Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 待分类

managing-up(向上管理)

managing-up 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

managing-up 是待分类类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为权限未标注;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在待分类类的 11,209 个 Skill 里排第 5,790。

总安装 517周安装 22GitHub Stars 21下载 181核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:managing-up(向上管理)
来源仓库:https://github.com/manager-dot-dev/manager-skills
仓库路径:skills/managing-up
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/manager-dot-dev/manager-skills --skill managing-up
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/manager-dot-dev/manager-skills --skill managing-up

这个 Skill 是做什么的

这个 Skill 的分类还没最终确定,用法以来源仓库的说明为准。

managing-up 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装使用。

需确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写操作。建议结合原始 README 核验具体用法后再部署到生产环境。

来源仓库内路径:skills/managing-up

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/manager-dot-dev/manager-skills --skill managin…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    权限没有明确标注,第一次使用时只给一个无关紧要的任务,观察它到底读了哪些文件和网络。

常见问题

6 条

managing-up 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/manager-dot-dev/manager-skills --skill managing-up。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

managing-up 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

managing-up 需要什么权限?

权限级别没有明确标注。第一次使用时建议只给无关紧要的任务,观察它实际读写了哪些内容。

managing-up 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

managing-up 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 517 次,近一周安装 22 次,下载 181 次,GitHub 21 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

managing-up 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理待分类类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

待分类类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
infsh-cli

infsh CLI · Codex、Claude

4,374,576382权限未标注未明确未收录
ai-video-generation

AI 视频生成 · Codex、Claude

4,313,376382调用外部服务未明确有提醒
lark-openapi-explorer

云雀 OpenAPI 浏览器 · Codex、Claude

2,064,1209,011需要联网未明确有提醒
lark-workflow-standup-report

Lark 工作流程站立报告 · Codex、Claude

2,041,6328,978需要联网未明确通过
use-my-browser

使用我的浏览器 · Codex、Claude

1,848,49140操作浏览器未明确未通过
managing-up

向上管理 · 本页

51721权限未标注未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Managing Up

Before Starting

Check for EM context first. If .agents/em-context.md exists, read it.

If .agents/em-context.md does not exist, ask for a minimal manager profile first and save it before giving detailed advice: role/title, team size, team mission or ownership area, and current challenge or priority.

If a specific person is central to the conversation and .agents/reports/[name].md does not exist, ask for a minimal profile for that person first and save it before giving detailed advice: title/level, tenure, strengths, and current challenge or growth area.

If the conversation reveals durable new context later, update .agents/em-context.md or .agents/reports/[name].md automatically. Save stable facts and patterns, not guesses, transient frustration, or unresolved interpretations.

Response Style

Keep the first answer concise and useful. Do not dump the whole framework unless the user asks for depth.

Default to:

  • State the likely diagnosis or recommendation first
  • Ask at most 2-3 targeted questions only if the missing context changes the advice
  • Give the next concrete action and, when useful, exact wording the manager can use
  • Mention the relevant framework briefly, but do not explain every part of it
  • Offer a deeper version only after the direct answer

How to Use This Skill

Identify the situation first:

  • Building or repairing the reliability of your relationship with your manager → Reliability Is the Foundation of Managing Up
  • Got a difficult performance review from your manager → When Your Own Review Goes Badly
  • Need to communicate a decision you disagree with to your team → Communicating Decisions You Disagree With
  • Delivering bad news or giving feedback upward to senior leaders → Communicating with Senior Leadership
  • Your manager doesn't know what you need from them → What Your Manager Wants from You

Default Response Shape

When helping someone manage up, focus on reliability and leverage:

  1. Manager need: what the user's manager likely cares about or fears.
  2. Current gap: surprise, trust, disagreement, credibility, or unclear ownership.
  3. Update / ask: exact message to send upward.
  4. Prevention loop: cadence or mechanism that avoids repeating the issue.
  5. Boundary: what not to absorb if the manager is being unreasonable.

For disagreements, separate "I need to be heard" from "I need the decision changed."


Reliability Is the Foundation of Managing Up

"Managing up" is often described as a political skill. It isn't. At its core, it's about one thing: not making your manager look unreliable to their manager.

Every time you miss a deadline without warning, you put your manager in an impossible position. They committed that deadline upward. Your late delivery — especially when delivered as a surprise — damages their credibility, not just yours. Managers talk to each other. Repeated surprises end careers.

The rule: warn early, not late. As soon as you know you can't hit a commitment, say so. "Tuesday isn't happening — it'll be Friday" on Monday morning is recoverable. "Oops, it'll be next week" on Tuesday afternoon is not.

This applies upward at every level. The EMs who build durable relationships with senior leadership are often not the most talented — they're the most reliable. They follow through. They don't make promises they can't keep. They surface problems before they become surprises.

Manage your manager intentionally. Your manager often knows less than you about what the right decision is. When you bring a problem, also bring the decision you want them to make. "I want you to make the decision" is almost never the right ask — "here's what I think we should do, and here's what I need from you" is.

Respond promptly to anything that might be blocking your manager. The same standard you hold for your team — respond within an hour to anything blocking — applies upward. And follow up on 100% of manager requests, even if just to say "I'll get back to you."


Communicating Decisions You Disagree With

When leadership makes a call you don't fully buy into, how you communicate it to the team matters more than people realize.

First: engage properly with the decision before communicating it. Distinguish between types:

  • Non-material (e.g., which lunch day): give feedback and move on. Debating small things wastes everyone's time.
  • Material (important but recoverable if wrong): make sure your concerns are genuinely heard. If they are, you can honestly tell the team: "I raised concerns, they were considered, and the people with the most context made the call."
  • Critical (company-trajectory-level): actively push to change it. If you're certain it's catastrophic, you may need to consider whether this is a team you want to stay on.

The key principle: you're almost never as certain as you think you are. Most decisions that feel clearly wrong turn out to have context you didn't have.

What to tell the team: describe how you engaged with the process, not just the outcome. "I had concerns, I raised them, this is what was decided and why" is more credible than "leadership wants this." The first version maintains your integrity. The second erodes it every time.


Communicating with Senior Leadership

A few behaviors that undermine how senior leadership perceives you:

Finesse matters. How you communicate has as much impact as what you communicate. Saying *"everything we presented in the last 2 months was a lie"* in a Slack channel — even if technically accurate — demoralizes people and signals lack of judgment. HOW you present difficult information matters.

Language accuracy. If you're not 100% sure about something, signal it. "I believe..." or "as far as I know..." prevents the frustration of confident-sounding statements that turn out to be wrong.

Delivering bad news. Don't associate yourself with the news. Avoid: a long preface about importance, multiple negative words, excessive detail. State the situation clearly, own what's yours, move to next steps.

Giving feedback to senior leaders. It's an inversion of norms — and feeling nervous about it is healthy. Techniques that work: use the "even more" framing (*"I think you could have even more impact if..."*), use yourself as an example rather than criticizing them directly, lead with curiosity rather than judgment, bring specific data and examples.


What Your Manager Wants from You

Most managers want their reports to manage up — but rarely say it explicitly. What this looks like in practice:

  • Bring solutions, not just problems. When you escalate an issue, come with your recommended path forward. Even if it's wrong, it moves the conversation faster and signals ownership.
  • Share wins upward. Your manager can't advocate for your team in calibrations and planning meetings if they don't know what the team is accomplishing. Be the "Minister of Foreign Affairs" — brief your manager regularly on what your team is doing and why it matters.
  • Give your manager useful signal. If something is going wrong, say so early. If a relationship is fraying, surface it. Your manager's biggest fear is being blindsided by something you knew about.
  • Make their job easier. Follow through. Don't create work for them. Be the report they don't have to chase.

The EMs who have the most influence with their managers aren't the ones who make the fewest mistakes — they're the ones their manager trusts to carry things without dropping them.


When Your Own Review Goes Badly

When your manager gives you a difficult performance review, the first instinct is to blame the manager. Sometimes that's right. But half the blame is usually yours.

  • You didn't provide regular updates, so your manager built their own picture from incomplete information
  • You didn't initiate conversations about your direction, so they filled in the gaps
  • You expected them to recognize work you never surfaced

Don't expect your manager to guess your motivations. Don't expect 1:1s to automatically solve communication problems. Don't expect appreciation for work that was never made visible. The same principle works in reverse: if your team never tells you what's working or what's frustrating, part of that is on you for not creating the space.


Dive Deeper

If the user asks where a framework came from, wants to read the original article, or wants more context on any topic — read references/sources.md for the full list of source articles (with links) and books.


Related Skills

  • managing-yourself — The 10 ways EMs get stuck includes traps #8–10 on managing up and down
  • influence — For persuading peers, cross-functional stakeholders, and getting headcount
  • feedback — Giving feedback to your manager is a specific case of the feedback skill

平台分布

Codex

36.92%
按下载量换算67

Claude

27.87%
按下载量换算50

Cursor

19.12%
按下载量换算35

Gemini CLI

8.58%
按下载量换算16

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

权限未标注

当前来源未能明确判断权限范围,默认进入异常复核队列。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills