Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

planning-goal(规划目标)

planning-goal 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

planning-goal 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 56,324。

总安装 456周安装 19GitHub Stars 8下载 152核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:planning-goal(规划目标)
来源仓库:https://github.com/vamseeachanta/workspace-hub
仓库路径:skills/planning-goal
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/vamseeachanta/workspace-hub --skill planning-goal
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/vamseeachanta/workspace-hub --skill planning-goal

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,支持快速定位候选结果。适合在关键词搜索、任务场景或来源线索下使用,提升信息获取效率。可结合来源仓库和原始 README 核验具体用法,确保准确性。安装前应确认权限范围、维护状态及是否触发联网或文件读写。建议在使用前评估技能是否会执行命令或访问敏感数据。

planning-goal 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/planning-goal

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/vamseeachanta/workspace-hub --skill planning-g…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

planning-goal 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/vamseeachanta/workspace-hub --skill planning-goal。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

planning-goal 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

planning-goal 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

planning-goal 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

planning-goal 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 456 次,近一周安装 19 次,下载 152 次,GitHub 8 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

planning-goal 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
planning-goal

规划目标 · 本页

4568调用外部服务MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Goal-Oriented Action Planning (GOAP)

Dynamic planning system using A* search to find optimal action sequences for complex objectives

Quick Start

# Define goal state and current state
Current: {code_written: true, tests_written: false, deployed: false}
Goal: {deployed: true, monitoring: true}

# GOAP generates optimal plan:
1. write_tests -> tests_written: true
2. run_tests -> tests_passed: true
3. build_application -> built: true
4. deploy_application -> deployed: true
5. setup_monitoring -> monitoring: true

When to Use

  • Complex multi-step tasks with dependencies requiring optimal ordering
  • High-level goals needing systematic breakdown into concrete actions
  • Deployment workflows with many prerequisites
  • Refactoring projects requiring incremental, safe transformations
  • Any task where conditions must be met before actions can execute

Prerequisites

  • Clear definition of current state (what is true now)
  • Clear definition of goal state (what should be true)
  • Available actions with known preconditions and effects

Core Concepts

GOAP Algorithm

GOAP uses A* pathfinding through state space:

  1. State Space: All possible combinations of world facts
  2. Actions: Transforms with preconditions and effects
  3. Heuristic: Estimated cost to reach goal from current state
  4. Optimal Path: Lowest-cost action sequence achieving goal

Action Definition

Action: action_name
  Preconditions: {condition1: true, condition2: value}
  Effects: {new_condition: true, changed_value: new_value}
  Cost: numeric_value
  Execution: llm|code|hybrid
  Fallback: alternative_action

Execution Modes

ModeDescriptionUse Case
FocusedDirect action executionSpecific requested actions
ClosedSingle-domain planningDefined action set
OpenCreative problem solvingNovel solution discovery

Implementation Pattern

interface WorldState {
  [key: string]: boolean | string | number;
}

interface Action {
  name: string;
  preconditions: Partial<WorldState>;
  effects: Partial<WorldState>;
  cost: number;
  execution: 'llm' | 'code' | 'hybrid';
  tools?: string[];
  fallback?: string;
}

interface Plan {
  actions: Action[];
  totalCost: number;
  estimatedTime: string;
}

function generatePlan(
  currentState: WorldState,
  goalState: WorldState,
  availableActions: Action[]
): Plan {
  // A* search through state space
  // Returns optimal action sequence
}

Configuration

goap_config:
  planning:
    algorithm: a_star
    max_depth: 50
    timeout_ms: 5000

  execution:
    mode: adaptive  # focused | closed | open
    parallel_actions: true
    replan_on_failure: true

  monitoring:
    ooda_loop: true
    observe_interval_ms: 1000

  cost_weights:
    time: 1.0
    risk: 2.0
    resource: 1.5

Usage Examples

Example 1: Software Deployment

current_state:
  code_written: true
  tests_written: false
  tests_passed: false
  built: false
  deployed: false
  monitoring: false

goal_state:
  deployed: true
  monitoring: true

available_actions:
  - name: write_tests
    preconditions: {code_written: true}
    effects: {tests_written: true}
    cost: 3

  - name: run_tests
    preconditions: {tests_written: true}
    effects: {tests_passed: true}
    cost: 1

  - name: build_application
    preconditions: {tests_passed: true}
    effects: {built: true}
    cost: 2

  - name: deploy_application
    preconditions: {built: true}
    effects: {deployed: true}
    cost: 2

  - name: setup_monitoring
    preconditions: {deployed: true}
    effects: {monitoring: true}
    cost: 1

# Generated Plan (cost: 9)
plan:
  1. write_tests
  2. run_tests
  3. build_application
  4. deploy_application
  5. setup_monitoring

Example 2: Complex Refactoring

current_state:
  legacy_code: true
  documented: false
  tested: false
  refactored: false

goal_state:
  refactored: true
  tested: true
  documented: true

generated_plan:
  1. analyze_codebase:
      effects: {understood: true}

  2. write_tests_for_legacy:
      requires: understood
      effects: {tested: true}

  3. document_current_behavior:
      requires: understood
      effects: {documented: true}

  4. plan_refactoring:
      requires: [documented, tested]
      effects: {plan_ready: true}

  5. execute_refactoring:
      requires: plan_ready
      effects: {refactored: true}

  6. verify_tests_pass:
      requires: refactored
      validates: goal_achieved

Example 3: OODA Loop Monitoring

// Observe-Orient-Decide-Act loop during execution
async function executeWithOODA(plan: Plan): Promise<Result> {
  for (const action of plan.actions) {
    // OBSERVE: Check current state
    const currentState = await observeState();

    // ORIENT: Analyze deviations
    const deviation = analyzeDeviation(currentState, expectedState);

    // DECIDE: Replan if needed
    if (deviation.significant) {
      const newPlan = await replan(currentState, goalState);
      return executeWithOODA(newPlan);
    }

    // ACT: Execute action
    await executeAction(action);
  }
}

Execution Checklist

  • Define current state completely
  • Define goal state with all required conditions
  • Inventory available actions with preconditions/effects
  • Calculate action costs realistically
  • Generate plan using A* search
  • Review plan for feasibility
  • Execute with OODA loop monitoring
  • Handle failures with adaptive replanning
  • Verify goal state achieved

Best Practices

  • Atomic Actions: Each action should have one clear purpose
  • Explicit Preconditions: All requirements must be verifiable
  • Predictable Effects: Action outcomes should be consistent
  • Realistic Costs: Use costs to guide optimal path selection
  • Replan Early: Detect failures quickly and adapt
  • Parallel Where Possible: Execute independent actions concurrently

Error Handling

Plan Generation Failures

// No valid path exists
if (!plan) {
  // Analyze which preconditions cannot be satisfied
  const unsatisfiable = findUnsatisfiablePreconditions(goalState);
  console.error(`Cannot reach goal: missing ${unsatisfiable}`);

  // Suggest partial goals that ARE achievable
  const partialGoals = suggestAchievableSubsets(goalState);
}

Execution Failures

// Action failed during execution
if (actionResult.failed) {
  // Check if alternative action available
  if (action.fallback) {
    await executeAction(action.fallback);
  } else {
    // Replan from current state
    const newPlan = await replan(currentState, goalState);
  }
}

Metrics & Success Criteria

MetricTargetDescription
Plan Generation Time< 5sTime to generate optimal plan
Goal Achievement Rate> 95%Percentage of goals fully achieved
Replanning Frequency< 20%Actions requiring replanning
Cost Accuracy+/- 15%Actual vs estimated cost

Integration Points

MCP Tools

// Orchestrate GOAP plan across swarm
  task: "execute_goap_plan",
  strategy: "adaptive",
  priority: "high"
});

// Store successful patterns
  action: "store",
  namespace: "goap-patterns",
  key: "deployment_plan_v1",
  value: JSON.stringify(successfulPlan)
});

Hooks

# Pre-task: Initialize GOAP session

# Post-task: Store learned patterns

Related Skills

References

Version History

  • 1.0.0 (2026-01-02): Initial release - converted from goal-planner agent

平台分布

Claude Code

28.28%
按下载量换算43

windsurf

23.7%
按下载量换算36

trae

16.69%
按下载量换算25

OpenCode

12.75%
按下载量换算19

Cursor

6.48%
按下载量换算10

Codex

3.41%
按下载量换算5

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills