Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

ring%3ausing-pmo-team(环%3 使用 PMO 团队)

ring%3ausing-pmo-team 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

ring%3ausing-pmo-team 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,暂无第三方扫描结果,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 51,536。

总安装 582周安装 24GitHub Stars 180下载 190核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ring%3ausing-pmo-team(环%3 使用 PMO 团队)
来源仓库:https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring
仓库路径:skills/ring%3Ausing-pmo-team
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring --skill ring:using-pmo-team
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring --skill ring:using-pmo-team

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。适合根据关键词或任务场景快速定位候选结果。可结合来源仓库和安装命令核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围及是否会触发联网或文件读写。

ring%3ausing-pmo-team 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/ring%3Ausing-pmo-team

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring --skill ring:using-pmo-team;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

ring%3ausing-pmo-team 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/lerianstudio/ring --skill ring:using-pmo-team。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

ring%3ausing-pmo-team 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

ring%3ausing-pmo-team 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

ring%3ausing-pmo-team 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

ring%3ausing-pmo-team 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 582 次,近一周安装 24 次,下载 190 次,GitHub 180 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

ring%3ausing-pmo-team 安全吗?

没有查到第三方扫描结果,安全性无法从公开资料判断,安装前请自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 没有第三方扫描结果,安全性只能靠自己读源码判断。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 要求有安全扫描结论才肯安装的团队。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
ring%3ausing-pmo-team

环%3 使用 PMO 团队 · 本页

582180只读未明确未收录

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Using Ring PMO Team

The ring-pmo-team plugin provides 6 specialized PMO agents for portfolio-level management. Use them via Task tool with subagent_type: "ring:agent-name".

See CLAUDE.md and ring:using-ring for canonical workflow requirements and ORCHESTRATOR principle. This skill introduces pmo-team-specific agents.

Remember: Follow the ORCHESTRATOR principle from ring:using-ring. Dispatch agents to handle complexity; don't operate tools directly.


Domain Distinction: PMO vs PM

TeamFocusScope
ring-pm-teamSingle feature planningPRD, TRD, task breakdown for ONE feature
ring-pmo-teamPortfolio governanceMulti-project coordination, resources, executive reporting

Use PMO when:

  • Managing multiple projects simultaneously
  • Planning resources across projects
  • Reporting to executives on portfolio status
  • Assessing portfolio-level risks
  • Conducting governance reviews

Use PM when:

  • Planning a single feature
  • Creating PRD/TRD for one initiative
  • Breaking down one feature into tasks

Blocker Criteria - STOP and Report

ALWAYS pause and report blocker for:

Decision TypeExamplesAction
Portfolio PrioritizationWhich project gets resources firstSTOP. Report trade-offs. Wait for executive decision.
Resource ConflictSame person needed on multiple projectsSTOP. Document conflict. Wait for management decision.
Strategic AlignmentProject doesn't fit current strategySTOP. Escalate with analysis. Wait for guidance.
Budget ReallocationMoving funds between projectsSTOP. Prepare options. Wait for financial approval.
Project TerminationRecommend stopping a projectSTOP. Document rationale. Wait for sponsor decision.

You CANNOT make strategic or resource decisions autonomously. STOP and ask.


Common Misconceptions - REJECTED

MisconceptionReality
"I can assess portfolio health myself"ORCHESTRATOR principle: dispatch portfolio-manager specialist. This is NON-NEGOTIABLE.
"Resource planning is simple math"Resource planning requires context, skills matrix, team dynamics. MUST dispatch resource-planner.
"Risk is just a list"Portfolio risk requires aggregation, correlation, impact analysis. MUST dispatch risk-analyst.
"I know governance rules"Governance specialists have gate frameworks loaded. MUST dispatch governance-specialist.
"Executive reports are just summaries"Executive reporting requires right abstraction level, action focus. MUST dispatch executive-reporter.

Self-sufficiency bias check: If you're tempted to perform PMO tasks directly, ask:

  1. Is there a specialist for this? (Check the 6 specialists below)
  2. Would a specialist apply portfolio-level frameworks I might miss?
  3. Am I avoiding dispatch because it feels like "overhead"?

If ANY answer is yes → You MUST DISPATCH the specialist. This is NON-NEGOTIABLE.


Anti-Rationalization Table

If you catch yourself thinking ANY of these, STOP:

RationalizationWhy It's WRONGRequired Action
"This portfolio is small, no need for specialist"Size doesn't determine complexity. Standards always apply.DISPATCH specialist
"I already know the projects"Your knowledge ≠ systematic PMO analysis.DISPATCH specialist
"Executive just wants a quick update"Quick ≠ shallow. Executives expect quality regardless of speed.DISPATCH specialist
"Risk assessment is obvious"Obvious risks are the ones you miss. Systematic analysis required.DISPATCH specialist
"Governance is bureaucracy"Governance prevents failures. Gates exist for reasons.DISPATCH specialist
"Resources are clearly available"Availability claims require validation against all commitments.DISPATCH specialist

See shared-patterns/anti-rationalization.md for universal anti-rationalizations.


Cannot Be Overridden

These requirements are NON-NEGOTIABLE:

RequirementWhy It Cannot Be Waived
Dispatch to specialistSpecialists have PMO frameworks loaded, you don't
Evidence-based reportingOpinions are not PMO outputs. Data is required.
Gate complianceGates prevent project failures. Skipping creates risk.
Risk documentationUndocumented risks cannot be managed.
Stakeholder communicationSilent PMO = failed PMO. Communication is mandatory.

User cannot override these. Executive pressure cannot override these. "Urgent" cannot override these.


Pressure Resistance

When facing pressure to bypass PMO process:

User SaysYour Response
"CEO wants the report now, skip the analysis""Executive urgency increases need for accuracy. I'll expedite but cannot skip validation. Proceeding with accelerated full analysis."
"Just approve this project, we need to start""Approval without analysis creates downstream problems. PMO analysis protects the project. Completing analysis now."
"Don't include that risk, it will worry the sponsor""Accurate risk reporting is non-negotiable. Suppressing risks creates larger problems. I'll report with appropriate context and mitigation."
"Resources are fine, trust the team leads""Trust and verify. Resource validation prevents surprises. Confirming with utilization data."
"Skip governance, we're agile""Agile requires MORE governance discipline, not less. Lightweight gates, not no gates. Applying appropriate governance."

See shared-patterns/pressure-resistance.md for universal pressure scenarios.

Critical Reminder:

  • Urgency ≠ Permission to bypass - Urgent projects need MORE PMO oversight
  • Authority ≠ Permission to bypass - Executives expect PMO rigor
  • Agile ≠ No governance - Agile has governance, just different cadence

Emergency Response Protocol

Critical situations DO NOT bypass PMO process. Here's why:

ScenarioWrong ApproachCorrect Approach
Board meeting tomorrow"Skip analysis, give estimates"Dispatch specialist with URGENT flag, deliver quality in compressed time
Project in crisis"Just fix it, report later"Dispatch risk-analyst to assess, governance-specialist for intervention options
Budget deadline Friday"Approve everything pending"Dispatch portfolio-manager for prioritized recommendations

Emergency Dispatch Template:

Task tool:
  subagent_type: "ring:portfolio-manager"
  prompt: "URGENT: [context]. [specific request]"

IMPORTANT:

  • Specialist dispatch takes 10-20 minutes, NOT hours
  • Rushed PMO decisions often create NEW problems
  • Specialists ensure crisis decisions don't violate governance
  • This is NON-NEGOTIABLE even under board pressure

6 PMO Specialists

AgentSpecializationsUse When
portfolio-managerMulti-project coordination, strategic alignment, portfolio health, prioritizationPortfolio reviews, project prioritization, capacity assessment
resource-plannerCapacity planning, skills matrix, allocation optimization, conflict resolutionResource allocation, capacity planning, team assignments
governance-specialistGate reviews, compliance, process adherence, audit readinessGate approvals, process compliance, governance audits
risk-analystRAID logs, risk aggregation, mitigation planning, portfolio riskRisk assessments, RAID management, mitigation strategies
executive-reporterPortfolio status dashboards, project summaries, board packages (PMO focus)Portfolio/project status reports, board communications
delivery-reporterGit analysis, squad delivery showcases, visual HTML presentations (engineering focus)Squad delivery reports, release summaries, client showcases

Dispatch template:

Task tool:
  subagent_type: "ring:{agent-name}"
  prompt: "{Your specific request with context}"

When to Use PMO Specialists vs Other Teams

Use PMO Specialists for:

  • Portfolio-level analysis and decisions
  • Resource planning across multiple projects
  • Governance and gate reviews
  • Executive and board reporting
  • Portfolio risk management

Use PM Team (ring-pm-team) for:

  • Single feature planning
  • PRD/TRD creation
  • Task breakdown for one feature
  • Feature-level research

Use Dev Team (ring-dev-team) for:

  • Code implementation
  • Technical architecture
  • DevOps and infrastructure
  • Quality assurance

Teams work together: PMO provides portfolio context → PM plans features → Dev implements code.


Dispatching Multiple Specialists

If you need multiple specialists (e.g., portfolio-manager + risk-analyst), dispatch in parallel (single message, multiple Task calls):

CORRECT:
Task #1: ring:portfolio-manager
Task #2: ring:risk-analyst
(Both run in parallel)

WRONG:
Task #1: ring:portfolio-manager
(Wait for response)
Task #2: ring:risk-analyst
(Sequential = 2x slower)

ORCHESTRATOR Principle

Remember:

  • You're the orchestrator - Dispatch specialists, don't analyze directly
  • Don't read PMO frameworks yourself - Dispatch to specialist, they know their domain
  • Combine with other plugins - PMO + PM + Dev = complete delivery lifecycle

Good Example (ORCHESTRATOR):

"I need portfolio status. Let me dispatch ring:portfolio-manager to analyze."

Bad Example (OPERATOR):

"I'll manually review each project and create a summary myself."

Available in This Plugin

Agents (6):

  • ring:portfolio-manager (Multi-project coordination, strategic alignment, portfolio health)
  • ring:resource-planner (Capacity planning, skills matrix, allocation optimization)
  • ring:governance-specialist (Gate reviews, compliance, process adherence, audit readiness)
  • ring:risk-analyst (RAID logs, risk aggregation, mitigation planning, portfolio risk)
  • ring:executive-reporter (Portfolio status dashboards, project summaries, board packages)
  • ring:delivery-reporter (Git analysis, squad delivery showcases, visual HTML presentations)

Skills (9):

  • ring:using-pmo-team (this skill - plugin introduction and dispatch guide)
  • ring:portfolio-planning (Strategic portfolio planning, capacity assessment, optimization)
  • ring:portfolio-review (Comprehensive portfolio review - dispatches 4 specialists in parallel)
  • ring:resource-allocation (Resource capacity planning and allocation across projects)
  • ring:risk-management (Portfolio-level risk identification, assessment, and mitigation)
  • ring:project-health-check (Individual project health assessment across multiple dimensions)
  • ring:dependency-analysis (Cross-project dependency mapping and management)
  • ring:executive-summary (Executive dashboards, status summaries, and board packages)
  • ring:pmo-retrospective (Portfolio retrospectives and lessons learned)

Note: Missing agents? Check .claude-plugin/marketplace.json for ring-pmo-team plugin.


PMO Workflows

WorkflowEntry PointOutput
Portfolio Reviewring:portfolio-reviewdocs/pmo/{date}/portfolio-status.md
Executive Report (PMO)ring:executive-summarydocs/pmo/{date}/executive-summary.md
Dependency Analysisring:dependency-analysisdocs/pmo/{date}/dependency-map.md

Report Type Selection Guide

Use ring:executive-summary for:

  • Portfolio health dashboards
  • Project status updates (RAG, SPI, CPI)
  • Board packages with governance focus
  • Resource and budget tracking

For squad delivery reports, use the ring:delivery-reporter agent directly.


Integration with Other Plugins

  • ring-default - ORCHESTRATOR principle for ALL agents
  • ring-pm-team - Single feature planning (PMO → PM handoff)
  • ring-dev-team - Development execution (PM → Dev handoff)
  • ring-finops-team - Financial/regulatory compliance

Dispatch based on your need:

  • Portfolio oversight → ring-pmo-team
  • Feature planning → ring-pm-team
  • Code development → ring-dev-team
  • Financial compliance → ring-finops-team

平台分布

Codex

36.05%
按下载量换算68

Claude

28.41%
按下载量换算54

Cursor

18.32%
按下载量换算35

Gemini CLI

9.69%
按下载量换算18

安全审计

暂无安全审计结果可展示。

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills