Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索external-servicegithub未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计提醒

seo-competitor-pagesSEO competitor pages 搜索

Agent Skill

seo-competitor-pages 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

31,824

周安装

1,264

GitHub Stars

5,725

下载量

10,192
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:seo-competitor-pages(SEO competitor pages 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/agricidaniel/claude-seo
仓库路径:skills/seo-competitor-pages
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/agricidaniel/claude-seo --skill seo-competitor-pages
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/agricidaniel/claude-seo --skill seo-competitor-pages

简介

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。

  • 适合根据关键词快速定位候选结果,支持多宿主环境。
  • 可结合来源仓库和原始 README 核验具体用法。
  • 安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/agricidaniel/claude-seo --skill seo-competitor-pages
  • 安装前建议确认是否会触发联网或文件读写操作。

SKILL.md

Competitor Comparison & Alternatives Pages

Create high-converting comparison and alternatives pages that target competitive intent keywords with accurate, structured content.

Page Types

1. "X vs Y" Comparison Pages

  • Direct head-to-head comparison between two products/services
  • Balanced feature-by-feature analysis
  • Clear verdict or recommendation with justification
  • Target keyword: [Product A] vs [Product B]

2. "Alternatives to X" Pages

  • List of alternatives to a specific product/service
  • Each alternative with brief summary, pros/cons, best-for use case
  • Target keyword: [Product] alternatives, best alternatives to [Product]

3. "Best [Category] Tools" Roundup Pages

  • Curated list of top tools/services in a category
  • Ranking criteria clearly stated
  • Target keyword: best [category] tools [year], top [category] software

4. Comparison Table Pages

  • Feature matrix with multiple products in columns
  • Sortable/filterable if interactive
  • Target keyword: [category] comparison, [category] comparison chart

Comparison Table Generation

Feature Matrix Layout

| Feature          | Your Product | Competitor A | Competitor B |
|------------------|:------------:|:------------:|:------------:|
| Feature 1        | ✅           | ✅           | ❌           |
| Feature 2        | ✅           | ⚠️ Partial   | ✅           |
| Feature 3        | ✅           | ❌           | ❌           |
| Pricing (from)   | $X/mo        | $Y/mo        | $Z/mo        |
| Free Tier        | ✅           | ❌           | ✅           |

Data Accuracy Requirements

  • All feature claims must be verifiable from public sources
  • Pricing must be current (include "as of [date]" note)
  • Update frequency: review quarterly or when competitors ship major changes
  • Link to source for each competitor data point where possible

Schema Markup Recommendations

Product Schema with AggregateRating

{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Product",
  "name": "[Product Name]",
  "description": "[Product Description]",
  "brand": {
    "@type": "Brand",
    "name": "[Brand Name]"
  },
  "aggregateRating": {
    "@type": "AggregateRating",
    "ratingValue": "[Rating]",
    "reviewCount": "[Count]",
    "bestRating": "5",
    "worstRating": "1"
  }
}

SoftwareApplication (for software comparisons)

{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "name": "[Software Name]",
  "applicationCategory": "[Category]",
  "operatingSystem": "[OS]",
  "offers": {
    "@type": "Offer",
    "price": "[Price]",
    "priceCurrency": "USD"
  }
}

ItemList (for roundup pages)

{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "ItemList",
  "name": "Best [Category] Tools [Year]",
  "itemListOrder": "https://schema.org/ItemListOrderDescending",
  "numberOfItems": "[Count]",
  "itemListElement": [
    {
      "@type": "ListItem",
      "position": 1,
      "name": "[Product Name]",
      "url": "[Product URL]"
    }
  ]
}

Keyword Targeting

Comparison Intent Patterns

PatternExampleSearch Volume Signal
[A] vs [B]"Slack vs Teams"High
[A] alternative"Figma alternatives"High
[A] alternatives [year]"Notion alternatives 2026"High
best [category] tools"best project management tools"High
[A] vs [B] for [use case]"AWS vs Azure for startups"Medium
[A] review [year]"Monday.com review 2026"Medium
[A] vs [B] pricing"HubSpot vs Salesforce pricing"Medium
is [A] better than [B]"is Notion better than Confluence"Medium

Title Tag Formulas

  • X vs Y: [A] vs [B]: [Key Differentiator] ([Year])
  • Alternatives: [N] Best [A] Alternatives in [Year] (Free & Paid)
  • Roundup: [N] Best [Category] Tools in [Year], Compared & Ranked

H1 Patterns

  • Match title tag intent
  • Include primary keyword naturally
  • Keep under 70 characters

Conversion-Optimized Layouts

CTA Placement

  • Above fold: Brief comparison summary with primary CTA
  • After comparison table: "Try [Your Product] free" CTA
  • Bottom of page: Final recommendation with CTA
  • Avoid aggressive CTAs in competitor description sections (reduces trust)

Social Proof Sections

  • Customer testimonials relevant to comparison criteria
  • G2/Capterra/TrustPilot ratings (with source links)
  • Case studies showing migration from competitor
  • "Switched from [Competitor]" stories

Pricing Highlights

  • Clear pricing comparison table
  • Highlight value advantages (not just lowest price)
  • Include hidden costs (setup fees, per-user pricing, overage charges)
  • Link to full pricing page

Trust Signals

  • "Last updated [date]" timestamp
  • Author with relevant expertise
  • Methodology disclosure (how comparisons were conducted)
  • Disclosure of own product affiliation

Fairness Guidelines

  • Accuracy: All competitor information must be verifiable from public sources
  • No defamation: Never make false or misleading claims about competitors
  • Cite sources: Link to competitor websites, review sites, or documentation
  • Timely updates: Review and update when competitors release major changes
  • Disclose affiliation: Clearly state which product is yours
  • Balanced presentation: Acknowledge competitor strengths honestly
  • Pricing accuracy: Include "as of [date]" disclaimers on all pricing data
  • Feature verification: Test competitor features where possible, cite documentation otherwise

Internal Linking

  • Link to your own product/service pages from comparison sections
  • Cross-link between related comparison pages (e.g., "A vs B" links to "A vs C")
  • Link to feature-specific pages when discussing individual features
  • Breadcrumb: Home > Comparisons > [This Page]
  • Related comparisons section at bottom of page
  • Link to case studies and testimonials mentioned in the comparison

Output

Comparison Page Template

  • COMPARISON-PAGE.md: Ready-to-implement page structure with sections
  • Feature matrix table
  • Content outline with word count targets (minimum 1,500 words)

Schema Markup

  • comparison-schema.json: Product/SoftwareApplication/ItemList JSON-LD

Keyword Strategy

  • Primary and secondary keywords
  • Related long-tail opportunities
  • Content gaps vs existing competitor pages

Recommendations

  • Content improvements for existing comparison pages
  • New comparison page opportunities
  • Schema markup additions
  • Conversion optimization suggestions

Error Handling

ScenarioAction
Competitor URL unreachableReport which competitor URLs failed. Proceed with available data and note gaps in the comparison.
Insufficient competitor data (pricing, features unavailable)Flag missing data points clearly. Use "Not publicly available" in comparison tables rather than guessing.
No product/service overlap foundReport that the products serve different markets. Suggest alternative competitors that share feature overlap, or pivot to a category roundup format.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

38.44%
按下载量换算3,918

Claude

29.95%
按下载量换算3,053

Cursor

18.13%
按下载量换算1,848

Gemini CLI

10.68%
按下载量换算1,089

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

external-service

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills