Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

senior-backend(高级后端)

senior-backend 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

senior-backend 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 14,490。

总安装 698周安装 30GitHub Stars 1下载 245核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:senior-backend(高级后端)
来源仓库:https://github.com/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents
仓库路径:skills/senior-backend
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents --skill senior-backend
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents --skill senior-backend

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

senior-backend 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合围绕仓库状态和代码变更进行整理。适用于后端开发相关的协作信息管理,可结合代码变更事项使用。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装,需确认权限范围和维护状态。

安装前建议确认是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写等操作边界。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/senior-backend

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents --skill senio…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

senior-backend 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents --skill senior-backend。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

senior-backend 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

senior-backend 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

senior-backend 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

senior-backend 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 698 次,近一周安装 30 次,下载 245 次,GitHub 1 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

senior-backend 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
senior-backend

高级后端 · 本页

6981调用外部服务未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Senior Backend Engineer

Overview

Design and implement robust, scalable backend systems with a focus on API design, service architecture, data management, and operational excellence. This skill covers RESTful and GraphQL API patterns, message-driven architecture, caching strategies, rate limiting, health checks, and full observability with OpenTelemetry.

Announce at start: "I'm using the senior-backend skill for backend system design and implementation."


Phase 1: API Design

Goal: Define the contract before writing implementation code.

Actions

  1. Define resource models and relationships
  2. Design endpoint structure (REST) or schema (GraphQL)
  3. Establish authentication and authorization strategy
  4. Define rate limiting and throttling policies
  5. Create API documentation (OpenAPI/GraphQL schema)

API Style Decision Table

FactorRESTGraphQLgRPC
Multiple consumers with different data needsPoor fitStrong fitPoor fit
Simple CRUD operationsStrong fitOverkillOverkill
Real-time subscriptionsRequires WebSocket add-onBuilt-inBuilt-in (streaming)
Service-to-serviceGoodOverkillStrong fit
Public APIStrong fitGoodPoor fit (tooling)
Mobile with bandwidth constraintsOverfetching riskStrong fitStrong fit

STOP — Do NOT proceed to Phase 2 until:

  • Resource models are defined
  • Endpoint structure or schema is documented
  • Auth strategy is chosen
  • API contract is reviewable (OpenAPI/GraphQL schema)

Phase 2: Implementation

Goal: Build the service layer with clear separation of concerns.

Actions

  1. Set up project structure with clear layering
  2. Implement data access layer (repositories/DAOs)
  3. Build service layer with business logic
  4. Create API controllers/resolvers
  5. Add middleware (auth, logging, error handling, CORS)
  6. Implement caching strategy

RESTful URL Structure

GET    /api/v1/users              # List users (paginated)
GET    /api/v1/users/:id          # Get single user
POST   /api/v1/users              # Create user
PUT    /api/v1/users/:id          # Full update
PATCH  /api/v1/users/:id          # Partial update
DELETE /api/v1/users/:id          # Delete user
GET    /api/v1/users/:id/orders   # Nested resources
POST   /api/v1/users/:id/activate # State transitions

HTTP Status Code Decision Table

CodeMeaningWhen to Use
200OKSuccessful GET, PUT, PATCH
201CreatedSuccessful POST creating resource
204No ContentSuccessful DELETE
400Bad RequestValidation errors
401UnauthorizedMissing or invalid auth
403ForbiddenAuth valid but insufficient permissions
404Not FoundResource does not exist
409ConflictDuplicate or state conflict
422Unprocessable EntitySemantically invalid input
429Too Many RequestsRate limit exceeded
500Internal Server ErrorUnexpected server failure

Response Format

// Success (single)
{ "data": { "id": "123", "name": "Alice" }, "meta": { "requestId": "req_abc123" } }

// Success (collection)
{ "data": [...], "meta": { "page": 1, "pageSize": 20, "totalCount": 150, "totalPages": 8 } }

// Error
{ "error": { "code": "VALIDATION_ERROR", "message": "Invalid input", "details": [...] } }

Caching Strategy Decision Table

StrategyDescriptionUse Case
Cache-AsideApp checks cache, falls back to DBGeneral purpose
Write-ThroughWrite to cache and DB simultaneouslyStrong consistency
Write-BehindWrite to cache, async write to DBHigh write throughput
Read-ThroughCache loads from DB on missTransparent caching

STOP — Do NOT proceed to Phase 3 until:

  • Project structure follows layered architecture
  • Input validation is at the edge (Zod, Joi, class-validator)
  • Error handling returns structured error responses
  • Caching strategy is implemented with invalidation plan

Phase 3: Hardening

Goal: Prepare the service for production operation.

Actions

  1. Add comprehensive error handling
  2. Implement health checks and readiness probes
  3. Set up observability (traces, metrics, logs)
  4. Load test critical paths
  5. Document runbooks for operational scenarios

Health Check Endpoints

// GET /health — lightweight liveness check
{ "status": "healthy" }

// GET /health/ready — readiness with dependency checks
{
  "status": "healthy",
  "checks": {
    "database": { "status": "healthy", "latency": "5ms" },
    "redis": { "status": "healthy", "latency": "2ms" },
    "queue": { "status": "healthy", "latency": "8ms" }
  },
  "uptime": "72h15m",
  "version": "1.4.2"
}

Observability: RED Method Metrics

MetricDescriptionImplementation
RateRequests per secondCounter incremented per request
ErrorsError rate per secondCounter incremented per error
DurationLatency distributionHistogram (p50, p95, p99)

Structured Logging Format

{
  "timestamp": "2025-01-15T10:30:00.123Z",
  "level": "info",
  "message": "User created",
  "service": "user-service",
  "traceId": "abc123",
  "spanId": "def456",
  "userId": "usr_123",
  "duration": 45
}

Rate Limiting Algorithm Decision Table

AlgorithmProsConsBest For
Fixed WindowSimple, low memoryBurst at boundariesInternal APIs
Sliding WindowSmooth distributionMore memoryPublic APIs
Token BucketControlled burstsSlightly complexIndustry standard
Leaky BucketConstant outputNo burst allowedStrict rate control

STOP — Hardening complete when:

  • Health check endpoints respond correctly
  • Structured logging is configured
  • Metrics are exported (RED method)
  • Load test completed on critical paths
  • Error handling returns appropriate status codes

Event-Driven Architecture Patterns

Message Queue Pattern Decision Table

PatternUse CaseExample
Pub/SubBroadcast to multiple consumersUser registered -> email, analytics, CRM
Work QueueDistribute tasks across workersImage processing, PDF generation
Request/ReplyAsync request with responsePrice calculation service
Dead LetterHandle failed messagesRetry policy exceeded

Event Schema

{
  "eventId": "evt_abc123",
  "eventType": "user.created",
  "timestamp": "2025-01-15T10:30:00Z",
  "version": "1.0",
  "source": "user-service",
  "data": { "userId": "usr_123", "email": "alice@example.com" },
  "metadata": { "correlationId": "corr_xyz789", "causationId": "cmd_def456" }
}

GraphQL Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternProblemFix
N+1 queriesPerformance degradationDataLoader for batching
Unbounded queriesDoS vulnerabilityEnforce depth and complexity limits
Over-fetching in resolversWasted DB queriesSelect only requested fields

Anti-Patterns / Common Mistakes

Anti-PatternWhy It Is WrongCorrect Approach
Exposing database IDs directlySecurity risk, coupling to DBUse UUIDs or prefixed IDs
Synchronous external service calls in request pathSingle point of failure, latencyAsync with queues or circuit breaker
N+1 query patternsLinear performance degradationEager loading or DataLoader
Catching and swallowing errorsSilent failures, impossible debuggingLog and propagate with context
Shared mutable state across handlersRace conditions, unpredictable behaviorStateless request handling
Skipping input validationInjection, data corruptionValidate at the edge, always
Generic 500 for all errorsPoor developer experienceSpecific error codes and messages
No API versioningBreaking changes affect all consumersVersion from day one (/v1/)

Documentation Lookup (Context7)

Use mcp__context7__resolve-library-id then mcp__context7__query-docs for up-to-date docs. Returned docs override memorized knowledge.

  • express — for middleware patterns, routing, or request/response API
  • fastify — for plugin system, hooks, or schema validation
  • nestjs — for decorators, modules, providers, or guards
  • prisma — for schema syntax, client API, or migration commands

Integration Points

SkillRelationship
senior-architectArchitecture decisions guide backend service boundaries
security-reviewBackend security follows OWASP and auth patterns
performance-optimizationBackend performance uses caching and query tuning
testing-strategyBackend test strategy defines integration test approach
code-reviewReview verifies API design and error handling
acceptance-testingAPI behavior becomes acceptance criteria
senior-fullstackBackend serves the full-stack tRPC layer

Key Principles

  • API versioning from day one (/v1/)
  • Input validation at the edge (Zod, Joi, class-validator)
  • Idempotency keys for non-GET endpoints
  • Graceful shutdown (drain connections, finish in-flight requests)
  • Circuit breaker for external service calls
  • Database migrations versioned and reversible
  • Secrets in environment variables, never in code

Skill Type

FLEXIBLE — Adapt API style and architecture to the project context. The three-phase process (design, implement, harden) is strongly recommended. Health checks, structured logging, and error handling are non-negotiable for production services.

平台分布

Codex

37.77%
按下载量换算93

Claude

29.45%
按下载量换算72

Cursor

18.35%
按下载量换算45

Gemini CLI

9.4%
按下载量换算23

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills