Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

context-window-management(上下文窗口管理)

context-window-management 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

context-window-management 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 7,345。

总安装 19,241周安装 786GitHub Stars 35,668下载 6,162核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:context-window-management(上下文窗口管理)
来源仓库:https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills
仓库路径:skills/context-window-management
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill context-window-management
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill context-window-management

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

通过总结、修剪、路由和优先级管理 LLM 上下文窗口的策略。

涵盖六大核心功能:上下文工程、摘要、修剪、路由、令牌计数和优先级,以防止令牌限制和上下文腐烂 实施根据上下文大小进行调整的分层上下文策略,以及串行位置优化以将关键信息放置在上下文的开头和结尾 避免常见的反模式,包括天真的截断、忽略令牌成本以及降低性能的一刀切方法 与 RAG、对话内存、提示缓存和对话系统集成,以实现跨多轮对话的全面上下文管理

来源仓库内路径:skills/context-window-management

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill con…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

context-window-management 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill context-windo…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

context-window-management 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

context-window-management 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

context-window-management 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

context-window-management 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 19,241 次,近一周安装 786 次,下载 6,162 次,GitHub 35,668 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

context-window-management 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
context-window-management

上下文窗口管理 · 本页

19,24135,668需要联网MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Context Window Management

Strategies for managing LLM context windows including summarization, trimming, routing, and avoiding context rot

Capabilities

  • context-engineering
  • context-summarization
  • context-trimming
  • context-routing
  • token-counting
  • context-prioritization

Prerequisites

  • Knowledge: LLM fundamentals, Tokenization basics, Prompt engineering
  • Skills_recommended: prompt-engineering

Scope

  • Does_not_cover: RAG implementation details, Model fine-tuning, Embedding models
  • Boundaries: Focus is context optimization, Covers strategies not specific implementations

Ecosystem

Primary_tools

  • tiktoken - OpenAI's tokenizer for counting tokens
  • LangChain - Framework with context management utilities
  • Claude API - 200K+ context with caching support

Patterns

Tiered Context Strategy

Different strategies based on context size

When to use: Building any multi-turn conversation system

interface ContextTier {maxTokens: number; strategy: 'full' | 'summarize' | 'rag'; model: string;}

const TIERS: ContextTier[] = [{maxTokens: 8000, strategy: 'full', model: 'claude-3-haiku'}, {maxTokens: 32000, strategy: 'full', model: 'claude-3-5-sonnet'}, {maxTokens: 100000, strategy: 'summarize', model: 'claude-3-5-sonnet'}, {maxTokens: Infinity, strategy: 'rag', model: 'claude-3-5-sonnet'}];

async function selectStrategy(messages: Message[]): ContextTier {const tokens = await countTokens(messages);

for (const tier of TIERS) {
    if (tokens <= tier.maxTokens) {
        return tier;
    }
}
return TIERS[TIERS.length - 1];

}

async function prepareContext(messages: Message[]): PreparedContext {const tier = await selectStrategy(messages);

switch (tier.strategy) {
    case 'full':
        return { messages, model: tier.model };

    case 'summarize':
        const summary = await summarizeOldMessages(messages);
        return { messages: [summary, ...recentMessages(messages)], model: tier.model };

    case 'rag':
        const relevant = await retrieveRelevant(messages);
        return { messages: [...relevant, ...recentMessages(messages)], model: tier.model };
}

}

Serial Position Optimization

Place important content at start and end

When to use: Constructing prompts with significant context

// LLMs weight beginning and end more heavily // Structure prompts to leverage this

function buildOptimalPrompt(components: {systemPrompt: string; criticalContext: string; conversationHistory: Message[]; currentQuery: string;}): string {// START: System instructions (always first) const parts = [components.systemPrompt];

// CRITICAL CONTEXT: Right after system (high primacy)
if (components.criticalContext) {
    parts.push(`## Key Context\n${components.criticalContext}`);
}

// MIDDLE: Conversation history (lower weight)
// Summarize if long, keep recent messages full
const history = components.conversationHistory;
if (history.length > 10) {
    const oldSummary = summarize(history.slice(0, -5));
    const recent = history.slice(-5);
    parts.push(`## Earlier Conversation (Summary)\n${oldSummary}`);
    parts.push(`## Recent Messages\n${formatMessages(recent)}`);
} else {
    parts.push(`## Conversation\n${formatMessages(history)}`);
}

// END: Current query (high recency)
// Restate critical requirements here
parts.push(`## Current Request\n${components.currentQuery}`);

// FINAL: Reminder of key constraints
parts.push(`Remember: ${extractKeyConstraints(components.systemPrompt)}`);

return parts.join('\n\n');

}

Intelligent Summarization

Summarize by importance, not just recency

When to use: Context exceeds optimal size

interface MessageWithMetadata extends Message {importance: number; // 0-1 score hasCriticalInfo: boolean; // User preferences, decisions referenced: boolean; // Was this referenced later?}

async function smartSummarize(messages: MessageWithMetadata[], targetTokens: number): Message[] {// Sort by importance, preserve order for tied scores const sorted = [...messages].sort((a, b) => (b.importance + (b.hasCriticalInfo? 0.5: 0) + (b.referenced? 0.3: 0)) - (a.importance + (a.hasCriticalInfo? 0.5: 0) + (a.referenced? 0.3: 0)));

const keep: Message[] = [];
const summarizePool: Message[] = [];
let currentTokens = 0;

for (const msg of sorted) {
    const msgTokens = await countTokens([msg]);
    if (currentTokens + msgTokens < targetTokens * 0.7) {
        keep.push(msg);
        currentTokens += msgTokens;
    } else {
        summarizePool.push(msg);
    }
}

// Summarize the low-importance messages
if (summarizePool.length > 0) {
    const summary = await llm.complete(`
        Summarize these messages, preserving:
        - Any user preferences or decisions
        - Key facts that might be referenced later
        - The overall flow of conversation

        Messages:
        ${formatMessages(summarizePool)}
    `);

    keep.unshift({ role: 'system', content: `[Earlier context: ${summary}]` });
}

// Restore original order
return keep.sort((a, b) => a.timestamp - b.timestamp);

}

Token Budget Allocation

Allocate token budget across context components

When to use: Need predictable context management

interface TokenBudget {system: number; // System prompt criticalContext: number; // User prefs, key info history: number; // Conversation history query: number; // Current query response: number; // Reserved for response}

function allocateBudget(totalTokens: number): TokenBudget {return {system: Math.floor(totalTokens * 0.10), // 10% criticalContext: Math.floor(totalTokens * 0.15), // 15% history: Math.floor(totalTokens * 0.40), // 40% query: Math.floor(totalTokens * 0.10), // 10% response: Math.floor(totalTokens * 0.25), // 25%};}

async function buildWithBudget(components: ContextComponents, modelMaxTokens: number): PreparedContext {const budget = allocateBudget(modelMaxTokens);

// Truncate/summarize each component to fit budget
const prepared = {
    system: truncateToTokens(components.system, budget.system),
    criticalContext: truncateToTokens(
        components.criticalContext, budget.criticalContext
    ),
    history: await summarizeToTokens(components.history, budget.history),
    query: truncateToTokens(components.query, budget.query),
};

// Reallocate unused budget
const used = await countTokens(Object.values(prepared).join('\n'));
const remaining = modelMaxTokens - used - budget.response;

if (remaining > 0) {
    // Give extra to history (most valuable for conversation)
    prepared.history = await summarizeToTokens(
        components.history,
        budget.history + remaining
    );
}

return prepared;

}

Validation Checks

No Token Counting

Severity: WARNING

Message: Building context without token counting. May exceed model limits.

Fix action: Count tokens before sending, implement budget allocation

Naive Message Truncation

Severity: WARNING

Message: Truncating messages without summarization. Critical context may be lost.

Fix action: Summarize old messages instead of simply removing them

Hardcoded Token Limit

Severity: INFO

Message: Hardcoded token limit. Consider making configurable per model.

Fix action: Use model-specific limits from configuration

No Context Management Strategy

Severity: WARNING

Message: LLM calls without context management strategy.

Fix action: Implement context management: budgets, summarization, or RAG

Collaboration

Delegation Triggers

  • retrieval|rag|search -> rag-implementation (Need retrieval system)
  • memory|persistence|remember -> conversation-memory (Need memory storage)
  • cache|caching -> prompt-caching (Need caching optimization)

Complete Context System

Skills: context-window-management, rag-implementation, conversation-memory, prompt-caching

Workflow:

1. Design context strategy
2. Implement RAG for large corpuses
3. Set up memory persistence
4. Add caching for performance

Related Skills

Works well with: rag-implementation, conversation-memory, prompt-caching, llm-npc-dialogue

When to Use

  • User mentions or implies: context window
  • User mentions or implies: token limit
  • User mentions or implies: context management
  • User mentions or implies: context engineering
  • User mentions or implies: long context
  • User mentions or implies: context overflow

Limitations

  • Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
  • Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
  • Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.

平台分布

Claude Code

26.64%
按下载量换算1,642

OpenCode

22.97%
按下载量换算1,415

Gemini CLI

17.96%
按下载量换算1,107

Antigravity

13.44%
按下载量换算828

Cursor

7.14%
按下载量换算440

Codex

3.46%
按下载量换算213

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills