Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

planning-github-issue-tasks(规划 GitHub issue tasks)

用于围绕 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request、分支、提交和代码协作流程提供辅助能力。它适合让 Agent 查询项目状态、整理变更、辅助创建或检查协作事项,并把仓库中的信息转成可执行的下一步。使用时需要区分只读查询和写入操作;涉及创建 PR、修改 Issue、推送分支或访问私有仓库时,应确认 token 权限、目标仓库范围和用户授权。

planning-github-issue-tasks 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 68,654。

总安装 225周安装 9GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 73核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:planning-github-issue-tasks(规划 GitHub issue tasks)
来源仓库:https://github.com/b-mendoza/agent-skills
仓库路径:skills/planning-github-issue-tasks
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/b-mendoza/agent-skills --skill planning-github-issue-tasks
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/b-mendoza/agent-skills --skill planning-github-issue-tasks

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于围绕 GitHub 仓库、Issue、PR 和代码协作流程提供辅助能力。适合查询项目状态、整理变更、创建协作事项并生成可执行步骤。使用时需区分只读查询与写入操作,避免越权修改。涉及私有仓库或敏感操作时,应确认 token 权限和用户授权。建议先预览变更内容再执行,防止意外覆盖或数据丢失。

来源仓库内路径:skills/planning-github-issue-tasks

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/b-mendoza/agent-skills --skill planning-github…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

planning-github-issue-tasks 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/b-mendoza/agent-skills --skill planning-github-issue-tas…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

planning-github-issue-tasks 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

planning-github-issue-tasks 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

planning-github-issue-tasks 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

planning-github-issue-tasks 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 225 次,近一周安装 9 次,下载 73 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

planning-github-issue-tasks 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
planning-github-issue-tasks

规划 GitHub issue tasks · 本页

225—需要联网未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Planning GitHub Issue Tasks

Plan a GitHub issue into a structured execution artifact at docs/<ISSUE_SLUG>-tasks.md. This skill is the Phase 2 orchestrator in the GitHub workflow: it dispatches specialist subagents, validates each artifact boundary, preserves planning artifacts for resume and critique, and returns only concise handoff summaries to the parent workflow. It does not decompose work, prioritize dependencies, or validate plan quality inline.

Compatibility:

  • Downstream phases use TICKET_KEY-oriented handoffs and paths.
  • In this workflow, TICKET_KEY and ISSUE_SLUG are the same string (for example acme-app-42).
  • For cross-workflow comparison only, treat <KEY> as shorthand for this skill's platform-native work-item identifier. Runtime dispatches and returned summaries still use ISSUE_SLUG.

All artifact paths in this skill use docs/<ISSUE_SLUG>….

Inputs

InputRequiredExample
ISSUE_SLUGYesacme-app-42
RE_PLANNotrue
DECISIONSNoSSO decision changes task dependencies

Phase 2 is file-driven, so ISSUE_SLUG is sufficient. ISSUE_URL is not required once the issue snapshot already exists on disk.

The issue snapshot must already exist at docs/<ISSUE_SLUG>.md with these sections, produced by fetching-github-issue:

Required sectionWhy it matters
## DescriptionPrimary source for identifying work items
## Acceptance CriteriaMaps to Definition of Done per task
## CommentsCaptures scope changes and clarifications
## Child IssuesPrevents duplicate planning
## Linked IssuesPreserves dependency awareness

Stable context sections (## Metadata, ## Retrieval Warnings, ## Labels, ## Assignees, ## Milestone, ## Projects, ## Attachments) are also required by the stage-validator preflight and are produced by fetching-github-issue even when empty.

If any are missing, treat Phase 1 as incomplete and stop with a preflight failure.

If RE_PLAN=true, reuse the same ISSUE_SLUG, load ./references/re-plan-cycle.md, and pass the supplied DECISIONS only to the stages that need plan revisions.

This skill is self-contained at runtime. Use this file plus the co-located references/ and subagents/ files as the full execution contract. Treat the documented upstream snapshot artifact and parent workflow handoff as inputs, not as external runtime specs.

Output Contract

Artifact contract

Final artifact path: docs/<ISSUE_SLUG>-tasks.md

The final plan must contain all of these sections for downstream phases:

SectionConsumed by
## Issue Summaryclarifying-assumptions
## Execution Order Summarycreating-github-child-issues
## Problem Framingclarifying-assumptions, critique paths
## Assumptions and Constraintsclarifying-assumptions
## Cross-Cutting Open Questionsclarifying-assumptions
## Tasks marker section plus separate ## Task N headingsclarifying-assumptions, creating-github-child-issues, task execution
## Dependency Graphtask execution and critique
## Validation Reportclarifying-assumptions

Each final task entry must include these eight subsections:

  • **Objective:**
  • **Relevant requirements and context:**
  • **Questions to answer before starting:**
  • **Implementation notes:**
  • **Definition of done:**
  • **Likely files / artifacts affected:**
  • **Dependencies / prerequisites:**
  • **Priority:**

Add **Dependency rationale:** immediately after **Dependencies / prerequisites:** when a dependency relationship needs a short explanation for downstream execution or review.

Phase 2 does not add ## Decisions Log; that artifact is appended later by Phase 3.

Return handoff

Return only the concise phase handoff below. Use PLANNING: PASS only when PLAN: PASS, PRIORITIZATION: PASS, TASK_VALIDATION: PASS, and every STAGE_VALIDATION gate returned PASS. If any stage-validator dispatch returns STAGE_VALIDATION: ERROR, stop at that gate and return PLANNING: FAIL with the existing stage-specific Failure category; the Reason must explicitly state that the validator errored.

PLANNING: PASS | FAIL
ISSUE_SLUG: <ISSUE_SLUG>
File: <final file path or "not written">
Tasks: <N>
Cross-cutting questions: <N>
Validation warnings: <N>
Failure category: PREFLIGHT | STAGE_1 | STAGE_2 | STAGE_3 | POSTPIPELINE | NONE
Reason: <one line>
Artifacts preserved: <comma-separated paths>

Workflow Overview

docs/<ISSUE_SLUG>.md (issue snapshot)
       │
       ▼
┌──────────────────────────┐
│  task-planner            │  -> Detailed tasks (what + how)
└────────┬─────────────────┘
         ▼
┌──────────────────────────┐
│  dependency-prioritizer  │  -> Dependencies + execution order
└────────┬─────────────────┘
         ▼
┌──────────────────────────┐
│  task-validator          │  -> Final validated plan + report
└──────────────────────────┘
         │
         ▼
docs/<ISSUE_SLUG>-tasks.md

Each stage writes a Category A orchestration artifact that stays on disk for Phase 3 critique, targeted retries, and workflow resume:

StageFileProduced by
1docs/<ISSUE_SLUG>-stage-1-detailed.mdtask-planner
2docs/<ISSUE_SLUG>-stage-2-prioritized.mddependency-prioritizer
3docs/<ISSUE_SLUG>-tasks.mdtask-validator

Preserve these planning artifacts on disk. They support resume and critique workflows, and they stay out of git history as orchestration artifacts.

Subagent Registry

SubagentPathPurpose
task-planner./subagents/task-planner.mdDecompose the issue and draft the stage 1 plan
dependency-prioritizer./subagents/dependency-prioritizer.mdAnnotate dependencies and determine execution order
task-validator./subagents/task-validator.mdValidate the prioritized plan and append QA findings
stage-validator./subagents/stage-validator.mdCheck preflight, inter-stage, and final output gates

Read a subagent definition only when you are about to dispatch that subagent. Do not read the stage artifacts inline unless a validator or subagent contract explicitly requires it.

How This Skill Works

This skill does exactly three things:

  • Dispatch the planning subagents in sequence.
  • Validate each artifact boundary with stage-validator.
  • Report only stage verdicts and summary counts to the parent workflow.

The orchestrator keeps only decision-relevant handoff data between stages:

  • The stage subagent status summary (PLAN, PRIORITIZATION, or TASK_VALIDATION)
  • The validator verdict
  • The output file path for the passing stage
  • The specific issues that failed the current gate
  • Retry count for the current gate

Do not carry raw plan content forward in the orchestrator context.

Phase Guide

Execution order lives in ## Execution Steps. Use this table as the gate and recovery map when deciding which stage to dispatch or retry next.

Phase / gateDispatchRequired outputOn failure
preflightstage-validatorPhase 1 snapshot document is present and completeStop on STAGE_VALIDATION: FAIL or STAGE_VALIDATION: ERROR with Failure category: PREFLIGHT
Stage 1task-planner → stage-validatorPLAN: PASS and docs/<ISSUE_SLUG>-stage-1-detailed.md passes Stage 1 checksStop on PLAN: FAIL, PLAN: BLOCKED, or PLAN: ERROR; retry Stage 1 only on STAGE_VALIDATION: FAIL; stop on STAGE_VALIDATION: ERROR with Failure category: STAGE_1
Stage 2dependency-prioritizer → stage-validatorPRIORITIZATION: PASS and docs/<ISSUE_SLUG>-stage-2-prioritized.md passes Stage 2 checksStop on PRIORITIZATION: FAIL, PRIORITIZATION: BLOCKED, or PRIORITIZATION: ERROR; retry Stage 2 only on STAGE_VALIDATION: FAIL; stop on STAGE_VALIDATION: ERROR with Failure category: STAGE_2
Stage 3task-validator → stage-validatorTASK_VALIDATION: PASS and docs/<ISSUE_SLUG>-tasks.md passes Stage 3 checksStop on TASK_VALIDATION: FAIL, TASK_VALIDATION: BLOCKED, or TASK_VALIDATION: ERROR; retry Stage 3 only on STAGE_VALIDATION: FAIL; stop on STAGE_VALIDATION: ERROR with Failure category: STAGE_3
postpipelinestage-validatorFinal downstream contract is intactRe-dispatch Stage 3, then re-run STAGE=3 and STAGE=postpipeline only on STAGE_VALIDATION: FAIL; stop on STAGE_VALIDATION: ERROR with Failure category: POSTPIPELINE

Execution Paths

Use one of these paths:

  • Normal path: preflight → stage 1 → stage 2 → stage 3 → postpipeline
  • Re-plan path: read ./references/re-plan-cycle.md, identify the earliest affected stage, resume from that stage using the preserved on-disk artifacts, then rerun every downstream stage and finish with postpipeline

Use targeted fix loops only. When a gate fails, re-dispatch the stage that produced the failing artifact, pass only the validator's issues list, and re-run only the failing gate. Do not restart already-passing stages unless the re-plan rules require it.

Execution Steps

  1. Choose execution path

- If RE_PLAN is absent or false, run the normal path. - If RE_PLAN=true, read ./references/re-plan-cycle.md, determine the earliest affected stage, and resume from that point using the on-disk artifacts from the prior run. - Stop after 3 critique-driven re-plan iterations and escalate instead of looping indefinitely. - This re-plan cap is separate from the per-gate retry cap in Step 7. - Start at Stage 1 when the critique changes issue interpretation, scope, assumptions, or task decomposition. - Start at Stage 2 when the stage 1 task content is still valid but ordering, dependencies, or priority need to change. - Start at Stage 3 when only the final validated artifact or report needs correction. - After rerunning the earliest affected stage, rerun every downstream stage and finish with the post-pipeline gate. Skip preflight on a re-plan unless the issue snapshot itself changed or must be revalidated.

  1. Preflight Read the stage-validator definition and dispatch it with: If the validator returns STAGE_VALIDATION: FAIL, stop and return PLANNING: FAIL with Failure category: PREFLIGHT. If the validator returns STAGE_VALIDATION: ERROR, stop and return PLANNING: FAIL with Failure category: PREFLIGHT. The Reason must explicitly state that the validator errored.

- ISSUE_SLUG=<ISSUE_SLUG> - STAGE=preflight - FILE_PATH=docs/<ISSUE_SLUG>.md

  1. Stage 1 - Plan Read the task-planner definition and dispatch it with: If PLAN returns FAIL, BLOCKED, or ERROR, stop and return PLANNING: FAIL with Failure category: STAGE_1. Then validate stage 1 by reading the stage-validator definition and dispatching it with: If that validator returns STAGE_VALIDATION: FAIL, apply Step 7 before returning a phase failure. If that validator returns STAGE_VALIDATION: ERROR, stop and return PLANNING: FAIL with Failure category: STAGE_1. The Reason must explicitly state that the validator errored.

- ISSUE_SLUG=<ISSUE_SLUG> - INPUT_PATH=docs/<ISSUE_SLUG>.md - OUTPUT_PATH=docs/<ISSUE_SLUG>-stage-1-detailed.md - DECISIONS=<DECISIONS> only when Stage 1 is part of a re-plan - VALIDATION_ISSUES=<issues list> only when retrying Stage 1 after a failed validator gate - ISSUE_SLUG=<ISSUE_SLUG> - STAGE=1 - FILE_PATH=docs/<ISSUE_SLUG>-stage-1-detailed.md

  1. Stage 2 - Prioritize Read the dependency-prioritizer definition and dispatch it with: If PRIORITIZATION returns FAIL, BLOCKED, or ERROR, stop and return PLANNING: FAIL with Failure category: STAGE_2. Then validate stage 2 by reading the stage-validator definition and dispatching it with: If that validator returns STAGE_VALIDATION: FAIL, apply Step 7 before returning a phase failure. If that validator returns STAGE_VALIDATION: ERROR, stop and return PLANNING: FAIL with Failure category: STAGE_2. The Reason must explicitly state that the validator errored.

- ISSUE_SLUG=<ISSUE_SLUG> - INPUT_PATH=docs/<ISSUE_SLUG>-stage-1-detailed.md - OUTPUT_PATH=docs/<ISSUE_SLUG>-stage-2-prioritized.md - DECISIONS=<DECISIONS> only when Stage 2 is part of a re-plan - VALIDATION_ISSUES=<issues list> only when retrying Stage 2 after a failed validator gate - ISSUE_SLUG=<ISSUE_SLUG> - STAGE=2 - FILE_PATH=docs/<ISSUE_SLUG>-stage-2-prioritized.md

  1. Stage 3 - Validate Read the task-validator definition and dispatch it with: If TASK_VALIDATION returns FAIL, BLOCKED, or ERROR, stop and return PLANNING: FAIL with Failure category: STAGE_3. Then validate stage 3 by reading the stage-validator definition and dispatching it with: If that validator returns STAGE_VALIDATION: FAIL, apply Step 7 before returning a phase failure. If that validator returns STAGE_VALIDATION: ERROR, stop and return PLANNING: FAIL with Failure category: STAGE_3. The Reason must explicitly state that the validator errored.

- ISSUE_SLUG=<ISSUE_SLUG> - SNAPSHOT_PATH=docs/<ISSUE_SLUG>.md - PLAN_PATH=docs/<ISSUE_SLUG>-stage-2-prioritized.md - OUTPUT_PATH=docs/<ISSUE_SLUG>-tasks.md - VALIDATION_ISSUES=<issues list> only when retrying Stage 3 or repairing a failed post-pipeline gate - ISSUE_SLUG=<ISSUE_SLUG> - STAGE=3 - FILE_PATH=docs/<ISSUE_SLUG>-tasks.md

  1. Post-pipeline gate Read the stage-validator definition and dispatch it with: This confirms the full output contract for downstream phases. If that validator returns STAGE_VALIDATION: FAIL, apply Step 7. If that validator returns STAGE_VALIDATION: ERROR, stop and return PLANNING: FAIL with Failure category: POSTPIPELINE. The Reason must explicitly state that the validator errored.

- ISSUE_SLUG=<ISSUE_SLUG> - STAGE=postpipeline - FILE_PATH=docs/<ISSUE_SLUG>-tasks.md

  1. Targeted retry loop This loop applies only to STAGE_VALIDATION: FAIL results for Stage 1, Stage 2, Stage 3, and postpipeline. STAGE_VALIDATION: ERROR is terminal at the current gate and never enters this loop. Preflight failures are terminal per Step 2. If a stage subagent returns PLAN: FAIL | BLOCKED | ERROR, PRIORITIZATION: FAIL | BLOCKED | ERROR, or TASK_VALIDATION: FAIL | BLOCKED | ERROR, stop and return PLANNING: FAIL. Re-plan iterations and per-gate retry cycles are tracked separately. For any failing validator gate:

- Collect only the validator's issues list. - Re-dispatch only the stage that produced that artifact. - Pass the original inputs plus VALIDATION_ISSUES=<issues list>. - Re-run only the previously failing validator gate. - If the failed gate is postpipeline, re-dispatch Stage 3 with VALIDATION_ISSUES, then rerun STAGE=3 and STAGE=postpipeline. - Stop after 3 failed cycles for the same gate and return PLANNING: FAIL with the relevant failure category.

  1. Report On success, return the completion handoff from ## Output Contract. Include the final file path, task count, cross-cutting question count, warning count, and the preserved artifact paths. State explicitly that planning is complete and implementation has not started.

Example

  1. Dispatch stage-validator with STAGE=preflight, ISSUE_SLUG=acme-app-42, FILE_PATH=docs/acme-app-42.md -> PASS
  2. Dispatch task-planner with ISSUE_SLUG=acme-app-42, INPUT_PATH=docs/acme-app-42.md, OUTPUT_PATH=docs/acme-app-42-stage-1-detailed.md -> wrote stage 1 artifact
  3. Validate stage 1 -> PASS
  4. Dispatch dependency-prioritizer with ISSUE_SLUG=acme-app-42, INPUT_PATH=docs/acme-app-42-stage-1-detailed.md, OUTPUT_PATH=docs/acme-app-42-stage-2-prioritized.md -> wrote stage 2 artifact
  5. Validate stage 2 -> PASS
  6. Dispatch task-validator with ISSUE_SLUG=acme-app-42, SNAPSHOT_PATH=docs/acme-app-42.md, PLAN_PATH=docs/acme-app-42-stage-2-prioritized.md, OUTPUT_PATH=docs/acme-app-42-tasks.md -> wrote final plan
  7. Dispatch stage-validator with ISSUE_SLUG=acme-app-42, STAGE=3, FILE_PATH=docs/acme-app-42-tasks.md -> PASS
  8. Dispatch stage-validator with ISSUE_SLUG=acme-app-42, STAGE=postpipeline, FILE_PATH=docs/acme-app-42-tasks.md -> PASS
  9. Return: PLANNING: PASS ISSUE_SLUG: acme-app-42 File: docs/acme-app-42-tasks.md Tasks: 7 Cross-cutting questions: 3 Validation warnings: 1 Failure category: NONE Reason: Final plan validated and ready for Phase 3. Artifacts preserved: docs/acme-app-42-stage-1-detailed.md, docs/acme-app-42-stage-2-prioritized.md, docs/acme-app-42-tasks.md

平台分布

Codex

36.97%
按下载量换算27

Claude

28.31%
按下载量换算21

Cursor

20.45%
按下载量换算15

Gemini CLI

9.54%
按下载量换算7

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills