Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 待分类

managing-up(向上管理)

managing-up 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

managing-up 是待分类类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在待分类类的 11,209 个 Skill 里排第 4,047。

总安装 824周安装 34GitHub Stars 3下载 269核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:managing-up(向上管理)
来源仓库:https://github.com/oldwinter/skills
仓库路径:skills/managing-up
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill managing-up
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill managing-up

这个 Skill 是做什么的

这个 Skill 的分类还没最终确定,用法以来源仓库的说明为准。

managing-up 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中围绕仓库状态或协作事项进行整理。适用于需要可视化项目结构、流程或变更场景的 Agent 宿主环境。

通过 npx skills add 命令从指定仓库安装,需结合原始 README 核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网或文件读写操作。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/managing-up

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill managing-up;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

managing-up 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill managing-up。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

managing-up 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

managing-up 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

managing-up 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

managing-up 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 824 次,近一周安装 34 次,下载 269 次,GitHub 3 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

managing-up 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理待分类类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

待分类类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
infsh-cli

infsh CLI · Codex、Claude

4,374,576382权限未标注未明确未收录
ai-video-generation

AI 视频生成 · Codex、Claude

4,313,376382调用外部服务未明确有提醒
lark-openapi-explorer

云雀 OpenAPI 浏览器 · Codex、Claude

2,064,1209,011需要联网未明确有提醒
lark-workflow-standup-report

Lark 工作流程站立报告 · Codex、Claude

2,041,6328,978需要联网未明确通过
use-my-browser

使用我的浏览器 · Codex、Claude

1,848,49140操作浏览器未明确未通过
managing-up

向上管理 · 本页

8243只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Managing Up

Scope

Covers

  • Building a proactive partnership with your manager (vs waiting to be managed)
  • Setting a clear upward communication system (async updates, 1:1 structure, decision memos)
  • Leveraging leaders to remove blockers and accelerate decisions (clear asks + escalation triggers)
  • Communicating trade-offs and context so leadership can make good calls
  • Creating a “seat at the table” path: showing business-level perspective before you’re invited
  • Setting boundaries when leadership pace/expectations are misaligned (without being adversarial)

When to use

  • “Help me manage up with my boss—set a cadence and a weekly update template.”
  • “My exec stakeholders feel out of touch—help me communicate context and trade-offs better.”
  • “I need a clean escalation plan and how to ask my leader for help without sounding needy.”
  • “I want more influence / a seat at the table—create a plan and artifacts.”

When NOT to use

  • You need HR/legal guidance (harassment, discrimination, retaliation, threats, investigations) — follow your company process and involve HR/legal.
  • You’re negotiating compensation/title or a formal performance process — use your company process; this skill can help with communication artifacts but not with policy/legal strategy.
  • You have a personal safety or mental-health crisis — seek professional help and follow company policy.

Inputs

Minimum required

  • Your role, scope, and current priorities (what you own; what “good” looks like in the next 4–8 weeks)
  • Who you’re managing up to (manager level; decision power; relationship stage: new/stable/strained)
  • Current friction (2–5 concrete examples) and desired outcome (clarity, autonomy, speed, influence, boundaries)
  • Communication environment (remote/hybrid, time zones, tools, meeting cadence)
  • Constraints (sensitive topics, confidentiality/PII rules, upcoming deadlines)

Missing-info strategy

  • Ask up to 5 questions from references/INTAKE.md (3–5 at a time).
  • If details are missing, proceed with a default managing-up operating system and clearly label assumptions.
  • Do not request secrets (passwords/tokens) or sensitive personal data; use anonymized summaries.

Outputs (deliverables)

Produce a Managing Up Operating System Pack in Markdown (in-chat; or as files if requested):

  1. Context snapshot (role, goals, constraints, assumptions)
  2. Manager profile (“How my manager works” + what they optimize for)
  3. Upward communication cadence (1:1 structure + async update rhythm)
  4. Weekly update template (exec-ready; “no response required” default)
  5. Decision/trade-off memo template (for major decisions / escalations)
  6. Escalation + ask plan (leader leverage map, escalation triggers, ask ladder)
  7. Working agreement + boundary script (how to reset expectations respectfully)
  8. Influence / seat-at-the-table plan (pre-wiring, strategic contribution loop)
  9. Risks / Open questions / Next steps (always included)

Templates: references/TEMPLATES.md Expanded guidance: references/WORKFLOW.md

Workflow (8 steps)

1) Intake + objective + boundaries

  • Inputs: user context; references/INTAKE.md.
  • Actions: Clarify the outcome (autonomy, clarity, influence, speed, boundaries) and define what “better” means in 4–8 weeks. Identify constraints (HR/legal/PII). Choose pack scope (full pack vs subset).
  • Outputs: Context snapshot + assumptions/unknowns list.
  • Checks: Goal is measurable enough to evaluate after 4 weeks.

2) Build a manager profile (what they optimize for)

  • Inputs: org context, manager level, prior interactions.
  • Actions: Draft “How my manager works”: success metrics, incentives/pressures, decision style, risk tolerance, communication preferences, and common failure modes.
  • Outputs: Manager profile (draft) + validation questions to confirm in 1:1.
  • Checks: Profile includes at least 3 actionable implications (what to do differently).

3) Design the comms operating system (what goes where)

  • Inputs: current cadences, meeting load, tools.
  • Actions: Define channels: async weekly update, 1:1 agenda, decision memos for big calls, and escalation path for urgent issues. Decide what does not belong in 1:1s (pure status, unless required).
  • Outputs: Cadence plan + “what goes where” map.
  • Checks: System reduces surprises and reduces “drive-by” requests.

4) Write the weekly update + exec-ready narrative

  • Inputs: priorities, milestones, risks, dependencies.
  • Actions: Create a weekly update that is skimmable: TL;DR, progress vs plan, decisions needed, risks, explicit trade-offs, and clear asks. Default to “no reply required unless…”.
  • Outputs: Weekly update template + example filled-in update (anonymized).
  • Checks: A leader can understand status and decision needs in ≤ 60 seconds.

5) Create an escalation + ask plan (use leaders as resources)

  • Inputs: blockers, dependencies, stakeholders.
  • Actions: Define escalation triggers, pre-wire plan, and an “ask ladder” (from lightweight FYI → unblock → sponsor → decision). Translate blockers into specific leader actions.
  • Outputs: Escalation triggers + ask ladder + leverage map.
  • Checks: Each “ask” is actionable and time-bounded, not a vague request for help.

6) Align expectations + set boundaries (respectfully)

  • Inputs: mismatches (pace, scope, availability), examples.
  • Actions: Draft a working agreement and boundary script: clarify expectations, propose alternatives, and secure explicit agreement. Prepare “pushback” language for unreasonable requests (times, scope, urgency).
  • Outputs: Working agreement + scripts (short, copy/paste).
  • Checks: Boundaries are framed as protecting outcomes (quality, speed, sustainability), not personal preferences.

7) Build influence: seat-at-the-table loop

  • Inputs: strategy calendar, decisions, adjacent teams.
  • Actions: Create a plan to contribute at the business level: pre-reads, crisp POVs, trade-off framing, and consistent pre-briefs. Identify 1–2 high-leverage forums and how to earn invitation.
  • Outputs: Influence plan (30 days) + artifacts to share (POV note, decision memo).
  • Checks: Plan includes at least one recurring “strategic contribution” touchpoint per week.

8) Quality gate + 4-week pilot + iteration plan

  • Inputs: full draft pack.
  • Actions: Run references/CHECKLISTS.md and score with references/RUBRIC.md. Add Risks / Open questions / Next steps. Propose a 4-week pilot and a retro prompt set.
  • Outputs: Final Managing Up Operating System Pack.
  • Checks: Pack is immediately usable; next interactions are scheduled (cadence + checkpoints).

Quality gate (required)

Examples

Example 1 (new relationship): “I started a new PM role. Help me manage up with my manager: create a manager profile template, a weekly update format, and a 4-week pilot cadence.” Expected: manager profile + cadence + weekly update template + pilot plan + risks/open questions/next steps.

Example 2 (exec misalignment): “Our exec team keeps changing priorities and feels out of touch. Create an exec-ready weekly update and a trade-off memo template so I can escalate issues early and frame decisions.” Expected: weekly update + decision/trade-off memo + escalation triggers + comms map.

Boundary example: “My manager is retaliating against me and I need to document it.” Response: recommend HR/legal/company process; offer to create a factual incident timeline template and a neutral summary, but do not provide legal advice.

平台分布

Codex

34.76%
按下载量换算94

Claude

27.61%
按下载量换算74

Cursor

20.22%
按下载量换算54

Gemini CLI

10.27%
按下载量换算28

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills