Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索敏感数据github未标认证来源可访问clear审计异常

code-security-review代码安全审查

Agent Skill

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

总安装

380

周安装

16

GitHub Stars

10

下载量

133
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:code-security-review(代码安全审查)
来源仓库:https://github.com/dauquangthanh/hanoi-rainbow
仓库路径:skills/code-security-review
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/dauquangthanh/hanoi-rainbow --skill code-security-review
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/dauquangthanh/hanoi-rainbow --skill code-security-review

简介

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险和常见漏洞排查。

  • 适合梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险或生成安全复核清单。code-security-review 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。
  • 使用时不能直接采信工具输出,需确认最小权限与操作边界。
  • 安装前建议核实仓库维护状态及是否会触发文件读写或命令执行。
  • 涉及密钥或生产系统时,应先评估脱敏方式和访问控制策略。

SKILL.md

Code Security Review

Overview

Performs comprehensive security code reviews to identify vulnerabilities, assess security risks, and provide actionable remediation guidance. Covers OWASP Top 10, CWE classifications, compliance requirements, and security best practices.

Security Review Workflow

1. Initial Assessment

Gather context about the application:

  • Application type: Web app, API, mobile, desktop, embedded
  • Data sensitivity: PII, financial data, healthcare records, proprietary information
  • Compliance requirements: PCI-DSS, GDPR, HIPAA, SOC 2, ISO 27001
  • Authentication mechanisms: OAuth, JWT, session-based, API keys
  • Technology stack: Languages, frameworks, libraries, databases
  • External integrations: Third-party APIs, cloud services, payment processors

Perform threat modeling:

  • Identify critical assets (data, functions, resources)
  • Map attack surfaces (user inputs, APIs, file uploads, network interfaces)
  • Determine threat actors (external attackers, malicious insiders, automated bots)
  • Assess existing security controls

2. Code Analysis

Systematically review code for security vulnerabilities:

Priority Areas:

  1. Authentication & Authorization - Login flows, session management, access controls
  2. Input Validation - All user inputs, API parameters, file uploads
  3. Data Protection - Encryption at rest and in transit, sensitive data handling
  4. API Security - Rate limiting, authentication, input validation
  5. Dependency Security - Third-party libraries, outdated packages, known CVEs
  6. Configuration - Security headers, CORS, environment variables, secrets management
  7. Error Handling - Information disclosure, stack traces, error messages
  8. Business Logic - Race conditions, workflow bypasses, state manipulation

3. Vulnerability Classification

Classify each finding:

  • Severity: Critical, High, Medium, Low, Informational
  • CWE ID: Common Weakness Enumeration identifier
  • OWASP Category: Map to OWASP Top 10 if applicable
  • CVSS Score: Calculate if applicable (use CVSS 3.1)
  • Exploitability: How easy to exploit
  • Impact: Data loss, privilege escalation, DoS, data breach

4. Documentation

Produce comprehensive security report:

  • Executive Summary - High-level findings and risk overview
  • Detailed Findings - Each vulnerability with code examples and exploit scenarios
  • Remediation Guidance - Specific fixes with secure code examples
  • Compliance Assessment - Status against required standards
  • Remediation Timeline - Prioritized action plan
  • Security Metrics - Vulnerability counts by severity and category

Severity Classification

Critical (CVSS 9.0-10.0):

  • Remote code execution
  • Authentication bypass
  • SQL injection with data access
  • Hardcoded credentials for production systems
  • Complete access control bypass

High (CVSS 7.0-8.9):

  • Privilege escalation
  • Sensitive data exposure (PII, financial)
  • Cross-site scripting (XSS) with session theft
  • Insecure deserialization
  • XML external entity (XXE) injection

Medium (CVSS 4.0-6.9):

  • Information disclosure
  • Cross-site request forgery (CSRF)
  • Weak cryptography
  • Security misconfiguration
  • Missing security headers

Low (CVSS 0.1-3.9):

  • Version disclosure
  • Verbose error messages
  • Missing best practices
  • Security through obscurity

Informational:

  • Recommendations for defense in depth
  • Future-proofing suggestions
  • Security hygiene improvements

Report Structure

Generate security reports in this format:

Executive Summary

  • Total vulnerabilities by severity
  • Critical risk areas
  • Compliance status summary
  • Overall security posture rating
  • Recommended immediate actions

Detailed Findings

For each vulnerability:

## [SEVERITY] Finding Title (CWE-XXX)

**Severity**: Critical/High/Medium/Low
**CWE ID**: CWE-XXX
**OWASP**: A0X:YYYY
**CVSS Score**: X.X (if applicable)

**Description**:
[Clear explanation of the vulnerability]

**Location**:
- File: path/to/file.ext
- Lines: XX-XX
- Function/Class: function_name()

**Vulnerable Code**:

[Actual vulnerable code snippet]


**Exploit Scenario**: [Step-by-step demonstration of how an attacker could exploit this]

**Impact**: [What could happen if exploited - data breach, privilege escalation, etc.]

**Remediation**: [Specific steps to fix the vulnerability]

**Secure Code Example**:

[Working secure implementation]


**References**:

- [Relevant CWE, CVE, or documentation links]

Remediation Timeline

  • Phase 1 (Critical - Week 1): List of critical issues
  • Phase 2 (High - Weeks 2-3): List of high severity issues
  • Phase 3 (Medium - Month 2): List of medium severity issues
  • Phase 4 (Low - Month 3): List of low severity issues

Compliance Assessment

For each applicable standard, document:

  • Requirements checked
  • Compliance status (Compliant/Non-Compliant/Partially Compliant)
  • Specific gaps identified
  • Remediation needed for compliance

Detailed References

For comprehensive vulnerability patterns, testing procedures, and compliance details:

- Detailed vulnerability patterns for each OWASP Top 10 category - Code examples of vulnerable and secure implementations - Testing procedures and detection methods - Complete CWE mappings and classifications

- Comprehensive testing checklist by category - Manual and automated testing techniques - Security testing tools and configurations - API security testing procedures

- PCI-DSS requirements and validation - GDPR data protection requirements - HIPAA security and privacy rules - SOC 2 security controls

- Complete security report template - Example findings with remediation guidance - Executive summary examples - Remediation timeline structures

Best Practices

Be Thorough:

  • Review ALL user input points
  • Check ALL database queries
  • Verify ALL authentication and authorization checks
  • Test ALL file operations and uploads
  • Examine ALL external integrations

Be Practical:

  • Prioritize by risk (likelihood × impact)
  • Consider exploitability and business context
  • Account for compensating controls
  • Balance security with usability

Be Clear:

  • Provide step-by-step exploit scenarios
  • Show exact vulnerable code locations
  • Give specific, actionable remediation steps
  • Include working secure code examples

Be Professional:

  • Focus on code issues, not developers
  • Use industry-standard classifications (CWE, OWASP, CVSS)
  • Provide credible references (NIST, OWASP, vendor documentation)
  • Document assumptions and testing limitations

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

27.4%
按下载量换算36

Claude Code

25.87%
按下载量换算34

Antigravity

19.07%
按下载量换算25

Gemini CLI

13.65%
按下载量换算18

windsurf

7.15%
按下载量换算10

OpenCode

3.46%
按下载量换算5

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

未通过

权限和风险

敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills