Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

skillfactory(skillfactory 搜索)

skillfactory 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

skillfactory 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 26,730。

总安装 3,515周安装 145GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 1,148核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
2.2.2

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:skillfactory(skillfactory 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/zhelunsun/skillfactory
安装命令:
openclaw skills install skillfactory
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install skillfactory

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

skillfactory 是用于创建和管理 OpenClaw 技能的元技能工具。适合从想法出发构建新技能,支持迭代开发和发布流程。提供结构化指导,帮助用户系统化地设计技能功能和元数据。通过 clawhub 安装,建议参考原始文档了解模板和开发规范。使用前请评估其是否涉及代码生成或文件系统操作权限。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install skillfactory;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

skillfactory 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install skillfactory。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

skillfactory 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

skillfactory 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

skillfactory 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

skillfactory 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 3,515 次,近一周安装 145 次,下载 1,148 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

skillfactory 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
skillfactory

skillfactory 搜索 · 本页

3,515—需要联网MIT-0有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
skill-factory
version
2.2.1
description
>

Skill Factory — The Meta-Skill for Making Skills

"The first industrial revolution was marked by using machines to make machines. Skill Factory is the machine that makes skills."

Purpose

Skill Factory provides a repeatable, human-AI collaborative SOP for going from a raw idea to a polished, publishable OpenClaw skill. It handles:

  • 0→1: Rapid capture of fuzzy ideas → structured BRIEF → distilled skill
  • 1→N: Iterating an existing skill with new sources or structural improvements
  • N→∞: Publishing, versioning, ClawHub distribution, and ongoing maintenance

The key insight: this is not about capability, it's about workflow. Any Claw instance with this skill loaded can build production-quality skills — the process is the product.


How to Trigger This Skill

Just say something like:

New skill: [name], [1-2 sentences], [source URL (optional)]

Examples:

  • New skill: prompt-engineering, best practices from Anthropic and OpenAI
  • New skill: git-workflow, standardize my branching and PR flow, https://...
  • Skill upgrade: nova-reader, add Semantic Scholar data source

Claw will immediately enter Phase 0 — no more information needed to start.

中文用户: 新 skill:[名字],[1-2句说明],[来源URL(可选)]


Four-Phase SOP

Phase 0 · Capture(≤5 min)

Goal: Lock down the spec before any work begins.

  1. Save raw idea to inbox/<skill-name>.md
  2. Ask exactly 3 questions — no more:

- What is the target scenario / user? - Are there reference sources? (If not, Claw will search) - Publish scope: local-only / GitHub / ClawHub distribution?

  1. Generate wip/<skill-name>/BRIEF.md

Key principle: Phase 0 prevents over-engineering (LRN-003). Don't start building until the 3 questions are answered.


Phase 1 · Collect(automated)

Goal: Gather raw material without processing.

  1. web_fetch each source → save to wip/<skill-name>/raw/
  2. If no sources provided, web_search for 2–3 high-quality references
  3. Prioritize: official docs > primary blog posts > secondary analysis

Rule: At least 1 first-party source (official docs / original author's post). Raw content is saved as-is — no processing yet.


Phase 2 · Distill(core work)

Goal: Extract signal, discard noise.

  1. Read all raw/ files
  2. Write per skill-creator spec:

- SKILL.md — triggers + workflow (≤200 lines) - references/ — detailed knowledge, split by topic - scripts/ — reusable code, only if needed

  1. Mandatory verification (LRN-001): Re-fetch original source, diff against draft, check for gaps

Quality checklist:

  • [ ] Trigger words are broad enough to cover all user phrasings
  • [ ] SKILL.md has a clear "when to use" section
  • [ ] Detail lives in references/, not bloating SKILL.md
  • [ ] At least one mandatory re-read of primary source after distillation

Phase 3 · Publish

Goal: Clean, versioned, standalone repo ready for GitHub/ClawHub.

Repo Structure (Minimal)
<skill-name>/
├── SKILL.md          # Entry point (triggers + workflow)
├── README.md         # Human-facing intro — bilingual (EN + ZH)
├── CHANGELOG.md      # Version history
├── LICENSE           # MIT recommended
├── .gitignore
└── references/       # Knowledge base
    └── *.md

For script-heavy skills, add:

└── scripts/
    └── *.py
README Spec

A skill README must answer 3 questions in ≤60 seconds of reading:

  1. What problem does it solve? (1-2 sentences, no jargon)
  2. What makes it better than asking without it? (key differentiator)
  3. How do I use it? (one concrete example)

Bilingual (EN + ZH): Use two separate files for maximum clarity.

README.md       # English only — no Chinese text anywhere
README_zh.md    # Chinese only — full detail, selling points, usage

Each file includes a badge linking to the other version. This allows GitHub to render clean language-specific views and enables future ClawHub to surface the right version per locale.

ClawHub Distribution

When the user wants to publish to ClawHub:

  1. Ensure SKILL.md frontmatter has: name, version, description
  2. description must contain broad trigger phrases covering multiple phrasings
  3. LICENSE file present (MIT recommended)
  4. Tag the release: git tag v1.0.0 && git push --tags
Sync to Local Workspace

After publishing, sync to ~/.workbuddy/skills/<skill-name>/ so Claw can use it immediately:

Copy-Item -Recurse -Force "D:\WorkBuddy\<skill-name>\*" "$env:USERPROFILE\.workbuddy\skills\<skill-name>\"

Version Management

Version semantics follow Semantic Versioning adapted for skills:

MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH
Version bumpWhenExample trigger
PATCH x.x.1Typo fix, trigger word tweak, minor clarification"修复了一个例子描述不准"
MINOR x.1.0New reference source, new phase step, extended trigger coverage"加入 Anthropic 最新文档"
MAJOR 2.0.0Scope change, structural refactor, paradigm shift"从单文档改为多 reference 结构"

What warrants a MAJOR bump?

A MAJOR version (e.g. 1.x → 2.0) signals a breaking change in the skill's mental model:

  • The core SOP phases are restructured
  • The skill's scope is fundamentally redefined
  • Files are reorganized in ways that break the previous structure
  • The activation paradigm changes (e.g. from "ask anything" to "four-phase SOP")

MAJOR ≠ more content. A skill that doubles its references but keeps the same structure is still a MINOR bump.

What warrants a MINOR bump?

A MINOR version (e.g. 1.0 → 1.1 → 1.2) signals additive improvements that don't break the existing pattern:

  • New knowledge source added to references/
  • New trigger words added to frontmatter
  • New section added to SOP without restructuring existing phases
  • README improvements, badge updates

Commit message convention

feat: add [source] to references        → MINOR
fix: correct [description]              → PATCH
refactor: restructure [component]       → could be MAJOR
release: v2.0.0 - [summary]            → tag release commits

Changelog discipline

Every release must update CHANGELOG.md with:

  • Version number + date
  • Summary sentence (1 line)
  • Added / Changed / Fixed sections

Skill Iteration (1→N)

When upgrading an existing skill:

  1. Create a new branch or directly update D:/WorkBuddy/<skill-name>/
  2. Add new source to references/ with dated filename (source-YYYYMMDD.md)
  3. Update SKILL.md version field and trigger words if needed
  4. Update CHANGELOG.md
  5. Bump version (MAJOR / MINOR / PATCH per rules above)
  6. Commit with semantic message
  7. Re-sync to local workspace

Upgrade triggers: User sends new URL, user says "skill has a gap", Claw detects missing knowledge during a task execution.


Workspace Layout

D:/WorkBuddy/
├── .workspace-index.md      # Master skill status board
├── skill-factory/           # This meta-skill repo
│   ├── SKILL.md             # This file
│   ├── README.md
│   ├── CHANGELOG.md
│   ├── LICENSE
│   ├── .gitignore
│   ├── inbox/               # Raw ideas drop zone
│   └── wip/                 # Active work-in-progress
│       └── <skill-name>/
│           ├── BRIEF.md
│           ├── raw/
│           └── draft/
│
├── harness/                 # ✅ v1.2.0 — ready for GitHub
├── nova-reader/             # ✅ v1.1.0 — ready for GitHub
└── <future-skills>/

Lessons Learned (from .learnings)

IDLessonFix in SOP
LRN-001Missed content after distillation without re-reading sourcePhase 2 mandatory re-fetch
LRN-002Skill evolved in workspace, hard to publish as standalonePhase 3 independent repo
LRN-003Over-engineered before confirming real needPhase 0 three-question lock
LRN-004Research notes mixed with skill docsraw/ vs references/ separation

平台分布

OpenClaw

85.71%
按下载量换算984

安全审计

VirusTotal

可疑

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills