Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
AI 工具需要联网github未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

sparc-workflowsparc 工作流程

Agent Skill

sparc-workflow 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

465

周安装

19

GitHub Stars

8

下载量

150
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:sparc-workflow(sparc 工作流程)
来源仓库:https://github.com/vamseeachanta/workspace-hub
仓库路径:skills/sparc-workflow
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/vamseeachanta/workspace-hub --skill sparc-workflow
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/vamseeachanta/workspace-hub --skill sparc-workflow

简介

sparc-workflow 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息。

  • 适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装,需结合原始 README 核验具体用法。
  • 安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写操作。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

SPARC Workflow Skill

Systematic software development through Specification, Pseudocode, Architecture, Refinement (TDD), and Completion phases.

Quick Start

# Run full SPARC development cycle

# Run TDD-focused workflow

# List available SPARC modes

When to Use

  • Implementing a new feature from scratch
  • Complex problem requiring structured analysis before coding
  • Building production-quality code with comprehensive tests
  • Refactoring existing code systematically
  • API or UI development requiring clear specifications

Prerequisites

  • Understanding of TDD (Test-Driven Development)
  • Project with .agent-os/ directory structure
  • Access to testing framework (pytest, jest, etc.)

Overview

SPARC is a systematic methodology for software development that ensures quality through structured phases. Each phase builds on the previous, creating well-documented, well-tested code.

SPARC Phases

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  S → P → A → R → C                                              │
│                                                                  │
│  Specification → Pseudocode → Architecture → Refinement → Done  │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Phase Overview

PhaseFocusOutput
SpecificationWhat to buildRequirements document
PseudocodeHow it worksAlgorithm design
ArchitectureHow it fitsSystem design
RefinementMake it workTested implementation
CompletionMake it rightProduction-ready code

Phase 1: Specification

Purpose

Define what needs to be built with clear, measurable requirements.

Process

  1. Gather requirements from user prompt
  2. Identify acceptance criteria
  3. Define scope (in-scope and out-of-scope)
  4. Document constraints and assumptions

Output Template

# Feature Specification

## Overview
[One paragraph describing the feature]

## Requirements

### Functional Requirements
1. FR-1: [Requirement]
2. FR-2: [Requirement]
3. FR-3: [Requirement]

### Non-Functional Requirements
1. NFR-1: Performance - [Requirement]
2. NFR-2: Security - [Requirement]
3. NFR-3: Usability - [Requirement]

## Scope

### In Scope
- [Item 1]
- [Item 2]

### Out of Scope
- [Item 1]
- [Item 2]

## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] AC-1: [Testable criterion]
- [ ] AC-2: [Testable criterion]
- [ ] AC-3: [Testable criterion]

## Constraints
- [Technical constraint]
- [Business constraint]

## Assumptions
- [Assumption 1]
- [Assumption 2]

Specification Checklist

  • All requirements are clear and unambiguous
  • Each requirement is testable
  • Scope is explicitly defined
  • Constraints are documented
  • User stories follow "As a... I want... So that..." format

Phase 2: Pseudocode

Purpose

Design the algorithm and logic before implementation.

Process

  1. Break down requirements into logical steps
  2. Write language-agnostic pseudocode
  3. Identify edge cases
  4. Design error handling

Pseudocode Guidelines

FUNCTION process_data(input_data):
    // Validate input
    IF input_data is empty:
        RAISE ValidationError("Input cannot be empty")

    // Initialize result
    result = EMPTY_LIST

    // Process each item
    FOR EACH item IN input_data:
        // Check conditions
        IF item.meets_criteria():
            processed_item = transform(item)
            APPEND processed_item TO result

    RETURN result

FUNCTION transform(item):
    // Apply transformation logic
    new_value = item.value * MULTIPLIER
    RETURN Item(new_value, item.metadata)

Pseudocode Best Practices

  1. Be explicit: Show all decision points
  2. Include error handling: Show how errors are managed
  3. Note complexity: O(n), O(n²), etc.
  4. Identify data structures: Lists, maps, trees
  5. Show edge cases: Empty input, single item, maximum size

Output Template

# Pseudocode Design

## Main Algorithm

\`\`\`
FUNCTION main_feature(params):
    [Algorithm steps]
\`\`\`

## Helper Functions

\`\`\`
FUNCTION helper_one(input):
    [Steps]

FUNCTION helper_two(input):
    [Steps]
\`\`\`

## Error Handling

\`\`\`
TRY:
    [Main logic]
CATCH ValidationError:
    [Handle validation]
CATCH ProcessingError:
    [Handle processing]
FINALLY:
    [Cleanup]
\`\`\`

## Edge Cases

| Case | Input | Expected Output |
|------|-------|-----------------|
| Empty | [] | [] |
| Single | [1] | [processed_1] |
| Maximum | [1..10000] | [processed_all] |

## Complexity Analysis

- Time: O(n)
- Space: O(n)

Phase 3: Architecture

Purpose

Design how the feature fits into the system architecture.

Process

  1. Identify affected components
  2. Design interfaces and contracts
  3. Plan data flow
  4. Consider dependencies

Architecture Considerations

## Component Design

### New Components
- ComponentA: [Purpose]
- ComponentB: [Purpose]

### Modified Components
- ExistingComponent: [Changes needed]

## Interface Design

\`\`\`python
class IProcessor(Protocol):
    def process(self, data: InputData) -> OutputData:
        """Process input and return output."""
        ...

    def validate(self, data: InputData) -> bool:
        """Validate input data."""
        ...
\`\`\`

## Data Flow

\`\`\`
Input → Validator → Processor → Transformer → Output
            ↓            ↓
         Logger       Cache
\`\`\`

## Dependencies

### Internal
- module_a (version ≥ 1.2.0)
- module_b

### External
- library_x (version 2.0.0)

## File Structure

\`\`\`
src/
└── feature_name/
    ├── __init__.py
    ├── processor.py      # Main processing logic
    ├── validator.py      # Input validation
    ├── transformer.py    # Data transformation
    └── models.py         # Data models
\`\`\`

Phase 4: Refinement (TDD)

Purpose

Implement the feature using Test-Driven Development.

TDD Cycle

┌──────────────┐
│   1. RED     │  Write failing test
└──────┬───────┘
       │
       ▼
┌──────────────┐
│   2. GREEN   │  Write minimal code to pass
└──────┬───────┘
       │
       ▼
┌──────────────┐
│  3. REFACTOR │  Improve code quality
└──────┬───────┘
       │
       └──────────► Repeat

TDD Process

  1. Write Test First def test_process_valid_input(): """Test processing with valid input.""" processor = Processor() result = processor.process([1, 2, 3]) assert result == [2, 4, 6]
  2. Run Test (Should Fail) pytest tests/test_processor.py -v # Expected: FAILED
  3. Write Minimal Implementation class Processor: def process(self, data): return [x * 2 for x in data]
  4. Run Test (Should Pass) pytest tests/test_processor.py -v # Expected: PASSED
  5. Refactor class Processor: def __init__(self, multiplier: int = 2): self.multiplier = multiplier def process(self, data: List[int]) -> List[int]: return [x * self.multiplier for x in data]

Test Categories

# Unit Tests
class TestProcessor:
    def test_process_valid_input(self):
        """Test with valid input."""
        ...

    def test_process_empty_input(self):
        """Test with empty input."""
        ...

    def test_process_invalid_input(self):
        """Test with invalid input raises error."""
        ...

# Integration Tests
class TestProcessorIntegration:
    def test_end_to_end_workflow(self):
        """Test complete workflow."""
        ...

# Performance Tests
class TestProcessorPerformance:
    def test_large_dataset_performance(self):
        """Test performance with large dataset."""
        ...

Phase 5: Completion

Purpose

Finalize for production: documentation, cleanup, and verification.

Completion Checklist

## Code Quality
- [ ] All tests passing
- [ ] Test coverage ≥ 80%
- [ ] No linting errors
- [ ] Type hints complete
- [ ] Docstrings complete

## Documentation
- [ ] README updated
- [ ] API documentation
- [ ] Usage examples
- [ ] Changelog entry

## Security
- [ ] Input validation
- [ ] Error messages safe
- [ ] No hardcoded secrets
- [ ] Dependencies audited

## Performance
- [ ] Benchmarks run
- [ ] Memory usage checked
- [ ] No N+1 queries
- [ ] Caching implemented (if needed)

## Deployment
- [ ] Configuration documented
- [ ] Migration scripts (if needed)
- [ ] Rollback plan
- [ ] Monitoring in place

Using SPARC with Claude Flow

Start SPARC Workflow

Available Modes

ModeFocus
devFull development cycle
apiAPI development
uiUI development
testTesting focus
refactorCode improvement

TDD Mode

SPARC File Locations

.agent-os/
├── specs/
│   └── feature-name/
│       ├── spec.md              # Specification
│       ├── tasks.md             # Task breakdown
│       └── sub-specs/
│           ├── pseudocode.md    # Pseudocode
│           ├── architecture.md  # Architecture
│           ├── tests.md         # Test spec
│           └── api-spec.md      # API spec (if applicable)
└── product/
    └── decisions.md             # Decision log

Execution Checklist

  • Requirements gathered and documented in spec.md
  • Pseudocode designed with edge cases identified
  • Architecture defined with clear interfaces
  • Tests written BEFORE implementation (TDD)
  • Implementation passes all tests
  • Code refactored for quality
  • Documentation complete
  • Code review completed
  • Deployed to staging/production

Integration with Agent OS

Creating a Spec

# Use the create-spec workflow
# Reference: @~/.agent-os/instructions/create-spec.md

Executing Tasks

# Use the execute-tasks workflow
# Reference: @~/.agent-os/instructions/execute-tasks.md

Error Handling

Specification Phase Issues

  • Unclear requirements: Ask clarifying questions before proceeding
  • Scope creep: Document out-of-scope items explicitly
  • Missing acceptance criteria: Derive from requirements

TDD Phase Issues

  • Tests too complex: Break into smaller units
  • Flaky tests: Isolate external dependencies with mocks
  • Low coverage: Add edge case tests

Completion Phase Issues

  • Documentation gaps: Review against checklist
  • Performance issues: Profile and optimize hot paths
  • Security concerns: Run security audit tools

Metrics & Success Criteria

  • Test Coverage: >= 80% for all new code
  • Code Quality: Zero linting errors, all type hints present
  • Documentation: 100% of public APIs documented
  • Performance: Meets defined NFR benchmarks
  • TDD Adherence: Tests written before implementation

Best Practices

Specification

  1. Write requirements from user perspective
  2. Make every requirement testable
  3. Explicitly define boundaries
  4. Get stakeholder approval

Pseudocode

  1. Stay language-agnostic
  2. Show all decision branches
  3. Include error paths
  4. Note time/space complexity

Architecture

  1. Keep components loosely coupled
  2. Design for testability
  3. Plan for scalability
  4. Document dependencies

Refinement

  1. One test per behavior
  2. Test edge cases first
  3. Keep tests isolated
  4. Maintain fast test suite

Completion

  1. Review all checklist items
  2. Run full test suite
  3. Update documentation
  4. Plan deployment

Integration Points

MCP Tools

// Start SPARC mode
    mode: "dev",
    task_description: "Implement user authentication"
})

// Orchestrate tasks
    task: "Complete SPARC refinement phase",
    strategy: "sequential",
    priority: "high"
})

Related Skills

References


Version History

  • 1.1.0 (2026-01-02): Upgraded to SKILL_TEMPLATE_v2 format - added Quick Start, When to Use, Execution Checklist, Error Handling, Metrics, Integration Points, MCP hooks
  • 1.0.0 (2024-10-15): Initial release with 5 SPARC phases, TDD integration, Claude Flow support, Agent OS integration

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

30.61%
按下载量换算46

windsurf

25.01%
按下载量换算38

trae

17.23%
按下载量换算26

OpenCode

11.47%
按下载量换算17

Cursor

8.38%
按下载量换算13

Codex

3.52%
按下载量换算5

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills