Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

skilless.ai-writing(熟练的 ai 写作)

用于辅助文档、README、Markdown、说明文和内容稿件的整理与改写。它适合让 Agent 提炼结构、补齐章节、统一术语、检查链接或把零散材料整理成可读文档。使用时应保留项目已有事实、命令和路径,不要把未确认的信息写成确定结论;涉及对外文案时,还需要控制语气,避免过度营销或夸大能力。

skilless.ai-writing 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,暂无第三方扫描结果,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 66,424。

总安装 264周安装 11GitHub Stars 149下载 88核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:skilless.ai-writing(熟练的 ai 写作)
来源仓库:https://github.com/brikerman/skilless.ai
仓库路径:skills/skilless.ai-writing
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/brikerman/skilless.ai --skill skilless.ai-writing
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/brikerman/skilless.ai --skill skilless.ai-writing

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于辅助文档、README 和 Markdown 稿件整理。适合提炼结构、统一术语或检查链接完整性。使用时应保留项目已有事实,避免写成确定结论。

安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/brikerman/skilless.ai --skill skilless.ai-writing。涉及对外文案时,需控制语气避免过度营销。

来源仓库内路径:skills/skilless.ai-writing

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/brikerman/skilless.ai --skill skilless.ai-writ…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

skilless.ai-writing 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/brikerman/skilless.ai --skill skilless.ai-writing。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

skilless.ai-writing 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

skilless.ai-writing 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

skilless.ai-writing 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

skilless.ai-writing 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 264 次,近一周安装 11 次,下载 88 次,GitHub 149 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

skilless.ai-writing 安全吗?

没有查到第三方扫描结果,安全性无法从公开资料判断,安装前请自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 没有第三方扫描结果,安全性只能靠自己读源码判断。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 要求有安全扫描结论才肯安装的团队。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
skilless.ai-writing

熟练的 ai 写作 · 本页

264149只读未明确未收录

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Writing Skill

Produce professional, research-backed written content.

Use when user needs to: write reports, articles, emails, documentation, briefs, memos, or any content that requires research and structured presentation.

When to Use

  • User asks to "write", "draft", "compose", "create content"
  • User needs a report, analysis, or documentation
  • User wants an article, blog post, brief, or memo
  • Any writing task that benefits from research-backed data and citations

Core Principle

Every piece of writing produced by this skill must be research-first, evidence-based, and professionally structured. Do not write from general knowledge alone — always gather real data, verify claims, and cite sources.


Writing Process

Step 1 — Understand the Brief

Before writing anything, clarify:

  • What type of content? Report, article, email, documentation, memo, etc.
  • Who is the audience? Executive, technical, general public, etc.
  • What tone? Formal, conversational, technical, persuasive, etc.
  • What is the desired length? Brief (1-2 pages), standard (3-5 pages), comprehensive (5+ pages)
  • Are there specific points or questions to address?

If any of the above is unclear, use the question tool to batch-ask the user before proceeding.

Step 2 — Research (Invoke Research Skill)

Always research before writing. Invoke skilless.ai-research to gather data:

  1. Determine research depth based on the writing task:

- Quick email or short summary → L1 (1-2 searches) - Standard article or comparison → L2 (3-5 searches, 2-4 page reads) - Full report or deep analysis → L3 (5+ searches, 5+ page reads, cross-source fact-check)

  1. Let the research skill handle tool selection — it owns all CLI tools (search, web reader, video transcript extractor, media converter) and will choose the right ones based on the task.
  2. Fact-check all key claims following the research skill's fact-check protocol:

- Cross-verify key data from 2-3 independent sources - Note contradictions and resolve or flag them - Mark unverified claims explicitly

  1. Collect citation data for every fact, statistic, and claim:

- Source title, URL, publication date - Specific data points with original phrasing - Author/organization credibility

Step 3 — Outline

Before writing prose, create a structured outline:

  • Start with the conclusion / key finding
  • Organize supporting sections logically
  • Identify where each data point and citation will go
  • Ensure every major claim has a source assigned

Step 4 — Write

Follow the report structure defined below. Write clearly, concisely, and professionally.

Step 5 — Review

Before delivering:

  • Verify every citation is real and correctly referenced
  • Check that the executive summary accurately reflects the full content
  • Ensure no unsupported claims remain
  • Confirm the output follows the format rules

Report Structure

All reports and substantial writing follow this structure. Adjust section depth based on content length.

1. Executive Summary

Always lead with this. A self-contained summary that a busy reader can use without reading the full report.

Must include:

  • Key finding or recommendation — the single most important takeaway, in 1-2 sentences
  • Critical data points — the 3-5 most important numbers or facts, with citations
  • Context — why this matters, in 1-2 sentences
  • Recommended action (if applicable) — what the reader should do

Length: 150-300 words for standard reports, 50-100 words for short briefs.

2. Background / Context

  • Why this research was conducted
  • Scope and limitations
  • Key definitions or assumptions

3. Findings / Analysis

The detailed body of the report. Organize by theme, question, or comparison dimension.

Requirements:

  • Every claim backed by specific data — not vague statements like "many users prefer X", but "67% of surveyed users preferred X [3]"
  • Concrete numbers — prices, percentages, dates, version numbers, performance metrics
  • Source citations on every data point — inline [1], [2], etc.
  • Comparisons use tables when data fits single-line cells
  • Contradictions addressed explicitly — "Source A reports X [1], while Source B reports Y [2]. The discrepancy likely stems from [reason]. Source A is considered more reliable because [reason]."

4. Conclusion / Recommendations

  • Summarize findings (not a copy of the executive summary — this is more detailed)
  • Provide actionable recommendations with rationale
  • Note limitations and areas needing further investigation

5. Sources

Full citation list at the end:

## Sources

[1] [Title](URL) — Key data point used
[2] [Title](URL) — Key data point used
[3] [Title](URL) — Key data point used

Writing Standards

Data Quality

  • Use specific numbers, not vague language. Instead of "significant growth", write "42% year-over-year growth [2]"
  • Include dates and versions. Instead of "the latest version supports X", write "v3.2 (released March 2025) supports X [4]"
  • Attribute opinions. Instead of "X is considered the best", write "Gartner ranked X as the market leader in their 2025 report [5]"
  • Flag uncertainty. If data is limited, write "Based on available data (single source), X appears to be Y — further verification recommended"

Tone Matching

Adapt tone to the user's request and audience:

AudienceToneExample phrasing
Executive / decision-makerFormal, concise, action-oriented"We recommend adopting X based on 35% cost reduction [1]"
Technical teamPrecise, detailed, specification-focused"Latency reduced from 120ms to 45ms (p99) under 10K concurrent connections [3]"
General publicClear, accessible, jargon-free"This means your battery will last about twice as long as the previous model"
Internal memoDirect, brief, bullet-point heavy"Action needed: approve budget by Friday"

If the user does not specify tone, default to professional/formal for reports and analysis.

Length Calibration

  • Do not pad with filler — every sentence should carry information
  • Do not over-compress to the point of losing important nuance
  • If the user asks for a "brief" or "summary", aim for 300-500 words
  • If the user asks for a "full report" or "detailed analysis", aim for 1000-3000 words
  • When in doubt, use the question tool to ask about desired depth

Handling Different Content Types

Content typeResearch depthStructureKey focus
Full report / analysisL3Full report structure (exec summary through sources)Data depth, cross-verification, actionable recommendations
Article / blog postL2-L3Hook, body sections, conclusion, sourcesEngaging narrative, supported claims, clear takeaways
Documentation / guideL2Overview, steps/sections, examples, referencesAccuracy, completeness, practical examples
Email / memoL1-L2Key point first, supporting details, action itemsBrevity, clarity, specific asks
Comparison / evaluationL2-L3Exec summary, comparison table, detailed analysis, recommendationFair representation, concrete metrics, clear winner/tradeoffs

Asking the User

Use your environment's built-in question/ask tool when needed. Batch related questions into a single call.

SituationExample question(s)
Content type or audience unclear"To write this effectively: 1) Who is the target audience? 2) What tone — formal report or casual article? 3) Desired length?"
Scope too broad to cover well"This topic is quite broad. Would you like me to: 1) Cover all aspects at a high level 2) Focus deeply on [specific area] 3) Something else?"
Research found contradictory data"My research found conflicting data on [topic]: Source A says X, Source B says Y. How should I handle this in the report? 1) Present both with analysis 2) Go with the more credible source 3) Flag for further investigation"
Missing critical information"I could not find reliable data on [specific point]. Should I: 1) Proceed without it and note the gap 2) Try alternative search approaches 3) Adjust the scope?"
Draft complete — follow-upAfter delivering the content: "What would you like me to do next? 1) Expand a specific section 2) Adjust tone or format 3) Research additional aspects 4) Create a shorter summary version 5) Something else"

Output Format

Strict portable Markdown only. Must render correctly in any Markdown editor (GitHub, Obsidian, Typora, VS Code, etc.).

Rules

  1. No HTML tags — no <br>, <div>, <table>, <sub>, <sup>, or any HTML whatsoever
  2. Table cells must be single-line plain text — no line breaks, no nested lists, no multi-line content
  3. If content does not fit single-line table cells, use a list instead of a table
  4. Blank lines before and after headings, tables, code blocks, and block quotes
  5. Fenced code blocks only (triple backticks) — no indented code blocks
  6. No trailing spaces for line breaks — use separate paragraphs instead

Formatting Toolkit

ElementUsage
BoldKey conclusions, important numbers, recommendations
Lists (- or 1.)Pros/cons, steps, supporting points
✅ ❌ ⚠️Supported / not supported / caution
> quote blockDirect quotes from sources
` inline code `Technical terms, tool names, commands

Source Citations

Inline: [1], [2], etc. — placed immediately after the data point they support.

At the end of every document:

## Sources

[1] [Title](URL) — Key data point used
[2] [Title](URL) — Key data point used

Cross-References

  • Research & data gathering → Invoke skilless.ai-research for all search, web reading, video transcript extraction, and media operations. The research skill owns all CLI tools (search, web, youtube, ffmpeg) and defines research depth levels (L1–L3)
  • Brief unclear? → Invoke skilless.ai-brainstorming to clarify scope, audience, and direction before starting the writing process

平台分布

Codex

36.46%
按下载量换算32

Claude

29.37%
按下载量换算26

Cursor

19.26%
按下载量换算17

Gemini CLI

9.49%
按下载量换算8

安全审计

暂无安全审计结果可展示。

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills