Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

product-design(产品设计)

用于辅助界面设计、视觉规范、排版、配色、布局和交互体验优化。它适合让 Agent 根据产品场景整理页面结构、生成 UI 方案、检查视觉一致性或改进组件层级。使用时需要结合现有品牌、设计系统和用户任务,不应只堆装饰元素;涉及真实页面改动时,应通过截图或浏览器预览检查文本溢出、对齐和响应式表现。

product-design 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 58,406。

总安装 416周安装 17GitHub Stars 161下载 133核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:product-design(产品设计)
来源仓库:https://github.com/alekspetrov/navigator
仓库路径:skills/product-design
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/alekspetrov/navigator --skill product-design
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/alekspetrov/navigator --skill product-design

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于辅助界面设计、视觉规范和交互体验优化。适合让 Agent 整理页面结构、 生成 UI 方案或检查视觉一致性。使用时需结合现有品牌和设计系统,product-design 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。涉及页面改动应通过截图检查表现。

适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/product-design

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/alekspetrov/navigator --skill product-design;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

product-design 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/alekspetrov/navigator --skill product-design。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

product-design 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

product-design 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

product-design 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

product-design 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 416 次,近一周安装 17 次,下载 133 次,GitHub 161 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

product-design 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
product-design

产品设计 · 本页

416161调用外部服务MIT有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Product Design Skill

Automate design handoff from Figma to code with design system intelligence. Extract tokens, map components, detect drift, generate implementation plans.

When to Invoke

Auto-invoke when user says:

  • "Review this design"
  • "Analyze Figma mockup"
  • "Design handoff for [feature]"
  • "Check design system impact"
  • "Plan implementation for design"
  • "Extract tokens from Figma"
  • "What changed in the design?"

What This Does

5-Step Workflow:

  1. Design Analysis: Extract patterns, components, tokens from Figma
  2. Codebase Audit: Compare design vs implementation, find drift
  3. Implementation Planning: Generate phased task breakdown
  4. Task Assignment: Create Navigator task document
  5. Handoff: Ask user to review or start implementation

Time Savings: 6-10 hours → 15-20 minutes (95% reduction)

Prerequisites

Required

  1. Python Dependencies cd skills/product-design./setup.sh # Automated installation # OR manually: pip install -r requirements.txt
  2. Figma Desktop (for automated workflow)

- Download: https://www.figma.com/downloads/ - Enable MCP: Figma → Preferences → Enable local MCP Server - Must be running during design reviews

  1. Project Structure

- .agent/design-system/ directory (created on first run) - Project with components (React/Vue/Svelte)

Optional (Enhanced Features)

  • Figma Enterprise: Code Connect for automatic component mapping
  • Tailwind CSS: Design token integration via @theme
  • Storybook: Component documentation and visual regression

Installation

Quick start:

cd skills/product-design
./setup.sh

See INSTALL.md for detailed installation guide and troubleshooting.

Workflow Protocol

Step 0: Check Setup (Auto-Run)

Before starting, verify Python dependencies installed:

# Get Navigator plugin path
PLUGIN_PATH=$(dirname "$(dirname "$(dirname "$PWD")")")

# Check if venv exists
if [ ! -d "$PLUGIN_PATH/skills/product-design/venv" ]; then
  echo "❌ product-design skill not set up"
  echo ""
  echo "Run setup (30 seconds):"
  echo "  cd $PLUGIN_PATH/skills/product-design && ./setup.sh"
  echo ""
  echo "Or use manual workflow (no Python needed)"
  exit 1
fi

If setup missing:

  • Show setup instructions
  • Offer manual workflow as alternative
  • Do not proceed with automated Figma workflow

If setup complete:

  • Continue to Step 1 (Design Analysis)

Step 1: Design Analysis

Objective: Extract design patterns from Figma or manual description

With Figma MCP (Automated) ✨ SIMPLIFIED

New Architecture (v1.1.0+): Python directly connects to Figma MCP - no manual orchestration!

# Python functions now handle MCP connection automatically
from figma_mcp_client import FigmaMCPClient

async with FigmaMCPClient() as client:
    # Progressive refinement - fetch only what's needed
    metadata = await client.get_metadata()
    components = extract_components(metadata)

    # Fetch details only for complex components
    for comp in components:
        if comp['complexity'] == 'high':
            comp['detail'] = await client.get_design_context(comp['id'])

    # Get design tokens
    variables = await client.get_variable_defs()

Workflow (fully automated):

  1. User provides Figma URL
  2. Run python3 functions/design_analyzer.py --figma-url <URL>
  3. Python connects to Figma MCP (http://127.0.0.1:3845/mcp)
  4. Fetches metadata → analyzes → fetches details only if needed
  5. Returns complete analysis

Benefits:

  • ✅ No manual MCP tool calls by Claude
  • ✅ Progressive refinement (smart token usage)
  • ✅ Automatic connection management
  • ✅ Built-in error handling

Requirements:

  • Figma Desktop running
  • MCP enabled in preferences
  • Python dependencies installed (./setup.sh)
Manual Workflow (No MCP)
**Ask user for design information**:

What is the feature name? [e.g., "Dashboard Redesign"]

Figma link (optional): [figma.com/file/...]

**Design Tokens**:
List new or modified tokens:
- Colors (name: value, e.g., "primary-600: #2563EB")
- Spacing (e.g., "spacing-lg: 24px")
- Typography (e.g., "heading-xl: 36px/600")
- Other (radius, shadow, etc.)

**Components**:
List components in design:
- Component name
- Type (atom, molecule, organism)
- Variants (if any, e.g., "Button: primary/secondary, sm/md/lg")
- Similar to existing component? (name if known)

**Proceed to Step 2** after gathering information
Run design_analyzer.py
# Prepare input (MCP or manual JSON)
# MCP: Already have /tmp/figma_metadata.json
# Manual: Create JSON from user input

python3 functions/design_analyzer.py \
  --figma-data /tmp/figma_combined.json \
  --ui-kit-inventory .agent/design-system/ui-kit-inventory.json \
  --output /tmp/analysis_results.json

Analysis Output:

  • New components not in UI kit
  • Similar components (reuse opportunities)
  • New design tokens
  • Breaking changes (if any)

Step 2: Codebase Audit

Objective: Compare design vs implementation, detect drift

Token Extraction
python3 functions/token_extractor.py \
  --figma-variables /tmp/figma_variables.json \
  --existing-tokens .agent/design-system/design-tokens.json \
  --output /tmp/token_extraction.json

Output: DTCG formatted tokens + diff summary

Component Mapping
python3 functions/component_mapper.py \
  --figma-components /tmp/analysis_results.json \
  --code-connect-map /tmp/figma_code_connect.json \
  --project-root . \
  --output /tmp/component_mappings.json

Output: Figma component → code component mappings with confidence scores

Design System Audit
# Combine data for auditor
python3 functions/design_system_auditor.py \
  --figma-data /tmp/combined_figma.json \
  --code-data /tmp/combined_code.json \
  --output /tmp/audit_results.json

Audit Results:

  • Token alignment (in sync, drift, missing, unused)
  • Component reuse opportunities
  • Tailwind config recommendations
  • Priority level (critical, high, medium, low)

Step 3: Implementation Planning

Objective: Generate phased implementation task document

Generate Task Document
python3 functions/implementation_planner.py \
  --task-id "TASK-{{next_task_number}}" \
  --feature-name "{{feature_name}}" \
  --analysis-results /tmp/combined_analysis.json \
  --review-reference ".agent/design-system/reviews/{{date}}-{{feature-slug}}.md" \
  --output .agent/tasks/TASK-{{next_task_number}}-{{feature-slug}}.md

Task Document Includes:

  • Phased implementation (tokens → atoms → molecules → organisms)
  • Complexity estimates per phase
  • Acceptance criteria checklist
  • Files to modify
  • Testing strategy
  • Rollout plan
Create Design Review Report

Use template: templates/design-review-report.md

Save to: .agent/design-system/reviews/YYYY-MM-DD-{{feature-name}}.md

Contents:

  • Design analysis summary
  • Token changes (added/modified/removed)
  • Component changes (new/extended/breaking)
  • Design system impact
  • Implementation recommendations

Step 4: Task Assignment

Objective: Create task and assign context for implementation

Create PM Ticket (if configured)
**If PM tool configured** (Linear, GitHub Issues, Jira):
- Create ticket with task summary
- Link to task document and design review
- Assign to frontend developer or team

**If no PM tool**:
- Skip ticket creation
- Task document serves as source of truth
Update Navigator Documentation
**Update files**:
1. `.agent/tasks/TASK-{{number}}-{{feature}}.md` (created in Step 3)
2. `.agent/design-system/reviews/{{date}}-{{feature}}.md` (design review)
3. `.agent/DEVELOPMENT-README.md` (add task to index)

**Use TodoWrite** to track implementation phases

Step 5: Implementation Handoff

Objective: Present results and get user decision

Present Summary
✅ Design review complete for {{Feature Name}}

**Generated Documentation**:
- Design review: `.agent/design-system/reviews/{{date}}-{{feature}}.md`
- Implementation plan: `.agent/tasks/TASK-{{number}}-{{feature}}.md`
{{#if pm_configured}}- PM ticket: {{ticket_id}} (status: ready for development){{/if}}

**Summary**:
- Design Tokens: {{new_count}} new, {{modified_count}} modified
- Components: {{new_components}} new, {{extend_components}} to extend
- Estimated Time: {{total_hours}} hours
- Complexity: {{complexity_level}}
{{#if breaking_changes}}- ⚠️  Breaking Changes: {{breaking_count}} component(s){{/if}}

**Next Steps**:
[1] Start implementation now
[2] Review plan first (load task document)
[3] Modify plan before starting

**Recommended**: After implementation, set up visual regression testing:
  "Set up visual regression for {{components}}"

This ensures pixel-perfect implementation and prevents future drift (15 min setup).

Reply with choice or "Start implementation"
User Decision Branches

If user chooses [1] or says "Start implementation":

1. Load task document: `Read .agent/tasks/TASK-{{number}}-{{feature}}.md`
2. Load design review: `Read .agent/design-system/reviews/{{date}}-{{feature}}.md`
3. Begin Phase 1 (typically design tokens)
4. Follow autonomous completion protocol when done
5. After completion, suggest: "Set up visual regression for {{components}}" (optional but recommended)

If user chooses [2]:

1. Load and display task document
2. Highlight key phases and acceptance criteria
3. Ask: "Ready to start or need changes?"

If user chooses [3]:

1. Load task document
2. Ask what modifications needed
3. Edit task document
4. Regenerate if major changes
5. Then proceed to implementation

Predefined Functions

functions/design_analyzer.py

Purpose: Extract design patterns from Figma MCP data or manual input

Usage:

python3 functions/design_analyzer.py \
  --figma-data /path/to/figma_mcp_combined.json \
  --ui-kit-inventory .agent/design-system/ui-kit-inventory.json \
  --output /tmp/analysis.json

Input Format (figma_mcp_combined.json):

{
  "metadata": { ... },  // get_metadata response
  "variables": { ... }, // get_variable_defs response
  "code_connect_map": { ... } // get_code_connect_map response (optional)
}

Output: Component analysis with categorization (atom/molecule/organism) + similarity scores


functions/token_extractor.py

Purpose: Convert Figma variables to DTCG format with diff

Usage:

python3 functions/token_extractor.py \
  --figma-variables /path/to/figma_variables.json \
  --existing-tokens .agent/design-system/design-tokens.json \
  --format full \
  --output /tmp/tokens.json

Output Formats:

  • full: DTCG tokens + diff + summary
  • tokens-only: Just DTCG tokens
  • diff-only: Just diff and summary

DTCG Format (W3C Design Tokens spec):

{
  "color": {
    "primary": {
      "500": {
        "$value": "#3B82F6",
        "$type": "color",
        "$description": "Primary brand color"
      }
    }
  }
}

functions/component_mapper.py

Purpose: Map Figma components to codebase components

Usage:

python3 functions/component_mapper.py \
  --figma-components /path/to/analysis_results.json \
  --code-connect-map /path/to/code_connect.json \
  --project-root . \
  --output /tmp/mappings.json

Mapping Strategy:

  1. Code Connect first (100% confidence)
  2. Fuzzy name matching (70%+ confidence)
  3. Unmapped = needs creation

Output: Mappings with confidence scores + variant prop mapping


functions/design_system_auditor.py

Purpose: Audit design system for drift and reuse opportunities

Usage:

python3 functions/design_system_auditor.py \
  --figma-data /path/to/combined_figma.json \
  --code-data /path/to/combined_code.json \
  --output /tmp/audit.json

Audit Checks:

  • Token alignment (drift detection)
  • Component reuse opportunities (similarity >70%)
  • Unused tokens (cleanup candidates)
  • Priority level assignment

functions/implementation_planner.py

Purpose: Generate Navigator task document with phased breakdown

Usage:

python3 functions/implementation_planner.py \
  --task-id "TASK-16" \
  --feature-name "Dashboard Redesign" \
  --analysis-results /path/to/combined_analysis.json \
  --review-reference ".agent/design-system/reviews/2025-10-21-dashboard.md" \
  --output .agent/tasks/TASK-16-dashboard-redesign.md

Output: Complete Navigator task document with:

  • Phased implementation (atomic design order)
  • Complexity estimates (Low/Medium/High)
  • Acceptance criteria per phase
  • Testing strategy
  • Rollout plan

Templates

templates/design-review-report.md

When: Step 3 - Creating design review documentation

Structure:

# Design Review: {{Feature Name}}

**Date**: {{YYYY-MM-DD}}
**Figma**: [Link]({{figma_url}})
**Reviewer**: Navigator Product Design Skill

## New Design Tokens
[Token changes]

## New Components Required
[Component list with categories]

## Design System Impact
[High/Medium/Low impact analysis]

## Implementation Recommendations
[Phased approach]

Design System Documentation Structure

Initial Setup (First Run)

mkdir -p .agent/design-system/reviews

# Create initial files
touch .agent/design-system/design-tokens.json
touch .agent/design-system/ui-kit-inventory.json
touch .agent/design-system/component-mapping.json

design-tokens.json (DTCG format):

{
  "color": {},
  "spacing": {},
  "typography": {},
  "radius": {},
  "shadow": {}
}

ui-kit-inventory.json:

{
  "components": [
    {
      "name": "Button",
      "path": "src/components/ui/Button.tsx",
      "category": "atom",
      "variants": ["primary", "secondary", "ghost"],
      "figma_link": "..."
    }
  ],
  "tokens": {}
}

File Loading Strategy

Never load:

  • All design review reports (50+ files = 250k+ tokens)
  • Full Figma MCP responses (can be 350k+ tokens)

Always load when skill active:

  • ui-kit-inventory.json (~3k tokens)
  • design-tokens.json (~2k tokens)
  • Specific design review for current task (~5k tokens)

Total: ~10k tokens vs 150k+ (93% reduction)


Figma MCP Integration

MCP Server Detection

On skill invocation:

  1. Check for Figma MCP tools availability
  2. Detect local vs remote server
  3. Adjust workflow based on capabilities

Local Server (Recommended):

  • URL: http://127.0.0.1:3845/mcp
  • Tools: All (metadata, variables, code_connect, design_context)
  • Requires: Figma Desktop app running

Remote Server (Fallback):

  • URL: https://mcp.figma.com/mcp
  • Tools: Limited (no code_connect, requires explicit URLs)
  • Requires: Internet connection, explicit Figma links

Handling Token Limits

Problem: Large screens return >350k tokens (exceeds default 25k limit)

Solution:

1. Use `get_metadata` first (sparse XML, ~5k tokens)
2. Parse metadata to identify component node IDs
3. Fetch components individually via `get_design_context`
4. Aggregate results from multiple small calls

**Environment Variable** (recommended):
export MAX_MCP_OUTPUT_TOKENS=100000

MCP Tool Usage

get_metadata: Always first for large designs

  • Returns sparse XML with node IDs, types, names
  • Low token cost (~5-10k)
  • Use to plan component extraction strategy

get_variable_defs: Extract all design tokens

  • One call gets all variables
  • Moderate token cost (~10-20k)
  • Critical for token extraction

get_code_connect_map: Get component mappings

  • Requires Figma Enterprise plan
  • Returns node_id → code_path mappings
  • Highest confidence mappings

get_design_context: Extract component code

  • Use per-component (NOT full screen)
  • Can generate React/Vue/HTML via prompting
  • Highest token cost - use sparingly

Tailwind CSS Integration

Design Tokens → Tailwind @theme

Style Dictionary Pipeline:

# 1. Tokens extracted to design-tokens.json (DTCG format)
# 2. Run Style Dictionary build
npx style-dictionary build

# 3. Generates tailwind-tokens.css
# @theme {
#   --color-primary-500: #3B82F6;
#   --spacing-md: 16px;
# }

# 4. Tailwind auto-generates utilities
# .bg-primary-500, .p-md, etc.

Figma Auto Layout → Tailwind Classes

Translation Rules (apply during code generation):

Direction:
  Horizontal → flex-row
  Vertical → flex-col

Spacing:
  Gap → gap-{token}
  Padding → p-{token}, px-{token}, py-{token}

Alignment:
  Start → items-start, justify-start
  Center → items-center, justify-center
  Space Between → justify-between

Sizing:
  Hug → w-auto / h-auto
  Fill → flex-1
  Fixed → w-{value} / h-{value}

Token Optimization

Navigator Principles

Load on demand:

  • Design review for current task only
  • UI kit inventory (always needed)
  • Design tokens (always needed)

Use Task agent for codebase searches:

  • Finding all component files (60-80% token savings)
  • Searching for token usage in Tailwind config
  • Analyzing component variant patterns

Compact after completion:

  • Clear context after design review
  • Preserve task document in marker
  • Clean slate for implementation

Troubleshooting

"Figma MCP tool not found"

Issue: MCP server not available

Solutions:

  1. Check Figma Desktop app is running (for local server)
  2. Verify MCP server added: claude mcp add --transport http figma-desktop http://127.0.0.1:3845/mcp
  3. Fall back to manual workflow (still provides value)

"Token limit exceeded"

Issue: get_design_context response too large

Solutions:

  1. Use get_metadata first, then fetch components individually
  2. Set MAX_MCP_OUTPUT_TOKENS=100000
  3. Break design into smaller selections in Figma

"No components found in codebase"

Issue: component_mapper.py finds no matches

Solutions:

  1. Check --project-root points to correct directory
  2. Verify component file extensions (tsx, jsx, vue)
  3. Check components aren't in excluded directories (node_modules)

"Design tokens not in DTCG format"

Issue: Existing tokens use legacy format

Solutions:

  1. Run token_extractor.py with --format tokens-only to convert
  2. Backup existing tokens first
  3. Update Style Dictionary config to read DTCG format

Success Metrics

Efficiency Gains

Before: 6-10 hours per design handoff After: 15-20 minutes Savings: 95% time reduction

Quality Metrics

  • Design system drift detected automatically
  • 100% token consistency via automated sync
  • Component reuse rate tracked
  • Implementation accuracy via acceptance criteria

Example Usage

User: "Review the dashboard redesign from Figma: https://figma.com/file/..."

Navigator:
1. Checks for Figma MCP availability
2. Extracts metadata, variables, code_connect_map
3. Runs design_analyzer.py → finds 3 new components, 12 new tokens
4. Runs token_extractor.py → generates DTCG tokens, finds 5 drift issues
5. Runs component_mapper.py → maps 2 components, 1 new needed
6. Runs design_system_auditor.py → priority: HIGH (drift detected)
7. Runs implementation_planner.py → generates TASK-17 with 3 phases
8. Creates design review report
9. Presents summary with [Start/Review/Modify] options

User: "Start implementation"

Navigator:
1. Loads TASK-17 document
2. Begins Phase 1: Design Tokens
3. Updates design-tokens.json with 12 new tokens
4. Runs Style Dictionary build
5. Updates Tailwind config
6. Commits changes
7. Moves to Phase 2: StatBadge component
8. ... continues through all phases
9. Autonomous completion when done

Last Updated: 2025-10-21 Navigator Version: 3.2.0 (target) Skill Version: 1.0.0

平台分布

OpenCode

30.15%
按下载量换算40

Claude Code

22.87%
按下载量换算30

Antigravity

17.82%
按下载量换算24

Gemini CLI

14.1%
按下载量换算19

kilo

7.78%
按下载量换算10

windsurf

3.05%
按下载量换算4

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。

继续浏览同类 Skills