Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

product-design(产品设计)

用于辅助界面设计、视觉规范、排版、配色、布局和交互体验优化。它适合让 Agent 根据产品场景整理页面结构、生成 UI 方案、检查视觉一致性或改进组件层级。使用时需要结合现有品牌、设计系统和用户任务,不应只堆装饰元素;涉及真实页面改动时,应通过截图或浏览器预览检查文本溢出、对齐和响应式表现。

product-design 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 66,030。

总安装 269周安装 11GitHub Stars 1下载 86核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:product-design(产品设计)
来源仓库:https://github.com/bbssppllvv/essential-skills
仓库路径:skills/product-design
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/bbssppllvv/essential-skills --skill product-design
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/bbssppllvv/essential-skills --skill product-design

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

提供产品设计方法论指导,强调基于用户视角做出有据可依的决策。适用于界面布局、交互流程与情感化设计等多维度优化任务。要求在设计前明确 WHAT/WHO/WHAT SHOULD USERS DO 等核心问题。安装后可在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中作为设计评审参考。

建议结合 A/B 测试与可用性反馈持续迭代设计方案。

来源仓库内路径:skills/product-design

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/bbssppllvv/essential-skills --skill product-de…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

product-design 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/bbssppllvv/essential-skills --skill product-design。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

product-design 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

product-design 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

product-design 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

product-design 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 269 次,近一周安装 11 次,下载 86 次,GitHub 1 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

product-design 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
product-design

产品设计 · 本页

2691只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Product Design Best Practices

Professional design methodology. Don't guess — make intentional, justified decisions.

Always ask: "If I showed this to 10 users tomorrow, what would they remember?"

Before You Design: Discovery

Never design blind. Answer these first:

1. WHAT are we building?    → Screen type, platform, scope
2. WHO is this for?         → Audience, technical level
3. WHAT should users do?    → Primary action, success metric
4. WHAT feeling to evoke?   → Tone, energy
5. WHAT JOB does this do?   → "Help me decide" / "Convince me" / "Get me started"
6. WHAT objections exist?   → "Is it worth it?" / "Is it legit?" / "Will it work?"
7. WHAT should they remember? → The hook, the differentiator
8. ANY constraints?         → Brand, tech requirements, inspirations

Design Brief: "I'm designing a [WHAT] for [WHO] that helps them [GOAL] and should feel [TONE]."


Design Workflow

0. DISCOVER  → Design Brief
       ↓
1. RESEARCH  → Study real products, competitors, best-in-class examples
       ↓
2. ANALYZE   → Extract patterns, compare approaches, make decisions
       ↓
3. DESIGN    → Apply craft: typography, color, spacing, copy, soul
       ↓
4. IMPLEMENT → Build, validate against quality gates

Research & Analysis

Research ≠ Copying the Average

Research is about understanding WHY choices work, not copying WHAT everyone does.

  • Best practices = starting point, not destination
  • "Safe" often = "forgettable"
  • Document reasoning: "Most use X, but we chose Y because..."

Three Lenses (Use All)

Lens A: Structure — Layout, components, information hierarchy. Common solutions to common problems.

Lens B: Visual Craft — For each strong reference, notice:

  1. Typography — fonts, sizes, weights, letter-spacing
  2. Color — warm or cool? Accent? Hierarchy?
  3. Spacing — tight or airy? What's the rhythm?
  4. Details — shadows, borders, radii, gradients
  5. Icons/illustrations — style? Consistent?
  6. Overall vibe — premium? Playful? Technical?

Lens C: Conversion & Soul — What makes this one WORK?

  1. What's the HOOK in the first 3 seconds?
  2. How do they handle OBJECTIONS?
  3. Where's the TRUST (social proof, guarantees)?
  4. What's UNIQUE?
  5. What MICROCOPY has personality?
  6. What would a user REMEMBER tomorrow?

Steal List (Minimum 5 Items)

SourceWhatWhy It WorksHow I'll Use It
...Specific tactic with exact copy/numbersPsychology behind itAdaptation plan

Be specific, not vague:

  • "Linear — 13px/20px body, -0.01em tracking, 48px section gaps, #5E6AD2 accent at 8% opacity for hover"
  • NOT "Linear — clean design"

Typography

Scale: Ratio 1.2 (minor third). Max 6–8 sizes: Display (48–64px), H1 (36–48px), H2 (24–32px), Body (16–18px), Small (13–14px), Caption (11–12px).

Leading: Large text = tight (1.0–1.2). Body = loose (1.5–1.6).

Letter-spacing — DO NOT SKIP:

Text TypeLetter-spacing
Body (14–18px)0
Small text (11–13px)0.01–0.02em — required
UI labels/buttons0.02em — required
ALL CAPS0.06–0.1em — always required
Large headings (32px+)-0.01 to -0.02em
Display (48px+)-0.02 to -0.03em

Line length: 50–75 chars (max-width: 65ch). Pairing: Max 2 fonts.

Full guide: references/typography.md

Color

Palette: 4 layers — Neutrals (70–90%), Primary accent (5–10%), Semantic (success/warning/danger), Effects (rare).

Primary: One brand color with scale (50–950). 600 default, 700 hover, 800 active.

Contrast: 4.5:1 body text, 3:1 large text.

Dark theme: Not inverted. Background #0f0f0f, not #000. Text #f0f0f0, not #fff. Separate neutral scale.

Tokens: Name by purpose (--primary), not color (--blue).

Full guide: references/color.md

Spacing

Base unit: 4px or 8px. Everything multiplies from this.

4px: 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 48, 64, 96
8px: 8, 16, 24, 32, 48, 64, 96, 128

Proximity = relationship. Closer = connected, farther = separate.

Density: Match spacing to context — dense for dashboards (8-12px padding), default for product UI (16-24px), spacious for marketing (24-32px).

Responsive: Structural spacing (sections, containers) scales down 0.5-0.75x on mobile. Internal component spacing (icon-to-text, button padding) stays fixed.

Full guide: references/spacing.md

Avoiding AI Slop

NO INDIGO/VIOLET — Unless explicitly requested. Every LLM defaults to indigo (#6366f1). It's the biggest tell of AI-generated design. Choose brand-appropriate colors from research.

Generic (bad): default fonts, safe blue gradients, perfect symmetry, blob backgrounds, stock illustrations.

Professional (good): brand-appropriate color, intentional font pairing, visual tension/asymmetry, purposeful whitespace, custom imagery, social proof present.

Generic structure trap: Don't default to Hero → Features → Pricing → FAQ → CTA. Ask: "What can I add, remove, or reorder for THIS product?"

Full guide: references/anti-ai-slop.md

Motion

Motion serves: Feedback (it worked), Continuity (where it went), Hierarchy (look here). If it doesn't do one — remove it.

CategoryDuration
Instant (hover, press, toggle)90–150ms
State change (accordion, tabs)160–240ms
Large transition (modal, drawer)240–360ms

Easing: Enter = ease-out, Exit = ease-in, Change = ease-in-out.

Required: prefers-reduced-motion support. No animation > 500ms in product UI. Never transition: all.

Full guide: references/motion.md

Icons

One style per product (outline OR solid). No mixing libraries.

Optical corrections: Geometric center ≠ visual center. Arrows/chevrons need 0.5–1px shift.

Color: currentColor by default. Semantic colors only for status.

Accessibility: Action icons need aria-label. Hit area 44×44px minimum.

Libraries: Lucide (SaaS default), Heroicons (Tailwind), Material Symbols, SF Symbols (Apple).

Full guide: references/icons.md

The Persuasion Layer

Fill this table before writing code:

ElementYour Answer
Hook (first 3 sec)Hero headline + visual
Story arcProblem → Solution → Proof → Action
Objection killers1. ___ 2. ___ 3. ___
Trust signalsSocial proof / Guarantee / Security / Specifics (pick 2+)
Urgency/Scarcity___ or "N/A"
The memorable thingWhat will they screenshot?

If you can't fill this table, you're designing decoration, not persuasion.

The Soul

~80% proven patterns + ~20% unique choices.

  • One bold visual choice (color, type treatment, illustration style)
  • Voice and personality in copy
  • Micro-interactions that surprise
  • One detail users will remember

Test: "If someone screenshots this, would they know it's from THIS product?"


Implementation Quality Gate

CategoryCheck
FunctionalPrimary action obvious? Error states? Works on mobile?
VisualSquint test passes? Spacing rhythm? Typography intentional?
PersuasionHook in 3 sec? 2+ trust signals? Objections addressed?
PolishNo orphaned words? Icons aligned? Buttons consistent?
Implementation details (focus states, forms, images, touch, performance, accessibility): references/craft-details.md

Reference Files

GuideWhat's Inside
typography.mdScale, pairing, weight, line-height, letter-spacing, responsive type, tokens
color.mdPalette structure, neutrals, primary/semantic colors, dark theme, OKLCH, tokens
spacing.mdSpacing scale, component patterns, density, proximity, responsive adjustments
motion.mdMicro-interactions, timing, easing, reduced motion, animation tokens
icons.mdGrid system, optical corrections, accessibility, icon+text pairing, libraries
craft-details.mdFocus states, forms, images, touch, performance, accessibility, navigation
anti-ai-slop.mdWhat makes designs look generic and how to avoid it

平台分布

Codex

34.39%
按下载量换算30

Claude

35.18%
按下载量换算30

Cursor

18.17%
按下载量换算16

Gemini CLI

9.09%
按下载量换算8

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills