Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

code-security-review(代码安全审查)

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

code-security-review 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 59,696。

总安装 380周安装 16GitHub Stars 10下载 133核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:code-security-review(代码安全审查)
来源仓库:https://github.com/dauquangthanh/hanoi-rainbow
仓库路径:skills/code-security-review
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/dauquangthanh/hanoi-rainbow --skill code-security-review
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/dauquangthanh/hanoi-rainbow --skill code-security-review

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险和常见漏洞排查。适合梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险或生成安全复核清单。code-security-review 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。使用时不能直接采信工具输出,需确认最小权限与操作边界。安装前建议核实仓库维护状态及是否会触发文件读写或命令执行。

涉及密钥或生产系统时,应先评估脱敏方式和访问控制策略。

来源仓库内路径:skills/code-security-review

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/dauquangthanh/hanoi-rainbow --skill code-secur…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

code-security-review 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/dauquangthanh/hanoi-rainbow --skill code-security-review。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

code-security-review 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

code-security-review 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

code-security-review 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

code-security-review 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 380 次,近一周安装 16 次,下载 133 次,GitHub 10 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

code-security-review 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
code-security-review

代码安全审查 · 本页

38010接触敏感数据MIT未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Code Security Review

Overview

Performs comprehensive security code reviews to identify vulnerabilities, assess security risks, and provide actionable remediation guidance. Covers OWASP Top 10, CWE classifications, compliance requirements, and security best practices.

Security Review Workflow

1. Initial Assessment

Gather context about the application:

  • Application type: Web app, API, mobile, desktop, embedded
  • Data sensitivity: PII, financial data, healthcare records, proprietary information
  • Compliance requirements: PCI-DSS, GDPR, HIPAA, SOC 2, ISO 27001
  • Authentication mechanisms: OAuth, JWT, session-based, API keys
  • Technology stack: Languages, frameworks, libraries, databases
  • External integrations: Third-party APIs, cloud services, payment processors

Perform threat modeling:

  • Identify critical assets (data, functions, resources)
  • Map attack surfaces (user inputs, APIs, file uploads, network interfaces)
  • Determine threat actors (external attackers, malicious insiders, automated bots)
  • Assess existing security controls

2. Code Analysis

Systematically review code for security vulnerabilities:

Priority Areas:

  1. Authentication & Authorization - Login flows, session management, access controls
  2. Input Validation - All user inputs, API parameters, file uploads
  3. Data Protection - Encryption at rest and in transit, sensitive data handling
  4. API Security - Rate limiting, authentication, input validation
  5. Dependency Security - Third-party libraries, outdated packages, known CVEs
  6. Configuration - Security headers, CORS, environment variables, secrets management
  7. Error Handling - Information disclosure, stack traces, error messages
  8. Business Logic - Race conditions, workflow bypasses, state manipulation

3. Vulnerability Classification

Classify each finding:

  • Severity: Critical, High, Medium, Low, Informational
  • CWE ID: Common Weakness Enumeration identifier
  • OWASP Category: Map to OWASP Top 10 if applicable
  • CVSS Score: Calculate if applicable (use CVSS 3.1)
  • Exploitability: How easy to exploit
  • Impact: Data loss, privilege escalation, DoS, data breach

4. Documentation

Produce comprehensive security report:

  • Executive Summary - High-level findings and risk overview
  • Detailed Findings - Each vulnerability with code examples and exploit scenarios
  • Remediation Guidance - Specific fixes with secure code examples
  • Compliance Assessment - Status against required standards
  • Remediation Timeline - Prioritized action plan
  • Security Metrics - Vulnerability counts by severity and category

Severity Classification

Critical (CVSS 9.0-10.0):

  • Remote code execution
  • Authentication bypass
  • SQL injection with data access
  • Hardcoded credentials for production systems
  • Complete access control bypass

High (CVSS 7.0-8.9):

  • Privilege escalation
  • Sensitive data exposure (PII, financial)
  • Cross-site scripting (XSS) with session theft
  • Insecure deserialization
  • XML external entity (XXE) injection

Medium (CVSS 4.0-6.9):

  • Information disclosure
  • Cross-site request forgery (CSRF)
  • Weak cryptography
  • Security misconfiguration
  • Missing security headers

Low (CVSS 0.1-3.9):

  • Version disclosure
  • Verbose error messages
  • Missing best practices
  • Security through obscurity

Informational:

  • Recommendations for defense in depth
  • Future-proofing suggestions
  • Security hygiene improvements

Report Structure

Generate security reports in this format:

Executive Summary

  • Total vulnerabilities by severity
  • Critical risk areas
  • Compliance status summary
  • Overall security posture rating
  • Recommended immediate actions

Detailed Findings

For each vulnerability:

## [SEVERITY] Finding Title (CWE-XXX)

**Severity**: Critical/High/Medium/Low
**CWE ID**: CWE-XXX
**OWASP**: A0X:YYYY
**CVSS Score**: X.X (if applicable)

**Description**:
[Clear explanation of the vulnerability]

**Location**:
- File: path/to/file.ext
- Lines: XX-XX
- Function/Class: function_name()

**Vulnerable Code**:

[Actual vulnerable code snippet]


**Exploit Scenario**: [Step-by-step demonstration of how an attacker could exploit this]

**Impact**: [What could happen if exploited - data breach, privilege escalation, etc.]

**Remediation**: [Specific steps to fix the vulnerability]

**Secure Code Example**:

[Working secure implementation]


**References**:

- [Relevant CWE, CVE, or documentation links]

Remediation Timeline

  • Phase 1 (Critical - Week 1): List of critical issues
  • Phase 2 (High - Weeks 2-3): List of high severity issues
  • Phase 3 (Medium - Month 2): List of medium severity issues
  • Phase 4 (Low - Month 3): List of low severity issues

Compliance Assessment

For each applicable standard, document:

  • Requirements checked
  • Compliance status (Compliant/Non-Compliant/Partially Compliant)
  • Specific gaps identified
  • Remediation needed for compliance

Detailed References

For comprehensive vulnerability patterns, testing procedures, and compliance details:

- Detailed vulnerability patterns for each OWASP Top 10 category - Code examples of vulnerable and secure implementations - Testing procedures and detection methods - Complete CWE mappings and classifications

- Comprehensive testing checklist by category - Manual and automated testing techniques - Security testing tools and configurations - API security testing procedures

- PCI-DSS requirements and validation - GDPR data protection requirements - HIPAA security and privacy rules - SOC 2 security controls

- Complete security report template - Example findings with remediation guidance - Executive summary examples - Remediation timeline structures

Best Practices

Be Thorough:

  • Review ALL user input points
  • Check ALL database queries
  • Verify ALL authentication and authorization checks
  • Test ALL file operations and uploads
  • Examine ALL external integrations

Be Practical:

  • Prioritize by risk (likelihood × impact)
  • Consider exploitability and business context
  • Account for compensating controls
  • Balance security with usability

Be Clear:

  • Provide step-by-step exploit scenarios
  • Show exact vulnerable code locations
  • Give specific, actionable remediation steps
  • Include working secure code examples

Be Professional:

  • Focus on code issues, not developers
  • Use industry-standard classifications (CWE, OWASP, CVSS)
  • Provide credible references (NIST, OWASP, vendor documentation)
  • Document assumptions and testing limitations

平台分布

Codex

27.4%
按下载量换算36

Claude Code

25.87%
按下载量换算34

Antigravity

19.07%
按下载量换算25

Gemini CLI

13.65%
按下载量换算18

windsurf

7.15%
按下载量换算10

OpenCode

3.46%
按下载量换算5

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

未通过

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。

继续浏览同类 Skills