Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · AI 工具

sparc-workflow(sparc 工作流程)

sparc-workflow 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

sparc-workflow 是AI 工具类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在AI 工具类的 2,536 个 Skill 里排第 1,797。

总安装 465周安装 19GitHub Stars 8下载 150核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:sparc-workflow(sparc 工作流程)
来源仓库:https://github.com/vamseeachanta/workspace-hub
仓库路径:skills/sparc-workflow
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/vamseeachanta/workspace-hub --skill sparc-workflow
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/vamseeachanta/workspace-hub --skill sparc-workflow

这个 Skill 是做什么的

AI 工具类 Skill 用来扩展助手本身的能力,例如接模型、接检索、接外部服务。

sparc-workflow 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理。

通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装,需结合原始 README 核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写操作。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/sparc-workflow

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/vamseeachanta/workspace-hub --skill sparc-work…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

sparc-workflow 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/vamseeachanta/workspace-hub --skill sparc-workflow。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

sparc-workflow 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

sparc-workflow 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

sparc-workflow 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

sparc-workflow 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 465 次,近一周安装 19 次,下载 150 次,GitHub 8 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

sparc-workflow 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理AI 工具类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

AI 工具类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
executing-plans

执行计划 · Codex、Claude

1,515,336173,110只读MIT通过
verification-before-completion

完成前的验证 · Codex、Claude

1,319,472173,121权限未标注MIT通过
subagent-driven-development

子 Agent 驱动开发 · Codex、Claude

1,312,416173,138只读MIT通过
copy-editing

复制编辑 · Codex、Claude

1,209,57625,632只读MIT通过
paywall-upgrade-cro

付费专区升级 cro · Codex、Claude

1,030,17625,617只读MIT通过
sparc-workflow

sparc 工作流程 · 本页

4658需要联网MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

SPARC Workflow Skill

Systematic software development through Specification, Pseudocode, Architecture, Refinement (TDD), and Completion phases.

Quick Start

# Run full SPARC development cycle

# Run TDD-focused workflow

# List available SPARC modes

When to Use

  • Implementing a new feature from scratch
  • Complex problem requiring structured analysis before coding
  • Building production-quality code with comprehensive tests
  • Refactoring existing code systematically
  • API or UI development requiring clear specifications

Prerequisites

  • Understanding of TDD (Test-Driven Development)
  • Project with .agent-os/ directory structure
  • Access to testing framework (pytest, jest, etc.)

Overview

SPARC is a systematic methodology for software development that ensures quality through structured phases. Each phase builds on the previous, creating well-documented, well-tested code.

SPARC Phases

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  S → P → A → R → C                                              │
│                                                                  │
│  Specification → Pseudocode → Architecture → Refinement → Done  │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Phase Overview

PhaseFocusOutput
SpecificationWhat to buildRequirements document
PseudocodeHow it worksAlgorithm design
ArchitectureHow it fitsSystem design
RefinementMake it workTested implementation
CompletionMake it rightProduction-ready code

Phase 1: Specification

Purpose

Define what needs to be built with clear, measurable requirements.

Process

  1. Gather requirements from user prompt
  2. Identify acceptance criteria
  3. Define scope (in-scope and out-of-scope)
  4. Document constraints and assumptions

Output Template

# Feature Specification

## Overview
[One paragraph describing the feature]

## Requirements

### Functional Requirements
1. FR-1: [Requirement]
2. FR-2: [Requirement]
3. FR-3: [Requirement]

### Non-Functional Requirements
1. NFR-1: Performance - [Requirement]
2. NFR-2: Security - [Requirement]
3. NFR-3: Usability - [Requirement]

## Scope

### In Scope
- [Item 1]
- [Item 2]

### Out of Scope
- [Item 1]
- [Item 2]

## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] AC-1: [Testable criterion]
- [ ] AC-2: [Testable criterion]
- [ ] AC-3: [Testable criterion]

## Constraints
- [Technical constraint]
- [Business constraint]

## Assumptions
- [Assumption 1]
- [Assumption 2]

Specification Checklist

  • All requirements are clear and unambiguous
  • Each requirement is testable
  • Scope is explicitly defined
  • Constraints are documented
  • User stories follow "As a... I want... So that..." format

Phase 2: Pseudocode

Purpose

Design the algorithm and logic before implementation.

Process

  1. Break down requirements into logical steps
  2. Write language-agnostic pseudocode
  3. Identify edge cases
  4. Design error handling

Pseudocode Guidelines

FUNCTION process_data(input_data):
    // Validate input
    IF input_data is empty:
        RAISE ValidationError("Input cannot be empty")

    // Initialize result
    result = EMPTY_LIST

    // Process each item
    FOR EACH item IN input_data:
        // Check conditions
        IF item.meets_criteria():
            processed_item = transform(item)
            APPEND processed_item TO result

    RETURN result

FUNCTION transform(item):
    // Apply transformation logic
    new_value = item.value * MULTIPLIER
    RETURN Item(new_value, item.metadata)

Pseudocode Best Practices

  1. Be explicit: Show all decision points
  2. Include error handling: Show how errors are managed
  3. Note complexity: O(n), O(n²), etc.
  4. Identify data structures: Lists, maps, trees
  5. Show edge cases: Empty input, single item, maximum size

Output Template

# Pseudocode Design

## Main Algorithm

\`\`\`
FUNCTION main_feature(params):
    [Algorithm steps]
\`\`\`

## Helper Functions

\`\`\`
FUNCTION helper_one(input):
    [Steps]

FUNCTION helper_two(input):
    [Steps]
\`\`\`

## Error Handling

\`\`\`
TRY:
    [Main logic]
CATCH ValidationError:
    [Handle validation]
CATCH ProcessingError:
    [Handle processing]
FINALLY:
    [Cleanup]
\`\`\`

## Edge Cases

| Case | Input | Expected Output |
|------|-------|-----------------|
| Empty | [] | [] |
| Single | [1] | [processed_1] |
| Maximum | [1..10000] | [processed_all] |

## Complexity Analysis

- Time: O(n)
- Space: O(n)

Phase 3: Architecture

Purpose

Design how the feature fits into the system architecture.

Process

  1. Identify affected components
  2. Design interfaces and contracts
  3. Plan data flow
  4. Consider dependencies

Architecture Considerations

## Component Design

### New Components
- ComponentA: [Purpose]
- ComponentB: [Purpose]

### Modified Components
- ExistingComponent: [Changes needed]

## Interface Design

\`\`\`python
class IProcessor(Protocol):
    def process(self, data: InputData) -> OutputData:
        """Process input and return output."""
        ...

    def validate(self, data: InputData) -> bool:
        """Validate input data."""
        ...
\`\`\`

## Data Flow

\`\`\`
Input → Validator → Processor → Transformer → Output
            ↓            ↓
         Logger       Cache
\`\`\`

## Dependencies

### Internal
- module_a (version ≥ 1.2.0)
- module_b

### External
- library_x (version 2.0.0)

## File Structure

\`\`\`
src/
└── feature_name/
    ├── __init__.py
    ├── processor.py      # Main processing logic
    ├── validator.py      # Input validation
    ├── transformer.py    # Data transformation
    └── models.py         # Data models
\`\`\`

Phase 4: Refinement (TDD)

Purpose

Implement the feature using Test-Driven Development.

TDD Cycle

┌──────────────┐
│   1. RED     │  Write failing test
└──────┬───────┘
       │
       ▼
┌──────────────┐
│   2. GREEN   │  Write minimal code to pass
└──────┬───────┘
       │
       ▼
┌──────────────┐
│  3. REFACTOR │  Improve code quality
└──────┬───────┘
       │
       └──────────► Repeat

TDD Process

  1. Write Test First def test_process_valid_input(): """Test processing with valid input.""" processor = Processor() result = processor.process([1, 2, 3]) assert result == [2, 4, 6]
  2. Run Test (Should Fail) pytest tests/test_processor.py -v # Expected: FAILED
  3. Write Minimal Implementation class Processor: def process(self, data): return [x * 2 for x in data]
  4. Run Test (Should Pass) pytest tests/test_processor.py -v # Expected: PASSED
  5. Refactor class Processor: def __init__(self, multiplier: int = 2): self.multiplier = multiplier def process(self, data: List[int]) -> List[int]: return [x * self.multiplier for x in data]

Test Categories

# Unit Tests
class TestProcessor:
    def test_process_valid_input(self):
        """Test with valid input."""
        ...

    def test_process_empty_input(self):
        """Test with empty input."""
        ...

    def test_process_invalid_input(self):
        """Test with invalid input raises error."""
        ...

# Integration Tests
class TestProcessorIntegration:
    def test_end_to_end_workflow(self):
        """Test complete workflow."""
        ...

# Performance Tests
class TestProcessorPerformance:
    def test_large_dataset_performance(self):
        """Test performance with large dataset."""
        ...

Phase 5: Completion

Purpose

Finalize for production: documentation, cleanup, and verification.

Completion Checklist

## Code Quality
- [ ] All tests passing
- [ ] Test coverage ≥ 80%
- [ ] No linting errors
- [ ] Type hints complete
- [ ] Docstrings complete

## Documentation
- [ ] README updated
- [ ] API documentation
- [ ] Usage examples
- [ ] Changelog entry

## Security
- [ ] Input validation
- [ ] Error messages safe
- [ ] No hardcoded secrets
- [ ] Dependencies audited

## Performance
- [ ] Benchmarks run
- [ ] Memory usage checked
- [ ] No N+1 queries
- [ ] Caching implemented (if needed)

## Deployment
- [ ] Configuration documented
- [ ] Migration scripts (if needed)
- [ ] Rollback plan
- [ ] Monitoring in place

Using SPARC with Claude Flow

Start SPARC Workflow

Available Modes

ModeFocus
devFull development cycle
apiAPI development
uiUI development
testTesting focus
refactorCode improvement

TDD Mode

SPARC File Locations

.agent-os/
├── specs/
│   └── feature-name/
│       ├── spec.md              # Specification
│       ├── tasks.md             # Task breakdown
│       └── sub-specs/
│           ├── pseudocode.md    # Pseudocode
│           ├── architecture.md  # Architecture
│           ├── tests.md         # Test spec
│           └── api-spec.md      # API spec (if applicable)
└── product/
    └── decisions.md             # Decision log

Execution Checklist

  • Requirements gathered and documented in spec.md
  • Pseudocode designed with edge cases identified
  • Architecture defined with clear interfaces
  • Tests written BEFORE implementation (TDD)
  • Implementation passes all tests
  • Code refactored for quality
  • Documentation complete
  • Code review completed
  • Deployed to staging/production

Integration with Agent OS

Creating a Spec

# Use the create-spec workflow
# Reference: @~/.agent-os/instructions/create-spec.md

Executing Tasks

# Use the execute-tasks workflow
# Reference: @~/.agent-os/instructions/execute-tasks.md

Error Handling

Specification Phase Issues

  • Unclear requirements: Ask clarifying questions before proceeding
  • Scope creep: Document out-of-scope items explicitly
  • Missing acceptance criteria: Derive from requirements

TDD Phase Issues

  • Tests too complex: Break into smaller units
  • Flaky tests: Isolate external dependencies with mocks
  • Low coverage: Add edge case tests

Completion Phase Issues

  • Documentation gaps: Review against checklist
  • Performance issues: Profile and optimize hot paths
  • Security concerns: Run security audit tools

Metrics & Success Criteria

  • Test Coverage: >= 80% for all new code
  • Code Quality: Zero linting errors, all type hints present
  • Documentation: 100% of public APIs documented
  • Performance: Meets defined NFR benchmarks
  • TDD Adherence: Tests written before implementation

Best Practices

Specification

  1. Write requirements from user perspective
  2. Make every requirement testable
  3. Explicitly define boundaries
  4. Get stakeholder approval

Pseudocode

  1. Stay language-agnostic
  2. Show all decision branches
  3. Include error paths
  4. Note time/space complexity

Architecture

  1. Keep components loosely coupled
  2. Design for testability
  3. Plan for scalability
  4. Document dependencies

Refinement

  1. One test per behavior
  2. Test edge cases first
  3. Keep tests isolated
  4. Maintain fast test suite

Completion

  1. Review all checklist items
  2. Run full test suite
  3. Update documentation
  4. Plan deployment

Integration Points

MCP Tools

// Start SPARC mode
    mode: "dev",
    task_description: "Implement user authentication"
})

// Orchestrate tasks
    task: "Complete SPARC refinement phase",
    strategy: "sequential",
    priority: "high"
})

Related Skills

References


Version History

  • 1.1.0 (2026-01-02): Upgraded to SKILL_TEMPLATE_v2 format - added Quick Start, When to Use, Execution Checklist, Error Handling, Metrics, Integration Points, MCP hooks
  • 1.0.0 (2024-10-15): Initial release with 5 SPARC phases, TDD integration, Claude Flow support, Agent OS integration

平台分布

Claude Code

30.61%
按下载量换算46

windsurf

25.01%
按下载量换算38

trae

17.23%
按下载量换算26

OpenCode

11.47%
按下载量换算17

Cursor

8.38%
按下载量换算13

Codex

3.52%
按下载量换算5

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills