Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

ad-angles(广告角度)

ad-angles 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

ad-angles 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为权限未标注;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 55,679。

总安装 470周安装 20GitHub Stars 35下载 165核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ad-angles(广告角度)
来源仓库:https://github.com/superamped/ai-marketing-skills
仓库路径:skills/ad-angles
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/superamped/ai-marketing-skills --skill ad-angles
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/superamped/ai-marketing-skills --skill ad-angles

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

ad-angles 提供系统化广告创意脑暴框架,生成定制化广告概念。适用于新 campaign 启动、平台适配(如 Meta、LinkedIn)或品牌调性调整。根据产品特性、受众画像和约束条件,输出多个 headline 和文案选项。支持多轮迭代优化,确保创意符合平台规范与品牌安全要求。

ad-angles 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/ad-angles

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/superamped/ai-marketing-skills --skill ad-angl…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    权限没有明确标注,第一次使用时只给一个无关紧要的任务,观察它到底读了哪些文件和网络。

常见问题

6 条

ad-angles 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/superamped/ai-marketing-skills --skill ad-angles。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

ad-angles 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

ad-angles 需要什么权限?

权限级别没有明确标注。第一次使用时建议只给无关紧要的任务,观察它实际读写了哪些内容。

ad-angles 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

ad-angles 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 470 次,近一周安装 20 次,下载 165 次,GitHub 35 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

ad-angles 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
ad-angles

广告角度 · 本页

47035权限未标注未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Ad Angle Brainstorm

Usage

Use when brainstorming ad ideas before launching a new campaign, generating headline variations for A/B testing, exploring new messaging angles for a stale campaign, or preparing creative briefs for ad production.

Process

Step 1: Gather Inputs

Ask the user for:

  1. Product description — what it does, key features, core benefit
  2. Target audience — who they're targeting (role, industry, business type & stage)
  3. Platform — where the ads will run (Reddit, LinkedIn, Meta, Google, X/Twitter, etc.). This affects dimensions, tone, and output fields.
  4. Competitor names (optional) — for comparison-based angles
  5. Proof points (optional) — metrics, testimonials, customer count, case studies
  6. Number of concepts (optional) — default: 10
  7. Constraints (optional) — brand tone, things to avoid, compliance requirements

If the user has multiple products, ask which product this campaign is for. Don't assume — different products have different audiences, price points, and angles.

Step 1b: Diagnose Market Awareness & Sophistication

Before generating angles, diagnose where the target market sits on two axes. This determines which angle types will work and which will fail.

Market Awareness (5 stages):

StageProspect KnowsHeadline StrategyAngle Types That Work
1 — Most AwareProduct + desire + ready to buyName product + price/offerProof, Solution (direct)
2 — Product AwareProduct exists, not yet convincedReinforce desire, show proof, new mechanismProof, Solution, Comparison
3 — Solution AwareWants the outcome, doesn't know your productName the desire/outcome first, then introduce productSolution (benefit), Curiosity
4 — Problem AwareFeels the pain, doesn't know solutions existName the pain, dramatize it, present product as answerProblem, Curiosity
5 — UnawareDoesn't recognize the problem or won't admit itIdentification headline — echo an emotion or attitude, not a product claimCuriosity (identification)

Market Sophistication (5 stages):

StageMarket StateStrategy
1 — First in marketNo competitors have made this claimState the claim directly and boldly
2 — Competition appearedSame claims existEnlarge the claim — go bigger, bolder
3 — Claims worn outNeither claim nor size worksIntroduce a new mechanism — a new WAY to get the result
4 — Mechanisms copiedCompetitors adopted the mechanismFeature and elaborate the mechanism, or find a superior one
5 — Market exhaustedNothing is believedShift to pure identification — no promises, project character

Flag the awareness and sophistication stages in the output. If the market is at Awareness Stage 5 / Sophistication Stage 5, don't generate direct benefit headlines — they won't work. Shift to curiosity and identification angles.

Step 1c: Run the Emotion Audit

Before writing headlines, identify the emotional drivers behind the purchase.

Emotion Audit template:

Nobody buys [YOUR PRODUCT] for [FUNCTIONAL REASON].
They buy it to feel [EMOTION 1], [EMOTION 2], and [EMOTION 3].

Map the emotional cluster (2-3 emotions) for the target market:

  • Functional need: What specific task does the product accomplish?
  • Social need: Who do they need to impress? What status does it signal?
  • Emotional need: How do they want to feel after using it?

Step 2: Map Available Angles

Work through each of the 5 angle types and identify which ones are available based on the product and market:

Angle 1: Problem (Pain-Focused)

Lead with a pain the target market is facing. Make the reader feel the problem viscerally before mentioning a solution.

Generate problem angles by asking:

  • What frustrates this person about their current approach?
  • What are they wasting time/money on?
  • What's broken, slow, or painful in their workflow?
  • What keeps them up at night related to this problem?
Angle 2: Solution (Benefit-Focused or Process-Focused)

Lead with an outcome (benefit-focused), or show the method/system (process-focused).

Generate solution angles by asking:

  • What does their life look like after using this product? (benefit)
  • What specific outcome or metric improves? (benefit)
  • What's the step-by-step process that makes this work? (process)
Angle 3: Comparison

Position against alternatives (competitors, old way, status quo).

Generate comparison angles by asking:

  • What are they using today? (spreadsheets, competitor X, manual process)
  • What's wrong with the current alternative?
  • What's the old way vs. new way?
Angle 4: Proof (Results-Focused)

Lead with credibility, results, or social proof.

Generate proof angles by asking:

  • What results have customers achieved?
  • How many customers/users do you have?
  • Any notable logos, testimonials, or case studies?
Angle 5: Curiosity

Lead with intrigue, insight, or a counterintuitive take.

Generate curiosity angles by asking:

  • What's a counterintuitive truth about this space?
  • What's a mistake most people in this market make?
  • What's a surprising insight from your data or experience?

For each angle type, list 3-5 specific angles available based on the product and market.

Step 3: Select Formats

For each angle, pick the most effective format:

FormatStructureBest paired with
DirectStraightforward value statementSolution, Proof
Before/AfterShow transformationProblem, Solution
Us vs ThemSide-by-side comparisonComparison
TestimonialCustomer quote or reviewProof
QuestionLead with a question they ask themselvesProblem, Curiosity
ListicleMultiple benefits as a listSolution

Step 4: Assign Styles

For each concept, recommend a visual style:

StyleLook & feelBest for
BrandedProfessional, matches brand design systemSolution, Proof — builds credibility
Product imageScreenshot of UI, dashboard, outputSolution, Direct — makes product feel real
MemePopular meme template, captioned imagesProblem, Curiosity, Comparison — stops the scroll
UglyText-heavy, high-contrast colors, deliberately unpolished. Square format.Problem, Question, Solution — stands out in polished feeds
NativeLooks like an organic social post, casualProof (testimonial), Curiosity — reduces ad resistance

Step 5: Generate Concepts

Combine angles + formats + styles into concrete ad concepts. For each concept, produce:

  1. Concept name — Short label (e.g., "Pain: Spreadsheet Hell")
  2. Angle type — Problem / Solution / Comparison / Proof / Curiosity
  3. Format — Direct / Before-After / Us vs Them / Testimonial / Question / Listicle
  4. Style — Branded / Product image / Meme / Ugly / Native
  5. Headline — The actual ad headline text (goes on the image creative)
  6. Ad copy — The text that accompanies the image (platform-dependent: post text for Reddit/LinkedIn, primary text for Meta, etc.)
  7. CTA — Call-to-action button text
  8. Image suggestion — What screenshot or visual to use
  9. Landing page angle — How the landing page should match this ad's promise

Generate the requested number of concepts (default: 10), ensuring:

  • At least 2 different angle types are represented
  • At least 2 different styles are represented
  • Headlines use the target market's language, not marketing jargon
  • Each headline could stand alone and make someone curious enough to click

Step 6: Prioritize for Testing

Recommend which 3 concepts to test first based on:

  1. Angle diversity — Don't test 3 problem angles. Test problem + solution + curiosity.
  2. Ease of production — Simpler creatives first (branded/product image over meme)
  3. Specificity — More specific headlines tend to outperform generic ones
  4. Risk level — Start with safer concepts, add edgier ones in round 2

Step 7: Present and Confirm

This step is mandatory. Do not skip it.

Present the full concept table to the user showing all generated concepts with their angle, format, style, and headline. Include the recommended test batch but make it clear these are suggestions.

Ask the user:

  1. Which concepts do you want to move forward with?
  2. Do you want to change any headlines, styles, or angles?

Output Format

# Ad Angle Brainstorm

**Date:** [current date]
**Product:** [product name]
**Target Audience:** [audience description]
**Platform:** [target platform]
**Concepts Generated:** [count]

---

## Market Diagnosis

**Awareness Stage:** [1-5] — [description]
**Sophistication Stage:** [1-5] — [description]
**Emotion Audit:** Nobody buys [product] for [function]. They buy it to feel [emotions].

---

## Available Angles Summary

| Angle Type | # of Angles Found | Strongest Angle |
|-----------|-------------------|-----------------|
| Problem | X | [best one-liner] |
| Solution | X | [best one-liner] |
| Comparison | X | [best one-liner] |
| Proof | X | [best one-liner] |
| Curiosity | X | [best one-liner] |

---

## Ad Concepts

### Concept 1: [Name]

| Element | Detail |
|---------|--------|
| **Angle** | [type] |
| **Format** | [type] |
| **Style** | [type] |
| **Headline** | [The actual headline text for the ad image] |
| **Ad copy** | [The text accompanying the image] |
| **CTA** | [Button text] |
| **Image suggestion** | [What to show] |
| **Landing page angle** | [How the LP should match] |

---

[Continue for all concepts...]

---

## Recommended Test Batch (First 3)

| Priority | Concept | Why test this first |
|----------|---------|-------------------|
| 1 | [Concept name] | [Reason] |
| 2 | [Concept name] | [Reason] |
| 3 | [Concept name] | [Reason] |

**Testing approach:** Run all 3 in the same ad group targeting the same audience. Compare CTR and conversion rate.

Rules

  • Headlines should be written in the target market's language, not yours. If plumbers say "jobs" not "projects," your headline says "jobs."
  • Specificity beats cleverness. "Save 12 hours/week on reporting" beats "Work smarter, not harder."
  • Don't force all 5 angle types if you don't have the raw material. No proof points? Skip proof. No competitor to compare against? Skip comparison. Weak angles produce weak ads.
  • Each concept should be testable independently. Don't create concepts that depend on each other.
  • Ad copy should complement the headline, not repeat it. Use it to add context or intrigue.
  • The cookie-cutter template (headline + product image + clean background) is the fastest way to test many angles with minimal production overhead.

平台分布

Codex

34.3%
按下载量换算57

Claude

33.1%
按下载量换算55

Cursor

20.43%
按下载量换算34

Gemini CLI

9.47%
按下载量换算16

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

权限未标注

当前来源未能明确判断权限范围,默认进入异常复核队列。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills