Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · AI 工具

instructor(instructor 搜索)

instructor 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

instructor 是AI 工具类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在AI 工具类的 2,536 个 Skill 里排第 1,295。

总安装 879周安装 37GitHub Stars 37下载 308核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:instructor(instructor 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/ovachiever/droid-tings
仓库路径:skills/instructor
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/ovachiever/droid-tings --skill instructor
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/ovachiever/droid-tings --skill instructor

这个 Skill 是做什么的

AI 工具类 Skill 用来扩展助手本身的能力,例如接模型、接检索、接外部服务。

instructor 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中围绕仓库状态进行整理。适用于需要结构化指导和协作开发相关任务的场景。

通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装,需确认权限范围和维护状态。建议结合原始 README 文档核验具体用法,并注意是否会触发联网或文件操作。instructor 属于AI 工具类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/instructor

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/ovachiever/droid-tings --skill instructor;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

instructor 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/ovachiever/droid-tings --skill instructor。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

instructor 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

instructor 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

instructor 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

instructor 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 879 次,近一周安装 37 次,下载 308 次,GitHub 37 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

instructor 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理AI 工具类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

AI 工具类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
executing-plans

执行计划 · Codex、Claude

1,515,336173,110只读MIT通过
verification-before-completion

完成前的验证 · Codex、Claude

1,319,472173,121权限未标注MIT通过
subagent-driven-development

子 Agent 驱动开发 · Codex、Claude

1,312,416173,138只读MIT通过
copy-editing

复制编辑 · Codex、Claude

1,209,57625,632只读MIT通过
paywall-upgrade-cro

付费专区升级 cro · Codex、Claude

1,030,17625,617只读MIT通过
instructor

instructor 搜索 · 本页

87937需要联网MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Instructor: Structured LLM Outputs

When to Use This Skill

Use Instructor when you need to:

  • Extract structured data from LLM responses reliably
  • Validate outputs against Pydantic schemas automatically
  • Retry failed extractions with automatic error handling
  • Parse complex JSON with type safety and validation
  • Stream partial results for real-time processing
  • Support multiple LLM providers with consistent API

GitHub Stars: 15,000+ | Battle-tested: 100,000+ developers

Installation

# Base installation
pip install instructor

# With specific providers
pip install "instructor[anthropic]"  # Anthropic Claude
pip install "instructor[openai]"     # OpenAI
pip install "instructor[all]"        # All providers

Quick Start

Basic Example: Extract User Data

import instructor
from pydantic import BaseModel
from anthropic import Anthropic

# Define output structure
class User(BaseModel):
    name: str
    age: int
    email: str

# Create instructor client
client = instructor.from_anthropic(Anthropic())

# Extract structured data
user = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[{
        "role": "user",
        "content": "John Doe is 30 years old. His email is john@example.com"
    }],
    response_model=User
)

print(user.name)   # "John Doe"
print(user.age)    # 30
print(user.email)  # "john@example.com"

With OpenAI

from openai import OpenAI

client = instructor.from_openai(OpenAI())

user = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="gpt-4o-mini",
    response_model=User,
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Extract: Alice, 25, alice@email.com"}]
)

Core Concepts

1. Response Models (Pydantic)

Response models define the structure and validation rules for LLM outputs.

Basic Model
from pydantic import BaseModel, Field

class Article(BaseModel):
    title: str = Field(description="Article title")
    author: str = Field(description="Author name")
    word_count: int = Field(description="Number of words", gt=0)
    tags: list[str] = Field(description="List of relevant tags")

article = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[{
        "role": "user",
        "content": "Analyze this article: [article text]"
    }],
    response_model=Article
)

Benefits:

  • Type safety with Python type hints
  • Automatic validation (word_count > 0)
  • Self-documenting with Field descriptions
  • IDE autocomplete support
Nested Models
class Address(BaseModel):
    street: str
    city: str
    country: str

class Person(BaseModel):
    name: str
    age: int
    address: Address  # Nested model

person = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[{
        "role": "user",
        "content": "John lives at 123 Main St, Boston, USA"
    }],
    response_model=Person
)

print(person.address.city)  # "Boston"
Optional Fields
from typing import Optional

class Product(BaseModel):
    name: str
    price: float
    discount: Optional[float] = None  # Optional
    description: str = Field(default="No description")  # Default value

# LLM doesn't need to provide discount or description
Enums for Constraints
from enum import Enum

class Sentiment(str, Enum):
    POSITIVE = "positive"
    NEGATIVE = "negative"
    NEUTRAL = "neutral"

class Review(BaseModel):
    text: str
    sentiment: Sentiment  # Only these 3 values allowed

review = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[{
        "role": "user",
        "content": "This product is amazing!"
    }],
    response_model=Review
)

print(review.sentiment)  # Sentiment.POSITIVE

2. Validation

Pydantic validates LLM outputs automatically. If validation fails, Instructor retries.

Built-in Validators
from pydantic import Field, EmailStr, HttpUrl

class Contact(BaseModel):
    name: str = Field(min_length=2, max_length=100)
    age: int = Field(ge=0, le=120)  # 0 <= age <= 120
    email: EmailStr  # Validates email format
    website: HttpUrl  # Validates URL format

# If LLM provides invalid data, Instructor retries automatically
Custom Validators
from pydantic import field_validator

class Event(BaseModel):
    name: str
    date: str
    attendees: int

    @field_validator('date')
    def validate_date(cls, v):
        """Ensure date is in YYYY-MM-DD format."""
        import re
        if not re.match(r'\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}', v):
            raise ValueError('Date must be YYYY-MM-DD format')
        return v

    @field_validator('attendees')
    def validate_attendees(cls, v):
        """Ensure positive attendees."""
        if v < 1:
            raise ValueError('Must have at least 1 attendee')
        return v
Model-Level Validation
from pydantic import model_validator

class DateRange(BaseModel):
    start_date: str
    end_date: str

    @model_validator(mode='after')
    def check_dates(self):
        """Ensure end_date is after start_date."""
        from datetime import datetime
        start = datetime.strptime(self.start_date, '%Y-%m-%d')
        end = datetime.strptime(self.end_date, '%Y-%m-%d')

        if end < start:
            raise ValueError('end_date must be after start_date')
        return self

3. Automatic Retrying

Instructor retries automatically when validation fails, providing error feedback to the LLM.

# Retries up to 3 times if validation fails
user = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[{
        "role": "user",
        "content": "Extract user from: John, age unknown"
    }],
    response_model=User,
    max_retries=3  # Default is 3
)

# If age can't be extracted, Instructor tells the LLM:
# "Validation error: age - field required"
# LLM tries again with better extraction

How it works:

  1. LLM generates output
  2. Pydantic validates
  3. If invalid: Error message sent back to LLM
  4. LLM tries again with error feedback
  5. Repeats up to max_retries

4. Streaming

Stream partial results for real-time processing.

Streaming Partial Objects
from instructor import Partial

class Story(BaseModel):
    title: str
    content: str
    tags: list[str]

# Stream partial updates as LLM generates
for partial_story in client.messages.create_partial(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[{
        "role": "user",
        "content": "Write a short sci-fi story"
    }],
    response_model=Story
):
    print(f"Title: {partial_story.title}")
    print(f"Content so far: {partial_story.content[:100]}...")
    # Update UI in real-time
Streaming Iterables
class Task(BaseModel):
    title: str
    priority: str

# Stream list items as they're generated
tasks = client.messages.create_iterable(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[{
        "role": "user",
        "content": "Generate 10 project tasks"
    }],
    response_model=Task
)

for task in tasks:
    print(f"- {task.title} ({task.priority})")
    # Process each task as it arrives

Provider Configuration

Anthropic Claude

import instructor
from anthropic import Anthropic

client = instructor.from_anthropic(
    Anthropic(api_key="your-api-key")
)

# Use with Claude models
response = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[...],
    response_model=YourModel
)

OpenAI

from openai import OpenAI

client = instructor.from_openai(
    OpenAI(api_key="your-api-key")
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="gpt-4o-mini",
    response_model=YourModel,
    messages=[...]
)

Local Models (Ollama)

from openai import OpenAI

# Point to local Ollama server
client = instructor.from_openai(
    OpenAI(
        base_url="http://localhost:11434/v1",
        api_key="ollama"  # Required but ignored
    ),
    mode=instructor.Mode.JSON
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="llama3.1",
    response_model=YourModel,
    messages=[...]
)

Common Patterns

Pattern 1: Data Extraction from Text

class CompanyInfo(BaseModel):
    name: str
    founded_year: int
    industry: str
    employees: int
    headquarters: str

text = """
Tesla, Inc. was founded in 2003. It operates in the automotive and energy
industry with approximately 140,000 employees. The company is headquartered
in Austin, Texas.
"""

company = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[{
        "role": "user",
        "content": f"Extract company information from: {text}"
    }],
    response_model=CompanyInfo
)

Pattern 2: Classification

class Category(str, Enum):
    TECHNOLOGY = "technology"
    FINANCE = "finance"
    HEALTHCARE = "healthcare"
    EDUCATION = "education"
    OTHER = "other"

class ArticleClassification(BaseModel):
    category: Category
    confidence: float = Field(ge=0.0, le=1.0)
    keywords: list[str]

classification = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[{
        "role": "user",
        "content": "Classify this article: [article text]"
    }],
    response_model=ArticleClassification
)

Pattern 3: Multi-Entity Extraction

class Person(BaseModel):
    name: str
    role: str

class Organization(BaseModel):
    name: str
    industry: str

class Entities(BaseModel):
    people: list[Person]
    organizations: list[Organization]
    locations: list[str]

text = "Tim Cook, CEO of Apple, announced at the event in Cupertino..."

entities = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[{
        "role": "user",
        "content": f"Extract all entities from: {text}"
    }],
    response_model=Entities
)

for person in entities.people:
    print(f"{person.name} - {person.role}")

Pattern 4: Structured Analysis

class SentimentAnalysis(BaseModel):
    overall_sentiment: Sentiment
    positive_aspects: list[str]
    negative_aspects: list[str]
    suggestions: list[str]
    score: float = Field(ge=-1.0, le=1.0)

review = "The product works well but setup was confusing..."

analysis = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[{
        "role": "user",
        "content": f"Analyze this review: {review}"
    }],
    response_model=SentimentAnalysis
)

Pattern 5: Batch Processing

def extract_person(text: str) -> Person:
    return client.messages.create(
        model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
        max_tokens=1024,
        messages=[{
            "role": "user",
            "content": f"Extract person from: {text}"
        }],
        response_model=Person
    )

texts = [
    "John Doe is a 30-year-old engineer",
    "Jane Smith, 25, works in marketing",
    "Bob Johnson, age 40, software developer"
]

people = [extract_person(text) for text in texts]

Advanced Features

Union Types

from typing import Union

class TextContent(BaseModel):
    type: str = "text"
    content: str

class ImageContent(BaseModel):
    type: str = "image"
    url: HttpUrl
    caption: str

class Post(BaseModel):
    title: str
    content: Union[TextContent, ImageContent]  # Either type

# LLM chooses appropriate type based on content

Dynamic Models

from pydantic import create_model

# Create model at runtime
DynamicUser = create_model(
    'User',
    name=(str, ...),
    age=(int, Field(ge=0)),
    email=(EmailStr, ...)
)

user = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[...],
    response_model=DynamicUser
)

Custom Modes

# For providers without native structured outputs
client = instructor.from_anthropic(
    Anthropic(),
    mode=instructor.Mode.JSON  # JSON mode
)

# Available modes:
# - Mode.ANTHROPIC_TOOLS (recommended for Claude)
# - Mode.JSON (fallback)
# - Mode.TOOLS (OpenAI tools)

Context Management

# Single-use client
with instructor.from_anthropic(Anthropic()) as client:
    result = client.messages.create(
        model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
        max_tokens=1024,
        messages=[...],
        response_model=YourModel
    )
    # Client closed automatically

Error Handling

Handling Validation Errors

from pydantic import ValidationError

try:
    user = client.messages.create(
        model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
        max_tokens=1024,
        messages=[...],
        response_model=User,
        max_retries=3
    )
except ValidationError as e:
    print(f"Failed after retries: {e}")
    # Handle gracefully

except Exception as e:
    print(f"API error: {e}")

Custom Error Messages

class ValidatedUser(BaseModel):
    name: str = Field(description="Full name, 2-100 characters")
    age: int = Field(description="Age between 0 and 120", ge=0, le=120)
    email: EmailStr = Field(description="Valid email address")

    class Config:
        # Custom error messages
        json_schema_extra = {
            "examples": [
                {
                    "name": "John Doe",
                    "age": 30,
                    "email": "john@example.com"
                }
            ]
        }

Best Practices

1. Clear Field Descriptions

# ❌ Bad: Vague
class Product(BaseModel):
    name: str
    price: float

# ✅ Good: Descriptive
class Product(BaseModel):
    name: str = Field(description="Product name from the text")
    price: float = Field(description="Price in USD, without currency symbol")

2. Use Appropriate Validation

# ✅ Good: Constrain values
class Rating(BaseModel):
    score: int = Field(ge=1, le=5, description="Rating from 1 to 5 stars")
    review: str = Field(min_length=10, description="Review text, at least 10 chars")

3. Provide Examples in Prompts

messages = [{
    "role": "user",
    "content": """Extract person info from: "John, 30, engineer"

Example format:
{
  "name": "John Doe",
  "age": 30,
  "occupation": "engineer"
}"""
}]

4. Use Enums for Fixed Categories

# ✅ Good: Enum ensures valid values
class Status(str, Enum):
    PENDING = "pending"
    APPROVED = "approved"
    REJECTED = "rejected"

class Application(BaseModel):
    status: Status  # LLM must choose from enum

5. Handle Missing Data Gracefully

class PartialData(BaseModel):
    required_field: str
    optional_field: Optional[str] = None
    default_field: str = "default_value"

# LLM only needs to provide required_field

Comparison to Alternatives

FeatureInstructorManual JSONLangChainDSPy
Type Safety✅ Yes❌ No⚠️ Partial✅ Yes
Auto Validation✅ Yes❌ No❌ No⚠️ Limited
Auto Retry✅ Yes❌ No❌ No✅ Yes
Streaming✅ Yes❌ No✅ Yes❌ No
Multi-Provider✅ Yes⚠️ Manual✅ Yes✅ Yes
Learning CurveLowLowMediumHigh

When to choose Instructor:

  • Need structured, validated outputs
  • Want type safety and IDE support
  • Require automatic retries
  • Building data extraction systems

When to choose alternatives:

  • DSPy: Need prompt optimization
  • LangChain: Building complex chains
  • Manual: Simple, one-off extractions

Resources

See Also

  • references/validation.md - Advanced validation patterns
  • references/providers.md - Provider-specific configuration
  • references/examples.md - Real-world use cases

平台分布

Claude Code

25.89%
按下载量换算80

Antigravity

23.71%
按下载量换算73

Gemini CLI

17.97%
按下载量换算55

OpenCode

11.75%
按下载量换算36

Codex

7.92%
按下载量换算24

github-copilot

3.11%
按下载量换算10

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills