Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

testing-tdd-london(测试 TDD 伦敦)

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

testing-tdd-london 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为权限未标注;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 53,729。

总安装 524周安装 21GitHub Stars 8下载 170核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:testing-tdd-london(测试 TDD 伦敦)
来源仓库:https://github.com/vamseeachanta/workspace-hub
仓库路径:skills/testing-tdd-london
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/vamseeachanta/workspace-hub --skill testing-tdd-london
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/vamseeachanta/workspace-hub --skill testing-tdd-london

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。适合编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为通过测试而改坏真实逻辑。涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

安装方式:github,支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。

来源仓库内路径:skills/testing-tdd-london

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/vamseeachanta/workspace-hub --skill testing-td…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    权限没有明确标注,第一次使用时只给一个无关紧要的任务,观察它到底读了哪些文件和网络。

常见问题

6 条

testing-tdd-london 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/vamseeachanta/workspace-hub --skill testing-tdd-london。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

testing-tdd-london 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

testing-tdd-london 需要什么权限?

权限级别没有明确标注。第一次使用时建议只给无关紧要的任务,观察它实际读写了哪些内容。

testing-tdd-london 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

testing-tdd-london 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 524 次,近一周安装 21 次,下载 170 次,GitHub 8 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

testing-tdd-london 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
testing-tdd-london

测试 TDD 伦敦 · 本页

5248权限未标注MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

TDD London School (Mockist)

Outside-in, mock-driven development focusing on object collaborations and behavior verification

Quick Start

// 1. Start with acceptance test (outside)
describe('User Registration', () => {
  it('should register new user successfully', async () => {
    const mockRepository = { save: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue({ id: '123' }) };
    const mockNotifier = { sendWelcome: jest.fn() };

    const service = new UserService(mockRepository, mockNotifier);
    await service.register({ email: 'test@example.com' });

    // 2. Verify behavior (interactions)
    expect(mockRepository.save).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
      expect.objectContaining({ email: 'test@example.com' })
    );
    expect(mockNotifier.sendWelcome).toHaveBeenCalledWith('123');
  });
});

When to Use

  • Testing object collaborations and message passing
  • Contract-driven development with clear interfaces
  • Outside-in development starting from user behavior
  • When isolation of units is critical
  • Service orchestration testing
  • Testing HOW objects work together (not WHAT they contain)

Prerequisites

  • Understanding of mock objects vs stubs
  • Jest, Vitest, or similar testing framework with mocking support
  • Clear separation of concerns in architecture
  • Dependency injection pattern in codebase

Core Concepts

London vs Chicago School

AspectLondon (Mockist)Chicago (Classicist)
FocusBehavior/InteractionsState
IsolationMock all collaboratorsUse real objects
DirectionOutside-inInside-out
Test WhatHOW objects talkWHAT objects produce
CouplingTo implementationTo behavior

Outside-In Development Flow

Acceptance Test (failing)
    |
    v
Controller Test (failing)
    |
    v
Service Test (failing)
    |
    v
Repository Test (failing)
    |
    v
Implement (make tests pass from bottom up)

Mock Types

// Stub: Returns canned responses
const stubRepo = { findById: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(user) };

// Mock: Verifies interactions
const mockNotifier = { send: jest.fn() };
// Later: expect(mockNotifier.send).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expectedArgs);

// Spy: Wraps real object, records calls
const spyLogger = jest.spyOn(logger, 'info');

Implementation Pattern

1. Outside-In Development

// Start with acceptance test (outermost layer)
describe('User Registration Feature', () => {
  it('should register new user successfully', async () => {
    // Mock all collaborators
    const mockRepository = {
      save: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue({ id: '123', email: 'test@example.com' }),
      findByEmail: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(null)
    };

    const mockNotifier = {
      sendWelcome: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(true)
    };

    const userService = new UserService(mockRepository, mockNotifier);
    const result = await userService.register({
      email: 'test@example.com',
      password: 'secure123'
    });

    // Verify the conversation between objects
    expect(mockRepository.findByEmail).toHaveBeenCalledWith('test@example.com');
    expect(mockRepository.save).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
      expect.objectContaining({ email: 'test@example.com' })
    );
    expect(mockNotifier.sendWelcome).toHaveBeenCalledWith('123');
    expect(result.success).toBe(true);
  });
});

2. Interaction Testing

describe('Order Processing', () => {
  it('should follow proper workflow interactions', async () => {
    const mockPayment = { charge: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue({ success: true }) };
    const mockInventory = { reserve: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(true) };
    const mockShipping = { schedule: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue({ trackingId: 'ABC' }) };

    const service = new OrderService(mockPayment, mockInventory, mockShipping);
    await service.processOrder(order);

    // Verify call order matters
    const callOrder = [];
    mockInventory.reserve.mockImplementation(() => {
      callOrder.push('reserve');
      return Promise.resolve(true);
    });
    mockPayment.charge.mockImplementation(() => {
      callOrder.push('charge');
      return Promise.resolve({ success: true });
    });
    mockShipping.schedule.mockImplementation(() => {
      callOrder.push('schedule');
      return Promise.resolve({ trackingId: 'ABC' });
    });

    await service.processOrder(order);
    expect(callOrder).toEqual(['reserve', 'charge', 'schedule']);
  });
});

3. Contract Definition Through Mocks

// Define contracts for collaborators
const userServiceContract = {
  register: {
    input: { email: 'string', password: 'string' },
    output: { success: 'boolean', id: 'string' },
    collaborators: ['UserRepository', 'NotificationService'],
    interactions: [
      { method: 'findByEmail', args: ['email'], returns: 'null|User' },
      { method: 'save', args: ['User'], returns: 'User' },
      { method: 'sendWelcome', args: ['userId'], returns: 'boolean' }
    ]
  }
};

// Generate mocks from contract
function createMockFromContract(contract) {
  return Object.fromEntries(
    contract.interactions.map(i => [i.method, jest.fn()])
  );
}

Configuration

london_tdd_config:
  testing:
    framework: jest
    mock_library: jest  # or sinon, testdouble
    strict_mocks: true  # fail on unexpected calls

  coverage:
    interaction_coverage: true
    verify_all_mocks: true

  swarm_coordination:
    share_contracts: true
    sync_mock_definitions: true

  patterns:
    verify_call_order: true
    verify_call_count: true
    verify_call_args: true

Usage Examples

Example 1: Service Orchestration Test

describe('Service Collaboration', () => {
  let mockServiceA: jest.Mocked<ServiceA>;
  let mockServiceB: jest.Mocked<ServiceB>;
  let mockServiceC: jest.Mocked<ServiceC>;
  let orchestrator: ServiceOrchestrator;

  beforeEach(() => {
    mockServiceA = {
      prepare: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue({ data: 'prepared' })
    };
    mockServiceB = {
      process: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue({ result: 'processed' })
    };
    mockServiceC = {
      finalize: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue({ status: 'complete' })
    };

    orchestrator = new ServiceOrchestrator(
      mockServiceA,
      mockServiceB,
      mockServiceC
    );
  });

  it('should coordinate dependencies in correct order', async () => {
    await orchestrator.execute(task);

    // Verify coordination sequence
    expect(mockServiceA.prepare).toHaveBeenCalledBefore(mockServiceB.process);
    expect(mockServiceB.process).toHaveBeenCalledBefore(mockServiceC.finalize);

    // Verify data flow between services
    expect(mockServiceB.process).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
      expect.objectContaining({ data: 'prepared' })
    );
    expect(mockServiceC.finalize).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
      expect.objectContaining({ result: 'processed' })
    );
  });
});

Example 2: Error Handling Verification

describe('Error Handling', () => {
  it('should handle repository failure gracefully', async () => {
    const mockRepository = {
      save: jest.fn().mockRejectedValue(new Error('Connection failed'))
    };
    const mockLogger = {
      error: jest.fn()
    };
    const mockRetry = {
      attempt: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(false)
    };

    const service = new UserService(mockRepository, mockLogger, mockRetry);

    await expect(service.register(userData)).rejects.toThrow('Registration failed');

    // Verify error handling interactions
    expect(mockLogger.error).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
      'Repository save failed',
      expect.objectContaining({ error: expect.any(Error) })
    );
    expect(mockRetry.attempt).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(3);
  });
});

Example 3: Swarm Coordination Testing

describe('Swarm Test Coordination', () => {
  let swarmCoordinator: SwarmCoordinator;

  beforeAll(async () => {
    // Signal other swarm agents
    await swarmCoordinator.notifyTestStart('unit-tests');
  });

  afterAll(async () => {
    // Share test results with swarm
    await swarmCoordinator.shareResults(testResults);
  });

  it('should share mock contracts across swarm', () => {
    const sharedMocks = {
      userRepository: createSwarmMock('UserRepository', {
        save: jest.fn(),
        findByEmail: jest.fn()
      }),
      notificationService: createSwarmMock('NotificationService', {
        sendWelcome: jest.fn()
      })
    };

    // Other swarm agents can verify against these contracts
    swarmCoordinator.publishContracts(sharedMocks);
  });
});

Execution Checklist

  • Write failing acceptance test (outside)
  • Define mock contracts for all collaborators
  • Write failing unit test for next layer
  • Implement minimal code to pass test
  • Verify all mock interactions
  • Refactor while keeping tests green
  • Move to next inner layer
  • Share contracts with swarm if coordinating

Best Practices

Mock Management

  • Keep mocks simple and focused on single behavior
  • Verify interactions, not implementation details
  • Use jest.fn() for behavior verification
  • Avoid over-mocking internal details
  • Reset mocks between tests

Contract Design

  • Define clear interfaces through mock expectations
  • Focus on object responsibilities and collaborations
  • Use mocks to DRIVE design decisions
  • Keep contracts minimal and cohesive

Common Pitfalls

// BAD: Over-mocking internal details
const mock = {
  _internalState: {},
  _privateMethod: jest.fn()  // Don't mock private methods
};

// GOOD: Mock only public interface
const mock = {
  publicMethod: jest.fn().mockReturnValue(expectedResult)
};

// BAD: Verifying too many implementation details
expect(mock.method).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(3);  // Fragile

// GOOD: Verify essential behavior
expect(mock.method).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expectedArgs);

Error Handling

Missing Mock Verification

// Always verify mocks were called as expected
afterEach(() => {
  // Fail if any mock was called unexpectedly
  expect(unexpectedCallsDetected()).toBe(false);
});

// Use strict mocks
const strictMock = jest.fn().mockImplementation(() => {
  throw new Error('Unexpected call');
});

Mock Leakage Between Tests

// Always reset mocks
beforeEach(() => {
  jest.clearAllMocks();  // Clears call history
  // or
  jest.resetAllMocks();  // Also resets implementation
});

Metrics & Success Criteria

MetricTargetDescription
Interaction Coverage100%All collaborator calls verified
Mock Isolation100%No real dependencies in unit tests
Contract Consistency100%Mocks match real interfaces
Test Speed< 100msPer test (no I/O)

Integration Points

MCP Tools

// Store successful test patterns
  action: "store",
  namespace: "test-patterns",
  key: "order_processing_mocks",
  value: JSON.stringify(mockDefinitions)
});

// Share contracts across swarm
  action: "store",
  namespace: "test-contracts",
  key: "user_service_contract",
  value: JSON.stringify(userServiceContract)
});

Hooks

# Pre-test: Coordinate with swarm

# Post-test: Share results

Related Skills

References

Version History

  • 1.0.0 (2026-01-02): Initial release - converted from tdd-london-swarm agent

平台分布

Claude Code

27.23%
按下载量换算46

windsurf

20.23%
按下载量换算34

trae

18.53%
按下载量换算32

OpenCode

11.63%
按下载量换算20

Cursor

6.94%
按下载量换算12

Codex

3.79%
按下载量换算6

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

权限未标注

当前来源未能明确判断权限范围,默认进入异常复核队列。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills