Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

solidity-auditor(可靠性审核员)

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

solidity-auditor 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为执行命令;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 27,489。

总安装 3,384周安装 141GitHub Stars 674下载 1,128核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:solidity-auditor(可靠性审核员)
来源仓库:https://github.com/pashov/skills
仓库路径:skills/solidity-auditor
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/pashov/skills --skill solidity-auditor
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/pashov/skills --skill solidity-auditor

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于辅助安全审计和权限检查。solidity-auditor 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。适合梳理敏感配置和分析鉴权逻辑。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。不能将工具输出直接当作最终结论。

涉及密钥或生产系统时应确认最小权限和操作边界。建议配合人工复核敏感数据处理方式。

来源仓库内路径:skills/solidity-auditor

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/pashov/skills --skill solidity-auditor;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要执行命令,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

solidity-auditor 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/pashov/skills --skill solidity-auditor。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

solidity-auditor 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

solidity-auditor 需要什么权限?

权限级别是执行命令。安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 npx skills add https://github.com/pashov/skills --skill solidity-auditor 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

solidity-auditor 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

solidity-auditor 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 3,384 次,近一周安装 141 次,下载 1,128 次,GitHub 674 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

solidity-auditor 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要执行命令,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 不能接受 Skill 在你机器上执行命令的人。
  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
solidity-auditor

可靠性审核员 · 本页

3,384674执行命令未明确未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Smart Contract Security Audit

You are the orchestrator of a parallelized smart contract security audit.

Mode Selection

Exclude pattern: skip directories interfaces/, lib/, mocks/, test/ and files matching *.t.sol, *Test*.sol or *Mock*.sol.

  • Default (no arguments): scan all .sol files using the exclude pattern. Use Bash find (not Glob).
  • $filename...: scan the specified file(s) only.

Flags:

  • --file-output (off by default): also write the report to a markdown file (path per {resolved_path}/report-formatting.md). Never write a report file unless explicitly passed.

Orchestration

Turn 1 — Discover. Print the banner, then make these parallel tool calls in one message:

a. Bash find for in-scope .sol files per mode selection b. Glob for **/references/attack-vectors/attack-vectors.md — extract the references/ directory (two levels up) as {resolved_path} c. ToolSearch select:Agent d. Read the local VERSION file from the same directory as this skill e. Bash curl -sf https://raw.githubusercontent.com/pashov/skills/main/solidity-auditor/VERSION f. Bash mktemp -d /tmp/audit-XXXXXX → store as {bundle_dir}

If the remote VERSION fetch succeeds and differs from local, print ⚠️ You are not using the latest version. Please upgrade for best security coverage. See https://github.com/pashov/skills. If it fails, skip silently.

Turn 2 — Prepare. In one message, make parallel tool calls: (a) Read {resolved_path}/report-formatting.md, (b) Read {resolved_path}/judging.md.

Then build all bundles in a single Bash command using cat (not shell variables or heredocs):

  1. {bundle_dir}/source.md — ALL in-scope .sol files, each with a ### path header and fenced code block.
  2. Agent bundles = source.md + agent-specific files:
BundleAppended files (relative to {resolved_path})
agent-1-bundle.mdattack-vectors/attack-vectors.md + hacking-agents/vector-scan-agent.md + hacking-agents/shared-rules.md
agent-2-bundle.mdhacking-agents/math-precision-agent.md + hacking-agents/shared-rules.md
agent-3-bundle.mdhacking-agents/access-control-agent.md + hacking-agents/shared-rules.md
agent-4-bundle.mdhacking-agents/economic-security-agent.md + hacking-agents/shared-rules.md
agent-5-bundle.mdhacking-agents/execution-trace-agent.md + hacking-agents/shared-rules.md
agent-6-bundle.mdhacking-agents/invariant-agent.md + hacking-agents/shared-rules.md
agent-7-bundle.mdhacking-agents/periphery-agent.md + hacking-agents/shared-rules.md
agent-8-bundle.mdhacking-agents/first-principles-agent.md + hacking-agents/shared-rules.md

Print line counts for every bundle and source.md. Do NOT inline file content into agent prompts.

Turn 3 — Spawn. In one message, spawn all 8 agents as parallel foreground Agent calls. Prompt template (substitute real values):

Your bundle file is {bundle_dir}/agent-N-bundle.md (XXXX lines).
The bundle contains all in-scope source code and your agent instructions.
Read the bundle fully before producing findings.

Turn 4 — Deduplicate, validate & output. Single-pass: deduplicate all agent results, gate-evaluate, and produce the final report in one turn. Do NOT print an intermediate dedup list — go straight to the report.

  1. Deduplicate. Parse every FINDING and LEAD from all 8 agents. Group by group_key field (format: Contract | function | bug-class). Exact-match first; then merge synonymous bug_class tags sharing the same contract and function. Keep the best version per group, number sequentially, annotate [agents: N]. Check for composite chains: if finding A's output feeds into B's precondition AND combined impact is strictly worse than either alone, add "Chain: [A] + [B]" at confidence = min(A, B). Most audits have 0–2.
  2. Gate evaluation. Run each deduplicated finding through the four gates in judging.md (do not skip or reorder). Evaluate each finding exactly once — do not revisit after verdict. Single-pass protocol: evaluate every relevant code path ONCE in fixed order (constructor → setters → swap functions → mint → burn → liquidate). One-line verdict per path: BLOCKS, ALLOWS, IRRELEVANT, or UNCERTAIN. Commit after all paths — do not re-examine. UNCERTAIN = ALLOWS.
  3. Lead promotion & rejection guardrails.

- Promote LEAD → FINDING (confidence 75) if: complete exploit chain traced in source, OR [agents: 2+] demoted (not rejected) the same issue. - [agents: 2+] does NOT override a concrete refutation — demote to LEAD if refutation is uncertain. - No deployer-intent reasoning — evaluate what the code *allows*, not how the deployer *might* use it.

  1. Fix verification (confidence ≥ 80 only): trace the attack with fix applied; verify no new DoS, reentrancy, or broken invariants (use safeTransfer not require(token.transfer(...))); list all locations if the pattern repeats. If no safe fix exists, omit it with a note.
  2. Format and print per report-formatting.md. Exclude rejected items. If --file-output: also write to file.

Banner

Before doing anything else, print this exactly:

██████╗  █████╗ ███████╗██╗  ██╗ ██████╗ ██╗   ██╗     ███████╗██╗  ██╗██╗██╗     ██╗     ███████╗
██╔══██╗██╔══██╗██╔════╝██║  ██║██╔═══██╗██║   ██║     ██╔════╝██║ ██╔╝██║██║     ██║     ██╔════╝
██████╔╝███████║███████╗███████║██║   ██║██║   ██║     ███████╗█████╔╝ ██║██║     ██║     ███████╗
██╔═══╝ ██╔══██║╚════██║██╔══██║██║   ██║╚██╗ ██╔╝     ╚════██║██╔═██╗ ██║██║     ██║     ╚════██║
██║     ██║  ██║███████║██║  ██║╚██████╔╝ ╚████╔╝      ███████║██║  ██╗██║███████╗███████╗███████║
╚═╝     ╚═╝  ╚═╝╚══════╝╚═╝  ╚═╝ ╚═════╝   ╚═══╝       ╚══════╝╚═╝  ╚═╝╚═╝╚══════╝╚══════╝╚══════╝

平台分布

Codex

34.53%
按下载量换算389

Claude

28.94%
按下载量换算326

Cursor

17.35%
按下载量换算196

Gemini CLI

9.19%
按下载量换算104

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

未通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

执行命令

安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 npx skills add https://github.com/pashov/skills --skill solidity-auditor 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills