Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

workflow-fasttrack(工作流程快速通道)

workflow-fasttrack 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

workflow-fasttrack 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证为 MIT,暂无第三方扫描结果,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 68,015。

总安装 238周安装 10GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 83核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:workflow-fasttrack(工作流程快速通道)
来源仓库:https://github.com/nguyenthienthanh/aura-frog
仓库路径:skills/workflow-fasttrack
安装命令:
npx skills add nguyenthienthanh/aura-frog --skill "workflow-fasttrack"
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

AgentSkills.tonpx skills
npx skills add nguyenthienthanh/aura-frog --skill "workflow-fasttrack"

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

workflow-fasttrack 用于查找和安装 AI 代理的快速通道工作流程技能。适合加速特定类型任务的执行路径和资源分配。通过 npx skills add nguyenthienthanh/aura-frog --skill "workflow-fasttrack" 安装。

建议评估资源消耗,避免为简单任务启用高性能通道造成浪费。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/workflow-fasttrack

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add nguyenthienthanh/aura-frog --skill "workflow-fasttrack";命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

workflow-fasttrack 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add nguyenthienthanh/aura-frog --skill "workflow-fasttrack"。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

workflow-fasttrack 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

workflow-fasttrack 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

workflow-fasttrack 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

workflow-fasttrack 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 238 次,近一周安装 10 次,下载 83 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

workflow-fasttrack 安全吗?

没有查到第三方扫描结果,安全性无法从公开资料判断,安装前请自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 没有第三方扫描结果,安全性只能靠自己读源码判断。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 要求有安全扫描结论才肯安装的团队。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
workflow-fasttrack

工作流程快速通道 · 本页

238—接触敏感数据MIT未收录

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
workflow-fasttrack
description
Fast-track workflow for pre-approved specs. Skips phases 1-3, auto-executes 4-9 without approvals. Use: 'fasttrack: <specs>'
autoInvoke
true
priority
high
triggers
allowed-tools
Read, Grep, Glob, Edit, Write, Bash

Aura Frog Workflow Fast-Track

Priority: HIGH - Use when design/specs are already complete Version: 1.0.0


When to Use

USE when user provides:

  • Complete design document
  • Detailed tech specs
  • API specifications
  • Component breakdown
  • Any pre-approved requirements

DON'T use when:

  • Requirements are vague
  • Design needs clarification
  • User wants to discuss approach
  • Task complexity is unclear

How to Invoke

fasttrack: [paste specs or path to specs file]

or

workflow:fasttrack <path-to-specs.md>

or

Here are my specs: [detailed specs]
Just build it.

Fast-Track Phases (4-9 Only)

PhaseNameActionStop Condition
4Plan TestsAuto-generate test strategyNever
5aWrite Tests (RED)Write failing testsTests pass (error!)
5bBuild (GREEN)Implement to pass testsTests fail after 3 attempts
5cPolish (REFACTOR)Clean codeTests break
6ReviewSecurity + quality scanCritical security issue
7VerifyRun all testsCoverage <80%
8DocumentUpdate docsNever
9ShareNotify teamNever

Spec Validation

Before starting, validate specs contain:

required_sections[6]{section,purpose}:
  Overview,What we're building
  Requirements,Functional requirements
  Technical Design,Architecture/approach
  API/Interfaces,Endpoints or component APIs
  Data Model,Database/state structure
  Acceptance Criteria,Definition of done

If missing sections: Ask user to provide them, don't start without.


Execution Mode

No Approval Gates

STANDARD WORKFLOW:
Phase 4 → ✋ Wait → Phase 5a → ✋ Wait → Phase 5b → ...

FAST-TRACK WORKFLOW:
Phase 4 → Phase 5a → Phase 5b → Phase 5c → Phase 6 → Phase 7 → Phase 8 → Phase 9
         ↑                                                                      ↑
       START                                                                  END
       (No stops unless error)

Only Stop On

  1. Tests unexpectedly pass in Phase 5a (RED phase)

- Tests should fail initially - If they pass, specs may be incomplete

  1. Tests fail after 3 implementation attempts (GREEN phase)

- May need spec clarification

  1. Critical security vulnerability found (Phase 6)

- Must fix before proceeding

  1. Coverage below 80% (Phase 7)

- Need more tests

  1. Token limit warning (Any phase)

- Save state and handoff


Progress Reporting

Show condensed progress after each phase:

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
🚀 FAST-TRACK Progress
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
✅ Phase 4: Test Strategy (12 tests planned)
✅ Phase 5a: Tests Written (12 failing)
🔄 Phase 5b: Implementing... (8/12 passing)
⬜ Phase 5c: Refactor
⬜ Phase 6: Review
⬜ Phase 7: Verify
⬜ Phase 8: Document
⬜ Phase 9: Notify
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Input Format

Option 1: Inline Specs

fasttrack:

## Overview
User authentication with JWT tokens

## Requirements
- Login with email/password
- Token refresh
- Logout

## Technical Design
- Use bcrypt for passwords
- JWT with RS256
- Redis for token blacklist

## API
POST /auth/login
POST /auth/refresh
POST /auth/logout

## Data Model
users: id, email, password_hash, created_at

## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] User can login and receive token
- [ ] Token refreshes before expiry
- [ ] Logout invalidates token

Option 2: File Reference

fasttrack: .claude/specs/auth-feature.md

Option 3: Natural Language

I have the complete design ready:
[paste design]

Just build it without stopping for approvals.

Critical Rules

TDD Still Applies

Phase 5a (RED): Tests MUST fail initially
Phase 5b (GREEN): Implement until tests pass
Phase 5c (REFACTOR): Tests MUST still pass

KISS Still Applies

  • No over-engineering
  • Follow specs exactly
  • Don't add features not in specs

Quality Still Applies

  • 80% coverage minimum
  • No critical security issues
  • Clean, documented code

Error Recovery

Test Failure (Phase 5b)

Attempt 1: Implement → Tests fail
Attempt 2: Fix issues → Tests fail
Attempt 3: Different approach → Tests fail
→ STOP: Ask user for clarification

Security Issue (Phase 6)

Critical issue found:
→ STOP: Show issue and proposed fix
→ Wait for user confirmation
→ Then continue

Coverage Below 80% (Phase 7)

Coverage: 65%
Missing: auth.service.ts lines 45-67
→ Add tests for missing coverage
→ Re-run verification
→ If still <80% after 2 attempts, ask user

Integration with Standard Workflow

Fast-track is a mode, not a replacement:

workflow_modes[2]{mode,phases,approvals}:
  standard,1-9,8 gates (all phases)
  fasttrack,4-9,0 gates (errors only)

Switching Modes

# Start standard, switch to fast-track after Phase 3:
User: "approve phase 3, then fasttrack the rest"

# Start fast-track, switch to standard on error:
[Error in Phase 5b]
Claude: "Switching to standard mode for debugging..."

Example Execution

User: fasttrack: [complete specs]

Claude:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
🚀 FAST-TRACK Mode Activated
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Specs validated ✅
Starting Phase 4...

✅ Phase 4: Test Strategy
   - 15 unit tests planned
   - 3 integration tests planned
   - Coverage targets: 85%

✅ Phase 5a: Tests Written (RED)
   - 18 tests written
   - All failing as expected ✅

✅ Phase 5b: Implementation (GREEN)
   - auth.service.ts created
   - auth.controller.ts created
   - 18/18 tests passing ✅

✅ Phase 5c: Refactored
   - Extracted token utilities
   - Added error types
   - Tests still passing ✅

✅ Phase 6: Review
   - No security issues
   - Performance OK
   - Code quality: A

✅ Phase 7: Verification
   - Coverage: 87%
   - All tests passing

✅ Phase 8: Documentation
   - API docs updated
   - README updated

✅ Phase 9: Notification
   - Slack notified (or skipped if not configured)

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
🎉 FAST-TRACK Complete!
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Files created: 5
Tests: 18 passing
Coverage: 87%
Time: ~15 minutes

Ready to commit? (confirm to proceed)

Commands

CommandAction
fasttrack: <specs>Start fast-track with inline specs
workflow:fasttrack <file>Start fast-track from spec file
fasttrack:stopStop and switch to standard mode
fasttrack:statusShow current progress

Related Skills

  • workflow-orchestrator - Full 9-phase with approvals
  • bugfix-quick - Lightweight bug fix workflow
  • test-writer - Just write tests
  • code-reviewer - Just review code

Remember:

  • Validate specs before starting
  • TDD is still mandatory
  • Only stop on errors, not approvals
  • Show progress after each phase
  • Final commit still requires user confirmation

平台分布

OpenCode

26.05%
按下载量换算22

Claude Code

22.1%
按下载量换算18

windsurf

20.21%
按下载量换算17

cline

14.17%
按下载量换算12

Codex

7.91%
按下载量换算7

Antigravity

3.41%
按下载量换算3

安全审计

暂无安全审计结果可展示。

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills