Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

solo-build(单独构建)

solo-build 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

solo-build 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,674 个 Skill 里排第 6,082。

总安装 23,354周安装 954GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 7,479核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
2.2.1

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:solo-build(单独构建)
来源仓库:https://github.com/fortunto2/solo-build
安装命令:
openclaw skills install solo-build
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install solo-build

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

基于 TDD 工作流程实施计划任务并自动提交阶段成果。适用于代码构建、测试执行与门禁检查等自动化流水线场景。按预设门径控制发布节奏,减少人为干预偏差。solo-build 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。需提前配置 Git 凭证与环境变量保证执行连续性。

中断后可从断点继续,但依赖外部服务可用性。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install solo-build;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

solo-build 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install solo-build。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

solo-build 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

solo-build 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

solo-build 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

solo-build 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 23,354 次,近一周安装 954 次,下载 7,479 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

solo-build 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
solo-build

单独构建 · 本页

23,354—调用外部服务MIT-0有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
solo-build
description
Execute implementation plan tasks with TDD workflow, auto-commit, and phase gates. Use when user says "build it", "start building", "execute plan", "implement tasks", "ship it", or references a track ID. Do NOT use for planning (use /plan) or scaffolding (use /scaffold).
license
MIT
metadata
author
fortunto2
version
2.2.1
openclaw
emoji
🔨
allowed-tools
Read, Grep, Bash, Glob, Write, Edit, AskUserQuestion, mcp__solograph__session_search, mcp__solograph__project_code_search, mcp__solograph__codegraph_query, mcp__solograph__web_search, mcp__context7__resolve-library-id, mcp__context7__query-docs
argument-hint
[track-id] [--task X.Y] [--phase N]

/build

This skill is self-contained — follow the task loop, TDD rules, and completion flow below instead of delegating to external build/execution skills (superpowers, etc.).

Execute tasks from an implementation plan. Finds plan.md (in docs/plan/), picks the next unchecked task, implements it with TDD workflow, commits, and updates progress.

When to use

After /plan has created a track with spec.md + plan.md. This is the execution engine.

Pipeline: /plan → /build → /deploy → /review

MCP Tools (use if available)

  • session_search(query) — find how similar problems were solved before
  • project_code_search(query, project) — find reusable code across projects
  • codegraph_query(query) — check file dependencies, imports, callers

If MCP tools are not available, fall back to Glob + Grep + Read.

Pre-flight Checks

  1. Detect context — find where plan files live:

- Check docs/plan/*/plan.md — standard location - Use whichever exists. - DO NOT search for conductor/ or any other directory — only docs/plan/.

  1. Load workflow config from docs/workflow.md (if exists):

- TDD strictness (strict / moderate / none) - Commit strategy (conventional commits format) - Verification checkpoint rules - Integration Testing section — if present, run the specified CLI commands after completing tasks that touch the listed paths If docs/workflow.md missing: use defaults (moderate TDD, conventional commits).

  1. Verify git hooks are installed:

Read the stack YAML (templates/stacks/{stack}.yaml) — the pre_commit field tells you which system and what it runs: - husky + lint-staged → JS/TS stacks (eslint + prettier + tsc) - pre-commit → Python stacks (ruff + ruff-format + ty) - lefthook → mobile stacks (swiftlint/detekt + formatter)

Then verify the hook system is active:

   # husky
   [ -f .husky/pre-commit ] && git config core.hooksPath | grep -q husky && echo "OK" || echo "NOT ACTIVE"
   # pre-commit (Python)
   [ -f .pre-commit-config.yaml ] && [ -f .git/hooks/pre-commit ] && echo "OK" || echo "NOT ACTIVE"
   # lefthook
   [ -f lefthook.yml ] && lefthook version >/dev/null 2>&1 && echo "OK" || echo "NOT ACTIVE"

If not active — install before first commit: - husky: pnpm prepare (or npm run prepare) - pre-commit: uv run pre-commit install - lefthook: lefthook install

Don't use --no-verify on commits — if hooks fail, fix the issue and commit again.

Track Selection

If $ARGUMENTS contains a track ID:

  • Validate: {plan_root}/{argument}/plan.md exists (check docs/plan/).
  • If not found: search docs/plan/*/plan.md for partial matches, suggest corrections.

If $ARGUMENTS contains --task X.Y:

  • Jump directly to that task in the active track.

If no argument:

  1. Search for plan.md files in docs/plan/.
  2. Read each plan.md, find tracks with uncompleted tasks.
  3. If multiple, ask via AskUserQuestion.
  4. If zero tracks: "No plans found. Run /plan first."

Context Loading

Step 1 — Architecture overview (if MCP available)

codegraph_explain(project="{project name}")

Returns: stack, languages, directory layers, key patterns, top dependencies, hub files — one call instead of exploring the tree manually.

Step 2 — Essential docs (parallel reads)

  1. docs/plan/{trackId}/plan.md — task list (REQUIRED)
  2. docs/plan/{trackId}/spec.md — acceptance criteria (REQUIRED)
  3. docs/workflow.md — TDD policy, commit strategy (if exists)
  4. CLAUDE.md — architecture, Do/Don't
  5. .solo/pipelines/progress.md — running docs from previous iterations (if exists, pipeline-specific). Contains what was done in prior pipeline sessions: stages completed, commit SHAs, last output lines. Use this to avoid repeating completed work.

Do NOT read source code files at this stage. Only docs. Source files are loaded per-task in the execution loop (step 3 below).

Resumption

If a task is marked [~] in plan.md:

Resuming: {track title}
Last task: Task {X.Y}: {description} [in progress]

1. Continue from where we left off
2. Restart current task
3. Show progress summary first

Ask via AskUserQuestion, then proceed.

Task Execution Loop

Makefile convention: If Makefile exists in project root, always prefer make targets over raw commands. Use make test instead of pnpm test, make lint instead of pnpm lint, make build instead of pnpm build, etc. Run make help (or read Makefile) to discover available targets. If a make integration or similar target exists, use it for integration testing after pipeline-related tasks.

IMPORTANT — All-done check: Before entering the loop, scan plan.md for ANY - [ ] or - [~] tasks. If ALL tasks are [x] — skip the loop entirely and jump to Completion section below to run final verification and output <solo:done/>.

For each incomplete task in plan.md (marked [ ]), in order:

1. Find Next Task

Parse plan.md for first line matching - [ ] Task X.Y: (or - [~] Task X.Y: if resuming).

2. Start Task

  • Update plan.md: [ ] → [~] for current task.
  • Announce: "Starting Task X.Y: {description}"

3. Research (smart, before coding)

Do NOT grep the entire project or read all source files. Load only what this specific task needs.

If MCP available (preferred):

  1. project_code_search(query="{task keywords}", project="{name}") — find relevant code in the project. Read only the top 2-3 results.
  2. session_search("{task keywords}") — check if you solved this before.
  3. codegraph_query("MATCH (f:File {project: '{name}'})-[:IMPORTS]->(dep) WHERE f.path CONTAINS '{module}' RETURN dep.path") — check imports/dependencies of files you'll modify.

If MCP unavailable (fallback):

  1. Read ONLY the files explicitly mentioned in the task description (file paths).
  2. Glob for the specific module directory the task targets (e.g., src/auth/**/*.ts), not the entire project.
  3. If the task doesn't mention files, use Grep with a narrow pattern on src/ or app/ — never **/*.

Never do: Grep "keyword" . across the whole project. This dumps hundreds of lines into context for no reason. Be surgical.

Python-Specific Quality Tools

When the project uses a Python stack (detected by pyproject.toml or stack YAML), run the full Astral toolchain:

  1. Ruff — linting + formatting (always):
   uv run ruff check --fix .
   uv run ruff format .
  1. ty — type-checking (if ty in dev dependencies or stack YAML):
   uv run ty check .

ty is Astral's type-checker (extremely fast, replaces mypy/pyright). Fix type errors before committing.

  1. Hypothesis — property-based testing (if hypothesis in dependencies):

- Use @given(st.from_type(MyModel)) to auto-generate Pydantic model inputs. - Use @given(st.text(), st.integers()) for edge-case coverage on parsers/validators. - Hypothesis tests go in the same test files alongside regular pytest tests.

  1. Pre-commit — run all hooks before committing:
   uv run pre-commit run --all-files

Run these checks after each task implementation, before git commit. If any fail, fix before proceeding.

JS/TS-Specific Quality Tools

When the project uses a JS/TS stack (detected by package.json or stack YAML):

  1. ESLint — linting (always):
   pnpm lint --fix
  1. Prettier — formatting (always):
   pnpm format
  1. tsc --noEmit — type-checking (strict mode):
   pnpm tsc --noEmit

Fix type errors before committing. Strict mode should be on in tsconfig.json.

  1. Knip — dead code detection (if in devDependencies, run periodically):
   pnpm knip

Finds unused files, exports, and dependencies. Run after significant refactors.

  1. Pre-commit — husky + lint-staged runs ESLint + Prettier + tsc on staged files.

iOS/Android-Specific Quality Tools

When the project uses a mobile stack:

iOS (Swift):

swiftlint lint --strict
swift-format format --in-place --recursive Sources/

Android (Kotlin):

./gradlew detekt
./gradlew ktlintCheck

Both use lefthook for pre-commit hooks (language-agnostic, no Node.js required).

4. TDD Workflow (if TDD enabled in workflow.md)

Red — write failing test:

  • Create/update test file for the task functionality.
  • Run tests to confirm they fail.

Green — implement:

  • Write minimum code to make the test pass.
  • Run tests to confirm pass.

Refactor:

  • Clean up while tests stay green.
  • Run tests one final time.

5. Non-TDD Workflow (if TDD is "none" or "moderate" and task is simple)

  • Implement the task directly.
  • Run existing tests to check nothing broke.
  • For "moderate": write tests for business logic and API routes, skip for UI/config.

5.5. Integration Testing (CLI-First)

If the task touches core business logic (pipeline, algorithms, agent tools), run make integration (or the integration command from docs/workflow.md). The CLI exercises the same code paths as the UI without requiring a browser. If make integration fails, fix before committing.

5.6. Visual Verification (if browser/simulator/emulator available)

After implementation, run a quick visual smoke test if tools are available:

Web projects (Playwright MCP or browser tools): If you have Playwright MCP tools or browser tools available:

  1. Start the dev server if not already running (check stack YAML for dev_server.command)
  2. Navigate to the page affected by the current task
  3. Check the browser console for errors (hydration mismatches, uncaught exceptions, 404s)
  4. Take a screenshot to verify the visual output matches expectations
  5. If the task affects responsive layout, resize to mobile viewport (375px) and check

iOS projects (simulator): If instructed to use iOS Simulator in the pipeline prompt:

  1. Build for simulator: xcodebuild -scheme {Name} -sdk iphonesimulator build
  2. Install on booted simulator: xcrun simctl install booted {app-path}
  3. Launch and take screenshot: xcrun simctl io booted screenshot /tmp/sim-screenshot.png
  4. Check simulator logs: xcrun simctl spawn booted log stream --style compact --timeout 10

Android projects (emulator): If instructed to use Android Emulator in the pipeline prompt:

  1. Build debug APK: ./gradlew assembleDebug
  2. Install: adb install -r app/build/outputs/apk/debug/app-debug.apk
  3. Take screenshot: adb exec-out screencap -p > /tmp/emu-screenshot.png
  4. Check logcat: adb logcat '*:E' --format=time -d 2>&1 | tail -20

Graceful degradation: If browser/simulator/emulator tools are not available or fail — skip visual checks entirely. Visual testing is a bonus, never a blocker. Log that it was skipped and continue with the task.

6. Complete Task

Commit (following commit strategy):

git add {specific files changed}
git commit -m "<type>(<scope>): <description>"

Types: feat, fix, refactor, test, docs, chore, perf, style

Capture SHA after commit:

git rev-parse --short HEAD

SHA annotation in plan.md. After every task commit:

  1. Mark task done: [~] → [x]
  2. Append commit SHA inline: - [x] Task X.Y: description <!-- sha:abc1234 -->

Without a SHA, there's no traceability and no revert capability. If a task required multiple commits, record the last one.

7. Phase Completion Check

After each task, check if all tasks in current phase are [x].

If phase complete:

  1. SHA audit — scan all [x] tasks in this phase. If any are missing <!-- sha:... -->, capture their SHA now from git log and add it. Every [x] task MUST have a SHA.
  2. Run verification steps listed under ### Verification for the phase.
  3. Run full test suite.
  4. Run linter.
  5. Mark verification checkboxes in plan.md: - [ ] → - [x].
  6. Commit plan.md progress: git commit -m "chore(plan): complete phase {N}".
  7. Capture checkpoint SHA and append to phase heading in plan.md:

## Phase N: Title <!-- checkpoint:abc1234 -->.

  1. Report results and continue:
Phase {N} complete! <!-- checkpoint:abc1234 -->

  Tasks:  {M}/{M}
  Tests:  {pass/fail}
  Linter: {pass/fail}
  Verification:
    - [x] {check 1}
    - [x] {check 2}

  Revert this phase: git revert abc1234..HEAD

Proceed to the next phase automatically. No approval needed.

Error Handling

Test Failure

Tests failing after Task X.Y:
  {failure details}

1. Attempt to fix
2. Rollback task changes (git checkout)
3. Pause for manual intervention

Ask via AskUserQuestion. Do NOT automatically continue past failures.

Track Completion

When all phases and tasks are [x]:

1. Final Verification

  • Run local build — must pass before deploy:

- Next.js: pnpm build - Python: uv build or uv run python -m py_compile src/**/*.py - Astro: pnpm build - Cloudflare: pnpm build - iOS: xcodebuild -scheme {Name} -sdk iphonesimulator build - Android: ./gradlew assembleDebug

  • Run full test suite.
  • Run linter + type-checker.
  • Visual smoke test (if tools available):

- Web: start dev server, navigate to main page, check console for errors, take screenshot - iOS: build + install on simulator, launch, take screenshot, check logs - Android: build APK + install on emulator, launch, take screenshot, check logcat - Skip if tools unavailable — not a blocker for completion

  • Check acceptance criteria from spec.md.

2. Update plan.md header

Change **Status:** [ ] Not Started → **Status:** [x] Complete at the top of plan.md.

3. Signal completion

Output pipeline signal ONLY if pipeline state directory (.solo/states/) exists:

<solo:done/>

Do NOT repeat the signal tag elsewhere in the response. One occurrence only.

4. Summary

Track complete: {title} ({trackId})

  Phases: {N}/{N}
  Tasks:  {M}/{M}
  Tests:  All passing

  Phase checkpoints:
    Phase 1: abc1234
    Phase 2: def5678
    Phase 3: ghi9012

  Revert entire track: git revert abc1234..HEAD

Next:
  /build {next-track-id}  — continue with next track
  /plan "next feature"    — plan something new

Reverting Work

SHA comments in plan.md enable surgical reverts:

Revert a single task:

# Find SHA from plan.md: - [x] Task 2.3: ... <!-- sha:abc1234 -->
git revert abc1234

Then update plan.md: [x] → [ ] for that task.

Revert an entire phase:

# Find checkpoint from phase heading: ## Phase 2: ... <!-- checkpoint:def5678 -->
# Find previous checkpoint: ## Phase 1: ... <!-- checkpoint:abc1234 -->
git revert abc1234..def5678

Then update plan.md: all tasks in that phase [x] → [ ].

Never use git reset --hard — always git revert to preserve history.

Progress Tracking (TodoWrite)

At the start of a build session, create a task list from plan.md so progress is visible:

  1. On session start: Read plan.md, find all incomplete tasks ([ ] and [~]).
  2. Create TaskCreate for each phase with its tasks as description.
  3. TaskUpdate as you work: in_progress when starting a task, completed when done.
  4. This gives the user (and pipeline) real-time visibility into progress.

Rationalizations Catalog

These thoughts mean STOP — you're about to cut corners:

ThoughtReality
"This is too simple to test"Simple code breaks too. Write the test.
"I'll add tests later"Tests written after pass immediately — they prove nothing.
"I already tested it manually"Manual tests don't persist. Automated tests do.
"The test framework isn't set up"Set it up. That's part of the task.
"This is just a config change"Config changes break builds. Verify.
"I'm confident this works"Confidence without evidence is guessing. Run the command.
"Let me just try changing X"Stop. Investigate root cause first.
"Tests are passing, ship it"Tests passing ≠ acceptance criteria met. Check spec.md.
"I'll fix the lint later"Fix it now. Tech debt compounds.
"It works on my machine"Run the build. Verify in the actual environment.

Critical Rules

  1. Run phase checkpoints — verify tests + linter pass before moving to next phase.
  2. STOP on failure — do not continue past test failures or errors.
  3. Keep plan.md updated — task status must reflect actual progress at all times.
  4. Commit after each task — atomic commits with conventional format.
  5. Research before coding — 30 seconds of search saves 30 minutes of reimplementation.
  6. One task at a time — finish current task before starting next.
  7. Keep test output concise — when running tests, pipe through head -50 or use --reporter=dot / -q flag. Thousands of test lines pollute context. Only show failures in detail.
  8. Verify before claiming done — run the actual command, read the full output, confirm success BEFORE marking a task complete. Never say "should work now".

Common Issues

"No plans found"

Cause: No plan.md exists in docs/plan/. Fix: Run /plan "your feature" first to create a track.

Tests failing after task

Cause: Implementation broke existing functionality. Fix: Use the error handling flow — attempt fix, rollback if needed, pause for user input. Never skip failing tests.

Phase checkpoint failed

Cause: Tests or linter failed at phase boundary. Fix: Fix failures before proceeding. Re-run verification for that phase.

平台分布

OpenClaw

90.17%
按下载量换算6,744

安全审计

VirusTotal

可疑

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

未展示

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills