Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

voice-of-customer-synthesizer(客户声音合成器)

用于辅助音频、音乐、语音转写、语音合成或声音素材处理。它适合让 Agent 生成配乐说明、整理音频流程、调用语音工具或处理播客和视频配音素材。使用时需要确认输入音频来源、输出格式、时长和模型限制;涉及人声克隆、版权音乐或公开发布时,应先核对授权和合规边界。

voice-of-customer-synthesizer 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 69,749。

总安装 216周安装 9GitHub Stars 607下载 72核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:voice-of-customer-synthesizer(客户声音合成器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/athina-ai/goose-skills
仓库路径:skills/voice-of-customer-synthesizer
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/athina-ai/goose-skills --skill voice-of-customer-synthesizer
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/athina-ai/goose-skills --skill voice-of-customer-synthesizer

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

将客户语音反馈合成为标准化报告或演示素材,提升沟通效率。可用于培训案例制作、产品演示或内部知识库建设。基于 Goose Skills 项目构建,兼容 Claude 等 AI 开发环境。合成语音不得用于冒充真人身份或误导性宣传用途。

voice-of-customer-synthesizer 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/voice-of-customer-synthesizer

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/athina-ai/goose-skills --skill voice-of-custom…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

voice-of-customer-synthesizer 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/athina-ai/goose-skills --skill voice-of-customer-synthes…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

voice-of-customer-synthesizer 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

voice-of-customer-synthesizer 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

voice-of-customer-synthesizer 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

voice-of-customer-synthesizer 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 216 次,近一周安装 9 次,下载 72 次,GitHub 607 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

voice-of-customer-synthesizer 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
voice-of-customer-synthesizer

客户声音合成器 · 本页

216607需要联网未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Voice of Customer Synthesizer

Turn scattered customer feedback into a single source of truth. Aggregates signals from every source you have, clusters them into themes, and produces a report that product, marketing, and CS teams can actually act on.

Built for: Startups where customer feedback lives in 6 different places and nobody has time to synthesize it. The founder says "what are customers saying?" and nobody has a clear answer. This skill produces that answer.

When to Use

  • "What are our customers saying?"
  • "Synthesize customer feedback from last quarter"
  • "Build a VoC report for the product team"
  • "What themes are coming up in customer feedback?"
  • "Aggregate feedback from all our channels"

Phase 0: Intake

Feedback Sources (provide all you have)

  1. Support tickets — Export from support tool (CSV: customer, date, subject, description, tags, resolution)
  2. NPS/CSAT survey responses — Scores + verbatim comments
  3. Slack messages — Customer channel messages, feedback channels
  4. G2/Capterra reviews — Will scrape if product is listed (provide product name or URL)
  5. Call/meeting transcripts — Customer call recordings or notes
  6. Churn exit survey responses — Why did customers leave?
  7. Feature request log — Internal tracker of what customers have asked for
  8. Social mentions — Twitter/LinkedIn/Reddit threads mentioning your product
  9. Email threads — Notable customer emails (praise or complaints)
  10. In-app feedback — Any in-product feedback submissions

Configuration

  1. Time period — What window to analyze? (Last 30 days, quarter, 6 months)
  2. Product name — For review scraping and context
  3. Report audience — Who's reading this? (Product team, exec team, CS team, all)
  4. Focus areas — Any specific themes to pay attention to? (e.g., "onboarding experience", "pricing feedback", "mobile app")

Phase 1: Data Collection

1A: Internal Data Processing

From the provided inputs, normalize all feedback into a standard format:

SOURCE | DATE | CUSTOMER | SEGMENT | FEEDBACK_TEXT | SENTIMENT | CATEGORY

Sentiment classification per item:

  • Positive — Praise, satisfaction, delight
  • Neutral — Feature request, question, observation
  • Negative — Complaint, frustration, disappointment
  • Critical — Churn threat, escalation, anger

1B: External Review Scraping (if applicable)

If product is on review platforms:

Chain: review-scraper for G2, Capterra, Trustpilot
Filter: reviews from the target time period

Extract: rating, review text, reviewer role/company size, date, pros, cons.

1C: Social Listening (if applicable)

Search: "[product name]" feedback OR review OR "switched to" OR "stopped using"
Search: "[product name]" site:reddit.com OR site:twitter.com

Phase 2: Theme Clustering

Group all feedback items into themes using a bottom-up approach:

Clustering Method

  1. Read all feedback items
  2. Identify recurring topics (mentioned by 3+ customers or in 3+ sources)
  3. Group into theme clusters
  4. Rank by frequency AND severity

Theme Template

THEME: [Name — e.g., "Onboarding Complexity"]
FREQUENCY: [N mentions across M sources]
SENTIMENT: [Predominantly positive/neutral/negative]
TREND: [↑ Growing / → Stable / ↓ Declining vs prior period]

REPRESENTATIVE QUOTES:
- "[Exact quote]" — [Source, Customer segment, Date]
- "[Exact quote]" — [Source, Customer segment, Date]
- "[Exact quote]" — [Source, Customer segment, Date]

CUSTOMER SEGMENTS AFFECTED:
- [Segment 1: e.g., "New customers in first 30 days"]
- [Segment 2: e.g., "Enterprise accounts"]

ROOT CAUSE HYPOTHESIS:
[1-2 sentences: Why is this coming up? What's the underlying issue?]

IMPACT:
- On retention: [High/Medium/Low]
- On expansion: [High/Medium/Low]
- On acquisition: [High/Medium/Low]

Phase 3: Analysis

3A: Sentiment Overview

Overall Sentiment Distribution:
  Positive:  [N] items ([X%])  ████████░░
  Neutral:   [N] items ([X%])  ████░░░░░░
  Negative:  [N] items ([X%])  ██░░░░░░░░
  Critical:  [N] items ([X%])  █░░░░░░░░░

3B: Source Comparison

SourceVolumeAvg SentimentTop Theme
Support tickets[N][Pos/Neg score][Theme]
NPS comments[N][Score][Theme]
G2 reviews[N][Score][Theme]
Slack[N][Score][Theme]
Calls[N][Score][Theme]

Insight: Different sources often reveal different stories. Support tickets skew negative (problems). Reviews skew bipolar (love/hate). Calls reveal nuance. Note where themes appear across sources for highest confidence.

3C: Segment Analysis

Customer SegmentDominant SentimentTop RequestKey Pain
[New customers][Sentiment][Request][Pain]
[Power users][Sentiment][Request][Pain]
[Enterprise][Sentiment][Request][Pain]
[Churned][Sentiment][Request][Pain]

3D: Trend Detection

Compare against prior period (if available):

ThemePrior PeriodThis PeriodTrendAlert
[Theme 1][N mentions][N mentions][↑X%][New/Growing/Stable/Declining]
[Theme 2]............

New themes this period: [Themes that weren't present before] Resolved themes: [Themes that decreased significantly — things you fixed]

Phase 4: Recommendations

For Product Team

PriorityThemeRecommendationEvidence Strength
P0[Theme][Specific action][N mentions, M sources, includes churn signals]
P1[Theme][Action][Evidence]
P2[Theme][Action][Evidence]

For CS/Support Team

ActionThemeExpected Impact
[Create help article for X][Theme]Deflect ~[N] tickets/month
[Add onboarding step for Y][Theme]Reduce confusion for new users
[Proactive outreach to segment Z][Theme]Prevent churn in at-risk segment

For Marketing Team

ActionThemeOpportunity
[Use this proof point in messaging][Positive theme]"[Customer quote ready for marketing]"
[Address this objection on website][Negative theme]Counter common concern pre-sale
[Build case study around X][Positive theme][N] customers mentioned this win

Phase 5: Output Format

# Voice of Customer Report — [Period]
Sources analyzed: [list]
Total feedback items: [N]
Date range: [start] — [end]

---

## Executive Summary

[3-5 sentences: What are customers saying? What's the overall sentiment?
What's the single most important thing to act on?]

---

## Sentiment Overview

Positive: [X%] | Neutral: [X%] | Negative: [X%] | Critical: [X%]

Net Sentiment Score: [calculated — % positive minus % negative]
vs Prior Period: [+/- X points]

---

## Top Themes (Ranked by Impact)

### 1. [Theme Name] — [Sentiment] — [N mentions]
**Summary:** [2-3 sentences]
**Key quotes:**
> "[Quote]" — [Source]
> "[Quote]" — [Source]
**Recommended action:** [What to do]
**Owner:** [Product / CS / Marketing]

### 2. [Theme Name] — ...

### 3. [Theme Name] — ...

[Continue for top 5-8 themes]

---

## What Customers Love (Preserve These)

| Strength | Evidence | Marketing Opportunity |
|----------|---------|----------------------|
| [Feature/experience] | "[Quote]" — [N mentions] | [How to use in messaging] |

---

## What Customers Want (Feature Requests)

| Request | Frequency | Segments | Product Priority |
|---------|-----------|----------|-----------------|
| [Feature] | [N mentions] | [Who wants it] | [P0/P1/P2] |

---

## What Causes Pain (Fix These)

| Pain Point | Severity | Churn Risk | Recommended Fix |
|-----------|----------|------------|----------------|
| [Issue] | [High/Med/Low] | [Yes/No] | [Action] |

---

## Trends vs Prior Period

[What's getting better, what's getting worse, what's new]

---

## Team-Specific Action Items

### Product Team
1. [Action] — [Evidence]

### CS Team
1. [Action] — [Evidence]

### Marketing Team
1. [Action] — [Evidence]

---

## Appendix: All Themes Detail

[Full theme cards with all quotes and analysis]

Save to clients/<client-name>/customer-success/voc/voc-report-[YYYY-MM-DD].md.

Scheduling

Run monthly or quarterly:

0 8 1 */3 * python3 run_skill.py voice-of-customer-synthesizer --client <client-name>

Cost

ComponentCost
Review scraping (via review-scraper)~$0.50-1.00
Web search (social mentions)Free
All analysis and synthesisFree (LLM reasoning)
TotalFree — $1

Tools Required

  • Optional: review-scraper for G2/Capterra/Trustpilot reviews
  • Optional: twitter-scraper for social mentions
  • Optional: reddit-scraper for community feedback
  • All analysis is pure LLM reasoning on provided data

Trigger Phrases

  • "What are customers saying?"
  • "Build a VoC report"
  • "Synthesize our customer feedback"
  • "Run voice of customer analysis"
  • "Customer feedback summary for [period]"

平台分布

Codex

33%
按下载量换算24

Claude

31.94%
按下载量换算23

Cursor

19.9%
按下载量换算14

Gemini CLI

9.49%
按下载量换算7

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

可疑

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills