Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

api-design(API 设计)

用于辅助 API 设计、接口文档、请求响应结构和服务集成说明。它适合让 Agent 梳理 endpoint、生成 OpenAPI 草稿、检查字段命名、整理错误码或辅助前后端联调。使用时需要确认真实业务语义、鉴权方式、分页和错误处理规则;涉及生成接口文档时,应避免凭空补字段,最好从现有代码、schema 或接口样例中提取事实。

api-design 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 47,881。

总安装 713周安装 30GitHub Stars 1下载 250核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:api-design(API 设计)
来源仓库:https://github.com/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents
仓库路径:skills/api-design
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents --skill api-design
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents --skill api-design

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

api-design 用于辅助 API 设计、接口文档和错误码整理,适合前后端联调支持。适用于梳理 endpoint、生成 OpenAPI 草稿或检查字段命名的场景。使用时需确认业务语义、鉴权方式和分页规则,避免凭空补字段。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装并使用该技能。

api-design 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/api-design

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents --skill api-d…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

api-design 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/pixel-process-ug/superkit-agents --skill api-design。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

api-design 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

api-design 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

api-design 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

api-design 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 713 次,近一周安装 30 次,下载 250 次,GitHub 1 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

api-design 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
api-design

API 设计 · 本页

7131需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

API Design

Overview

Structured API endpoint design through guided discovery. Produces consistent, well-documented API designs with OpenAPI/Swagger specifications. Covers resource modeling, authentication, pagination, error handling, and versioning — ensuring consumer-centric design before any implementation begins.

Announce at start: "I'm using the api-design skill to design the API."

Phase 1: Discovery

Ask these questions ONE AT A TIME:

Resource Questions

#QuestionWhat It Determines
1What entities/resources does this API manage?Resource naming
2What are the relationships between them?Nested routes, includes
3What operations are needed for each? (CRUD, search, batch)HTTP methods, endpoints

Consumer Questions

#QuestionWhat It Determines
4Who will consume this API? (frontend, mobile, third-party, internal)Response shape, auth model
5What authentication/authorization is needed?Security scheme
6What rate limits or quotas apply?Rate limiting headers

Constraint Questions

#QuestionWhat It Determines
7REST, GraphQL, or tRPC?API paradigm
8Versioning strategy? (URL path, header, query param)URL structure
9Pagination approach? (cursor, offset, keyset)List response shape
10Existing API conventions in the codebase?Consistency constraints

API Paradigm Decision Table

FactorChoose RESTChoose GraphQLChoose tRPC
ConsumersMultiple, diverseFrontend-heavy, flexible queriesTypeScript monorepo
Caching needsStrong (HTTP caching)Moderate (client-side)Low (internal only)
Data shapePredictable, resource-orientedNested, variable-shapeType-safe RPC
Team familiarityUniversalRequires schema knowledgeRequires TypeScript
Real-time needsWebSocket addonSubscriptions built-inSubscription support

STOP after discovery — present a summary of resources, operations, and constraints. Get confirmation before designing endpoints.

Phase 2: Design Endpoints

For each endpoint, define:

### [METHOD] /api/v1/[resource]

**Purpose:** [what this endpoint does]

**Request:**
- Headers: `Authorization: Bearer <token>`
- Query params: `?page=1&limit=20&sort=created_at:desc`
- Body:

{ "field": "type — description" }


**Response (200):**

{ "data": [...], "meta": { "total": 100, "page": 1, "limit": 20 } }


**Error Responses:**

| Status | Code | Description |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 400 | VALIDATION_ERROR | Invalid request body |
| 401 | UNAUTHORIZED | Missing or invalid token |
| 404 | NOT_FOUND | Resource doesn't exist |
| 409 | CONFLICT | Resource already exists |

**Authorization:** [who can access this]

HTTP Method Decision Table

OperationMethodStatus (success)Idempotent
List resourcesGET200Yes
Get single resourceGET200Yes
Create resourcePOST201No
Full replacePUT200Yes
Partial updatePATCH200No
Delete resourceDELETE204Yes
Bulk createPOST201No
Search (complex)POST200Yes (safe)

Pagination Decision Table

ApproachWhen to UseProsCons
CursorReal-time feeds, large datasetsConsistent, no skippingCannot jump to page N
OffsetSmall datasets, admin panelsSimple, jumpableSkips/duplicates on insert
KeysetTime-series, logsEfficient on large tablesRequires sortable key

Error Response Format

All endpoints must use a consistent error shape:

{
  "error": {
    "code": "VALIDATION_ERROR",
    "message": "Human-readable description",
    "details": [
      { "field": "email", "message": "Invalid email format" }
    ]
  }
}

Status Code Reference

CodeMeaningWhen to Use
200OKSuccessful GET, PUT, PATCH
201CreatedSuccessful POST that creates
204No ContentSuccessful DELETE
400Bad RequestValidation failure
401UnauthorizedMissing or invalid credentials
403ForbiddenValid credentials, insufficient permissions
404Not FoundResource does not exist
409ConflictDuplicate or state conflict
422Unprocessable EntityValid JSON but semantic error
429Too Many RequestsRate limit exceeded
500Internal Server ErrorUnexpected server failure

STOP after endpoint design — present each endpoint for review and approval.

Phase 3: Generate OpenAPI Spec

openapi: 3.1.0
info:
  title: [API Name]
  version: 1.0.0
  description: [API description]

servers:
  - url: http://localhost:3000/api/v1
    description: Development
  - url: https://api.example.com/v1
    description: Production

paths:
  /resource:
    get:
      summary: List resources
      parameters: [...]
      responses: [...]
    post:
      summary: Create resource
      requestBody: [...]
      responses: [...]

components:
  schemas: [...]
  securitySchemes: [...]

STOP after spec generation — validate the YAML and present for final approval.

Phase 4: Save and Transition

After explicit approval:

  1. Save OpenAPI spec to docs/api/YYYY-MM-DD-<api-name>.yaml
  2. Commit with message: docs(api): add OpenAPI spec for <api-name>
  3. Determine next step based on user intent

Transition Decision Table

User IntentNext SkillRationale
"Let's implement this"planningCreate implementation plan from API spec
"Write specs for this"spec-writingBehavioral specs for each endpoint
"Generate client SDK"ManualUse OpenAPI codegen tools
"Just save the design"NoneAPI design is the deliverable
"Add tests"testing-strategyDefine API test approach

Design Principles

PrincipleRule
Consistent namingPlural nouns for collections (/users, not /user)
Proper HTTP methodsGET reads, POST creates, PUT replaces, PATCH updates, DELETE removes
Proper status codesUse the right code for the right situation (see table above)
Consistent error formatSame error shape across all endpoints
Pagination by defaultAll list endpoints paginated
Filtering and sortingQuery params for list endpoints
IdempotencyPUT and DELETE are always idempotent
HATEOASInclude links for discoverability (when appropriate)

Anti-Patterns / Common Mistakes

MistakeWhy It Is WrongWhat To Do Instead
Verb-based URLs (/getUsers)Not RESTful, breaks conventionsUse nouns: GET /users
Inconsistent plural/singularConfuses consumersAlways plural for collections
Returning 200 for errorsHides failures from clientsUse proper status codes
No pagination on list endpointsPerformance bomb on large datasetsAlways paginate
Different error formats per endpointClients can't build generic error handlingOne error shape for all
Exposing internal IDs in URLsSecurity and coupling riskUse UUIDs or slugs
No versioning strategyBreaking changes break clientsVersion from day one
Designing without knowing consumersAPI serves no one wellDiscovery phase first

Anti-Rationalization Guards

  • Do NOT skip the discovery phase — understand consumers and constraints first
  • Do NOT design endpoints without defining error responses
  • Do NOT skip pagination for any list endpoint
  • Do NOT use inconsistent naming across endpoints
  • Do NOT generate the OpenAPI spec without user approval of endpoint designs
  • Do NOT mix API paradigms (REST + GraphQL) without explicit justification

Integration Points

SkillRelationship
spec-writingDownstream: API design informs behavioral specifications
planningDownstream: API endpoints become implementation tasks
tech-docs-generatorDownstream: OpenAPI spec feeds API reference docs
testing-strategyDownstream: API design informs integration test strategy
security-reviewDownstream: auth/authz model reviewed for vulnerabilities
database-schema-designUpstream: data model informs resource design
prd-generationUpstream: PRD requirements drive API resource identification

Verification Gate

Before claiming the API design is complete:

  1. VERIFY all endpoints have request/response schemas
  2. VERIFY all error responses are documented with consistent format
  3. VERIFY authentication is specified for each endpoint
  4. VERIFY pagination is defined for all list endpoints
  5. VERIFY the OpenAPI spec is valid YAML
  6. VERIFY user has approved each endpoint individually

Skill Type

Flexible — Adapt API paradigm, pagination style, and auth model to project needs while preserving the discovery-first approach, consistent error handling, and consumer-centric design principles.

平台分布

Codex

36.7%
按下载量换算92

Claude

30%
按下载量换算75

Cursor

18.56%
按下载量换算46

Gemini CLI

10.95%
按下载量换算27

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills