Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

reply-templates(回复模板)

reply-templates 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

reply-templates 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 57,864。

总安装 423周安装 18GitHub Stars 55下载 148核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:reply-templates(回复模板)
来源仓库:https://github.com/vm0-ai/vm0-skills
仓库路径:skills/reply-templates
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/vm0-ai/vm0-skills --skill reply-templates
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/vm0-ai/vm0-skills --skill reply-templates

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词快速定位结果。可结合来源仓库和原始 README 核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态及是否会触发联网或文件读写。安装方式:通过 npx skills add 从 GitHub 仓库安装。

来源仓库内路径:skills/reply-templates

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/vm0-ai/vm0-skills --skill reply-templates;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

reply-templates 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/vm0-ai/vm0-skills --skill reply-templates。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

reply-templates 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

reply-templates 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

reply-templates 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

reply-templates 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 423 次,近一周安装 18 次,下载 148 次,GitHub 55 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

reply-templates 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
reply-templates

回复模板 · 本页

42355只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Template Architecture

Required Components for Every Template

Each template in the library must contain:

  1. Label: A descriptive, searchable name
  2. Category: The inquiry type it addresses
  3. Applicability criteria: Conditions under which this template is the right choice
  4. Red flags: Scenarios where this template must NOT be used
  5. Variable fields: Placeholders that require per-use customization
  6. Body text: The response content with embedded placeholders
  7. Post-send checklist: Standard follow-up tasks after dispatching the response
  8. Review date: When the template was last verified for legal and factual accuracy

Template Governance Cycle

  1. Drafting: Author the template informed by current law and team practices
  2. Approval: Legal team reviews for accuracy, compliance, and completeness
  3. Activation: Enter the template into the shared library with full metadata
  4. Deployment: Use the template to produce tailored responses
  5. Refinement tracking: Monitor ad-hoc edits made during use to surface improvement opportunities
  6. Revision: Update when statutes, regulations, or internal policies change
  7. Deprecation: Remove or archive templates that no longer apply

Inquiry Categories and Template Guidance

Category 1: Data Subject Requests

Covers all requests from individuals exercising privacy rights under GDPR, CCPA, and similar frameworks.

Variants:

  • Receipt acknowledgment
  • Identity verification follow-up
  • Fulfillment (access, erasure, rectification)
  • Partial denial with justification
  • Complete denial with justification
  • Timeline extension notice

Mandatory elements in every DSR template:

  • Citation of the governing regulation
  • Concrete response deadline
  • Verification requirements for the requestor
  • Enumeration of the individual's rights (including supervisory authority complaints)
  • Team contact details for follow-up

Skeleton:

Subject: Your Data [Access/Erasure/Rectification] Request -- Ref {{ref_number}}

Dear {{individual_name}},

We received your {{request_date}} request to [access/erase/rectify] personal data under [regulation].

[Acknowledgment / verification instructions / fulfillment summary / denial rationale]

A substantive response will be provided by {{deadline}}.

[Contact details]
[Rights summary]

Category 2: Litigation Hold Notices

Preservation directives issued to custodians when litigation is anticipated or pending.

Variants:

  • Initial preservation directive
  • Periodic reaffirmation reminder
  • Scope modification
  • Hold release

Mandatory elements:

  • Matter identifier and reference code
  • Explicit preservation duties
  • Scope boundaries (date window, data categories, systems, communication channels)
  • Spoliation prohibition
  • Point of contact for questions
  • Acknowledgment requirement and deadline

Skeleton:

Subject: LITIGATION HOLD -- {{matter_name}} -- Response Required

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION

Dear {{custodian_name}},

You are receiving this directive because you may hold documents, messages, or electronic data pertinent to the matter identified above.

PRESERVATION REQUIREMENTS:
Starting now, retain all documents and electronically stored information connected to:
- Topic: {{scope_description}}
- Time window: {{date_start}} through present
- Material types: {{material_categories}}

Do NOT alter, discard, or destroy any potentially relevant materials.

[Platform-specific retention instructions]

Confirm receipt by {{ack_deadline}}.

Questions? Contact {{legal_contact}}.

Category 3: Privacy Inquiries

Responses to external questions about organizational data practices.

Variants:

  • Cookie and tracking technology questions
  • Privacy notice clarifications
  • Data sharing practice inquiries
  • Children's data handling questions
  • International transfer inquiries

Mandatory elements:

  • Pointer to the published privacy notice
  • Answers grounded in current, verified practices
  • Links to relevant privacy documentation
  • Privacy team contact information

Category 4: Vendor and Contract Inquiries

Responses to legal questions from business partners and suppliers.

Variants:

  • Contract status updates
  • Amendment request handling
  • Compliance certification questions
  • Audit facilitation responses
  • Insurance documentation requests

Mandatory elements:

  • Reference to the governing agreement
  • Precise answer to the vendor's specific question
  • Any necessary disclaimers or scope limitations
  • Timeline and next steps

Category 5: Non-Disclosure Agreements

Handling the NDA lifecycle from initiation through renewal.

Variants:

  • Dispatching the organization's standard NDA form
  • Reviewing and marking up a counterparty's NDA
  • Declining an NDA request with explanation
  • Renewal or extension of an existing NDA

Mandatory elements:

  • Stated purpose for the confidentiality arrangement
  • Summary of key terms
  • Signing instructions and process
  • Expected timeline

Category 6: Subpoenas and Legal Process

Responses to compulsory legal demands.

Variants:

  • Receipt acknowledgment
  • Formal objection
  • Extension request
  • Production cover letter

Mandatory elements:

  • Case citation and jurisdictional details
  • Itemized objections where applicable
  • Preservation confirmation
  • Compliance timeline
  • Privilege log reference if relevant

Important: Responses to compulsory legal process nearly always demand individualized attorney review. Templates serve as scaffolding, never as final output.

Category 7: Insurance Notifications

Communications with insurers regarding potential or active claims.

Variants:

  • Initial claim notice
  • Supplemental information submission
  • Reservation of rights response

Mandatory elements:

  • Policy number and coverage window
  • Factual description of the matter or event
  • Chronological narrative
  • Request for coverage confirmation

Customization Requirements

Mandatory Per-Use Adjustments

No template may be sent without populating:

  • Accurate names, dates, and reference identifiers
  • Case-specific facts
  • Correct jurisdiction and applicable legal framework
  • Calculated response deadlines based on receipt date
  • Proper signature block and contact coordinates

Tone Calibration

Adjust register based on:

  • Recipient: Internal colleague vs. external party, business person vs. attorney, individual vs. regulatory body
  • Relationship: New counterparty vs. long-term partner vs. adversary
  • Gravity: Routine matter vs. contested dispute vs. government investigation
  • Time pressure: Standard processing vs. expedited turnaround

Jurisdictional Adaptation

  • Confirm that all regulatory citations match the requestor's jurisdiction
  • Recalculate deadlines according to applicable statutory requirements
  • Include jurisdiction-mandated rights disclosures
  • Apply locally appropriate legal terminology

Situations Requiring Escalation Instead of Templates

Before producing any response, scan for conditions that disqualify template use:

Universal Disqualifiers

  • Active or threatened litigation or regulatory proceeding
  • Inquiry originates from a regulator, government body, or law enforcement
  • The response could create a binding obligation or constitute a waiver
  • Potential criminal exposure
  • Media involvement is present or foreseeable
  • The scenario has no precedent within the team's experience
  • Conflicting requirements across multiple jurisdictions
  • Executive leadership or board members are involved parties

Category-Specific Disqualifiers

Data Subject Requests:

  • Requestor is a minor or acting on behalf of a minor
  • Requested data is subject to an active litigation hold
  • Requestor is in pending litigation or dispute with the organization
  • Requestor is an employee with an open HR investigation
  • Request scope appears designed for discovery rather than privacy rights
  • Special-category data is implicated (health, biometric, genetic)

Litigation Holds:

  • Criminal liability is possible
  • Preservation scope is contested or ambiguous
  • Hold conflicts with regulatory data deletion mandates
  • Overlapping holds exist for connected matters
  • A custodian challenges the hold parameters

Vendor Questions:

  • Vendor is challenging contractual terms
  • Vendor is threatening legal action or contract termination
  • Response could prejudice an active negotiation
  • Inquiry involves regulatory compliance rather than contractual interpretation

Subpoenas / Legal Process:

  • ALWAYS route to counsel (templates are starting frameworks only)
  • Privilege concerns are identified
  • Third-party data is within scope
  • Cross-border production complications exist
  • Compliance timeline is unreasonably compressed

Escalation Protocol When a Disqualifier is Detected

  1. Halt: Do not produce a template-based response.
  2. Flag: Notify the requestor that an escalation condition exists.
  3. Detail: Explain which disqualifier was triggered and its implications.
  4. Direct: Recommend the appropriate escalation path (senior counsel, outside counsel, specific specialist).
  5. Assist: Offer a preliminary draft clearly watermarked "DRAFT -- FOR COUNSEL REVIEW ONLY" to accelerate the individualized review.

Authoring New Templates

Phase 1: Scope Definition

  • What recurring inquiry does this address?
  • How often does it arise?
  • Who is the typical recipient?
  • What is the normal urgency level?

Phase 2: Content Requirements

  • What information is legally required in every response?
  • Which regulations or policies govern this response type?
  • What organizational standards apply?

Phase 3: Variable Identification

  • Which elements change per use? (names, dates, case-specific facts)
  • Which elements remain constant? (statutory language, standard terms)
  • Use unambiguous placeholder names: {{requestor_name}}, {{compliance_deadline}}, {{matter_id}}

Phase 4: Drafting

  • Write in clear, professional prose
  • Minimize unnecessary legal jargon for business-audience templates
  • Incorporate all legally mandated content
  • Insert placeholders for every variable element
  • Include a subject line template for email-based responses

Phase 5: Safeguard Definition

  • Under what circumstances must this template be set aside?
  • What signals indicate the matter needs bespoke handling?
  • Specificity matters: vague safeguards provide no protection

Phase 6: Metadata Completion

  • Assign template name and category
  • Record version number and last-reviewed date
  • Document author and approver
  • Attach the post-send checklist

Standard Template Format

## Template: {{template_label}}

**Category**: {{category}}
**Version**: {{version}} | **Reviewed**: {{review_date}}
**Approved By**: {{approver_name}}

### When to Use
- [Condition 1]
- [Condition 2]

### When NOT to Use (Escalation Triggers)
- [Disqualifier 1]
- [Disqualifier 2]

### Variable Fields
| Placeholder | Meaning | Sample Value |
|---|---|---|
| {{var1}} | [description] | [example] |
| {{var2}} | [description] | [example] |

### Subject Line
[Template with {{placeholders}}]

### Body
[Response content with {{placeholders}}]

### Post-Send Actions
1. [Step 1]
2. [Step 2]

### Usage Notes
[Special guidance for anyone deploying this template]

平台分布

Codex

38.62%
按下载量换算57

Claude

31.67%
按下载量换算47

Cursor

16.99%
按下载量换算25

Gemini CLI

9.9%
按下载量换算15

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills