Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索敏感数据github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计提醒

ad-angle-miner广告角度矿工

Agent Skill

ad-angle-miner 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

1,548

周安装

62

GitHub Stars

1

下载量

501
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ad-angle-miner(广告角度矿工)
来源仓库:https://github.com/nikiandr/goose-skills
仓库路径:skills/ad-angle-miner
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/nikiandr/goose-skills --skill ad-angle-miner
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/nikiandr/goose-skills --skill ad-angle-miner

简介

ad-angle-miner 从用户评论、社交媒体和竞品广告中提取高转化潜力的广告角度。

  • 适用于广告创意策划、痛点挖掘和差异化 messaging 设计场景。
  • 输入产品信息和目标受众后,自动分析文本数据并输出可执行的 ad angle 列表。
  • 结果按证据强度排序,帮助团队聚焦于真实用户反馈驱动的核心卖点。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

Ad Angle Miner

Dig through customer voice data — reviews, Reddit, support tickets, competitor ads — to extract the specific language, pain points, and outcome desires that make ads convert. The output is an angle bank your team can pull from for any campaign.

Core principle: The best ad angles aren't invented in a brainstorm. They're extracted from what real people are already saying. This skill finds those angles and ranks them by strength of evidence.

When to Use

  • "What angles should we run in our ads?"
  • "Find pain points we can use in ad copy"
  • "What are people complaining about with [competitors]?"
  • "Mine reviews for ad messaging"
  • "I need fresh ad angles — not the same tired stuff"

Phase 0: Intake

  1. Your product — Name + what it does in one sentence
  2. Competitors — 2-5 competitor names (for review mining)
  3. ICP — Who are you targeting? (role, company stage, pain)
  4. Data sources to mine (pick all that apply):

- G2/Capterra/Trustpilot reviews (yours + competitors) - Reddit threads in relevant subreddits - Twitter/X complaints or praise - Support tickets or NPS comments (paste or file) - Competitor ads (Meta + Google)

  1. Any angles you've already tested? — So we can skip those

Phase 1: Source Collection

1A: Review Mining

Run review-scraper for your product and each competitor:

python3 skills/review-scraper/scripts/scrape_reviews.py \
  --product "<product_name>" \
  --platforms g2,capterra \
  --output json

Focus on:

  • 1-2 star reviews of competitors — Pain they're failing to solve
  • 4-5 star reviews of you — Outcomes that delight buyers
  • 4-5 star reviews of competitors — Strengths you need to counter or match
  • Review language patterns — Exact phrases buyers use

1B: Reddit/Community Mining

Run reddit-scraper for relevant subreddits:

python3 skills/reddit-scraper/scripts/scrape_reddit.py \
  --query "<product category> OR <competitor> OR <pain keyword>" \
  --subreddits "<relevant_subreddits>" \
  --sort relevance \
  --time month \
  --limit 50

Extract:

  • Questions people ask before buying
  • Complaints about current solutions
  • "I wish [product] would..." statements
  • Comparison threads (vs discussions)

1C: Twitter/X Mining

Run twitter-scraper:

python3 skills/twitter-scraper/scripts/scrape_twitter.py \
  --query "<competitor> (frustrating OR broken OR hate OR love OR switched)" \
  --max-results 50

1D: Competitor Ad Mining (Optional)

Run ad-creative-intelligence to see what angles competitors are currently using. This reveals:

  • Angles they've validated (long-running ads = working)
  • Angles they're testing (new ads)
  • Angles nobody is running (white space)

1E: Internal Data (Optional)

If the user provides support tickets, NPS comments, or sales call transcripts — ingest and tag with the same framework below.

Phase 2: Angle Extraction

Process all collected data through this extraction framework:

Angle Categories

CategoryWhat to Look ForAd Power
Pain anglesSpecific frustrations with status quo or competitorsHigh — pain motivates action
Outcome anglesDesired results buyers describe in their own wordsHigh — positive aspiration
Identity anglesHow buyers describe themselves or want to be seenMedium — emotional resonance
Fear anglesRisks of NOT switching or actingMedium — loss aversion
Competitive displacementSpecific reasons people switched from a competitorVery high — direct comparison
Social proof anglesOutcomes or metrics buyers cite in reviewsHigh — credibility
Contrast anglesBefore/after or old way/new way framingsHigh — clear value prop

For Each Angle, Extract:

  1. The angle — One-sentence framing
  2. Proof quotes — 2-5 verbatim quotes from sources
  3. Source count — How many independent sources mention this?
  4. Competitor weakness? — Does this exploit a specific competitor's gap?
  5. Emotional register — Frustration / Aspiration / Fear / Relief / Pride
  6. Recommended format — Search ad / Meta static / Meta video / LinkedIn / Twitter

Phase 3: Scoring & Ranking

Score each angle on:

FactorWeightDescription
Evidence strength30%Number of independent sources mentioning it
Emotional intensity25%How strongly people feel about this (language intensity)
Competitive differentiation20%Does this set you apart, or could any competitor claim it?
ICP relevance15%How closely does this match the target buyer's world?
Freshness10%Is this angle already overused in competitor ads?

Total score out of 100. Rank all angles.

Phase 4: Output Format

# Ad Angle Bank — [Product Name] — [DATE]

Sources mined: [list]
Total angles extracted: [N]
Top-tier angles (score 70+): [N]

---

## Tier 1: Highest-Conviction Angles (Score 70+)

### Angle 1: [One-sentence angle]
- **Category:** [Pain / Outcome / Identity / Fear / Displacement / Proof / Contrast]
- **Score:** [X/100]
- **Emotional register:** [Frustration / Aspiration / etc.]
- **Proof quotes:**
  > "[Verbatim quote 1]" — [Source: G2 review / Reddit / etc.]
  > "[Verbatim quote 2]" — [Source]
  > "[Verbatim quote 3]" — [Source]
- **Source count:** [N] independent mentions
- **Competitor weakness exploited:** [Competitor name + specific gap, or "N/A"]
- **Recommended formats:** [Search ad headline / Meta static / Video hook / etc.]
- **Sample headline:** "[Draft headline using this angle]"
- **Sample body copy:** "[Draft 1-2 sentence body]"

### Angle 2: ...

---

## Tier 2: Worth Testing (Score 50-69)

[Same format, briefer]

---

## Tier 3: Emerging / Low-Evidence (Score < 50)

[Brief list — angles with potential but insufficient evidence]

---

## Competitive Angle Map

| Angle | Your Product | [Comp A] | [Comp B] | [Comp C] |
|-------|-------------|----------|----------|----------|
| [Angle 1] | Can claim ✓ | Weak here ✗ | Also claims | Not relevant |
| [Angle 2] | Strong ✓ | Strong | Weak ✗ | Not relevant |
...

---

## Recommended Test Plan

### Week 1-2: Test Tier 1 Angles
- [Angle] → [Format] → [Platform]
- [Angle] → [Format] → [Platform]

### Week 3-4: Test Tier 2 Angles
- [Angle] → [Format] → [Platform]

Save to clients/<client-name>/ads/angle-bank-[YYYY-MM-DD].md.

Cost

ComponentCost
Review scraper (per product)~$0.10-0.30 (Apify)
Reddit scraper~$0.05-0.10 (Apify)
Twitter scraper~$0.10-0.20 (Apify)
Ad scraper (optional)~$0.40-1.00 (Apify)
AnalysisFree (LLM reasoning)
Total~$0.25-1.60

Tools Required

  • Apify API tokenAPIFY_API_TOKEN env var
  • Upstream skills: review-scraper, reddit-scraper, twitter-scraper
  • Optional: ad-creative-intelligence (for competitor ad angles)

Trigger Phrases

  • "Mine ad angles from reviews"
  • "What angles should we run?"
  • "Find pain language for our ads"
  • "Build an ad angle bank for [client]"
  • "What are people complaining about with [competitor]?"

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

33.53%
按下载量换算168

Claude

29.9%
按下载量换算150

Cursor

19.54%
按下载量换算98

Gemini CLI

9.19%
按下载量换算46

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

可疑

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills