Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

reply-prediction(回复预测)

reply-prediction 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

reply-prediction 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为权限未标注;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 71,596。

总安装 194周安装 8GitHub Stars 12下载 63核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:reply-prediction(回复预测)
来源仓库:https://github.com/louisblythe/sales-skills
仓库路径:skills/reply-prediction
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/louisblythe/sales-skills --skill reply-prediction
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/louisblythe/sales-skills --skill reply-prediction

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词快速定位结果。可结合来源仓库和原始 README 核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态及是否会触发联网或文件读写。安装方式:通过 npx skills add 从 GitHub 仓库安装。

来源仓库内路径:skills/reply-prediction

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/louisblythe/sales-skills --skill reply-predict…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    权限没有明确标注,第一次使用时只给一个无关紧要的任务,观察它到底读了哪些文件和网络。

常见问题

6 条

reply-prediction 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/louisblythe/sales-skills --skill reply-prediction。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

reply-prediction 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

reply-prediction 需要什么权限?

权限级别没有明确标注。第一次使用时建议只给无关紧要的任务,观察它实际读写了哪些内容。

reply-prediction 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

reply-prediction 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 194 次,近一周安装 8 次,下载 63 次,GitHub 12 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

reply-prediction 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
reply-prediction

回复预测 · 本页

19412权限未标注未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Reply Prediction

You are an expert in building sales bots that anticipate likely prospect responses and pre-load appropriate follow-ups. Your goal is to help developers create systems that predict responses and prepare intelligent replies in advance.

Why Reply Prediction Matters

The Reactive Problem

Traditional approach:
1. Bot sends message
2. Waits for response
3. Analyzes response
4. Generates reply
5. Sends reply

Time to reply: Seconds to minutes
Quality: Variable, sometimes off-target

Predictive Approach

Predictive approach:
1. Bot sends message
2. Predicts likely responses
3. Pre-generates replies for each
4. Response arrives
5. Matches to prediction
6. Sends pre-optimized reply

Time to reply: Near-instant
Quality: Pre-reviewed, consistent

Prediction Categories

Response Type Predictions

For any given message, predict likelihood of:

Positive responses:
- "Yes, I'm interested"
- "Tell me more"
- "Let's schedule a call"

Neutral responses:
- "What exactly do you do?"
- "How is this different from X?"
- "I need to check with my team"

Negative responses:
- "Not interested"
- "We already have a solution"
- "Bad timing"

No response:
- Probability of no reply

Content Predictions

Predict specific content:

Questions likely to be asked:
- Pricing questions
- Feature questions
- Comparison questions
- Implementation questions

Objections likely to be raised:
- Budget concerns
- Timing concerns
- Authority concerns
- Competitor mentions

Information likely to be shared:
- Company details
- Pain point specifics
- Timeline information

Prediction Implementation

Probability Model

class ReplyPredictor:
    def __init__(self, model):
        self.model = model
        self.predictions = {}

    def predict_responses(self, context):
        """Generate probability distribution of likely responses"""

        features = extract_features(context)

        predictions = {
            "positive_interest": 0,
            "question_pricing": 0,
            "question_features": 0,
            "question_comparison": 0,
            "objection_timing": 0,
            "objection_budget": 0,
            "objection_competitor": 0,
            "not_interested": 0,
            "no_response": 0
        }

        # Use model to predict probabilities
        probabilities = self.model.predict_proba(features)

        for response_type, prob in zip(self.model.classes_, probabilities):
            predictions[response_type] = prob

        return predictions

    def get_top_predictions(self, context, n=3):
        all_predictions = self.predict_responses(context)
        sorted_predictions = sorted(
            all_predictions.items(),
            key=lambda x: x[1],
            reverse=True
        )
        return sorted_predictions[:n]

Historical Pattern Analysis

def predict_from_history(message_template, prospect_segment):
    """Predict based on historical response patterns"""

    # Get historical responses to this template
    historical = get_historical_responses(
        template_id=message_template.id,
        segment=prospect_segment
    )

    # Calculate response distribution
    response_counts = Counter([r.response_type for r in historical])
    total = len(historical)

    predictions = {}
    for response_type, count in response_counts.items():
        predictions[response_type] = count / total

    # Get common response content
    content_patterns = extract_common_content(historical)

    return {
        "type_probabilities": predictions,
        "content_patterns": content_patterns,
        "sample_size": total
    }

Context-Aware Prediction

def predict_with_context(context):
    """Adjust predictions based on conversation context"""

    base_predictions = predict_from_history(
        context.last_message.template,
        context.prospect.segment
    )

    # Adjust for conversation stage
    stage_adjustments = {
        "discovery": {"question_features": 0.2, "not_interested": -0.1},
        "evaluation": {"question_pricing": 0.3, "question_comparison": 0.2},
        "proposal": {"objection_budget": 0.2, "positive_interest": 0.1},
        "negotiation": {"objection_budget": 0.3, "positive_interest": 0.2}
    }

    adjustments = stage_adjustments.get(context.stage, {})
    adjusted = apply_adjustments(base_predictions, adjustments)

    # Adjust for prospect engagement
    if context.prospect.engagement_score > 70:
        adjusted["positive_interest"] *= 1.3
        adjusted["not_interested"] *= 0.5

    # Adjust for recent behavior
    if context.prospect.asked_pricing_before:
        adjusted["question_pricing"] *= 1.5

    return adjusted

Pre-Generated Replies

Reply Templates by Prediction

PREDICTED_REPLY_TEMPLATES = {
    "positive_interest": {
        "replies": [
            "Great! What specifically caught your attention?",
            "Glad to hear it. Would a quick call or more info be more helpful right now?"
        ],
        "next_action": "advance_to_meeting"
    },
    "question_pricing": {
        "replies": [
            "Happy to walk through pricing. To give you accurate info, can I ask a few questions about your team size and needs?",
            "Pricing depends on a few factors. What's your team size, and what's most important to you in a solution?"
        ],
        "next_action": "qualify_then_price"
    },
    "question_comparison": {
        "replies": [
            "Good question—here's how we're different: [comparison points]. What matters most to you?",
            "We get asked that a lot. The main difference is [key differentiator]. What's driving the comparison?"
        ],
        "next_action": "understand_evaluation"
    },
    "objection_timing": {
        "replies": [
            "Totally understand—when would be a better time to revisit this?",
            "Makes sense. If I check back in [timeframe], would that work better?"
        ],
        "next_action": "schedule_future_outreach"
    },
    "not_interested": {
        "replies": [
            "No problem. Mind if I ask what's not a fit? Helps me know if I should reach out again in the future.",
            "Understood. If anything changes, feel free to reach out. Best of luck!"
        ],
        "next_action": "disqualify_or_nurture"
    }
}

Dynamic Reply Selection

def select_preloaded_reply(actual_response, predictions, context):
    """Match actual response to predictions and select reply"""

    # Classify actual response
    response_type = classify_response(actual_response)

    # Check if we predicted this
    if response_type in predictions and predictions[response_type] > 0.1:
        # Use preloaded reply
        template = PREDICTED_REPLY_TEMPLATES.get(response_type)
        if template:
            reply = select_best_reply(template["replies"], context)
            return {
                "reply": reply,
                "source": "predicted",
                "confidence": predictions[response_type]
            }

    # Fall back to real-time generation
    return {
        "reply": generate_reply_realtime(actual_response, context),
        "source": "generated",
        "confidence": None
    }

Prediction Caching

Pre-Computation

def precompute_replies(conversation):
    """Precompute replies before response arrives"""

    # Get predictions
    predictions = predict_responses(conversation.context)
    top_predictions = get_top_predictions(predictions, n=5)

    # Generate and cache replies
    cached_replies = {}
    for response_type, probability in top_predictions:
        if probability > 0.05:  # Only cache if >5% probability
            template = PREDICTED_REPLY_TEMPLATES.get(response_type)
            if template:
                reply = personalize_reply(
                    template["replies"],
                    conversation.prospect
                )
                cached_replies[response_type] = {
                    "reply": reply,
                    "probability": probability,
                    "generated_at": datetime.now()
                }

    # Store in cache
    cache_key = f"replies:{conversation.id}"
    cache.set(cache_key, cached_replies, ttl=3600)

    return cached_replies

Cache Retrieval

def get_reply_for_response(conversation_id, actual_response):
    """Retrieve cached reply if available"""

    cache_key = f"replies:{conversation_id}"
    cached = cache.get(cache_key)

    if not cached:
        return None

    # Match response to cached predictions
    response_type = classify_response(actual_response)

    if response_type in cached:
        return cached[response_type]

    return None

Learning & Improvement

Prediction Accuracy Tracking

def track_prediction_accuracy(conversation_id, predicted, actual):
    """Track how accurate predictions were"""

    log_prediction_result(
        conversation_id=conversation_id,
        predicted_type=max(predicted, key=predicted.get),
        predicted_probability=max(predicted.values()),
        actual_type=actual,
        correct=actual == max(predicted, key=predicted.get)
    )

    # Update model if enough data
    if should_retrain_model():
        retrain_prediction_model()

Feedback Loop

def improve_predictions(results):
    """Use outcomes to improve prediction model"""

    for result in results:
        # Was predicted reply effective?
        if result["source"] == "predicted":
            effectiveness = measure_reply_effectiveness(result)

            if effectiveness < THRESHOLD:
                # Flag reply for review
                flag_for_review(
                    response_type=result["response_type"],
                    reply=result["reply"],
                    effectiveness=effectiveness
                )

    # Aggregate learnings
    improvement_suggestions = analyze_prediction_patterns(results)
    return improvement_suggestions

Metrics

Prediction Quality

Track:
- Prediction accuracy (did we predict right type?)
- Reply match rate (how often was cached reply used?)
- Response time improvement
- Reply effectiveness by source (predicted vs generated)

Optimize:
- Which responses are predictable?
- Where do we need better predictions?
- Which templates perform best?

平台分布

Codex

34.48%
按下载量换算22

Claude

29.75%
按下载量换算19

Cursor

19.04%
按下载量换算12

Gemini CLI

10.07%
按下载量换算6

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

权限未标注

当前来源未能明确判断权限范围,默认进入异常复核队列。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills