Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
待分类只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

managing-up向上管理

Agent Skill

managing-up 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

824

周安装

34

GitHub Stars

3

下载量

269
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:managing-up(向上管理)
来源仓库:https://github.com/oldwinter/skills
仓库路径:skills/managing-up
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill managing-up
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/oldwinter/skills --skill managing-up

简介

managing-up 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中围绕仓库状态或协作事项进行整理。

  • 适用于需要可视化项目结构、流程或变更场景的 Agent 宿主环境。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从指定仓库安装,需结合原始 README 核验具体用法。
  • 安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网或文件读写操作。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

Managing Up

Scope

Covers

  • Building a proactive partnership with your manager (vs waiting to be managed)
  • Setting a clear upward communication system (async updates, 1:1 structure, decision memos)
  • Leveraging leaders to remove blockers and accelerate decisions (clear asks + escalation triggers)
  • Communicating trade-offs and context so leadership can make good calls
  • Creating a “seat at the table” path: showing business-level perspective before you’re invited
  • Setting boundaries when leadership pace/expectations are misaligned (without being adversarial)

When to use

  • “Help me manage up with my boss—set a cadence and a weekly update template.”
  • “My exec stakeholders feel out of touch—help me communicate context and trade-offs better.”
  • “I need a clean escalation plan and how to ask my leader for help without sounding needy.”
  • “I want more influence / a seat at the table—create a plan and artifacts.”

When NOT to use

  • You need HR/legal guidance (harassment, discrimination, retaliation, threats, investigations) — follow your company process and involve HR/legal.
  • You’re negotiating compensation/title or a formal performance process — use your company process; this skill can help with communication artifacts but not with policy/legal strategy.
  • You have a personal safety or mental-health crisis — seek professional help and follow company policy.

Inputs

Minimum required

  • Your role, scope, and current priorities (what you own; what “good” looks like in the next 4–8 weeks)
  • Who you’re managing up to (manager level; decision power; relationship stage: new/stable/strained)
  • Current friction (2–5 concrete examples) and desired outcome (clarity, autonomy, speed, influence, boundaries)
  • Communication environment (remote/hybrid, time zones, tools, meeting cadence)
  • Constraints (sensitive topics, confidentiality/PII rules, upcoming deadlines)

Missing-info strategy

  • Ask up to 5 questions from references/INTAKE.md (3–5 at a time).
  • If details are missing, proceed with a default managing-up operating system and clearly label assumptions.
  • Do not request secrets (passwords/tokens) or sensitive personal data; use anonymized summaries.

Outputs (deliverables)

Produce a Managing Up Operating System Pack in Markdown (in-chat; or as files if requested):

  1. Context snapshot (role, goals, constraints, assumptions)
  2. Manager profile (“How my manager works” + what they optimize for)
  3. Upward communication cadence (1:1 structure + async update rhythm)
  4. Weekly update template (exec-ready; “no response required” default)
  5. Decision/trade-off memo template (for major decisions / escalations)
  6. Escalation + ask plan (leader leverage map, escalation triggers, ask ladder)
  7. Working agreement + boundary script (how to reset expectations respectfully)
  8. Influence / seat-at-the-table plan (pre-wiring, strategic contribution loop)
  9. Risks / Open questions / Next steps (always included)

Templates: references/TEMPLATES.md Expanded guidance: references/WORKFLOW.md

Workflow (8 steps)

1) Intake + objective + boundaries

  • Inputs: user context; references/INTAKE.md.
  • Actions: Clarify the outcome (autonomy, clarity, influence, speed, boundaries) and define what “better” means in 4–8 weeks. Identify constraints (HR/legal/PII). Choose pack scope (full pack vs subset).
  • Outputs: Context snapshot + assumptions/unknowns list.
  • Checks: Goal is measurable enough to evaluate after 4 weeks.

2) Build a manager profile (what they optimize for)

  • Inputs: org context, manager level, prior interactions.
  • Actions: Draft “How my manager works”: success metrics, incentives/pressures, decision style, risk tolerance, communication preferences, and common failure modes.
  • Outputs: Manager profile (draft) + validation questions to confirm in 1:1.
  • Checks: Profile includes at least 3 actionable implications (what to do differently).

3) Design the comms operating system (what goes where)

  • Inputs: current cadences, meeting load, tools.
  • Actions: Define channels: async weekly update, 1:1 agenda, decision memos for big calls, and escalation path for urgent issues. Decide what does not belong in 1:1s (pure status, unless required).
  • Outputs: Cadence plan + “what goes where” map.
  • Checks: System reduces surprises and reduces “drive-by” requests.

4) Write the weekly update + exec-ready narrative

  • Inputs: priorities, milestones, risks, dependencies.
  • Actions: Create a weekly update that is skimmable: TL;DR, progress vs plan, decisions needed, risks, explicit trade-offs, and clear asks. Default to “no reply required unless…”.
  • Outputs: Weekly update template + example filled-in update (anonymized).
  • Checks: A leader can understand status and decision needs in ≤ 60 seconds.

5) Create an escalation + ask plan (use leaders as resources)

  • Inputs: blockers, dependencies, stakeholders.
  • Actions: Define escalation triggers, pre-wire plan, and an “ask ladder” (from lightweight FYI → unblock → sponsor → decision). Translate blockers into specific leader actions.
  • Outputs: Escalation triggers + ask ladder + leverage map.
  • Checks: Each “ask” is actionable and time-bounded, not a vague request for help.

6) Align expectations + set boundaries (respectfully)

  • Inputs: mismatches (pace, scope, availability), examples.
  • Actions: Draft a working agreement and boundary script: clarify expectations, propose alternatives, and secure explicit agreement. Prepare “pushback” language for unreasonable requests (times, scope, urgency).
  • Outputs: Working agreement + scripts (short, copy/paste).
  • Checks: Boundaries are framed as protecting outcomes (quality, speed, sustainability), not personal preferences.

7) Build influence: seat-at-the-table loop

  • Inputs: strategy calendar, decisions, adjacent teams.
  • Actions: Create a plan to contribute at the business level: pre-reads, crisp POVs, trade-off framing, and consistent pre-briefs. Identify 1–2 high-leverage forums and how to earn invitation.
  • Outputs: Influence plan (30 days) + artifacts to share (POV note, decision memo).
  • Checks: Plan includes at least one recurring “strategic contribution” touchpoint per week.

8) Quality gate + 4-week pilot + iteration plan

  • Inputs: full draft pack.
  • Actions: Run references/CHECKLISTS.md and score with references/RUBRIC.md. Add Risks / Open questions / Next steps. Propose a 4-week pilot and a retro prompt set.
  • Outputs: Final Managing Up Operating System Pack.
  • Checks: Pack is immediately usable; next interactions are scheduled (cadence + checkpoints).

Quality gate (required)

Examples

Example 1 (new relationship): “I started a new PM role. Help me manage up with my manager: create a manager profile template, a weekly update format, and a 4-week pilot cadence.” Expected: manager profile + cadence + weekly update template + pilot plan + risks/open questions/next steps.

Example 2 (exec misalignment): “Our exec team keeps changing priorities and feels out of touch. Create an exec-ready weekly update and a trade-off memo template so I can escalate issues early and frame decisions.” Expected: weekly update + decision/trade-off memo + escalation triggers + comms map.

Boundary example: “My manager is retaliating against me and I need to document it.” Response: recommend HR/legal/company process; offer to create a factual incident timeline template and a neutral summary, but do not provide legal advice.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

34.76%
按下载量换算94

Claude

27.61%
按下载量换算74

Cursor

20.22%
按下载量换算54

Gemini CLI

10.27%
按下载量换算28

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills