Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

ad-angle-miner(广告角度矿工)

ad-angle-miner 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

ad-angle-miner 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 67,168。

总安装 250周安装 10GitHub Stars 607下载 81核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ad-angle-miner(广告角度矿工)
来源仓库:https://github.com/athina-ai/goose-skills
仓库路径:skills/ad-angle-miner
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/athina-ai/goose-skills --skill ad-angle-miner
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/athina-ai/goose-skills --skill ad-angle-miner

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词或任务需求快速定位候选结果。它从客户评论、竞品广告和社交媒体中提取高转化潜力的广告角度,基于真实用户语言生成角度银行。

使用时需提供目标产品或竞品名称,技能会自动分析 Reddit、Yelp 等平台数据并排序证据强度。安装前请确认是否具备 GitHub 访问权限,并评估是否会触发网络请求或令牌写入,避免安全风险。ad-angle-miner 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/ad-angle-miner

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/athina-ai/goose-skills --skill ad-angle-miner;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

ad-angle-miner 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/athina-ai/goose-skills --skill ad-angle-miner。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

ad-angle-miner 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

ad-angle-miner 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

ad-angle-miner 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

ad-angle-miner 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 250 次,近一周安装 10 次,下载 81 次,GitHub 607 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

ad-angle-miner 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
ad-angle-miner

广告角度矿工 · 本页

250607接触敏感数据未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Ad Angle Miner

Dig through customer voice data — reviews, Reddit, support tickets, competitor ads — to extract the specific language, pain points, and outcome desires that make ads convert. The output is an angle bank your team can pull from for any campaign.

Core principle: The best ad angles aren't invented in a brainstorm. They're extracted from what real people are already saying. This skill finds those angles and ranks them by strength of evidence.

When to Use

  • "What angles should we run in our ads?"
  • "Find pain points we can use in ad copy"
  • "What are people complaining about with [competitors]?"
  • "Mine reviews for ad messaging"
  • "I need fresh ad angles — not the same tired stuff"

Prerequisites

  • Environment variable: APIFY_API_TOKEN — required for review scraping and Reddit scraping
  • Web search access — your AI agent must support web_search or equivalent for Twitter/X and competitor ad lookups

Phase 0: Intake

  1. Your product — Name + what it does in one sentence
  2. Competitors — 2-5 competitor names (for review mining)
  3. ICP — Who are you targeting? (role, company stage, pain)
  4. Data sources to mine (pick all that apply):

- G2/Capterra/Trustpilot reviews (yours + competitors) - Reddit threads in relevant subreddits - Twitter/X complaints or praise - Support tickets or NPS comments (paste or file) - Competitor ads (Meta + Google)

  1. Any angles you've already tested? — So we can skip those

Phase 1: Source Collection

1A: Review Mining (Apify)

Use the Apify Amazon Reviews Scraper (or web_search for G2/Capterra/TrustRadius reviews).

Option 1: Amazon product reviews via Apify

Start a run of the web_wanderer/amazon-reviews-extractor actor:

POST https://api.apify.com/v2/acts/web_wanderer~amazon-reviews-extractor/runs?token=$APIFY_API_TOKEN
Content-Type: application/json

{
  "products": [
    "https://www.amazon.com/dp/PRODUCT_ASIN"
  ],
  "maxReviews": 100
}

Poll until the run finishes:

GET https://api.apify.com/v2/acts/web_wanderer~amazon-reviews-extractor/runs/{RUN_ID}?token=$APIFY_API_TOKEN

When status is SUCCEEDED, fetch results:

GET https://api.apify.com/v2/datasets/{DATASET_ID}/items?token=$APIFY_API_TOKEN

Output fields: Each review has rating (1-5), reviewTitle, reviewText, reviewDate, verifiedPurchase (bool), productAsin, productTitle, helpfulVoteCount.

Option 2: G2/Capterra/TrustRadius reviews via web_search

For B2B products, run web searches to find review content:

web_search: "<product_name> reviews site:g2.com"
web_search: "<product_name> reviews site:capterra.com"
web_search: "<product_name> reviews site:trustradius.com"
web_search: "<competitor_name> reviews site:g2.com"

Focus on:

  • 1-2 star reviews of competitors — Pain they're failing to solve
  • 4-5 star reviews of you — Outcomes that delight buyers
  • 4-5 star reviews of competitors — Strengths you need to counter or match
  • Review language patterns — Exact phrases buyers use

1B: Reddit/Community Mining (Apify)

Use the trudax/reddit-scraper-lite actor to search Reddit for relevant threads:

Search by keyword:

POST https://api.apify.com/v2/acts/trudax~reddit-scraper-lite/runs?token=$APIFY_API_TOKEN
Content-Type: application/json

{
  "searches": [
    "<product category> OR <competitor> OR <pain keyword>"
  ],
  "maxItems": 50
}

Browse a specific subreddit:

POST https://api.apify.com/v2/acts/trudax~reddit-scraper-lite/runs?token=$APIFY_API_TOKEN
Content-Type: application/json

{
  "startUrls": [
    {"url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/SUBREDDIT_NAME/hot/"}
  ],
  "maxItems": 50
}

Poll until complete:

GET https://api.apify.com/v2/acts/trudax~reddit-scraper-lite/runs/{RUN_ID}?token=$APIFY_API_TOKEN

Fetch results when status is SUCCEEDED:

GET https://api.apify.com/v2/datasets/{DATASET_ID}/items?token=$APIFY_API_TOKEN

Output fields: Each item has dataType ("post" or "comment"), title (posts only), body, communityName, upVotes, numberOfComments (posts), url, createdAt.

Extract:

  • Questions people ask before buying
  • Complaints about current solutions
  • "I wish [product] would..." statements
  • Comparison threads (vs discussions)

1C: Twitter/X Mining (web_search)

Use web_search to find relevant Twitter/X posts — no scraper or credentials needed:

web_search: "<competitor> (frustrating OR broken OR hate) site:x.com"
web_search: "<competitor> (love OR switched to OR replaced) site:x.com"
web_search: "<product category> (recommendation OR alternative OR looking for) site:twitter.com"
web_search: "<competitor> site:x.com" (for general sentiment)

Run 3-5 queries covering:

  • Competitor complaints and frustrations
  • Product category praise / switching stories
  • "What do you use for X?" buying-intent threads

1D: Competitor Ad Mining (web_search)

Use web_search to check the Meta Ad Library for competitor ad creatives — no separate tool needed:

web_search: "<competitor_name> site:facebook.com/ads/library"
web_search: "<competitor_name> facebook ads library"
web_search: "<competitor_name> ad creative examples"

This reveals:

  • Angles they've validated (long-running ads = working)
  • Angles they're testing (new ads)
  • Angles nobody is running (white space)

1E: Internal Data (Optional)

If the user provides support tickets, NPS comments, or sales call transcripts — ingest and tag with the same framework below.

Phase 2: Angle Extraction

Process all collected data through this extraction framework:

Angle Categories

CategoryWhat to Look ForAd Power
Pain anglesSpecific frustrations with status quo or competitorsHigh — pain motivates action
Outcome anglesDesired results buyers describe in their own wordsHigh — positive aspiration
Identity anglesHow buyers describe themselves or want to be seenMedium — emotional resonance
Fear anglesRisks of NOT switching or actingMedium — loss aversion
Competitive displacementSpecific reasons people switched from a competitorVery high — direct comparison
Social proof anglesOutcomes or metrics buyers cite in reviewsHigh — credibility
Contrast anglesBefore/after or old way/new way framingsHigh — clear value prop

For Each Angle, Extract:

  1. The angle — One-sentence framing
  2. Proof quotes — 2-5 verbatim quotes from sources
  3. Source count — How many independent sources mention this?
  4. Competitor weakness? — Does this exploit a specific competitor's gap?
  5. Emotional register — Frustration / Aspiration / Fear / Relief / Pride
  6. Recommended format — Search ad / Meta static / Meta video / LinkedIn / Twitter

Phase 3: Scoring & Ranking

Score each angle on:

FactorWeightDescription
Evidence strength30%Number of independent sources mentioning it
Emotional intensity25%How strongly people feel about this (language intensity)
Competitive differentiation20%Does this set you apart, or could any competitor claim it?
ICP relevance15%How closely does this match the target buyer's world?
Freshness10%Is this angle already overused in competitor ads?

Total score out of 100. Rank all angles.

Phase 4: Output Format

# Ad Angle Bank — [Product Name] — [DATE]

Sources mined: [list]
Total angles extracted: [N]
Top-tier angles (score 70+): [N]

---

## Tier 1: Highest-Conviction Angles (Score 70+)

### Angle 1: [One-sentence angle]
- **Category:** [Pain / Outcome / Identity / Fear / Displacement / Proof / Contrast]
- **Score:** [X/100]
- **Emotional register:** [Frustration / Aspiration / etc.]
- **Proof quotes:**
  > "[Verbatim quote 1]" — [Source: G2 review / Reddit / etc.]
  > "[Verbatim quote 2]" — [Source]
  > "[Verbatim quote 3]" — [Source]
- **Source count:** [N] independent mentions
- **Competitor weakness exploited:** [Competitor name + specific gap, or "N/A"]
- **Recommended formats:** [Search ad headline / Meta static / Video hook / etc.]
- **Sample headline:** "[Draft headline using this angle]"
- **Sample body copy:** "[Draft 1-2 sentence body]"

### Angle 2: ...

---

## Tier 2: Worth Testing (Score 50-69)

[Same format, briefer]

---

## Tier 3: Emerging / Low-Evidence (Score < 50)

[Brief list — angles with potential but insufficient evidence]

---

## Competitive Angle Map

| Angle | Your Product | [Comp A] | [Comp B] | [Comp C] |
|-------|-------------|----------|----------|----------|
| [Angle 1] | Can claim ✓ | Weak here ✗ | Also claims | Not relevant |
| [Angle 2] | Strong ✓ | Strong | Weak ✗ | Not relevant |
...

---

## Recommended Test Plan

### Week 1-2: Test Tier 1 Angles
- [Angle] → [Format] → [Platform]
- [Angle] → [Format] → [Platform]

### Week 3-4: Test Tier 2 Angles
- [Angle] → [Format] → [Platform]

Save to angle-bank-[YYYY-MM-DD].md in the current working directory (or user-specified path).

Cost

ComponentCost
Amazon review scraper (per product)~$0.10-0.30 (Apify)
Reddit scraper~$0.05-0.10 (Apify)
Twitter/X (web_search)Free
Competitor ads (web_search)Free
G2/Capterra reviews (web_search)Free
AnalysisFree (LLM reasoning)
Total~$0.15-0.40

Tools Required

  • Environment variable: APIFY_API_TOKEN — for Apify actors (review scraper, Reddit scraper)
  • Web search — built into your AI agent (for Twitter/X, competitor ads, G2/Capterra reviews)
  • No third-party libraries needed. All data collection uses HTTP APIs (requests or equivalent) and web_search.

Trigger Phrases

  • "Mine ad angles from reviews"
  • "What angles should we run?"
  • "Find pain language for our ads"
  • "Build an ad angle bank for [client]"
  • "What are people complaining about with [competitor]?"

平台分布

Codex

34.69%
按下载量换算28

Claude

30.18%
按下载量换算24

Cursor

17.58%
按下载量换算14

Gemini CLI

8.35%
按下载量换算7

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

可疑

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills