Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

solo-build(单独构建)

solo-build 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

solo-build 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为执行命令;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 46,860。

总安装 759周安装 31GitHub Stars 15下载 246核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:solo-build(单独构建)
来源仓库:https://github.com/fortunto2/solo-factory
仓库路径:skills/solo-build
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/fortunto2/solo-factory --skill solo-build
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/fortunto2/solo-factory --skill solo-build

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

solo-build 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中快速定位候选结果。适用于构建流程相关的信息检索与筛选需求。可通过 GitHub 仓库和 README 文档了解具体实现方式。安装前应确认权限、维护状态及是否涉及网络或文件操作。

建议结合项目构建环境测试其兼容性。

来源仓库内路径:skills/solo-build

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/fortunto2/solo-factory --skill solo-build;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要执行命令,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

solo-build 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/fortunto2/solo-factory --skill solo-build。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

solo-build 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

solo-build 需要什么权限?

权限级别是执行命令。安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 npx skills add https://github.com/fortunto2/solo-factory --skill solo-build 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

solo-build 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

solo-build 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 759 次,近一周安装 31 次,下载 246 次,GitHub 15 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

solo-build 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要执行命令,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 不能接受 Skill 在你机器上执行命令的人。
  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
solo-build

单独构建 · 本页

75915执行命令未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

/build

This skill is self-contained — follow the task loop, TDD rules, and completion flow below instead of delegating to external build/execution skills (superpowers, etc.).

Execute tasks from an implementation plan. Finds plan.md (in docs/plan/), picks the next unchecked task, implements it with TDD workflow, commits, and updates progress.

Live Context

  • Branch:!git branch --show-current 2>/dev/null
  • Status:!git status --short 2>/dev/null | head -10
  • Last commit:!git log --oneline -3 2>/dev/null

When to use

After /plan has created a track with spec.md + plan.md. This is the execution engine.

Pipeline: /plan → /build → /deploy → /review

MCP Tools (use if available)

  • session_search(query) — find how similar problems were solved before
  • project_code_search(query, project) — find reusable code across projects
  • codegraph_query(query) — check file dependencies, imports, callers

If MCP tools are not available, fall back to Glob + Grep + Read.

Pre-flight Checks

  1. Detect context — find where plan files live:

- Check docs/plan/*/plan.md — standard location - Use whichever exists. - DO NOT search for conductor/ or any other directory — only docs/plan/.

  1. Load workflow config from docs/workflow.md (if exists):

- TDD strictness (strict / moderate / none) - Commit strategy (conventional commits format) - Verification checkpoint rules - Integration Testing section — if present, run the specified CLI commands after completing tasks that touch the listed paths If docs/workflow.md missing: use defaults (moderate TDD, conventional commits).

  1. Verify git hooks are installed: Read the stack YAML (templates/stacks/{stack}.yaml) — the pre_commit field tells you which system and what it runs: Then verify the hook system is active: # husky [-f.husky/pre-commit] && git config core.hooksPath | grep -q husky && echo "OK" || echo "NOT ACTIVE" # pre-commit (Python) [-f.pre-commit-config.yaml] && [-f.git/hooks/pre-commit] && echo "OK" || echo "NOT ACTIVE" # lefthook [-f lefthook.yml] && lefthook version >/dev/null 2>&1 && echo "OK" || echo "NOT ACTIVE" If not active — install before first commit: Don't use --no-verify on commits — if hooks fail, fix the issue and commit again.

- husky + lint-staged → JS/TS stacks (eslint + prettier + tsc) - pre-commit → Python stacks (ruff + ruff-format + ty) - lefthook → mobile stacks (swiftlint/detekt + formatter) - husky: pnpm prepare (or npm run prepare) - pre-commit: uv run pre-commit install - lefthook: lefthook install

Track Selection

If $ARGUMENTS contains a track ID:

  • Validate: {plan_root}/{argument}/plan.md exists (check docs/plan/).
  • If not found: search docs/plan/*/plan.md for partial matches, suggest corrections.

If $ARGUMENTS contains --task X.Y:

  • Jump directly to that task in the active track.

If no argument:

  1. Search for plan.md files in docs/plan/.
  2. Read each plan.md, find tracks with uncompleted tasks.
  3. If multiple, ask via AskUserQuestion.
  4. If zero tracks: "No plans found. Run /plan first."

Context Loading

Step 1 — Architecture overview (if MCP available)

codegraph_explain(project="{project name}")

Returns: stack, languages, directory layers, key patterns, top dependencies, hub files.

Step 1.5 — Get RepoMap (if MCP available)

codegraph_repomap(project="{project name}")

Returns: a YAML map of the top files and their exported classes/functions. Use this to understand the global structure.

Step 2 — Essential docs (parallel reads)

  1. docs/plan/{trackId}/plan.md — task list (REQUIRED). Read the ## Context Handoff section first — it has a compact summary of intent, key files, decisions, and risks. This is your primary orientation.
  2. docs/plan/{trackId}/spec.md — acceptance criteria (REQUIRED)
  3. docs/workflow.md — TDD policy, commit strategy (if exists)
  4. CLAUDE.md — architecture, Do/Don't
  5. .solo/pipelines/progress.md — running docs from previous iterations (if exists, pipeline-specific). Contains what was done in prior pipeline sessions: stages completed, commit SHAs, last output lines. Use this to avoid repeating completed work.

Do NOT read source code files at this stage. Only docs. Source files are loaded per-task in the execution loop (step 3 below).

Resumption

If a task is marked [~] in plan.md:

Resuming: {track title}
Last task: Task {X.Y}: {description} [in progress]

1. Continue from where we left off
2. Restart current task
3. Show progress summary first

Ask via AskUserQuestion, then proceed.

Context Engineering Rules

Read references/context-engineering.md for full rules on observation masking, attention positioning, and plan recitation. Key points:

  • Observation masking: large outputs (>50 lines) → write to scratch/, keep 5-10 line summary
  • Attention positioning: errors at START, history in MIDDLE, next steps at END
  • Plan recitation: re-read plan.md at START of each task to prevent drift

Task Execution Loop

Makefile convention: If Makefile exists in project root, always prefer make targets over raw commands. Use make test instead of pnpm test, make lint instead of pnpm lint, make build instead of pnpm build, etc. Run make help (or read Makefile) to discover available targets. If a make integration or similar target exists, use it for integration testing after pipeline-related tasks.

IMPORTANT — All-done check: Before entering the loop, scan plan.md for ANY - [] or - [~] tasks. If ALL tasks are [x] — skip the loop entirely and jump to Completion section below to run final verification and output <solo:done/>.

For each incomplete task in plan.md (marked []), in order:

1. Find Next Task

Parse plan.md for first line matching - [] Task X.Y: (or - [~] Task X.Y: if resuming).

2. Start Task

  • Update plan.md: [] → [~] for current task.
  • Announce: "Starting Task X.Y: {description}"

3. Research (smart, before coding)

Do NOT grep the entire project or read all source files. Load only what this specific task needs.

If MCP available (preferred):

  1. project_code_search(query="{task keywords}", project="{name}") — find relevant code in the project. Read only the top 2-3 results.
  2. session_search("{task keywords}") — check if you solved this before.
  3. codegraph_query("MATCH (f:File {project: '{name}'})-[:IMPORTS]->(dep) WHERE f.path CONTAINS '{module}' RETURN dep.path") — check imports/dependencies of files you'll modify.

If MCP unavailable (fallback):

  1. Read ONLY the files explicitly mentioned in the task description (file paths).
  2. Glob for the specific module directory the task targets (e.g., src/auth/**/*.ts), not the entire project.
  3. If the task doesn't mention files, use Grep with a narrow pattern on src/ or app/ — never **/*.

Never do: Grep "keyword". across the whole project. This dumps hundreds of lines into context for no reason. Be surgical.

Platform-Specific Quality Tools

Read references/quality-tools.md for full commands per stack. Quick reference:

StackLintFormatType-checkPre-commit
Pythonuv run ruff check --fix.uv run ruff format.uv run ty check.uv run pre-commit run --all-files
JS/TSpnpm lint --fixpnpm formatpnpm tsc --noEmithusky + lint-staged
iOSswiftlint lint --strictswift-format—lefthook
Android./gradlew detekt./gradlew ktlintCheck—lefthook

Run after each task implementation, before git commit. If any fail, fix before proceeding.

4. TDD Workflow (if TDD enabled in workflow.md)

Red — write failing test:

  • Create/update test file for the task functionality.
  • Run tests to confirm they fail.

Green — implement:

  • Write minimum code to make the test pass.
  • Run tests to confirm pass.

Refactor:

  • Clean up while tests stay green.
  • Run tests one final time.

5. Non-TDD Workflow (if TDD is "none" or "moderate" and task is simple)

  • Implement the task directly.
  • Run existing tests to check nothing broke.
  • For "moderate": write tests for business logic and API routes, skip for UI/config.

5.5. Integration Testing (CLI-First)

If the task touches core business logic (pipeline, algorithms, agent tools), run make integration (or the integration command from docs/workflow.md). The CLI exercises the same code paths as the UI without requiring a browser. If make integration fails, fix before committing.

5.6. Visual Verification (if browser/simulator/emulator available)

After implementation, run a quick visual smoke test if tools are available:

Web projects (Playwright MCP or browser tools): If you have Playwright MCP tools or browser tools available:

  1. Start the dev server if not already running (check stack YAML for dev_server.command)
  2. Navigate to the page affected by the current task
  3. Check the browser console for errors (hydration mismatches, uncaught exceptions, 404s)
  4. Take a screenshot to verify the visual output matches expectations
  5. If the task affects responsive layout, resize to mobile viewport (375px) and check

iOS projects (simulator): If instructed to use iOS Simulator in the pipeline prompt:

  1. Build for simulator: xcodebuild -scheme {Name} -sdk iphonesimulator build
  2. Install on booted simulator: xcrun simctl install booted {app-path}
  3. Launch and take screenshot: xcrun simctl io booted screenshot /tmp/sim-screenshot.png
  4. Check simulator logs: xcrun simctl spawn booted log stream --style compact --timeout 10

Android projects (emulator): If instructed to use Android Emulator in the pipeline prompt:

  1. Build debug APK: ./gradlew assembleDebug
  2. Install: adb install -r app/build/outputs/apk/debug/app-debug.apk
  3. Take screenshot: adb exec-out screencap -p > /tmp/emu-screenshot.png
  4. Check logcat: adb logcat '*:E' --format=time -d 2>&1 | tail -20

Graceful degradation: If browser/simulator/emulator tools are not available or fail — skip visual checks entirely. Visual testing is a bonus, never a blocker. Log that it was skipped and continue with the task.

6. Complete Task

Commit (following commit strategy):

git add {specific files changed}
git commit -m "<type>(<scope>): <description>"

Types: feat, fix, refactor, test, docs, chore, perf, style

Capture SHA after commit:

git rev-parse --short HEAD

SHA annotation in plan.md. After every task commit:

  1. Mark task done: [~] → [x]
  2. Append commit SHA inline: - [x] Task X.Y: description <!-- sha:abc1234 -->

Without a SHA, there's no traceability and no revert capability. If a task required multiple commits, record the last one.

7. Phase Completion Check

After each task, check if all tasks in current phase are [x].

If phase complete:

  1. SHA audit — scan all [x] tasks in this phase. If any are missing <!-- sha:... -->, capture their SHA now from git log and add it. Every [x] task MUST have a SHA.
  2. Run verification steps listed under ### Verification for the phase.
  3. Run full test suite.
  4. Run linter.
  5. Mark verification checkboxes in plan.md: - [] → - [x].
  6. Commit plan.md progress: git commit -m "chore(plan): complete phase {N}".
  7. Capture checkpoint SHA and append to phase heading in plan.md: ## Phase N: Title <!-- checkpoint:abc1234 -->.
  8. Report results and continue:
Phase {N} complete! <!-- checkpoint:abc1234 -->

  Tasks:  {M}/{M}
  Tests:  {pass/fail}
  Linter: {pass/fail}
  Verification:
    - [x] {check 1}
    - [x] {check 2}

  Revert this phase: git revert abc1234..HEAD

Proceed to the next phase automatically. No approval needed.

Error Handling

Test Failure

Tests failing after Task X.Y:
  {failure details}

1. Attempt to fix
2. Rollback task changes (git checkout)
3. Pause for manual intervention

Ask via AskUserQuestion. Do NOT automatically continue past failures.

Track Completion

When all phases and tasks are [x]:

1. Final Verification

  • Run local build — must pass before deploy:

- Next.js: pnpm build - Python: uv build or uv run python -m py_compile src/**/*.py - Astro: pnpm build - Cloudflare: pnpm build - iOS: xcodebuild -scheme {Name} -sdk iphonesimulator build - Android: ./gradlew assembleDebug

  • Run full test suite.
  • Run linter + type-checker.
  • Visual smoke test (if tools available):

- Web: start dev server, navigate to main page, check console for errors, take screenshot - iOS: build + install on simulator, launch, take screenshot, check logs - Android: build APK + install on emulator, launch, take screenshot, check logcat - Skip if tools unavailable — not a blocker for completion

  • Check acceptance criteria from spec.md:

- For EACH - [] criterion: verify it's met (search code, run command if specified). - If criterion contains a runnable command (make task, cargo test, benchmark, passes N/N) → RUN IT. Do NOT skip as "unverifiable". - Update spec.md checkboxes: - [] → - [x] for verified criteria. - If any criterion FAILS → do NOT mark plan complete. Fix or note the failure. - Commit spec updates: git add docs/plan/*/spec.md && git commit -m "docs: update spec checkboxes (verified by build)"

Build failure escalation

If the same build/test error occurs 3+ times in a row, STOP retrying. Instead:

  1. Output the error message clearly.
  2. Suggest a fix (e.g., cargo clean, rm -rf node_modules, disk space check).
  3. Output <solo:redo/> to let review handle it. Do NOT burn iterations on identical failures.

2. Update plan.md header

Change **Status:** [] Not Started → **Status:** [x] Complete at the top of plan.md.

3. Signal completion

Output pipeline signal ONLY if pipeline state directory (.solo/states/) exists:

<solo:done/>

Do NOT repeat the signal tag elsewhere in the response. One occurrence only.

4. Summary

Track complete: {title} ({trackId})

  Phases: {N}/{N}
  Tasks:  {M}/{M}
  Tests:  All passing

  Phase checkpoints:
    Phase 1: abc1234
    Phase 2: def5678
    Phase 3: ghi9012

  Revert entire track: git revert abc1234..HEAD

Next:
  /build {next-track-id}  — continue with next track
  /plan "next feature"    — plan something new

Reverting Work

SHA comments in plan.md enable surgical reverts:

Revert a single task:

# Find SHA from plan.md: - [x] Task 2.3: ... <!-- sha:abc1234 -->
git revert abc1234

Then update plan.md: [x] → [] for that task.

Revert an entire phase:

# Find checkpoint from phase heading: ## Phase 2: ... <!-- checkpoint:def5678 -->
# Find previous checkpoint: ## Phase 1: ... <!-- checkpoint:abc1234 -->
git revert abc1234..def5678

Then update plan.md: all tasks in that phase [x] → [].

Never use git reset --hard — always git revert to preserve history.

Progress Tracking (TodoWrite)

At the start of a build session, create a task list from plan.md so progress is visible:

  1. On session start: Read plan.md, find all incomplete tasks ([] and [~]).
  2. Create TaskCreate for each phase with its tasks as description.
  3. TaskUpdate as you work: in_progress when starting a task, completed when done.
  4. This gives the user (and pipeline) real-time visibility into progress.

Rationalizations Catalog

These thoughts mean STOP — you're about to cut corners:

ThoughtReality
"This is too simple to test"Simple code breaks too. Write the test.
"I'll add tests later"Tests written after pass immediately — they prove nothing.
"I already tested it manually"Manual tests don't persist. Automated tests do.
"The test framework isn't set up"Set it up. That's part of the task.
"This is just a config change"Config changes break builds. Verify.
"I'm confident this works"Confidence without evidence is guessing. Run the command.
"Let me just try changing X"Stop. Investigate root cause first.
"Tests are passing, ship it"Tests passing ≠ acceptance criteria met. Check spec.md.
"I'll fix the lint later"Fix it now. Tech debt compounds.
"It works on my machine"Run the build. Verify in the actual environment.

Red Flags — STOP immediately if you catch yourself thinking:

  • "I'll skip the test for this one" — No. Write it.
  • "Let me keep the old code as reference" — Delete means delete. You'll adapt it instead of writing fresh. No exceptions.
  • "I'm following the spirit, not the letter" — Violating the letter of the rules IS violating the spirit.
  • "This is different because..." — It's not. Follow the process.
  • "Just one more quick change before committing" — Commit what you have. Scope creep kills tracks.
  • "The plan says X but Y would be better" — Follow the plan. If it's truly wrong, update plan.md FIRST, then implement.

Foundational principle: If you wouldn't mass-delete production data without checking, don't skip a test without evidence it's unnecessary.

Critical Rules

  1. Run phase checkpoints — verify tests + linter pass before moving to next phase.
  2. STOP on failure — do not continue past test failures or errors.
  3. Keep plan.md updated — task status must reflect actual progress at all times.
  4. Commit after each task — atomic commits with conventional format.
  5. Research before coding — 30 seconds of search saves 30 minutes of reimplementation.
  6. One task at a time — finish current task before starting next.
  7. Keep test output concise — when running tests, pipe through head -50 or use --reporter=dot / -q flag. Thousands of test lines pollute context. Only show failures in detail. If output is large, use observation masking (write to scratch/, keep summary).
  8. Verify before claiming done — run the actual command, read the full output, confirm success BEFORE marking a task complete. Never say "should work now".
  9. Recite the plan — re-read plan.md at the start of each task. Don't rely on memory of what comes next.

Common Issues

"No plans found"

Cause: No plan.md exists in docs/plan/. Fix: Run /plan "your feature" first to create a track.

Tests failing after task

Cause: Implementation broke existing functionality. Fix: Use the error handling flow — attempt fix, rollback if needed, pause for user input. Never skip failing tests.

Phase checkpoint failed

Cause: Tests or linter failed at phase boundary. Fix: Fix failures before proceeding. Re-run verification for that phase.

平台分布

Codex

37.01%
按下载量换算91

Claude

29.79%
按下载量换算73

Cursor

18.05%
按下载量换算44

Gemini CLI

10.02%
按下载量换算25

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

执行命令

安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 npx skills add https://github.com/fortunto2/solo-factory --skill solo-build 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills