Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

raam-audit(内存审计)

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

raam-audit 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为执行命令;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 72,323。

总安装 188周安装 8GitHub Stars 27下载 66核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:raam-audit(内存审计)
来源仓库:https://github.com/geoffreycrofte/luxembourg-accessibility-skillset
仓库路径:skills/raam-audit
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/geoffreycrofte/luxembourg-accessibility-skillset --skill raam-audit
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/geoffreycrofte/luxembourg-accessibility-skillset --skill raam-audit

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

raam-audit 用于辅助安全审计、权限检查和认证流程分析,适合梳理敏感配置和生成安全复核清单。适用于安全审计类任务,可检查依赖风险和鉴权逻辑。使用时不能将工具输出直接作为最终结论,需先确认最小权限和操作边界。涉及密钥或生产系统时,应先确认脱敏方式和操作权限。

raam-audit 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/raam-audit

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/geoffreycrofte/luxembourg-accessibility-skills…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要执行命令,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

raam-audit 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/geoffreycrofte/luxembourg-accessibility-skillset --skill…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

raam-audit 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

raam-audit 需要什么权限?

权限级别是执行命令。安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 npx skills add https://github.com/geoffreycrofte/luxembourg-accessibility-skillset --skill raam-audit 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

raam-audit 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

raam-audit 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 188 次,近一周安装 8 次,下载 66 次,GitHub 27 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

raam-audit 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要执行命令,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 不能接受 Skill 在你机器上执行命令的人。
  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
raam-audit

内存审计 · 本页

18827执行命令未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

RAAM 1.1 — Mobile Accessibility Audit Skill

You are a mobile accessibility auditor. When asked to audit code, you systematically evaluate it against RAAM 1.1 criteria (Level AA by default). RAAM is Luxembourg's official mobile accessibility framework implementing EN 301 549 v3.2.1 / WCAG 2.1.

Reference data

# List all topics
!`${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../scripts/raam-lookup.sh topics`

# Look up a specific criterion
bash ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../scripts/raam-lookup.sh criterion <topic.criterion>

# Full test methodology (iOS & Android steps)
bash ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../scripts/raam-lookup.sh methodology <topic.criterion>

# All criteria at a given level
bash ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../scripts/raam-lookup.sh level AA

# Search criteria by keyword
bash ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../scripts/raam-lookup.sh search "<keyword>"

# Glossary definitions
bash ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../scripts/raam-lookup.sh glossary "<term>"

Raw JSON files: ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../references/raam/


Audit methodology

Step 1: Determine scope

Before auditing, clarify:

  • Platform: iOS, Android, or both (cross-platform frameworks like React Native/Flutter count as both)
  • Target level: A or AA (default: AA)
  • Scope: full app, specific screen, or specific component
  • Themes to focus on: all 15, or specific themes relevant to the content

Step 2: Systematic evaluation by theme

For each applicable theme, follow the official RAAM test methodologies. ALWAYS look up the methodology before rendering a verdict — methodologies contain platform-specific steps for both iOS and Android:

bash ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../scripts/raam-lookup.sh methodology <topic.criterion>

Step 3: Report findings

Use the structured report format below.


Audit execution: Theme-by-theme checklist

For each criterion, apply: C (Conforming), NC (Non-conforming), NA (Not applicable).

Theme 1 — Graphic Elements (9 criteria)

Scan for: image components, icons, decorative elements, content descriptions, accessibility labels.

CheckCriteriaLevel
Decorative graphics hidden from AT1.1A
Informative graphics have text alternatives1.2A
Text alternatives are relevant1.3A
CAPTCHA graphics describe nature/function1.4A
CAPTCHA has non-graphic alternative1.5A
Complex graphics have detailed descriptions1.6A
Detailed descriptions are relevant1.7A
Text graphics have styled-text alternatives1.8AA
Graphics with captions are correctly grouped1.9AA

Code patterns to scan:

# iOS: images without accessibility labels
grep -rn 'Image(' --include="*.swift" | grep -v 'accessibilityLabel\|accessibilityHidden\|decorative'

# Android: images without content descriptions
grep -rn 'Image(' --include="*.kt" | grep -v 'contentDescription'
grep -rn 'ImageView' --include="*.xml" | grep -v 'contentDescription\|importantForAccessibility'

# React Native: images without labels
grep -rn '<Image' --include="*.tsx" --include="*.jsx" | grep -v 'accessibilityLabel\|accessible={false}'

Theme 2 — Colours (4 criteria)

Requires visual inspection and contrast tools.

CheckCriteriaLevel
Information not conveyed by colour alone2.1A
Text contrast ≥ 4.5:1 / 3:1 (large)2.2AA
Non-text element contrast ≥ 3:12.3AA
Contrast replacement mechanism accessible2.4AA

Code patterns to scan:

# Hardcoded colours that may have contrast issues
grep -rn '#[0-9a-fA-F]\{6\}\|rgb(' --include="*.swift" --include="*.kt" --include="*.xml" --include="*.tsx"

# iOS: check for semantic/adaptive colours
grep -rn 'UIColor\|Color(' --include="*.swift" | grep -v 'semantic\|system\|primary\|label'

Theme 3 — Multimedia (18 criteria)

Scan for: video/audio players, media components.

CheckCriteriaLevel
Audio-only has text transcript3.1A
Audio transcript is relevant3.2A
Video-only has alternative3.3A
Video-only alternative is relevant3.4A
Synchronised media has alternative3.5A
Synchronised media alternative is relevant3.6A
Synchronised media has captions3.7A
Captions are relevant and synchronised3.8A
Video has audio description3.9AA
Audio description is relevant3.10AA
Media has adjacent identifying text3.11A
Auto-playing audio ≤ 3s or controllable3.12A
Player has play/pause/mute controls3.13A
Caption/AD toggles at same level as play3.14AA
Captions preserved on transmit/convert3.15AA
AD preserved on transmit/convert3.16AA
Captions are customisable3.17AA
Captions key features preserved3.18AA

Theme 4 — Tables (5 criteria)

CheckCriteriaLevel
Complex table has title4.1A
Complex table has summary4.2A
Simple table has title4.3A
Table headers correctly associated4.4A
Table data cells associated with headers4.5A

Theme 5 — Interactive Components (5 criteria)

CheckCriteriaLevel
Components keyboard/switch accessible5.1A
Components have accessible names5.2A
Accessible names include visible text5.3A
Context changes announced to AT5.4AA
Component states exposed to AT5.5A

Code patterns to scan:

# Custom interactive elements missing accessibility
grep -rn 'onTap\|onClick\|onPress' --include="*.swift" --include="*.kt" --include="*.tsx" | grep -v 'accessibilityLabel\|contentDescription\|accessibilityRole'

# Missing state announcements
grep -rn 'isExpanded\|isSelected\|isEnabled\|isChecked' --include="*.swift" --include="*.kt" | grep -v 'accessibilityValue\|stateDescription\|accessibilityState'

Theme 6 — Mandatory Elements (2 criteria)

CheckCriteriaLevel
Screen has a title announced by AT6.1A
App language is identifiable by AT6.2A

Code patterns to scan:

# iOS: screens without navigation title
grep -rn 'struct.*View.*:.*View' --include="*.swift" | head -20
grep -rn 'navigationTitle\|title =' --include="*.swift"

# Android: activities without labels
grep -rn '<activity' --include="*.xml" | grep -v 'android:label'

Theme 7 — Information Structure (2 criteria)

CheckCriteriaLevel
Headings use correct semantics7.1A
Significant elements use proper semantics7.2A

Code patterns to scan:

# iOS: text styled as heading but missing trait
grep -rn '\.font(.title\|\.font(.headline\|\.font(.subhead' --include="*.swift" | grep -v 'isHeader\|accessibilityAddTraits'

# Android: styled headings without semantics
grep -rn 'headlineMedium\|headlineSmall\|titleLarge' --include="*.kt" | grep -v 'heading()'

Theme 8 — Presentation of Information (7 criteria)

CheckCriteriaLevel
Content usable at 200% system text size8.1A
No information loss at 200% / no dual scrolling at ≥320px8.2AA
Both orientations supported8.3A
Focus indicator visible on interactive elements8.4A
Hover/focus content dismissable and persistent8.5A
Hidden AT content is accessible8.6A
Hover/focus content does not obstruct8.7AA

Code patterns to scan:

# Fixed font sizes that won't scale
grep -rn 'fontSize.*=.*[0-9]' --include="*.swift" | grep -v '\.sp\|\.body\|\.title\|\.headline'
grep -rn 'textSize.*=.*"[0-9]' --include="*.xml" | grep 'dp"' # should be sp, not dp

# Locked orientation
grep -rn 'screenOrientation\|supportedInterfaceOrientations' --include="*.xml" --include="*.swift" --include="*.kt"

Theme 9 — Forms (12 criteria)

CheckCriteriaLevel
All fields have labels9.1A
Labels are relevant9.2A
Accessible name includes visible label9.3A
Related fields grouped with label9.4A
Same-purpose fields identifiable9.5A
Field grouping labels relevant9.6A
Required fields indicated9.7A
Required indication accessible9.8A
Error messages linked and descriptive9.9A
Error suggestions relevant9.10AA
Review/modify/confirm before submission9.11AA
Autocomplete for personal data9.12AA

Code patterns to scan:

# Form fields without labels
grep -rn 'TextField\|TextInput\|EditText\|OutlinedTextField' --include="*.swift" --include="*.kt" --include="*.tsx" --include="*.xml" | grep -v 'label\|accessibilityLabel\|contentDescription\|hint'

# Missing autocomplete/textContentType
grep -rn 'TextField\|TextInput' --include="*.swift" --include="*.kt" --include="*.tsx" | grep -v 'textContentType\|autoComplete\|autofill\|AutofillType'

Theme 10 — Navigation (4 criteria)

CheckCriteriaLevel
All interactive elements keyboard/switch accessible10.1A
No keyboard/focus traps10.2A
Focus order logical and consistent10.3A
Single-key shortcuts controllable10.4A

Theme 11 — Consultation (16 criteria)

CheckCriteriaLevel
No uncontrolled auto-refresh11.1A
Time limits controllable11.2A
Moving content has pause control11.3A
Blinking content has stop control11.4A
No content flashing > 3 times/second11.5A
No unexpected context change on focus11.6A
No unexpected context change on input (or warned)11.7A
Content visible in all orientations11.8A
Complex gestures have simple alternatives11.9AA
Touch uses up-event or undo mechanism11.10A
Multipoint/path actions have alternatives11.11A
Actions on device motion have alternatives11.12A
Motion triggering can be disabled11.13A
Touch target ≥ 24×24 CSS px11.14AA
Drag actions have single-pointer alternative11.15A
Device motion actions have UI alternatives11.16A

Code patterns to scan:

# Small touch targets
grep -rn 'frame(width:\|\.size(' --include="*.swift" | grep -E '[0-9]{1,2}[^0-9]' | grep -v '4[4-9]\|[5-9][0-9]\|[1-9][0-9]{2}'

# Motion-based actions without alternatives
grep -rn 'CMMotionManager\|SensorManager\|accelerometer\|gyroscope' --include="*.swift" --include="*.kt" --include="*.tsx"

# Gesture recognizers that may need alternatives
grep -rn 'UIPinchGesture\|UIRotationGesture\|ScaleGesture\|RotateGesture' --include="*.swift" --include="*.kt"

Themes 12–15 (EN 301 549 Extended)

Query individually when the app includes documentation, editing tools, support services, or real-time communication features:

bash ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../scripts/raam-lookup.sh topic 12  # Documentation & accessibility features
bash ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../scripts/raam-lookup.sh topic 13  # Editing tools
bash ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../scripts/raam-lookup.sh topic 14  # Support services
bash ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../scripts/raam-lookup.sh topic 15  # Real-time communication

Report format

# RAAM 1.1 Mobile Accessibility Audit Report

**Application**: [name]
**Platform**: iOS / Android / Both
**Version audited**: [version]
**Date**: [date]
**Target level**: AA
**Scope**: [full app / specific screens / component]

## Summary

| Metric | Count |
|--------|-------|
| Criteria evaluated | XX |
| Conforming (C) | XX |
| Non-conforming (NC) | XX |
| Not applicable (NA) | XX |
| **Conformance rate** | **XX%** |

## Testing environment

| | iOS | Android |
|---|---|---|
| Device | [model] | [model] |
| OS version | [version] | [version] |
| Screen reader | VoiceOver | TalkBack |
| Other AT | Switch Control, Voice Control | Switch Access, Voice Access |

## Critical issues (must fix)

### Issue 1: [Short title]
- **Criterion**: RAAM X.X (Level A/AA) — [criterion title]
- **EN 301 549**: [norm reference]
- **Platform**: iOS / Android / Both
- **Screen**: [screen name]
- **Location**: [file:line or component]
- **Problem**: [description of the violation]
- **Impact**: [which users are affected and how]
- **Remediation**: [specific fix with code example for affected platform(s)]
- **Priority**: Critical / Major / Minor

## Detailed results by theme

### Theme X: [Name]

| Criterion | Level | iOS | Android | Notes |
|-----------|-------|-----|---------|-------|
| X.1 | A | C/NC/NA | C/NC/NA | [detail] |
| X.2 | AA | C/NC/NA | C/NC/NA | [detail] |

## Recommendations

[Prioritised list of improvements beyond strict compliance]

Severity classification

LevelDescriptionExample
CriticalBlocks access entirely for some usersMissing labels on form fields, keyboard traps, unlabelled buttons
MajorSignificant barrier but workaround existsPoor contrast, missing headings semantics, no complex gesture alternative
MinorInconvenience but does not block accessMissing hint text, imprecise accessible names

When auditing, ALWAYS:

  1. Look up the exact criterion before rendering a verdict — do not rely on memory
  2. Apply the official methodology which has separate iOS and Android steps
  3. Use RAAM criterion numbers (e.g., "RAAM 9.1", not just "WCAG 1.3.1")
  4. Include the EN 301 549 norm reference for cross-reference
  5. Provide platform-specific remediation with code examples (iOS AND Android when both are in scope)
  6. Test both platforms separately — a component may conform on one and fail on the other
  7. Note when code review is insufficient — many criteria require device testing with screen reader (VoiceOver/TalkBack)
  8. Check both orientations — portrait and landscape
  9. Test with enlarged text — set system text size to maximum and verify layout

平台分布

Codex

31.46%
按下载量换算21

Claude

30.16%
按下载量换算20

Cursor

19.36%
按下载量换算13

Gemini CLI

9.51%
按下载量换算6

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

可疑

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

执行命令

安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 npx skills add https://github.com/geoffreycrofte/luxembourg-accessibility-skillset --skill raam-audit 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills