Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 运维

personal-ontology(个人本体论)

personal-ontology 用于辅助前端页面、组件、样式和交互逻辑开发,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要维护前端项目、生成组件或检查界面实现时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

personal-ontology 是运维类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为只读;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在运维类的 954 个 Skill 里排第 663。

总安装 3,873周安装 163GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 1,356核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:personal-ontology(个人本体论)
来源仓库:https://github.com/levineam/personal-ontology
安装命令:
openclaw skills install personal-ontology
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install personal-ontology

这个 Skill 是做什么的

运维类 Skill 处理部署、监控、日志和云资源,多数需要较高的执行权限。

帮助用户构建和维护个人本体 - Palantir 风格的对象(身份、信念、预测、目标)和链接(它们之间的关系)图,从而实现人工智能驱动的决策和生活协调。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install personal-ontology;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

personal-ontology 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install personal-ontology。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

personal-ontology 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

personal-ontology 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

personal-ontology 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

personal-ontology 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 3,873 次,近一周安装 163 次,下载 1,356 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

personal-ontology 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理运维类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

运维类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
docker-essentials

Docker 基础 · OpenClaw

1,005,15130接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
playwright-scraper-skill

Playwright scraper 技能 · OpenClaw

923,55754接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
moltguard

moltguard 搜索 · OpenClaw

825,096110接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
finance-news

财经新闻 · OpenClaw

275,51210需要联网MIT-0有提醒
security-monitor

安全监视器 · OpenClaw

224,1695需要联网MIT-0有提醒
personal-ontology

个人本体论 · 本页

3,873—只读MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
personal-ontology
description
Help users build and maintain a Personal Ontology - a Palantir-style graph of Objects (identity, beliefs, predictions, goals) and Links (relationships between them) that enables AI-driven decision-making and life alignment.

Personal Ontology Skill

A framework for organizing your life as a knowledge graph. Objects are the entities (beliefs, goals, projects). Links are the relationships between them (serves, supports, contradicts). The agent uses this graph to make decisions aligned with who you are.

Quick Start (Example)

You tell the agent: "Moltbot bootstrap personal ontology." It scans your notes, proposes candidate Objects (e.g., a Belief about AI, a Goal for health, a Project for a newsletter), and presents them for review - nothing is auto-committed.

You confirm or edit those candidates. The agent then creates/updates your ontology files and links Projects → Goals → Core Self, flagging any orphans or contradictions for your decision.

From that point on, the agent runs a light daily scan: it watches for new beliefs, predictions, goals, and projects, and surfaces only high-confidence candidates or conflicts so you stay aligned without extra maintenance.

The Object Hierarchy

Objects are organized from most abstract/stable to most concrete/changeable:

  1. Higher Order - The highest organizing principle (God, universe, truth). Acknowledged, not defined.
  2. Beliefs - Foundational assumptions about reality. What you hold to be true. *Generally unfalsifiable.*
  3. Predictions - Your model of what will happen. *Testable, time-bound, updateable.*
  4. Core Self - Who you are: Mission, Values, Strengths.
  5. Goals - Time-bound objectives serving your Core Self. *Outcomes you want to achieve.*
  6. Projects - Organized efforts toward goals. *Bounded work with beginning and end.*
  7. Tasks - Atomic units of work. *(Live elsewhere: daily notes, Kanban, reminders.)*

Link Types

Every Object (except Higher Order) should link to other Objects. Standard link types:

LinkMeaningExample
servesDirectly supports an outcome"This Project serves Goal X"
supportsProvides evidence/foundation for"This Prediction supports Belief Y"
contradictsIn tension with"This Belief contradicts Prediction Z"
relates-toGeneral association"This Goal relates-to Value W"
depends-onRequires for completion"Project A depends-on Project B"
evolved-fromUpdated version of"Prediction 2.0 evolved-from Prediction 1.0"

Validation rule: Every Project must serve at least one Goal. Every Goal must serve Core Self. Orphan Objects are flagged for review.

File Structure

Live ontology (canonical): [User's Notes Folder]/My_Personal_Ontology/

My_Personal_Ontology/
├── 1-higher-order.md
├── 2-beliefs.md
├── 3-predictions.md
├── 4-core-self.md
├── 5-goals.md
└── 6-projects.md

Each file contains multiple Objects of that type, each with a ## Links section.

Suggestions queue: Ontology_Suggestions.md

Use this file to capture all candidate updates (bootstrap + ongoing).


For AI Agents

Deployment Modes

Interactive Mode: Direct conversation. User asks for help, agent references ontology for context.

  • "Should I take this job?" → Check against Goals, Values, Mission
  • "What should I work on?" → Surface high-priority Projects serving active Goals

Embedded Mode: Agent uses ontology to inform all decisions without explicit reference.

  • Email triage → Prioritize based on Goals/Projects
  • Task suggestions → Only suggest what serves active Projects
  • Calendar optimization → Protect time for Goal-aligned work

Automated Mode: Passive scanning and maintenance without user prompting.

  • Daily scan for new/changed Objects
  • Flag contradictions and orphans
  • Surface stale Predictions

When to Reference the Ontology

  1. Making decisions - Check proposed action against Values, Goals, Mission
  2. Prioritizing - Use Goal hierarchy to rank options
  3. Explaining - Connect tasks to higher purpose ("This serves your goal of...")
  4. Flagging misalignment - "This task doesn't connect to any active Goal"
  5. Surfacing insights - "Your Prediction about X has a time horizon of Q1 - any update?"

Integration Recipes (optional)

For users who want the ontology to shape daily behavior, integrate it into:

  • Morning briefing: restate Mission + top Goal + active Project, then suggest the next concrete output.
  • Task sanity checks: flag tasks that don't clearly map to a Project → Goal.
  • End-of-day closure: reflect on what served the Mission/Goals, then close the loop so the user can disconnect.
  • Wind-down: brain dump + tiny alignment cue for tomorrow.
Adaptive prompts ("magic in the background")

If higher layers are missing (Higher Order, Predictions), do not nag daily. Instead:

  • Ask one tiny, optional prompt at most once every N days.
  • Track last-asked timestamps in a small local state file (example: memory/ontology-nudges.json).
  • Only surface prompts at natural transitions (work start or wind-down), and skip on overloaded days.

These can be implemented via scheduled prompts (cron) that read the ontology files + the user's task board/journal + the nudge state file.

How to Use It

1. Read Core Self first for value judgments
2. Read Goals for current priorities
3. Read Projects for tactical context
4. Read Beliefs/Predictions for worldview grounding
5. Reference explicitly when helpful ("This aligns with your mission to...")
6. Flag when something doesn't fit

Daily Passive Scan

Agents should perform a lightweight scan of recent activity to maintain the ontology.

What to Scan

  • New notes (last 24h) - Look for ontology-relevant content
  • Modified files (last 24h) - Check if existing Objects need updates
  • Task completions - Do they affect Project status?
  • Calendar/journal - Any events that validate/invalidate Predictions?

Extraction Patterns

When scanning, look for these signals:

PatternCandidate Object
"I believe...", "I think...", "I'm convinced..."Belief
"I predict...", "By 20XX...", "will happen", "I expect..."Prediction
"My goal is...", "I want to achieve...", "I'm working toward..."Goal
"I'm working on...", "Project:", "I'm building..."Project
Mission statements, value lists, "What matters to me..."Core Self

When to Act

SignalAction
New Object candidate (high confidence)Queue for user review
New Object candidate (low confidence)Note in daily memory, don't surface yet
Existing Object contradictedSurface immediately with evidence
Prediction time horizon passedPrompt for resolution
Project completedPrompt to update Goals

Contradiction Detection

When new content conflicts with existing ontology:

  1. Note the specific contradiction
  2. Surface to user with both sides
  3. Don't auto-resolve - user decides which to update
  4. Track resolution in Prediction Log or Object history

Intelligence Layer

The ontology isn't just storage - it drives insights. Regularly surface:

Orphan Detection

  • Orphan Project - Doesn't serve any Goal → "This project isn't connected to your goals. Is it still relevant?"
  • Orphan Goal - Doesn't connect to Core Self → "What mission/value does this goal serve?"
  • Orphan Task - Doesn't belong to any Project → "Is this task important enough to track?"

Staleness Checks

  • Stale Prediction - Time horizon passed, no update → "Your prediction that X would happen by Q1 2026 - did it?"
  • Stale Project - No activity in 30+ days → "Is [Project] still active?"
  • Stale Goal - No serving Projects → "What's the next project for [Goal]?"

Alignment Checks

  • Task audit - "These 5 tasks from today don't connect to any Project. Intentional?"
  • Time allocation - "You spent 80% of this week on Goal 2 but marked Goal 1 as top priority"
  • Value drift - "Your recent decisions seem to prioritize X over Y, but your values list Y first"

Pattern Recognition

  • Recurring themes - "You've mentioned 'AI safety' in 5 notes this month. Should this be a Belief or Goal?"
  • Implicit Objects - "You act as if you believe X, but it's not in your Beliefs. Add it?"
  • Prediction clusters - "These 3 predictions are related. What's the underlying model?"

Review Cadence

Weekly (Agent-initiated)

  • Are current tasks serving projects?
  • Are projects serving goals?
  • Any new Objects to add from the week's notes?

Monthly (User-prompted)

  • Do goals still serve Core Self?
  • New predictions to add? Existing ones to update?
  • Any completed Projects to close out?

Quarterly (Deep review)

  • What surprised you? What does that reveal?
  • Has Core Self shifted?
  • Full Prediction Log review - what were you right/wrong about?

Temporal Tracking

Objects evolve. Track when and why:

## History
- 2026-01-28: Created
- 2026-03-15: Updated based on [evidence/event]
- 2026-06-01: Marked resolved/completed

For Predictions specifically, track:

  • Created: When you made the prediction
  • Timeframe: When you expected resolution
  • Resolved: Date + outcome (confirmed/disconfirmed/modified)
  • Learning: What the outcome revealed

Setup

How to Run Bootstrap (User-Facing)

Say: "Moltbot bootstrap personal ontology."

The agent will: 1) Scan your notes for candidate Objects 2) Present candidates for your review (no auto-commit) 3) Write/merge confirmed Objects into your ontology files

Default location (Obsidian): Vault v3/ontology/ (pretty-formatted, readable Markdown)

For New Users

  1. Run the bootstrap process (see bootstrap.md) to extract candidate Objects from existing notes
  2. Review and confirm/edit candidates
  3. Work through prompts.md to fill gaps
  4. Agent begins daily passive scans

For Existing Users

  1. Copy templates to your ontology folder
  2. Fill in what you know
  3. Agent maintains and extends over time

Reference Implementation

See templates/ for starter files. The user's ontology will be created in their notes folder.

Files

  • SKILL.md - This file (agent instructions)
  • heuristics.md - Rules for categorization and validation
  • bootstrap.md - Initial extraction from existing vault
  • prompts.md - Guided questions for building each layer
  • templates/ - Starter files for each Object type

平台分布

OpenClaw

79.15%
按下载量换算1,073

安全审计

VirusTotal

未展示

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills