Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

competitive-analysis(竞争分析)

competitive-analysis 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Local Agent 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

competitive-analysis 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Local Agent,通过unknown获取,权限为权限未标注;许可证信息还不明确,暂无第三方扫描结果,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 47,060。

总安装 751周安装 31下载 246核验 2026-05-01
研究检索权限未标注unknown未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计未展示Local Agent

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:competitive-analysis(竞争分析)
来源仓库:https://skills.volces.com
仓库路径:competitive-analysis
安装命令:
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。当前暂无明确安装命令,请以来源页面说明为准。

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

competitive-analysis 用于搜集和分析竞争对手公开信息。适合在 Local Agent 中支撑市场策略制定与产品定位优化。可通过公司名、产品名等关键词获取官网、新闻与报告摘要。数据来源于公开渠道,完整度与时效性存在局限。

competitive-analysis 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。安装后建议先用已知案例测试其覆盖范围与准确性。

来源仓库内路径:competitive-analysis

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Local Agent;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    没有现成安装命令,按unknown的说明从来源页面获取,仓库路径是 competitive-analysis。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    权限没有明确标注,第一次使用时只给一个无关紧要的任务,观察它到底读了哪些文件和网络。

常见问题

6 条

competitive-analysis 怎么安装?

公开资料没有给出可以直接复制的命令,需要按来源页面说明手动安装,仓库内路径为 competitive-analysis。

competitive-analysis 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Local Agent。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

competitive-analysis 需要什么权限?

权限级别没有明确标注。第一次使用时建议只给无关紧要的任务,观察它实际读写了哪些内容。

competitive-analysis 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

competitive-analysis 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 751 次,近一周安装 31 次,下载 246 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

competitive-analysis 安全吗?

没有查到第三方扫描结果,安全性无法从公开资料判断,安装前请自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 Local Agent 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 没有第三方扫描结果,安全性只能靠自己读源码判断。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Local Agent,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 要求有安全扫描结论才肯安装的团队。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
competitive-analysis

竞争分析 · 本页

751—权限未标注未明确未收录

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Competitive Analysis

Overview

Shallow competitive research (checking a few websites) is not enough. This playbook gives you a systematic way to dissect competitors across strategy, product, pricing, marketing, operations, and reviews — then synthesise findings into exploitable gaps and a positioning wedge.


Step 1: Identify and Tier Your Competitors

Not all competitors are equal. Categorize them before diving in.

Direct competitors: Solve the exact same problem for the exact same customer. These are your primary benchmarks.

Indirect competitors: Solve a related problem or serve the same customer with a different solution. These matter because your customer is choosing between ALL of them (including doing nothing).

Aspirational competitors: Not in your niche yet, but could be. Larger or more established players who might expand into your space. Monitor these — they reveal what "winning at scale" looks like.

Identify 3-5 direct, 2-3 indirect, and 1-2 aspirational. You don't need to deep-dive all of them — focus your deepest analysis on your top 3 direct competitors.


Step 2: Intelligence Gathering Framework

For each competitor you're deep-diving, collect data across these six layers:

Layer 1: Strategy & Positioning

  • What is their stated mission or tagline?
  • Who do they say they're for? (Check homepage, about page, marketing copy)
  • What problem do they claim to solve?
  • What is their core differentiator? (The one thing they lean hardest on)
  • Who do they NOT serve? (The gaps in their positioning = your opportunity)

Layer 2: Product & Features

  • What does their product actually do? (Use their product page, feature list, docs)
  • What is their product's complexity level? (Simple tool vs. full platform)
  • What are their key technical strengths?
  • What's missing from their product that users would want? (See Layer 5 — Reviews)
  • What's their integration ecosystem like?

Layer 3: Pricing & Business Model

  • What pricing tiers do they offer?
  • What's included at each tier?
  • Do they offer a free tier or free trial? What's the conversion funnel?
  • What's their pricing psychology? (Per-user, per-usage, flat-rate, freemium?)
  • Where are the pricing gaps? (Too expensive for small users? No mid-tier option?)

Layer 4: Marketing & Distribution

  • How do they acquire customers? (Check: SEO — use Ahrefs/Ubersuggest free; Paid ads — use Google Ads Transparency Center or Facebook Ad Library; Content — check their blog, YouTube, social)
  • What channels are they strongest on?
  • What channels are they ignoring? (Your opening)
  • What is their content strategy? (Blog topics reveal what they think customers care about)
  • Do they have a referral or partner program?

Layer 5: Customer Reviews (Critical Layer)

This is where you find gold. Read 20+ reviews per competitor across:

  • G2, Capterra, Trustpilot
  • App Store / Google Play (if applicable)
  • Reddit threads mentioning the product
  • Twitter/X mentions

Categorize every complaint you find:

  • Feature gaps (things users want but don't have)
  • UX/experience frustrations (things that are clunky or confusing)
  • Pricing complaints (things users think are overpriced or unfair)
  • Support complaints (things the company handles poorly)
  • Onboarding complaints (things that are hard to get started with)

Also note what users praise most — these are the table stakes you must match.

Layer 6: Company Health & Trajectory

  • When was the company founded? How old is it?
  • Is it funded? How much? By whom? (Crunchbase)
  • Headcount trend on LinkedIn — growing, stable, or shrinking?
  • Recent news, blog posts, or product announcements — what direction are they moving?
  • Are they expanding into new markets or doubling down?

Step 3: Build a Comparison Matrix

After gathering data, create a side-by-side matrix. Columns = competitors (+ your planned offering). Rows = the dimensions that matter most to your target customer.

Pick 8-12 rows that are decision-relevant. Examples:

  • Price (monthly, annual)
  • Ease of setup (1-5 scale based on reviews)
  • Key feature A
  • Key feature B
  • Integration with [popular tool]
  • Free tier available?
  • Customer support quality
  • Speed / performance
  • Customization depth

Fill in each cell with what you know. Leave gaps where you genuinely don't know — gaps in your knowledge are research tasks, not guesses.


Step 4: Synthesize Into Exploitable Gaps

From your matrix and review analysis, identify your top 3 exploitable gaps. A gap is exploitable when ALL of these are true:

  1. Multiple competitors share the weakness — it's not just one player being sloppy; it's a structural blind spot in the market.
  2. Customers actually complain about it — you have review evidence that real people care.
  3. You can solve it — given your skills, budget, and timeline as a solopreneur.
  4. It's not table stakes — if everyone does it, you can't win by doing it too. The gap must be something competitors skip or do poorly.

For each exploitable gap, write:

  • What the gap is
  • Evidence (specific complaints or data)
  • How you would solve it
  • Why competitors likely aren't solving it (too niche for them? Requires a different business model? Conflicts with their strategy?)

Step 5: Define Your Competitive Wedge

Your "wedge" is the single, sharp angle you enter the market on. It's not "we're better at everything." It's "we are the only option that does [specific thing] for [specific person]."

Wedge formula:

"The only [product category] that [does specific thing] for [specific customer type]."

Examples:

  • "The only project management tool built specifically for solo consultants managing client work."
  • "The only email marketing platform with AI-generated subject line A/B testing built into the free tier."

Test your wedge:

  • Would a target customer immediately understand why this is different?
  • Is this wedge defensible for at least 6-12 months before a competitor copies it?
  • Can you build and deliver on this wedge solo?

Step 6: Ongoing Competitive Monitoring

Competition doesn't stop once you launch. Set up a lightweight monitoring routine:

  • Weekly (5 min): Check Google Alerts for top 2-3 competitor names. Scan for new features, pricing changes, funding news.
  • Monthly (30 min): Re-read 5-10 new reviews on G2/Capterra for your competitors. Are new complaints emerging?
  • Quarterly (2 hours): Re-run the comparison matrix. Have gaps closed? Have new gaps opened? Has a new competitor appeared?

Pitfalls

  • Copying a competitor's strategy instead of finding gaps. Copying loses on price and polish against incumbents.
  • Obsessing over one well-funded competitor and ignoring the small players who actually serve your niche.
  • Reading only positive reviews. Negative reviews are 10x more valuable for finding gaps.
  • Forgetting that "doing nothing" is always a competitor. Some customers will stick with their manual workaround rather than switch.

平台分布

Local Agent

80.48%
按下载量换算198

安全审计

暂无安全审计结果可展示。

权限和风险

权限未标注

当前来源未能明确判断权限范围,默认进入异常复核队列。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills