requests: {summary.get('total_requests_sent', {}).get('num_requests', 0)}")
    print(f"  Bugs found: {summary.get('num_bugs', 0)}")
    print(f"  500 errors: {summary.get('num_server_error', 0)}")
EOF

Key Concepts

TermDefinition
Stateful FuzzingAPI fuzzing that maintains state across requests by using responses from earlier requests as inputs to later ones, enabling testing of multi-step workflows
Producer-Consumer DependenciesRESTler's inference that a value produced by one API call (e.g., a created resource ID) should be consumed by a subsequent call
Fuzzing GrammarCompiled representation of the API specification that defines how to generate valid and invalid requests for each endpoint
CheckerRESTler security rule that tests for specific vulnerability patterns like use-after-free, namespace isolation, or information leakage
Bug BucketRESTler's categorization of discovered bugs by type and endpoint, grouping similar failures for efficient triage
Garbage CollectionRESTler's periodic cleanup of resources created during fuzzing to prevent resource exhaustion on the target system

Tools & Systems

  • RESTler: Microsoft Research's stateful REST API fuzzing tool that compiles OpenAPI specs into fuzzing grammars
  • Schemathesis: Property-based API testing tool that generates test cases from OpenAPI/GraphQL schemas
  • Dredd: API testing tool that validates API implementations against OpenAPI/API Blueprint documentation
  • Fuzz-lightyear: Yelp's stateless API fuzzer focused on finding authentication and authorization vulnerabilities
  • API Fuzzer: OWASP tool for API endpoint fuzzing with customizable payload dictionaries

Common Scenarios

Scenario: Microservice API Fuzzing Campaign

Context: A fintech company has 12 microservice APIs with OpenAPI specifications. Before a major release, the security team runs RESTler fuzzing against each service in the staging environment to catch bugs.

Approach:

  1. Collect OpenAPI specs for all 12 services and compile each into a RESTler grammar
  2. Configure authentication for each service with service-specific credentials
  3. Run test mode on each service to validate endpoint reachability and fix grammar issues
  4. Run fuzz-lean mode (1 hour per service) to identify quick wins
  5. Find 23 bugs in fuzz-lean mode: 8 unhandled 500 errors, 5 use-after-free patterns, 4 namespace isolation failures, 6 information leakage in error responses
  6. Run full fuzz mode (4 hours per service) on the 5 services with the most bugs
  7. Discover 47 additional bugs including a critical authentication bypass where deleting a user and reusing their token still allows access
  8. Generate bug reports and track remediation through JIRA integration

Pitfalls:

  • Running RESTler against production without understanding that it creates and deletes thousands of resources
  • Not configuring authentication correctly, causing RESTler to only test unauthenticated access
  • Using the default dictionary without adding application-specific injection payloads
  • Not setting a time budget, allowing RESTler to run indefinitely
  • Ignoring the compilation warnings that indicate endpoints RESTler cannot reach due to dependency issues

Output Format

## RESTler API Fuzzing Report

**Target**: User Service API (staging.example.com)
**Specification**: OpenAPI 3.0 (42 endpoints)
**Duration**: 4 hours (full fuzz mode)
**Total Requests**: 145,832

### Bug Summary

| Category | Count | Severity |
|----------|-------|----------|
| 500 Internal Server Error | 12 | High |
| Use After Free | 3 | Critical |
| Namespace Rule Violation | 5 | Critical |
| Information Leakage | 8 | Medium |
| Resource Leak | 4 | Low |

### Critical Findings

**1. Use-After-Free: Deleted user token still valid**
- Sequence: POST /users -> DELETE /users/{id} -> GET /users/{id}
- After deleting user, GET with the deleted user's token returns 200
- Impact: Deleted accounts can still access the API

**2. Namespace Violation: Cross-tenant data access**
- Sequence: POST /users (tenant A) -> GET /users/{id} (tenant B token)
- User created by tenant A is accessible with tenant B's credentials
- Impact: Multi-tenant isolation breach

**3. 500 Error: Unhandled integer overflow**
- Request: POST /orders {"quantity": 2147483648}
- Response: 500 Internal Server Error with stack trace
- Impact: DoS potential, information disclosure via stack trace

### Coverage

- Endpoints covered: 38/42 (90.5%)
- Uncovered: POST /admin/migrate, DELETE /admin/cache,
  PUT /config/advanced, POST /webhooks/test

平台分布

Codex

36.55%
按下载量换算43

Claude

32.28%
按下载量换算38

Cursor

16.92%
按下载量换算20

Gemini CLI

9.93%
按下载量换算12

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

未通过

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills