Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

sklearn-explainability(sklearn 可解释性)

sklearn-explainability 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

sklearn-explainability 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 57,638。

总安装 428周安装 18GitHub Stars 9下载 150核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:sklearn-explainability(sklearn 可解释性)
来源仓库:https://github.com/tondevrel/scientific-agent-skills
仓库路径:skills/sklearn-explainability
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/tondevrel/scientific-agent-skills --skill sklearn-explainability
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/tondevrel/scientific-agent-skills --skill sklearn-explainability

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

sklearn-explainability 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中快速定位候选结果。适用于需要根据关键词或任务场景从多个来源中筛选信息的场景。通过关键词、任务场景或来源线索进行信息检索与筛选。

安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/tondevrel/scientific-agent-skills --skill sklearn-explainability。建议确认权限范围和维护状态,注意是否会触发联网或文件读写操作。

来源仓库内路径:skills/sklearn-explainability

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/tondevrel/scientific-agent-skills --skill skle…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

sklearn-explainability 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/tondevrel/scientific-agent-skills --skill sklearn-explai…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

sklearn-explainability 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

sklearn-explainability 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

sklearn-explainability 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

sklearn-explainability 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 428 次,近一周安装 18 次,下载 150 次,GitHub 9 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

sklearn-explainability 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
sklearn-explainability

sklearn 可解释性 · 本页

4289只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

scikit-learn - Explainability & Interpretability

In scientific research, a model's "why" is as important as its "what". This guide focuses on tools that reveal the decision-making process of machine learning models, ensuring they are scientifically valid and not just overfitting on artifacts.

When to Use

  • Validating that a model uses physically meaningful features (e.g., in drug discovery).
  • Identifying biases or "shortcuts" the model has learned from the training data.
  • Explaining individual predictions to non-experts (Local explanations).
  • Ranking the global impact of variables on a complex system (Global explanations).
  • Scientific auditing and regulatory compliance.

Core Principles

1. Model-Specific vs. Model-Agnostic

  • Model-Specific: Tools like feature_importances_ in Random Forests. Fast but tied to one architecture.
  • Model-Agnostic: Tools like SHAP or Permutation Importance. Work on any model (SVM, MLP, etc.) but are more compute-intensive.

2. Global vs. Local Explanations

  • Global: How does the feature "Temperature" affect the model overall?
  • Local: Why did the model predict "Reaction Failed" for this specific sample?

3. Feature Importance vs. Feature Contribution

Importance tells you if a feature is used; Contribution tells you how it changed the output (positive or negative).

Quick Reference: Built-in Inspection

from sklearn.inspection import permutation_importance, PartialDependenceDisplay

# 1. Permutation Importance (Better than default tree importance)
result = permutation_importance(model, X_test, y_test, n_repeats=10)
print(result.importances_mean)

# 2. Partial Dependence Plots (How one feature affects prediction)
PartialDependenceDisplay.from_estimator(model, X, features=['temp', 'pressure'])

Critical Rules

✅ DO

  • Prefer Permutation Importance over default RandomForest.feature_importances_ - Default importance is biased toward high-cardinality features (like unique IDs).
  • Use PartialDependenceDisplay - To visualize the relationship between a feature and the target (Linear, Exponential, or Sigmoid).
  • Scale Features before Interpretability - Many models (like Logistic Regression) require scaling for their coefficients (β) to be comparable.
  • Check Feature Correlations - If two features are highly correlated, importance will be split between them, making both look "less important" than they are.

❌ DON'T

  • Don't trust coefficients (β) of unregularized models - High variance in coefficients can lead to false conclusions about feature importance.
  • Don't use Feature Importance on Training Data - Always calculate it on the Test Set to see what features actually help with generalization.
  • Don't confuse Correlation with Causation - ML models show which features are predictive, not necessarily which ones are causative.

Interpretation Patterns

1. SHAP Integration (The Gold Standard)

import shap

# Works for any scikit-learn model
explainer = shap.Explainer(model.predict, X_test)
shap_values = explainer(X_test)

# Visualize global importance
shap.plots.bar(shap_values)

# Visualize local explanation for the first sample
shap.plots.waterfall(shap_values[0])

2. Partial Dependence (PDP) for Science

from sklearn.inspection import PartialDependenceDisplay

# Check if the model learned the correct physical law
# (e.g., does the reaction rate increase with temperature?)
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(8, 4))
PartialDependenceDisplay.from_estimator(model, X, [0, (0, 1)], ax=ax)
# [0] is a 1D plot, [(0, 1)] is a 2D interaction plot

Advanced: Feature Contribution (ELI5 style)

For a single prediction, see which features pushed it towards which class.

def explain_prediction(model, sample):
    # For linear models, this is: intercept + sum(coef * value)
    prediction = model.predict_proba(sample)
    # ... logic to map coefficients to feature names ...
    pass

Practical Workflows: Validating a Scientific Model

Step 1: Detect "Leakage" Features

If a feature has 99% importance and wasn't expected to, it's likely a data leak (e.g., a sample timestamp or ID).

Step 2: Stability Analysis

Run permutation importance with different random seeds. If the top features change significantly, the model is unstable and unreliable.

Step 3: Interaction Check

Use 2D PDP to see if the model captured the interaction between features (e.g., Pressure only matters if Temperature > 100°C).

Common Pitfalls

The "Default Importance" Bias

In RandomForest, features with many categories (like Serial_Number) look very important because the tree can split on them many times.

# ✅ Solution: Use Permutation Importance on the test set instead.

Multicollinearity Ghosting

If Feature_A and Feature_B are 100% correlated, the model might only use one.

# ✅ Solution: Use hierarchical clustering on features or check VIF
# before interpreting importance.

Explainability turns Machine Learning into a true scientific tool. It allows researchers to move beyond the "Black Box" and extract new hypotheses directly from trained models.

平台分布

Codex

36.11%
按下载量换算54

Claude

30.85%
按下载量换算46

Cursor

20.2%
按下载量换算30

Gemini CLI

10.12%
按下载量换算15

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills