Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

causal-inference(因果推理)

causal-inference 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

causal-inference 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 1,454。

总安装 91,704周安装 3,899GitHub Stars 6下载 32,128核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
0.2.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:causal-inference(因果推理)
来源仓库:https://github.com/oswalpalash/causal-inference
安装命令:
openclaw skills install causal-inference
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install causal-inference

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

为代理行为添加因果推理。触发任何具有可观察结果的高级操作 - 电子邮件、消息、日历更改、文件操作、API 调用、通知、提醒、购买、部署。用于规划干预措施、调试故障、预测结果、回填历史数据进行分析或回答“如果我执行 X 会发生什么?”在回顾过去的操作以了解哪些有效/失败以及原因时也会触发。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install causal-inference;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

causal-inference 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install causal-inference。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

causal-inference 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

causal-inference 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

causal-inference 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

causal-inference 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 91,704 次,近一周安装 3,899 次,下载 32,128 次,GitHub 6 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

causal-inference 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
causal-inference

因果推理 · 本页

91,7046需要联网MIT-0有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
causal-inference
description
Add causal reasoning to agent actions. Trigger on ANY high-level action with observable outcomes - emails, messages, calendar changes, file operations, API calls, notifications, reminders, purchases, deployments. Use for planning interventions, debugging failures, predicting outcomes, backfilling historical data for analysis, or answering "what happens if I do X?" Also trigger when reviewing past actions to understand what worked/failed and why.

Causal Inference

A lightweight causal layer for predicting action outcomes, not by pattern-matching correlations, but by modeling interventions and counterfactuals.

Core Invariant

Every action must be representable as an explicit intervention on a causal model, with predicted effects + uncertainty + a falsifiable audit trail.

Plans must be *causally valid*, not just plausible.

When to Trigger

Trigger this skill on ANY high-level action, including but not limited to:

DomainActions to Log
CommunicationSend email, send message, reply, follow-up, notification, mention
CalendarCreate/move/cancel meeting, set reminder, RSVP
TasksCreate/complete/defer task, set priority, assign
FilesCreate/edit/share document, commit code, deploy
SocialPost, react, comment, share, DM
PurchasesOrder, subscribe, cancel, refund
SystemConfig change, permission grant, integration setup

Also trigger when:

  • Reviewing outcomes — "Did that email get a reply?" → log outcome, update estimates
  • Debugging failures — "Why didn't this work?" → trace causal graph
  • Backfilling history — "Analyze my past emails/calendar" → parse logs, reconstruct actions
  • Planning — "Should I send now or later?" → query causal model

Backfill: Bootstrap from Historical Data

Don't start from zero. Parse existing logs to reconstruct past actions + outcomes.

Email Backfill

# Extract sent emails with reply status
gog gmail list --sent --after 2024-01-01 --format json > /tmp/sent_emails.json

# For each sent email, check if reply exists
python3 scripts/backfill_email.py /tmp/sent_emails.json

Calendar Backfill

# Extract past events with attendance
gog calendar list --after 2024-01-01 --format json > /tmp/events.json

# Reconstruct: did meeting happen? was it moved? attendee count?
python3 scripts/backfill_calendar.py /tmp/events.json

Message Backfill (WhatsApp/Discord/Slack)

# Parse message history for send/reply patterns
wacli search --after 2024-01-01 --from me --format json > /tmp/wa_sent.json
python3 scripts/backfill_messages.py /tmp/wa_sent.json

Generic Backfill Pattern

# For any historical data source:
for record in historical_data:
    action_event = {
        "action": infer_action_type(record),
        "context": extract_context(record),
        "time": record["timestamp"],
        "pre_state": reconstruct_pre_state(record),
        "post_state": extract_post_state(record),
        "outcome": determine_outcome(record),
        "backfilled": True  # Mark as reconstructed
    }
    append_to_log(action_event)

Architecture

A. Action Log (required)

Every executed action emits a structured event:

{
  "action": "send_followup",
  "domain": "email",
  "context": {"recipient_type": "warm_lead", "prior_touches": 2},
  "time": "2025-01-26T10:00:00Z",
  "pre_state": {"days_since_last_contact": 7},
  "post_state": {"reply_received": true, "reply_delay_hours": 4},
  "outcome": "positive_reply",
  "outcome_observed_at": "2025-01-26T14:00:00Z",
  "backfilled": false
}

Store in memory/causal/action_log.jsonl.

B. Causal Graphs (per domain)

Start with 10-30 observable variables per domain.

Email domain:

send_time → reply_prob
subject_style → open_rate
recipient_type → reply_prob
followup_count → reply_prob (diminishing)
time_since_last → reply_prob

Calendar domain:

meeting_time → attendance_rate
attendee_count → slip_risk
conflict_degree → reschedule_prob
buffer_time → focus_quality

Messaging domain:

response_delay → conversation_continuation
message_length → response_length
time_of_day → response_prob
platform → response_delay

Task domain:

due_date_proximity → completion_prob
priority_level → completion_speed
task_size → deferral_risk
context_switches → error_rate

Store graph definitions in memory/causal/graphs/.

C. Estimation

For each "knob" (intervention variable), estimate treatment effects:

# Pseudo: effect of morning vs evening sends
effect = mean(reply_prob | send_time=morning) - mean(reply_prob | send_time=evening)
uncertainty = std_error(effect)

Use simple regression or propensity matching first. Graduate to do-calculus when graphs are explicit and identification is needed.

D. Decision Policy

Before executing actions:

  1. Identify intervention variable(s)
  2. Query causal model for expected outcome distribution
  3. Compute expected utility + uncertainty bounds
  4. If uncertainty > threshold OR expected harm > threshold → refuse or escalate to user
  5. Log prediction for later validation

Workflow

On Every Action

BEFORE executing:
1. Log pre_state
2. If enough historical data: query model for expected outcome
3. If high uncertainty or risk: confirm with user

AFTER executing:
1. Log action + context + time
2. Set reminder to check outcome (if not immediate)

WHEN outcome observed:
1. Update action log with post_state + outcome
2. Re-estimate treatment effects if enough new data

Planning an Action

1. User request → identify candidate actions
2. For each action:
   a. Map to intervention(s) on causal graph
   b. Predict P(outcome | do(action))
   c. Estimate uncertainty
   d. Compute expected utility
3. Rank by expected utility, filter by safety
4. Execute best action, log prediction
5. Observe outcome, update model

Debugging a Failure

1. Identify failed outcome
2. Trace back through causal graph
3. For each upstream node:
   a. Was the value as expected?
   b. Did the causal link hold?
4. Identify broken link(s)
5. Compute minimal intervention set that would have prevented failure
6. Log counterfactual for learning

Quick Start: Bootstrap Today

# 1. Create the infrastructure
mkdir -p memory/causal/graphs memory/causal/estimates

# 2. Initialize config
cat > memory/causal/config.yaml << 'EOF'
domains:
  - email
  - calendar
  - messaging
  - tasks

thresholds:
  max_uncertainty: 0.3
  min_expected_utility: 0.1

protected_actions:
  - delete_email
  - cancel_meeting
  - send_to_new_contact
  - financial_transaction
EOF

# 3. Backfill one domain (start with email)
python3 scripts/backfill_email.py

# 4. Estimate initial effects
python3 scripts/estimate_effect.py --treatment send_time --outcome reply_received --values morning,evening

Safety Constraints

Define "protected variables" that require explicit user approval:

protected:
  - delete_email
  - cancel_meeting
  - send_to_new_contact
  - financial_transaction

thresholds:
  max_uncertainty: 0.3  # don't act if P(outcome) uncertainty > 30%
  min_expected_utility: 0.1  # don't act if expected gain < 10%

Files

  • memory/causal/action_log.jsonl — all logged actions with outcomes
  • memory/causal/graphs/ — domain-specific causal graph definitions
  • memory/causal/estimates/ — learned treatment effects
  • memory/causal/config.yaml — safety thresholds and protected variables

References

  • See references/do-calculus.md for formal intervention semantics
  • See references/estimation.md for treatment effect estimation methods

平台分布

OpenClaw

80.43%
按下载量换算25,841

安全审计

VirusTotal

可疑

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

未展示

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills