Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

create-issue(创建问题)

用于围绕 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request、分支、提交和代码协作流程提供辅助能力。它适合让 Agent 查询项目状态、整理变更、辅助创建或检查协作事项,并把仓库中的信息转成可执行的下一步。使用时需要区分只读查询和写入操作;涉及创建 PR、修改 Issue、推送分支或访问私有仓库时,应确认 token 权限、目标仓库范围和用户授权。

create-issue 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 45,286。

总安装 857周安装 35GitHub Stars 15下载 274核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:create-issue(创建问题)
来源仓库:https://github.com/zxkane/autonomous-dev-team
仓库路径:skills/create-issue
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/zxkane/autonomous-dev-team --skill create-issue
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/zxkane/autonomous-dev-team --skill create-issue

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于围绕 GitHub 仓库、Issue、PR、分支和提交提供协作支持。可查询项目状态、整理变更、辅助创建事项并生成下一步动作。适合在开发协作中将信息转化为可执行任务。涉及写入操作时需确认 token 权限与仓库访问范围。create-issue 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/create-issue

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/zxkane/autonomous-dev-team --skill create-issu…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

create-issue 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/zxkane/autonomous-dev-team --skill create-issue。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

create-issue 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

create-issue 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

create-issue 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

create-issue 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 857 次,近一周安装 35 次,下载 274 次,GitHub 15 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

create-issue 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
create-issue

创建问题 · 本页

85715调用外部服务未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Create GitHub Issue

Create well-structured GitHub issues from user descriptions through interactive clarification.

Repository Detection

Detect the repository from the current git remote:

REPO=$(gh repo view --json nameWithOwner -q '.nameWithOwner')
# Splits into OWNER and REPO_NAME

If detection fails, ask the user for the target repository.

Process

Step 1: Understand the Request

When the user describes a feature or bug, gather context through clarifying questions. Do NOT create the issue immediately.

For features, clarify:

  • What is the user-facing goal? (not implementation details)
  • What are the acceptance criteria? (how to verify it works)
  • Are there UI/UX implications?
  • What existing functionality does this relate to?
  • Priority and scope constraints

For bugs, clarify:

  • Steps to reproduce
  • Expected vs actual behavior
  • Environment (prod, staging, PR preview)
  • Severity (blocking, degraded, cosmetic)
  • Any error messages or logs

Ask 2-3 focused questions per round. Stop when there is enough information to write a clear issue.

Step 2: Draft the Issue

Use the appropriate template based on issue type. For full template content, consult references/issue-templates.md.

Both templates include these required sections:

  • Summary / Motivation (feature) or Steps to Reproduce (bug)
  • Requirements with checkboxes (feature) or Expected/Actual Behavior (bug)
  • Testing Requirements (mandatory TDD section: test cases doc, unit tests, E2E tests)
  • Acceptance Criteria with checkboxes
  • Dependencies section for issue ordering

Step 2.5: Detect & Attach Workspace Changes

After drafting the issue, check the workspace for local changes that may provide useful context for the autonomous dev agent. For the complete detection, attachment, and cleanup procedure, consult references/workspace-changes.md.

Summary:

  1. Run git status --short — skip if no changes
  2. Summarize changes and ask user for confirmation
  3. Choose strategy based on diff size: inline (< 500 lines), branch push (>= 500 lines), or file list fallback
  4. Add a ## Pre-existing Changes section to the issue body
  5. Optionally clean up local changes after attachment

Step 3: Confirm with User

Present the draft issue to the user with:

  1. Proposed title (concise, descriptive)
  2. Full issue body (including Pre-existing Changes section if applicable)
  3. Proposed labels
  4. Whether to add autonomous label

Use AskUserQuestion to confirm:

  • "Does this issue look correct? Should I create it?"
  • Ask about autonomous label: whether AI should handle this automatically

Step 4: Create the Issue

Use GitHub MCP tools or gh CLI to create the issue with:

  • title: The confirmed title
  • body: The confirmed body
  • labels: Appropriate labels (see Label Guide below)

Report the created issue URL to the user.

If branch push was deferred (large diff strategy):

After the issue is created and the issue number is known:

  1. Execute the branch push commands from Step 2.5.5 using the actual issue number
  2. Update the issue body to include the branch reference section

Label Guide

LabelWhen to Apply
bugBug reports
enhancementFeature requests
autonomousUser confirms AI should handle dev/test/review/merge automatically
no-auto-closeUsed with autonomous -- AI handles dev/test/review but stops before merge, requiring manual approval
documentationDocumentation-only changes
good first issueSimple, well-scoped tasks

Autonomous Label Decision

After drafting the issue, explicitly ask the user whether to add the autonomous label.

Provide guidance on when autonomous is appropriate:

  • Good fit: Well-defined scope, clear acceptance criteria, follows existing patterns, no ambiguous design decisions
  • Poor fit: Requires significant architecture decisions, needs user input during development, involves sensitive infrastructure changes, exploratory/research tasks

Frame the question as:

"Should this issue be handled by the autonomous development pipeline? The AI will automatically develop, test, review, and merge the changes. This works best for well-defined tasks with clear acceptance criteria."

If the user selects autonomous, also ask about no-auto-close:

"Should this issue also have the no-auto-close label? With this label, the AI will handle development, testing, and review, but will stop before merging -- you'll be notified to make the final merge decision. This is recommended for sensitive infrastructure changes, features needing product sign-off, or experimental work."

Label interaction summary:

  • autonomous alone = AI handles dev/test/review and auto-merges on pass
  • autonomous + no-auto-close = AI handles dev/test/review but stops before merge, notifying the owner for manual approval

Writing Guidelines

  • Title: Start with verb, be specific. "Add pagination to plans list page" not "Plans page improvement"
  • Body: Write for an AI developer who has access to the full codebase but no verbal context from this conversation
  • Acceptance criteria: Must be objectively verifiable, not subjective
  • Scope: Prefer smaller, focused issues over large multi-part ones
  • References: Link to related issues, PRD sections, or code paths when relevant
  • Dependencies: When creating multiple related issues, populate the ## Dependencies section with links to blocking issues. Create issues in dependency order so earlier issue numbers are available for later ones. The dispatcher will skip issues whose dependencies are still open.
  • Testing Requirements: ALWAYS include the "Testing Requirements" section. The dev agent follows the project's TDD workflow but has been observed to skip E2E tests or test-case docs when the issue doesn't explicitly call them out. Be specific about:

- Key scenarios each test type must cover (2-4 bullet points) - For bugs: the regression test must fail before the fix and pass after

Multi-Issue Creation

When breaking a large feature into multiple issues:

  1. Create issues in dependency order — issues with no dependencies first, then issues that depend on them. This ensures issue numbers are known when writing dependency references.
  2. Populate the ## Dependencies section in each issue body with #N links to blocking issues.
  3. Use a consistent naming scheme — prefix titles with the project/feature name for easy filtering (e.g., "MyProject: Add DynamoDB infrastructure").
  4. Cross-reference the plan — if an implementation plan exists, link each issue to the relevant plan tasks/chunks.
  5. The dispatcher skips blocked issues — issues with open dependencies in the ## Dependencies section are ignored by the autonomous dispatcher until all dependencies are resolved (closed/merged).

References

For detailed content, consult:

  • references/issue-templates.md -- Full feature and bug issue templates with all required sections
  • references/workspace-changes.md -- Complete workspace change detection, attachment strategies, and cleanup procedure

平台分布

Codex

37.9%
按下载量换算104

Claude

29.9%
按下载量换算82

Cursor

17.64%
按下载量换算48

Gemini CLI

10.67%
按下载量换算29

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

可疑

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills