Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

security-architect(安全架构师)

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

security-architect 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 14,922。

总安装 8,207周安装 253GitHub Stars 25下载 1,969核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:security-architect(安全架构师)
来源仓库:https://github.com/daffy0208/ai-dev-standards
仓库路径:skills/security-architect
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/daffy0208/ai-dev-standards --skill 'Security Architect'
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/daffy0208/ai-dev-standards --skill 'Security Architect'

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。适合梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。不能将工具输出直接当作最终结论,涉及密钥或生产系统时应先确认最小权限。

安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/daffy0208/ai-dev-standards --skill 'Security Architect'。建议脱敏处理用户数据,并明确操作边界。

来源仓库内路径:skills/security-architect

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/daffy0208/ai-dev-standards --skill 'Security A…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

security-architect 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/daffy0208/ai-dev-standards --skill 'Security Architect'。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

security-architect 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

security-architect 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

security-architect 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

security-architect 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 8,207 次,近一周安装 253 次,下载 1,969 次,GitHub 25 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

security-architect 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
security-architect

安全架构师 · 本页

8,20725接触敏感数据MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Security Architect

Overview

Security Architect is a consolidated skill that covers the complete security lifecycle: threat modeling, secure design principles, secure coding practices, and regulatory compliance. It ensures security is integrated from the start, not bolted on at the end.

Consolidated from:

  • threat-modeling - STRIDE threat analysis and risk assessment
  • security-first-design - Security principles and secure design patterns
  • secure-coding-review - OWASP Top 10 and vulnerability detection
  • compliance-validator - GDPR, HIPAA, SOC2, PCI-DSS compliance

When to Use This Skill

Use Security Architect when:

  • Starting a new project (design phase)
  • Conducting security architecture review
  • Reviewing code for security vulnerabilities
  • Ensuring regulatory compliance
  • Responding to security incidents
  • Planning for security certifications (SOC2, ISO 27001)
  • Designing authentication and authorization systems

Key Capabilities

Threat Modeling (from threat-modeling)

  • Apply STRIDE methodology for threat identification
  • Assess risk levels (Likelihood × Impact)
  • Create threat models and mitigation plans
  • Identify attack surfaces and trust boundaries

Security Design (from security-first-design)

  • Apply security principles (Defense in Depth, Least Privilege, Zero Trust)
  • Design secure authentication and authorization
  • Implement encryption and key management
  • Design secure APIs and data protection

Secure Coding (from secure-coding-review)

  • Review code against OWASP Top 10
  • Detect injection vulnerabilities (SQL, XSS, command)
  • Identify broken authentication and access control
  • Ensure secure data handling and validation

Compliance (from compliance-validator)

  • Ensure GDPR, HIPAA, CCPA, SOC2, PCI-DSS compliance
  • Implement data subject rights (access, erasure, portability)
  • Design audit logging and retention policies
  • Configure encryption and access controls

Workflow

Part 1: Threat Modeling (STRIDE)

STRIDE Framework

S - Spoofing (Authentication)

  • Threat: Attacker impersonates a user or system
  • Examples:

- Stolen credentials - Session hijacking - Weak or no authentication

  • Mitigations:

- Multi-factor authentication (MFA) - Strong password policies - JWT with short expiration - Secure session management

T - Tampering (Integrity)

  • Threat: Attacker modifies data or code
  • Examples:

- SQL injection - Man-in-the-middle attacks - Parameter manipulation - Code injection

  • Mitigations:

- Input validation and sanitization - HTTPS/TLS everywhere - Signed tokens (JWT) - Integrity checks (hashing)

R - Repudiation (Accountability)

  • Threat: User denies performing an action
  • Examples:

- No audit logs - Unsigned transactions - Anonymous actions

  • Mitigations:

- Comprehensive audit logging - Digital signatures for transactions - Immutable log storage - User action tracking

I - Information Disclosure (Confidentiality)

  • Threat: Sensitive data exposed to unauthorized parties
  • Examples:

- Exposed API keys - Database dumps - Verbose error messages - Insufficient access controls

  • Mitigations:

- Encryption at rest and in transit - Principle of least privilege - Secure secret management (AWS Secrets Manager, Vault) - Role-based access control (RBAC)

D - Denial of Service (Availability)

  • Threat: System becomes unavailable to legitimate users
  • Examples:

- DDoS attacks - Resource exhaustion - Unhandled exceptions

  • Mitigations:

- Rate limiting and throttling - Input validation (reject massive payloads) - Auto-scaling infrastructure - CDN and DDoS protection (Cloudflare)

E - Elevation of Privilege (Authorization)

  • Threat: User gains unauthorized access to higher privileges
  • Examples:

- Broken access control - Insecure direct object references (IDOR) - Missing authorization checks

  • Mitigations:

- Authorization checks on every request - Principle of least privilege - Attribute-based access control (ABAC) - Regular permission audits


Threat Modeling Process

Step 1: Identify Assets

  • User data (PII, passwords, financial info)
  • Business data (IP, customer lists, transactions)
  • System credentials (API keys, certificates)
  • Infrastructure (servers, databases, APIs)

Step 2: Identify Trust Boundaries

  • User ↔ Web App
  • Web App ↔ API
  • API ↔ Database
  • Internal services ↔ External APIs
  • Admin ↔ Production systems

Step 3: Apply STRIDE to Each Boundary For each boundary, ask:

  • S: Can an attacker spoof identity?
  • T: Can data be tampered with?
  • R: Can actions be repudiated?
  • I: Can information be disclosed?
  • D: Can service be denied?
  • E: Can privileges be elevated?

Step 4: Assess Risk

Risk = Likelihood × Impact

Likelihood:
- High (likely to occur)
- Medium (may occur)
- Low (unlikely to occur)

Impact:
- Critical (data breach, financial loss, legal liability)
- High (significant damage, downtime)
- Medium (limited damage, temporary disruption)
- Low (minimal impact)

Risk Level:
- Critical: Immediate action required
- High: Address before launch
- Medium: Address post-launch
- Low: Monitor, may accept risk

Step 5: Define Mitigations For each threat, document:

  • Mitigation strategy
  • Implementation effort (low, medium, high)
  • Residual risk after mitigation
  • Owner and timeline

Part 2: Security-First Design

Security Principles

1. Defense in Depth Multiple layers of security controls. If one fails, others still protect.

Example:

  • Layer 1: Firewall
  • Layer 2: Authentication
  • Layer 3: Authorization
  • Layer 4: Encryption
  • Layer 5: Audit logs

2. Least Privilege Users/systems only have minimum permissions needed.

Example:

  • Read-only database credentials for reporting service
  • User can only see their own data
  • Admin access requires MFA + time-limited token

3. Zero Trust Never trust, always verify. Even internal networks are untrusted.

Example:

  • Every request authenticated and authorized
  • No "trusted" internal network
  • Encrypt internal traffic
  • Assume breach mentality

4. Secure by Default Default configuration is secure. Users must opt-in to less secure options.

Example:

  • HTTPS enforced by default
  • Strict password policy by default
  • MFA recommended on signup
  • Secure cookies (HttpOnly, Secure, SameSite)

5. Fail Securely When errors occur, fail in a way that doesn't compromise security.

Example:

  • Access denied on error (not granted)
  • Log error but don't expose details to user
  • Graceful degradation without exposing internals

Secure Design Patterns

Authentication:

  • Pattern: OAuth 2.0 + OpenID Connect (OIDC)
  • Implementation:

- Use Auth0, AWS Cognito, or Okta (don't build your own) - JWT tokens with short expiration (15 min access, 7 day refresh) - Secure token storage (HttpOnly cookies or secure local storage) - MFA for sensitive operations

Authorization:

  • Pattern: Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) or Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC)
  • Implementation:

- Define roles: admin, user, viewer - Check authorization on every API request - Use middleware: @requireRole('admin') - Implement IDOR protection (verify ownership)

Data Protection:

  • Pattern: Encryption at rest and in transit
  • Implementation:

- TLS 1.3 for all external traffic - AES-256 for data at rest - Key management service (AWS KMS, Google Cloud KMS) - Encrypt PII fields (email, SSN, credit cards)

API Security:

  • Pattern: Rate limiting + authentication + input validation
  • Implementation:

- Rate limit: 100 requests/minute per user - API keys for server-to-server - OAuth tokens for user-to-server - Validate all inputs (type, length, format) - Whitelist allowed values

Secrets Management:

  • Pattern: Never commit secrets, use secret managers
  • Implementation:

- AWS Secrets Manager or HashiCorp Vault - Environment variables for config (never in code) - Rotate secrets regularly (90 days) - Use IAM roles (not long-lived credentials)


Part 3: Secure Coding Review (OWASP Top 10)

OWASP Top 10 (2021)

A01: Broken Access Control

  • Risk: Users access data/functions they shouldn't
  • Examples:

- URL tampering: /user/123 → /user/456 - Missing authorization checks - Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR)

How to Detect:

// BAD: No authorization check
app.get('/api/users/:id', (req, res) => {
  const user = db.users.findById(req.params.id)
  res.json(user) // Anyone can see any user!
})

// GOOD: Check ownership
app.get('/api/users/:id', authMiddleware, (req, res) => {
  const requestedId = req.params.id
  const currentUserId = req.user.id

  if (requestedId !== currentUserId && !req.user.isAdmin) {
    return res.status(403).json({ error: 'Forbidden' })
  }

  const user = db.users.findById(requestedId)
  res.json(user)
})

A02: Cryptographic Failures

  • Risk: Sensitive data exposed due to weak or missing encryption
  • Examples:

- Plaintext passwords in database - HTTP instead of HTTPS - Weak hashing (MD5, SHA1)

How to Detect:

// BAD: Plaintext password
const user = { email, password: req.body.password }
db.users.create(user)

// GOOD: Hash with bcrypt
const bcrypt = require('bcrypt')
const hashedPassword = await bcrypt.hash(req.body.password, 10)
const user = { email, password: hashedPassword }
db.users.create(user)

A03: Injection

  • Risk: Attacker injects malicious code (SQL, XSS, command)
  • Examples:

- SQL injection - Cross-site scripting (XSS) - Command injection

How to Detect:

// BAD: SQL Injection
const query = `SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = '${req.body.email}'`
db.query(query) // Attacker can send: ' OR '1'='1

// GOOD: Parameterized query
const query = 'SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = ?'
db.query(query, [req.body.email])

// BAD: XSS
;<div dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{ __html: userInput }} />

// GOOD: Escape user input
import DOMPurify from 'dompurify'
const sanitized = DOMPurify.sanitize(userInput)
;<div dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{ __html: sanitized }} />

A04: Insecure Design

  • Risk: Flawed architecture or missing security controls
  • Examples:

- No rate limiting - Lack of threat modeling - No security requirements

How to Detect:

  • Review architecture diagram
  • Check for rate limiting, authentication, authorization
  • Validate threat model exists

A05: Security Misconfiguration

  • Risk: Default configs, verbose errors, unnecessary features enabled
  • Examples:

- Default admin password - Directory listing enabled - Stack traces in production

How to Detect:

// BAD: Exposes stack trace
app.use((err, req, res, next) => {
  res.status(500).json({ error: err.stack })
})

// GOOD: Generic error message
app.use((err, req, res, next) => {
  logger.error(err)
  res.status(500).json({ error: 'Internal server error' })
})

A06-A10: Other Critical Issues

  • A06: Vulnerable and Outdated Components (use npm audit, Dependabot)
  • A07: Identification and Authentication Failures (weak passwords, no MFA)
  • A08: Software and Data Integrity Failures (supply chain attacks)
  • A09: Security Logging and Monitoring Failures (no audit logs)
  • A10: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (validate URLs)

Part 4: Compliance Validation

Regulatory Frameworks

GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation)

  • Scope: EU data subjects
  • Key Requirements:

- Lawful basis for processing (consent, contract, legitimate interest) - Data subject rights (access, rectification, erasure, portability) - Privacy by design and default - Data breach notification (72 hours) - Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) for high-risk processing

Implementation Checklist:

  • Consent mechanism for data collection
  • Data subject access request (DSAR) process
  • Right to erasure ("right to be forgotten") implementation
  • Data portability export (JSON/CSV)
  • Privacy policy and cookie banner
  • Data Processing Agreement (DPA) with vendors
  • Breach notification process

HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act)

  • Scope: Healthcare data in the US
  • Key Requirements:

- Protected Health Information (PHI) must be encrypted - Access controls and audit logs - Business Associate Agreements (BAA) - Breach notification

Implementation Checklist:

  • Encrypt PHI at rest (AES-256) and in transit (TLS 1.3)
  • Role-based access control to PHI
  • Audit logs for all PHI access
  • BAA with cloud providers (AWS, Azure)
  • Breach notification process
  • Regular security risk assessments

SOC 2 (Service Organization Control 2)

  • Scope: SaaS companies handling customer data
  • Key Requirements:

- Trust Service Criteria (Security, Availability, Confidentiality) - Access controls and monitoring - Change management - Incident response

Implementation Checklist:

  • Security policies documented
  • Background checks for employees
  • Multi-factor authentication (MFA) enforced
  • Encryption at rest and in transit
  • Audit logging and monitoring
  • Incident response plan
  • Vendor management program
  • Regular security training

PCI-DSS (Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard)

  • Scope: Organizations handling credit card data
  • Key Requirements:

- Never store CVV/CVC codes - Encrypt cardholder data - Regularly update and patch systems - Restrict access to cardholder data

Implementation Checklist:

  • Use payment processor (Stripe, Braintree) - DON'T store cards yourself
  • If storing cards, use tokenization
  • PCI-compliant hosting (Level 1 certified)
  • Network segmentation (isolate cardholder data)
  • Vulnerability scanning and penetration testing
  • Strong access controls

Examples

Example 1: Threat Model for SaaS Application

Application: Project Management SaaS

Assets:

  • User credentials (email, password)
  • Project data (documents, tasks, comments)
  • Payment information (via Stripe)
  • API keys for integrations

Trust Boundaries:

  1. User Browser ↔ Web App (HTTPS)
  2. Web App ↔ API Server (internal TLS)
  3. API Server ↔ Database (encrypted connection)
  4. API Server ↔ Stripe API (HTTPS)

STRIDE Analysis for Boundary 1 (User ↔ Web App):

ThreatRiskMitigation
S: Credential theftHighMFA, password hashing (bcrypt)
T: Session hijackingMediumHttpOnly cookies, SameSite, CSRF tokens
R: Denied actionLowAudit logs for all user actions
I: Data exposure via XSSHighContent Security Policy, input sanitization
D: Brute force loginMediumRate limiting (5 attempts/min)
E: Account takeoverHighEmail verification, MFA

Priority Mitigations:

  1. Implement MFA (High risk, high impact)
  2. Add rate limiting (Medium risk, easy fix)
  3. Enable CSP headers (High risk, easy fix)

Example 2: Secure Code Review Findings

Code Review: User authentication endpoint

Findings:

CRITICAL: SQL Injection (A03)

// Current code (VULNERABLE):
const query = `SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = '${email}' AND password = '${password}'`

// Recommended fix:
const query = 'SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = ? AND password_hash = ?'
const hashedPassword = bcrypt.hashSync(password, user.salt)
db.query(query, [email, hashedPassword])

HIGH: Plaintext Passwords (A02)

// Current code (VULNERABLE):
db.users.create({ email, password })

// Recommended fix:
const hashedPassword = await bcrypt.hash(password, 10)
db.users.create({ email, password: hashedPassword })

MEDIUM: No Rate Limiting (A04)

// Recommended fix:
const rateLimit = require('express-rate-limit')
const loginLimiter = rateLimit({
  windowMs: 15 * 60 * 1000, // 15 minutes
  max: 5 // 5 attempts
})
app.post('/login', loginLimiter, loginHandler)

Action: Fix CRITICAL and HIGH before deployment. Add MEDIUM post-launch.


Example 3: GDPR Compliance Implementation

Requirement: Implement data subject rights

Implementation:

1. Right to Access (DSAR)

app.get('/api/user/data-export', authMiddleware, async (req, res) => {
  const userId = req.user.id

  const userData = {
    profile: await db.users.findById(userId),
    projects: await db.projects.findByUser(userId),
    comments: await db.comments.findByUser(userId),
    activity: await db.activityLog.findByUser(userId)
  }

  res.setHeader('Content-Type', 'application/json')
  res.setHeader('Content-Disposition', 'attachment; filename=my-data.json')
  res.json(userData)
})

2. Right to Erasure

app.delete('/api/user/account', authMiddleware, async (req, res) => {
  const userId = req.user.id

  // Anonymize instead of delete (retain for legal compliance)
  await db.users.update(userId, {
    email: `deleted-${userId}@example.com`,
    name: 'Deleted User',
    deleted_at: new Date()
  })

  // Delete PII
  await db.sessions.deleteByUser(userId)
  await db.notifications.deleteByUser(userId)

  res.json({ message: 'Account deleted successfully' })
})

3. Consent Management

const user = {
  email,
  marketing_consent: req.body.marketingConsent || false,
  analytics_consent: req.body.analyticsConsent || false,
  consent_date: new Date()
}

Best Practices

Threat Modeling

  1. Model early - Design phase, not after development
  2. Update regularly - When architecture changes
  3. Focus on high-risk threats - Don't aim for 100% coverage
  4. Document mitigations - Not just threats

Security Design

  1. Use proven solutions - Don't roll your own crypto
  2. Defense in depth - Multiple layers of security
  3. Secure by default - Opt-in to less secure, not opt-out
  4. Assume breach - Design with "when" not "if" mindset

Secure Coding

  1. Automate security scanning - SAST, DAST, SCA in CI/CD
  2. Validate all inputs - Trust nothing from users
  3. Use security libraries - OWASP, helmet.js, DOMPurify
  4. Keep dependencies updated - Monitor with Dependabot

Compliance

  1. Understand scope - Which regulations apply to you
  2. Document everything - Policies, procedures, decisions
  3. Regular audits - Internal + external reviews
  4. Work with legal - Don't interpret regulations alone

Common Pitfalls

1. Security as an Afterthought

Antipattern: Build first, secure later Result: Expensive retrofitting, vulnerabilities in production

Better: Integrate security from design phase

2. Trusting Client-Side Validation

Antipattern: Only validate on frontend Result: Attacker bypasses with curl

Better: Always validate on backend

3. Rolling Your Own Crypto

Antipattern: Custom encryption or hashing Result: Weak crypto, vulnerabilities

Better: Use proven libraries (bcrypt, libsodium)

4. Over-Reliance on Compliance

Antipattern: "We're compliant, so we're secure" Result: Compliant but insecure

Better: Compliance is minimum; security is ongoing

5. Ignoring Low-Risk Threats

Antipattern: Only fix CRITICAL issues Result: Death by a thousand cuts

Better: Systematically address all severity levels


Related Skills

  • quality-assurance - Security testing and validation gates
  • api-designer - API security patterns
  • deployment-advisor - Infrastructure security
  • framework-orchestrator - Security in phase gates
  • data-engineer - Data security and privacy

Deliverables

When using Security Architect, produce:

  1. Threat Model

- Asset inventory - Trust boundaries - STRIDE analysis - Risk assessment - Mitigation plan

  1. Security Architecture Document

- Authentication/authorization design - Encryption strategy - Secrets management - Network diagram with security controls

  1. Secure Code Review Report

- OWASP Top 10 findings - Severity ratings - Remediation recommendations - Re-test results

  1. Compliance Checklist

- Applicable regulations - Implementation status - Gap analysis - Remediation plan


Success Metrics

Security Architect is effective when:

  • Threat models completed before development
  • Zero CRITICAL vulnerabilities in production
  • Security incidents <1 per year
  • Compliance audits passed
  • Security gates enforced in CI/CD
  • Team follows secure coding practices
  • Regular security training completed

Remember: Security is not a feature, it's a foundation. Build it in from the start.

平台分布

Claude Code

29.74%
按下载量换算586

OpenCode

22.93%
按下载量换算451

Antigravity

15.21%
按下载量换算299

Gemini CLI

11.95%
按下载量换算235

Codex

6.96%
按下载量换算137

Cursor

3.49%
按下载量换算69

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills