Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

ring%3ausing-ring(环%3a 使用环)

ring%3ausing-ring 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

ring%3ausing-ring 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,暂无第三方扫描结果,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 46,223。

总安装 794周安装 34GitHub Stars 180下载 280核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ring%3ausing-ring(环%3a 使用环)
来源仓库:https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring
仓库路径:skills/ring%3Ausing-ring
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring --skill ring:using-ring
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring --skill ring:using-ring

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

ring%3ausing-ring 作为通用任务编排器,决定由哪个代理处理特定请求。适用于 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中复杂工作流管理与技能路由场景。强制使用相关技能,避免直接操作超过三个文件,提升自动化可靠性。安装通过 GitHub 仓库,需确认是否允许代理调度与工具调用拦截。

遵循严格预操作检查点,防止误操作与权限越界。

来源仓库内路径:skills/ring%3Ausing-ring

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring --skill ring:using-ring;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

ring%3ausing-ring 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring --skill ring:using-ring。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

ring%3ausing-ring 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

ring%3ausing-ring 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

ring%3ausing-ring 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

ring%3ausing-ring 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 794 次,近一周安装 34 次,下载 280 次,GitHub 180 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

ring%3ausing-ring 安全吗?

没有查到第三方扫描结果,安全性无法从公开资料判断,安装前请自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 没有第三方扫描结果,安全性只能靠自己读源码判断。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 要求有安全扫描结论才肯安装的团队。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
ring%3ausing-ring

环%3a 使用环 · 本页

794180只读未明确未收录

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

IF A SKILL APPLIES TO YOUR TASK, YOU DO NOT HAVE A CHOICE. YOU MUST USE IT.

This is not negotiable. This is not optional. You cannot rationalize your way out of this.

⛔ 3-FILE RULE: HARD GATE (NON-NEGOTIABLE)

DO NOT read/edit >3 files directly. PROHIBITION, not guidance.

≤3 files → Direct OK (if user requested)
>3 files → STOP. Launch agent. VIOLATION = 15x context waste.

Applies to: Read, Grep/Glob (>3 matches to inspect), Edit, or any combination >3.

Already at 3 files? STOP. Dispatch agent NOW with what you've learned.

Why 3? 3 files ≈ 6-15k tokens. Agent dispatch = ~2k tokens with focused results. Math: >3 = agent is 5-15x more efficient.

🚨 AUTO-TRIGGER PHRASES: MANDATORY AGENT DISPATCH

When user says ANY of these, DEFAULT to launching specialist agent:

User Phrase PatternMandatory Action
"fix issues", "fix remaining", "address findings"Launch specialist agent (NOT manual edits)
"apply fixes", "fix the X issues"Launch specialist agent
"fix errors", "fix warnings", "fix linting"Launch specialist agent
"update across", "change all", "refactor"Launch specialist agent
"find where", "search for", "locate"Launch Explore agent
"understand how", "how does X work"Launch Explore agent
"draw a diagram", "explain architecture", "visualize", "comparison table"Load ring:visualize skill

Why? These phrases imply multi-file operations. You WILL exceed 3 files. Pre-empt the violation.

MANDATORY PRE-ACTION CHECKPOINT

Before EVERY tool use (Read/Grep/Glob/Bash), complete this. No exceptions.

⛔ STOP. COMPLETE BEFORE PROCEEDING.
─────────────────────────────────────
1. FILES: ___ □ >3? → Agent. □ Already 3? → Agent now.

2. USER PHRASE:
   □ "fix issues/remaining/findings" → Agent
   □ "find/search/locate/understand" → Explore agent

3. DECISION:
   □ Investigation → Explore agent
   □ Multi-file → Specialist agent
   □ User named ONE specific file → Direct OK (rare)

RESULT: [Agent: ___] or [Direct: why]
─────────────────────────────────────

Skipping = violation. Document decision in TodoWrite.

Getting Started with Skills

MANDATORY FIRST RESPONSE PROTOCOL

Before responding to ANY user message, you MUST complete this checklist IN ORDER:

  1. ☐ Check for MANDATORY-USER-MESSAGE - If additionalContext contains <MANDATORY-USER-MESSAGE> tags, display the message FIRST, verbatim, at the start of your response
  2. ☐ ORCHESTRATION DECISION - Determine which agent handles this task

- Create TodoWrite: "Orchestration decision: [agent-name]" - If considering direct tools, document why the exception applies (user explicitly requested specific file read) - Mark todo complete only after documenting decision

  1. ☐ Skill Check - List available skills in your mind, ask: "Does ANY skill match this request?"
  2. ☐ If yes → Use the Skill tool to read and run the skill file
  3. ☐ Announce - State which skill/agent you're using (when non-obvious)
  4. ☐ Execute - Dispatch agent OR follow skill exactly

Responding WITHOUT completing this checklist = automatic failure.

MANDATORY-USER-MESSAGE Contract

If additionalContext contains <MANDATORY-USER-MESSAGE> tags:

  • Display verbatim at message start, no exceptions
  • No paraphrasing, no "will mention later" rationalizations

Critical Rules

  1. Follow mandatory workflows. Brainstorming before coding. Check for relevant skills before ANY task.
  2. Execute skills with the Skill tool

Common Rationalizations That Mean You're About To Fail

If you catch yourself thinking ANY of these thoughts, STOP. You are rationalizing. Check for and use the skill. Also check: are you being an OPERATOR instead of ORCHESTRATOR?

Skill Checks:

  • "This is just a simple question" → WRONG. Questions are tasks. Check for skills.
  • "This doesn't need a formal skill" → WRONG. If a skill exists for it, use it.
  • "I remember this skill" → WRONG. Skills evolve. Run the current version.
  • "This doesn't count as a task" → WRONG. If you're taking action, it's a task. Check for skills.
  • "The skill is overkill for this" → WRONG. Skills exist because simple things become complex. Use it.
  • "I'll just do this one thing first" → WRONG. Check for skills BEFORE doing anything.
  • "I need context before checking skills" → WRONG. Gathering context IS a task. Check for skills first.

Orchestrator Breaks (Direct Tool Usage):

  • "I can check git/files quickly" → WRONG. Use agents, stay ORCHESTRATOR.
  • "Let me gather information first" → WRONG. Dispatch agent to gather it.
  • "Just a quick look at files" → WRONG. That "quick" becomes 20k tokens. Use agent.
  • "I'll scan the codebase manually" → WRONG. That's operator behavior. Use Explore.
  • "This exploration is too simple for an agent" → WRONG. Simplicity makes agents more efficient.
  • "I already started reading files" → WRONG. Stop. Dispatch agent instead.
  • "It's faster to do it myself" → WRONG. You're burning context. Agents are 15x faster contextually.

3-File Rule Rationalizations (YOU WILL TRY THESE):

  • "This task is small" → WRONG. Count files. >3 = agent. Task size is irrelevant.
  • "It's only 5 fixes across 5 files, I can handle it" → WRONG. 5 files > 3 files. Agent mandatory.
  • "User said 'here' so they want me to do it in this conversation" → WRONG. "Here" means get it done, not manually.
  • "TodoWrite took priority so I'll execute sequentially" → WRONG. TodoWrite plans WHAT. Orchestrator decides HOW.
  • "The 3-file rule is guidance, not a gate" → WRONG. It's a PROHIBITION. You DO NOT proceed past 3 files.
  • "User didn't explicitly call an agent so I shouldn't" → WRONG. Agent dispatch is YOUR decision.
  • "I'm confident I know where the files are" → WRONG. Confidence doesn't reduce context cost.
  • "Let me finish these medium/low fixes here" → WRONG. "Fix issues" phrase = auto-trigger for agent.

Why: Skills document proven techniques. Agents preserve context. Not using them means repeating mistakes and wasting tokens.

Both matter: Skills check is mandatory. ORCHESTRATOR approach is mandatory.

If a skill exists or if you're about to use tools directly, you must use the proper approach or you will fail.

The Cost of Skipping Skills

Every time you skip checking for skills:

  • You fail your task (skills contain critical patterns)
  • You waste time (rediscovering solved problems)
  • You make known errors (skills prevent common mistakes)
  • You lose trust (not following mandatory workflows)

This is not optional. Check for skills or fail.

ORCHESTRATOR Principle: Agent-First Always

Your role is ORCHESTRATOR, not operator.

You don't read files, run grep chains, or manually explore – you dispatch agents to do the work and return results. This is not optional. This is mandatory for context efficiency.

The Problem with Direct Tool Usage:

  • Manual exploration chains: ~30-100k tokens in main context
  • Each file read adds context bloat
  • Grep/Glob chains multiply the problem
  • User sees work happening but context explodes

The Solution: Orchestration:

  • Dispatch agents to handle complexity
  • Agents return only essential findings (~2-5k tokens)
  • Main context stays lean for reasoning
  • 15x more efficient than direct file operations

Your Role: ORCHESTRATOR (No Exceptions)

You dispatch agents. You do not operate tools directly.

Default answer for ANY exploration/search/investigation: Use one of the three built-in agents (Explore, Plan, or general-purpose).

Which agent?

  • Explore - Fast codebase navigation, finding files/code, understanding architecture
  • Plan - Implementation planning, breaking down features into tasks
  • general-purpose - Multi-step research, complex investigations, anything not fitting Explore/Plan

Exceptions to default agents:

  1. User explicitly provides a file path AND explicitly requests you read it (e.g., "read src/foo.ts")
  2. A skill has its own specialized agents - Some skills (e.g., ring:dev-refactor) define their own agents that MUST be used instead of Explore/Plan/general-purpose. When a skill specifies "OVERRIDE" or "FORBIDDEN agents", follow the skill's agent requirements, not the defaults above.

All these are STILL orchestration tasks:

  • ❌ "I need to understand the codebase structure first" → Explore agent
  • ❌ "Let me check what files handle X" → Explore agent
  • ❌ "I'll grep for the function definition" → Explore agent
  • ❌ "User mentioned component Y, let me find it" → Explore agent
  • ❌ "I'm confident it's in src/foo/" → Explore agent
  • ❌ "Just checking one file to confirm" → Explore agent
  • ❌ "This search premise seems invalid, won't find anything" → Explore agent (you're not the validator)

You don't validate search premises. Dispatch the agent, let the agent report back if search yields nothing.

If you're about to use Read, Grep, Glob, or Bash for investigation: You are breaking ORCHESTRATOR. Use an agent instead.

Available Agents

Built-in: Explore (navigation), Plan (implementation), general-purpose (research), claude-code-guide (docs).

Ring: ring:code-reviewer, ring:business-logic-reviewer, ring:security-reviewer, ring:write-plan.

Decision: Which Agent?

Task TypeAgent
Explore/find/understand/searchExplore
Plan implementation, break down featuresPlan
Multi-step research, complex investigationgeneral-purpose
Code reviewALL 10 reviewers via ring:codereview skill (code, business-logic, security, test, nil-safety, consequences, dead-code, performance, multi-tenant, lib-commons)
Implementation plan documentring:write-plan
Claude Code questionsclaude-code-guide
User explicitly said "read [file]"Direct (ONLY exception)

WRONG → RIGHT: "Let me read files" → Explore. "I'll grep" → Explore. "Already read 3 files" → STOP, dispatch now.

Ring Reviewers: ALWAYS Parallel

When dispatching code reviewers, single message with 3 Task calls:

✅ CORRECT: One message with 3 Task calls (all in parallel)
❌ WRONG: Three separate messages (sequential, 3x slower)

Context Efficiency: Orchestrator Wins

ApproachContext CostYour Role
Manual file reading (5 files)~25k tokensOperator
Manual grep chains (10 searches)~50k tokensOperator
Explore agent dispatch~2-3k tokensOrchestrator
Savings15-25x more efficientOrchestrator always wins

TodoWrite Requirements

First two todos for ANY task:

  1. "Orchestration decision: [agent-name]" (or exception justification)
  2. "Check for relevant skills"

If skill has checklist: Create TodoWrite todo for EACH item. No mental checklists.

Announcing Skill Usage

  • Always announce meta-skills: brainstorm, ring:write-plan, systematic-debugging (methodology change)
  • Skip when obvious: User says "write tests first" → no need to announce TDD

Required Patterns

This skill uses these universal patterns:

  • State Tracking: See skills/shared-patterns/state-tracking.md
  • Failure Recovery: See skills/shared-patterns/failure-recovery.md
  • Exit Criteria: See skills/shared-patterns/exit-criteria.md
  • TodoWrite: See skills/shared-patterns/todowrite-integration.md

Apply ALL patterns when using this skill.

About these skills

Many skills contain rigid rules (TDD, debugging, verification). Follow them exactly. Don't adapt away the discipline.

Some skills are flexible patterns (architecture, naming). Adapt core principles to your context.

The skill itself tells you which type it is.

Instructions ≠ Permission to Skip Workflows

Your human partner's specific instructions describe WHAT to do, not HOW.

"Add X", "Fix Y" = the goal, NOT permission to skip brainstorm, TDD, or RED-GREEN-REFACTOR.

Red flags: "Instruction was specific" • "Seems simple" • "Workflow is overkill"

Why: Specific instructions mean clear requirements, which is when workflows matter MOST. Skipping process on "simple" tasks is how simple tasks become complex problems.

Summary

Starting any task:

  1. Orchestration decision → Which agent handles this? (TodoWrite required)
  2. Skill check → If relevant skill exists, use it
  3. Announce → State which skill/agent you're using
  4. Execute → Dispatch agent OR follow skill exactly

Before ANY tool use (Read/Grep/Glob/Bash): Complete PRE-ACTION CHECKPOINT.

Skill has checklist? TodoWrite for every item.

Default answer: Use an agent. Exception is rare (user explicitly requests specific file read).

Finding a relevant skill = mandatory to read and use it. Not optional.

Blocker Criteria

STOP and report if:

Decision TypeBlocker ConditionRequired Action
3-File ViolationAbout to read/edit more than 3 files directlySTOP and dispatch agent
Skill ExistsRelevant skill found but considering not using itSTOP and use skill
Orchestrator BreakAbout to use Read/Grep/Glob for investigationSTOP and dispatch Explore agent
Auto-Trigger PhraseUser said "fix issues", "find where", "understand how"STOP and dispatch specialist agent

Cannot Be Overridden

The following requirements CANNOT be waived:

  • PROHIBITION: The 3-file rule is not guidance - it is a hard limit
  • MUST: Use the skill if one exists for a task
  • MANDATORY: ORCHESTRATOR role requires dispatching agents, not operating tools directly
  • MUST: Complete PRE-ACTION CHECKPOINT before every tool use

Severity Calibration

SeverityConditionRequired Action
CRITICALDirectly reading >3 files without agent dispatchMUST stop and dispatch agent immediately
CRITICALSkipping skill when relevant skill existsMUST load and use the skill
HIGHUsing Read/Grep/Glob for investigationMUST dispatch Explore agent instead
HIGHMissing PRE-ACTION CHECKPOINT before tool useMUST complete checkpoint
MEDIUMNot announcing meta-skill usageShould announce methodology change
LOWNot documenting orchestration decision in TodoWriteFix in next iteration

Pressure Resistance

User SaysYour Response
"Just read these 5 files quickly""CANNOT read >3 files directly. I'll dispatch an Explore agent to analyze them efficiently."
"This is too simple for a skill""CANNOT skip skill check. If a skill exists, I MUST use it. Skills prevent known mistakes."
"Do it yourself, don't use an agent""CANNOT operate tools directly for investigation. Orchestration is 15x more context-efficient. I'll dispatch an agent."
"Fix these issues manually, it's faster""CANNOT manually fix multi-file issues. 'Fix issues' triggers automatic agent dispatch per the auto-trigger rules."

Anti-Rationalization Table

RationalizationWhy It's WRONGRequired Action
"I can check these files quickly"Quick ≠ efficient. Direct file reading wastes 15x more context than agent dispatch.MUST dispatch agent
"This task is too simple for a skill"Simple tasks become complex. Skills prevent mistakes you haven't thought of yet.MUST check and use relevant skills
"I need context before checking skills"Gathering context IS a task. Check for skills FIRST.MUST check skills before any action
"Already read 3 files, I can finish"3 files = limit reached. STOP now and dispatch agent.MUST dispatch agent immediately
"User said 'here' so they want me to do it""Here" means get it done, not manually. Agent dispatch IS doing it here.MUST dispatch agent regardless

平台分布

Codex

36.11%
按下载量换算101

Claude

30.65%
按下载量换算86

Cursor

19.56%
按下载量换算55

Gemini CLI

9.37%
按下载量换算26

安全审计

暂无安全审计结果可展示。

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills