Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · AI 工具

instructor(instructor 搜索)

instructor 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

instructor 是AI 工具类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在AI 工具类的 2,536 个 Skill 里排第 318。

总安装 7,292周安装 295GitHub Stars 26,415下载 2,289核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:instructor(instructor 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates
仓库路径:skills/instructor
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates --skill instructor
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates --skill instructor

这个 Skill 是做什么的

AI 工具类 Skill 用来扩展助手本身的能力,例如接模型、接检索、接外部服务。

instructor 提供结构化 LLM 输出提取能力,支持 Pydantic 模式验证与类型安全解析。适用于 JSON 数据抽取、表单填写与多 provider 统一接口适配场景。自动重试失败请求并支持流式部分结果返回,提升数据获取稳定性。使用时需明确定义输出 schema,避免模糊字段导致解析错误。

对敏感信息提取应脱敏处理,禁止将输出直接用于身份认证或权限控制。

来源仓库内路径:skills/instructor

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates --skill instruct…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

instructor 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates --skill instructor。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

instructor 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

instructor 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

instructor 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

instructor 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 7,292 次,近一周安装 295 次,下载 2,289 次,GitHub 26,415 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

instructor 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理AI 工具类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

AI 工具类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
executing-plans

执行计划 · Codex、Claude

1,515,336173,110只读MIT通过
verification-before-completion

完成前的验证 · Codex、Claude

1,319,472173,121权限未标注MIT通过
subagent-driven-development

子 Agent 驱动开发 · Codex、Claude

1,312,416173,138只读MIT通过
copy-editing

复制编辑 · Codex、Claude

1,209,57625,632只读MIT通过
paywall-upgrade-cro

付费专区升级 cro · Codex、Claude

1,030,17625,617只读MIT通过
instructor

instructor 搜索 · 本页

7,29226,415需要联网MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Instructor: Structured LLM Outputs

When to Use This Skill

Use Instructor when you need to:

  • Extract structured data from LLM responses reliably
  • Validate outputs against Pydantic schemas automatically
  • Retry failed extractions with automatic error handling
  • Parse complex JSON with type safety and validation
  • Stream partial results for real-time processing
  • Support multiple LLM providers with consistent API

GitHub Stars: 15,000+ | Battle-tested: 100,000+ developers

Installation

# Base installation
pip install instructor

# With specific providers
pip install "instructor[anthropic]"  # Anthropic Claude
pip install "instructor[openai]"     # OpenAI
pip install "instructor[all]"        # All providers

Quick Start

Basic Example: Extract User Data

import instructor
from pydantic import BaseModel
from anthropic import Anthropic

# Define output structure
class User(BaseModel):
    name: str
    age: int
    email: str

# Create instructor client
client = instructor.from_anthropic(Anthropic())

# Extract structured data
user = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[{
        "role": "user",
        "content": "John Doe is 30 years old. His email is john@example.com"
    }],
    response_model=User
)

print(user.name)   # "John Doe"
print(user.age)    # 30
print(user.email)  # "john@example.com"

With OpenAI

from openai import OpenAI

client = instructor.from_openai(OpenAI())

user = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="gpt-4o-mini",
    response_model=User,
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Extract: Alice, 25, alice@email.com"}]
)

Core Concepts

1. Response Models (Pydantic)

Response models define the structure and validation rules for LLM outputs.

Basic Model
from pydantic import BaseModel, Field

class Article(BaseModel):
    title: str = Field(description="Article title")
    author: str = Field(description="Author name")
    word_count: int = Field(description="Number of words", gt=0)
    tags: list[str] = Field(description="List of relevant tags")

article = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[{
        "role": "user",
        "content": "Analyze this article: [article text]"
    }],
    response_model=Article
)

Benefits:

  • Type safety with Python type hints
  • Automatic validation (word_count > 0)
  • Self-documenting with Field descriptions
  • IDE autocomplete support
Nested Models
class Address(BaseModel):
    street: str
    city: str
    country: str

class Person(BaseModel):
    name: str
    age: int
    address: Address  # Nested model

person = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[{
        "role": "user",
        "content": "John lives at 123 Main St, Boston, USA"
    }],
    response_model=Person
)

print(person.address.city)  # "Boston"
Optional Fields
from typing import Optional

class Product(BaseModel):
    name: str
    price: float
    discount: Optional[float] = None  # Optional
    description: str = Field(default="No description")  # Default value

# LLM doesn't need to provide discount or description
Enums for Constraints
from enum import Enum

class Sentiment(str, Enum):
    POSITIVE = "positive"
    NEGATIVE = "negative"
    NEUTRAL = "neutral"

class Review(BaseModel):
    text: str
    sentiment: Sentiment  # Only these 3 values allowed

review = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[{
        "role": "user",
        "content": "This product is amazing!"
    }],
    response_model=Review
)

print(review.sentiment)  # Sentiment.POSITIVE

2. Validation

Pydantic validates LLM outputs automatically. If validation fails, Instructor retries.

Built-in Validators
from pydantic import Field, EmailStr, HttpUrl

class Contact(BaseModel):
    name: str = Field(min_length=2, max_length=100)
    age: int = Field(ge=0, le=120)  # 0 <= age <= 120
    email: EmailStr  # Validates email format
    website: HttpUrl  # Validates URL format

# If LLM provides invalid data, Instructor retries automatically
Custom Validators
from pydantic import field_validator

class Event(BaseModel):
    name: str
    date: str
    attendees: int

    @field_validator('date')
    def validate_date(cls, v):
        """Ensure date is in YYYY-MM-DD format."""
        import re
        if not re.match(r'\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}', v):
            raise ValueError('Date must be YYYY-MM-DD format')
        return v

    @field_validator('attendees')
    def validate_attendees(cls, v):
        """Ensure positive attendees."""
        if v < 1:
            raise ValueError('Must have at least 1 attendee')
        return v
Model-Level Validation
from pydantic import model_validator

class DateRange(BaseModel):
    start_date: str
    end_date: str

    @model_validator(mode='after')
    def check_dates(self):
        """Ensure end_date is after start_date."""
        from datetime import datetime
        start = datetime.strptime(self.start_date, '%Y-%m-%d')
        end = datetime.strptime(self.end_date, '%Y-%m-%d')

        if end < start:
            raise ValueError('end_date must be after start_date')
        return self

3. Automatic Retrying

Instructor retries automatically when validation fails, providing error feedback to the LLM.

# Retries up to 3 times if validation fails
user = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[{
        "role": "user",
        "content": "Extract user from: John, age unknown"
    }],
    response_model=User,
    max_retries=3  # Default is 3
)

# If age can't be extracted, Instructor tells the LLM:
# "Validation error: age - field required"
# LLM tries again with better extraction

How it works:

  1. LLM generates output
  2. Pydantic validates
  3. If invalid: Error message sent back to LLM
  4. LLM tries again with error feedback
  5. Repeats up to max_retries

4. Streaming

Stream partial results for real-time processing.

Streaming Partial Objects
from instructor import Partial

class Story(BaseModel):
    title: str
    content: str
    tags: list[str]

# Stream partial updates as LLM generates
for partial_story in client.messages.create_partial(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[{
        "role": "user",
        "content": "Write a short sci-fi story"
    }],
    response_model=Story
):
    print(f"Title: {partial_story.title}")
    print(f"Content so far: {partial_story.content[:100]}...")
    # Update UI in real-time
Streaming Iterables
class Task(BaseModel):
    title: str
    priority: str

# Stream list items as they're generated
tasks = client.messages.create_iterable(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[{
        "role": "user",
        "content": "Generate 10 project tasks"
    }],
    response_model=Task
)

for task in tasks:
    print(f"- {task.title} ({task.priority})")
    # Process each task as it arrives

Provider Configuration

Anthropic Claude

import instructor
from anthropic import Anthropic

client = instructor.from_anthropic(
    Anthropic(api_key="your-api-key")
)

# Use with Claude models
response = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[...],
    response_model=YourModel
)

OpenAI

from openai import OpenAI

client = instructor.from_openai(
    OpenAI(api_key="your-api-key")
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="gpt-4o-mini",
    response_model=YourModel,
    messages=[...]
)

Local Models (Ollama)

from openai import OpenAI

# Point to local Ollama server
client = instructor.from_openai(
    OpenAI(
        base_url="http://localhost:11434/v1",
        api_key="ollama"  # Required but ignored
    ),
    mode=instructor.Mode.JSON
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="llama3.1",
    response_model=YourModel,
    messages=[...]
)

Common Patterns

Pattern 1: Data Extraction from Text

class CompanyInfo(BaseModel):
    name: str
    founded_year: int
    industry: str
    employees: int
    headquarters: str

text = """
Tesla, Inc. was founded in 2003. It operates in the automotive and energy
industry with approximately 140,000 employees. The company is headquartered
in Austin, Texas.
"""

company = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[{
        "role": "user",
        "content": f"Extract company information from: {text}"
    }],
    response_model=CompanyInfo
)

Pattern 2: Classification

class Category(str, Enum):
    TECHNOLOGY = "technology"
    FINANCE = "finance"
    HEALTHCARE = "healthcare"
    EDUCATION = "education"
    OTHER = "other"

class ArticleClassification(BaseModel):
    category: Category
    confidence: float = Field(ge=0.0, le=1.0)
    keywords: list[str]

classification = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[{
        "role": "user",
        "content": "Classify this article: [article text]"
    }],
    response_model=ArticleClassification
)

Pattern 3: Multi-Entity Extraction

class Person(BaseModel):
    name: str
    role: str

class Organization(BaseModel):
    name: str
    industry: str

class Entities(BaseModel):
    people: list[Person]
    organizations: list[Organization]
    locations: list[str]

text = "Tim Cook, CEO of Apple, announced at the event in Cupertino..."

entities = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[{
        "role": "user",
        "content": f"Extract all entities from: {text}"
    }],
    response_model=Entities
)

for person in entities.people:
    print(f"{person.name} - {person.role}")

Pattern 4: Structured Analysis

class SentimentAnalysis(BaseModel):
    overall_sentiment: Sentiment
    positive_aspects: list[str]
    negative_aspects: list[str]
    suggestions: list[str]
    score: float = Field(ge=-1.0, le=1.0)

review = "The product works well but setup was confusing..."

analysis = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[{
        "role": "user",
        "content": f"Analyze this review: {review}"
    }],
    response_model=SentimentAnalysis
)

Pattern 5: Batch Processing

def extract_person(text: str) -> Person:
    return client.messages.create(
        model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
        max_tokens=1024,
        messages=[{
            "role": "user",
            "content": f"Extract person from: {text}"
        }],
        response_model=Person
    )

texts = [
    "John Doe is a 30-year-old engineer",
    "Jane Smith, 25, works in marketing",
    "Bob Johnson, age 40, software developer"
]

people = [extract_person(text) for text in texts]

Advanced Features

Union Types

from typing import Union

class TextContent(BaseModel):
    type: str = "text"
    content: str

class ImageContent(BaseModel):
    type: str = "image"
    url: HttpUrl
    caption: str

class Post(BaseModel):
    title: str
    content: Union[TextContent, ImageContent]  # Either type

# LLM chooses appropriate type based on content

Dynamic Models

from pydantic import create_model

# Create model at runtime
DynamicUser = create_model(
    'User',
    name=(str, ...),
    age=(int, Field(ge=0)),
    email=(EmailStr, ...)
)

user = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[...],
    response_model=DynamicUser
)

Custom Modes

# For providers without native structured outputs
client = instructor.from_anthropic(
    Anthropic(),
    mode=instructor.Mode.JSON  # JSON mode
)

# Available modes:
# - Mode.ANTHROPIC_TOOLS (recommended for Claude)
# - Mode.JSON (fallback)
# - Mode.TOOLS (OpenAI tools)

Context Management

# Single-use client
with instructor.from_anthropic(Anthropic()) as client:
    result = client.messages.create(
        model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
        max_tokens=1024,
        messages=[...],
        response_model=YourModel
    )
    # Client closed automatically

Error Handling

Handling Validation Errors

from pydantic import ValidationError

try:
    user = client.messages.create(
        model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
        max_tokens=1024,
        messages=[...],
        response_model=User,
        max_retries=3
    )
except ValidationError as e:
    print(f"Failed after retries: {e}")
    # Handle gracefully

except Exception as e:
    print(f"API error: {e}")

Custom Error Messages

class ValidatedUser(BaseModel):
    name: str = Field(description="Full name, 2-100 characters")
    age: int = Field(description="Age between 0 and 120", ge=0, le=120)
    email: EmailStr = Field(description="Valid email address")

    class Config:
        # Custom error messages
        json_schema_extra = {
            "examples": [
                {
                    "name": "John Doe",
                    "age": 30,
                    "email": "john@example.com"
                }
            ]
        }

Best Practices

1. Clear Field Descriptions

# ❌ Bad: Vague
class Product(BaseModel):
    name: str
    price: float

# ✅ Good: Descriptive
class Product(BaseModel):
    name: str = Field(description="Product name from the text")
    price: float = Field(description="Price in USD, without currency symbol")

2. Use Appropriate Validation

# ✅ Good: Constrain values
class Rating(BaseModel):
    score: int = Field(ge=1, le=5, description="Rating from 1 to 5 stars")
    review: str = Field(min_length=10, description="Review text, at least 10 chars")

3. Provide Examples in Prompts

messages = [{
    "role": "user",
    "content": """Extract person info from: "John, 30, engineer"

Example format:
{
  "name": "John Doe",
  "age": 30,
  "occupation": "engineer"
}"""
}]

4. Use Enums for Fixed Categories

# ✅ Good: Enum ensures valid values
class Status(str, Enum):
    PENDING = "pending"
    APPROVED = "approved"
    REJECTED = "rejected"

class Application(BaseModel):
    status: Status  # LLM must choose from enum

5. Handle Missing Data Gracefully

class PartialData(BaseModel):
    required_field: str
    optional_field: Optional[str] = None
    default_field: str = "default_value"

# LLM only needs to provide required_field

Comparison to Alternatives

FeatureInstructorManual JSONLangChainDSPy
Type Safety✅ Yes❌ No⚠️ Partial✅ Yes
Auto Validation✅ Yes❌ No❌ No⚠️ Limited
Auto Retry✅ Yes❌ No❌ No✅ Yes
Streaming✅ Yes❌ No✅ Yes❌ No
Multi-Provider✅ Yes⚠️ Manual✅ Yes✅ Yes
Learning CurveLowLowMediumHigh

When to choose Instructor:

  • Need structured, validated outputs
  • Want type safety and IDE support
  • Require automatic retries
  • Building data extraction systems

When to choose alternatives:

  • DSPy: Need prompt optimization
  • LangChain: Building complex chains
  • Manual: Simple, one-off extractions

Resources

See Also

  • references/validation.md - Advanced validation patterns
  • references/providers.md - Provider-specific configuration
  • references/examples.md - Real-world use cases

平台分布

Claude Code

28.57%
按下载量换算654

OpenCode

22.61%
按下载量换算518

Cursor

18.28%
按下载量换算418

Gemini CLI

13.44%
按下载量换算308

Antigravity

7.56%
按下载量换算173

Codex

3.15%
按下载量换算72

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills