Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

ln-404-test-executor(ln 404 测试执行器)

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

ln-404-test-executor 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 17,731。

总安装 6,439周安装 271GitHub Stars 437下载 2,255核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ln-404-test-executor(ln 404 测试执行器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills
仓库路径:skills/ln-404-test-executor
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills --skill ln-404-test-executor
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills --skill ln-404-test-executor

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。可编写单元测试、端到端测试或根据日志定位问题,提升测试效率。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装使用。使用时需确认测试框架、运行命令,并区分模拟与生产环境。

ln-404-test-executor 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/ln-404-test-executor

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills --skill ln-4…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

ln-404-test-executor 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills --skill ln-404-test-ex…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

ln-404-test-executor 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

ln-404-test-executor 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

ln-404-test-executor 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

ln-404-test-executor 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 6,439 次,近一周安装 271 次,下载 2,255 次,GitHub 437 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

ln-404-test-executor 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
ln-404-test-executor

ln 404 测试执行器 · 本页

6,439437调用外部服务MIT有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Paths: File paths (shared/, references/, ../ln-*) are relative to skills repo root. If not found at CWD, locate this SKILL.md directory and go up one level for repo root. If shared/ is missing, fetch files via WebFetch from https://raw.githubusercontent.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills/master/skills/{path}.

Test Task Executor

Type: L3 Worker

Runs a single Story final test task (label "tests") through implementation/execution to To Review.

Purpose & Scope

  • Handle only tasks labeled "tests"; other tasks go to ln-401.
  • Follow the 11-section test task plan (E2E/Integration/Unit, infra/docs/cleanup).
  • Enforce risk-based constraints: Priority ≥15 scenarios covered; each test passes Usefulness Criteria; no framework/DB/library/performance tests.
  • Update Linear/kanban for this task only: Todo -> In Progress -> To Review.

Hex-line acceleration (if available): Use outline(file_path) before reading test targets. Use narrow inspect_path(path=<relevant test dir>) to understand test structure; if you intentionally need a full broad inventory of tests/, opt in with max_entries=0 instead of assuming the default pattern cap will show everything. Use grep_search(output_mode="summary") first to find tests/helpers/fixtures, then escalate to output_mode="content", edit_ready=true only when you need canonical hunks for a follow-up edit; use allow_large_output=true only as an explicit override. Use read_file() and edit_file() as the primary path for test/code/config files. Keep read_file() in discovery mode for normal inspection; use read_file(edit_ready=true, verbosity="full") before edits that need revision/checksum protocol. Use verify() and changes() before handoff. Built-in Read/Edit are fallback only when hex-line is unavailable.

Inputs

InputRequiredSourceDescription
taskIdYesargs, parent Story, kanban, userTest task to execute

Resolution: Task Resolution Chain. Status filter: Todo (label: tests)

Task Storage Mode

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/environment_state_contract.md, shared/references/storage_mode_detection.md, and shared/references/input_resolution_pattern.md

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/ci_tool_detection.md — compact output flags, pipefail, normalization-before-truncation policy for test command execution.

Extract: task_provider = Task Management → Provider (linear | file).

AspectLinear ModeFile Mode
Load taskget_issue(task_id)Read("docs/tasks/epics/.../tasks/T{NNN}-*.md")
Load Storyget_issue(parent_id)Read("docs/tasks/epics/.../story.md")
Update statussave_issue(id, state)Edit the **Status:** line in file
Test resultscreate_comment({issueId, body})Write comment to .../comments/{ISO-timestamp}.md

File Mode transitions: Todo → In Progress → To Review

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/mcp_tool_preferences.md — ALWAYS use hex-line MCP for code files when available. No fallback to standard Read/Edit unless hex-line is down.

Workflow (concise)

  1. Resolve taskId: Run Task Resolution Chain per guide (status filter: [Todo, label: tests]).
  2. Load task: Fetch full test task description (Linear: get_issue; File: Read task file); read linked guides/manuals/ADRs/research; review parent Story and manual test results if provided. 2b) Goal gate: MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/goal_articulation_gate.md — State REAL GOAL of these tests (which business behavior must be verified, not "write tests"). NOT THE GOAL: testing infrastructure or framework behavior instead of business logic. HIDDEN CONSTRAINT: which existing tests might break from implementation changes.
  3. Read environment docs: Read docs/project/infrastructure.md — get server IPs, ports, service endpoints. Read docs/project/runbook.md — understand test environment setup, Docker commands, test execution prerequisites. Use exact commands from runbook.
  4. Validate plan: Check Priority ≥15 coverage and Usefulness Criteria; ensure focus on business flows (no infra-only tests).
  5. Start work: Set task In Progress (Linear: update_issue; File: Edit status line); move in kanban.
  6. Implement & run: MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/code_efficiency_criterion.md — Author/update tests per plan; reuse existing fixtures/helpers; run tests; fix failing existing tests; update infra/doc sections as required. Before handoff, verify 3 efficiency self-checks (especially: reuse fixtures instead of duplicating setup).
  7. Complete: Ensure counts/priority still within limits; set task To Review; move in kanban; add comment summarizing coverage, commands run, and any deviations.

Critical Rules

  • Single-task only; no bulk updates.
  • Do not mark Done; the reviewer approves. Task must end in To Review.
  • Keep language (EN/RU) consistent with task.
  • No framework/library/DB/performance/load tests; focus on business logic correctness (not infrastructure throughput).
  • Respect limits and priority; if violated, stop and return with findings.
  • Do NOT commit. Leave all changes uncommitted — the reviewer reviews and commits.

Runtime Summary Artifact

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/coordinator_summary_contract.md, shared/references/worker_runtime_contract.md, shared/references/task_worker_runtime_contract.md

Shared contract:

  • emit summary_kind=task-status
  • standalone mode omits runId and summaryArtifactPath
  • managed mode passes both runId and exact summaryArtifactPath before the worker writes its validated summary

Monitor (2.1.98+): For test/coverage commands expected >30s, use Monitor. Fallback: Bash(run_in_background=true).

Definition of Done

  • Task identified as test task and set to In Progress; kanban updated
  • Plan validated (priority/limits) and guides read
  • Tests implemented/updated and executed; existing failures fixed
  • Docs/infra updates applied per task plan
  • Task set to To Review; kanban moved; summary comment added with commands and coverage
  • Runtime summary artifact written to the shared task-status location.

Test Failure Analysis Protocol

CRITICAL: When a newly written test fails, STOP and analyze BEFORE changing anything (failing new tests often indicate implementation bugs, not test issues — fixing blindly masks root cause).

Step 1: Verify Test Correctness

  • Does test match AC requirements exactly? (Given/When/Then from Story)
  • Is expected value correct per business logic?
  • If uncertain: Query ref_search_documentation(query="[domain] expected behavior")

Step 2: Decision

Test matches AC?Action
YESBUG IN CODE → Fix implementation, not test
NOTest is wrong → Fix test assertion
UNCERTAINMANDATORY: Query MCP Ref + ask user before changing

Step 3: Document in Linear comment "Test [name] failed. Analysis: [test correct / test wrong]. Action: [fixed code / fixed test]. Reason: [justification]"

RED FLAGS (require user confirmation):

  • ⚠️ Changing assertion to match actual output ("make test green")
  • ⚠️ Removing test case that "doesn't work"
  • ⚠️ Weakening expectations (e.g., toContain instead of toEqual)

GREEN LIGHTS (safe to proceed):

  • ✅ Fixing typo in test setup/mock data
  • ✅ Fixing code to match AC requirements
  • ✅ Adding missing test setup step

Test Writing Principles

1. Strict Assertions - Fail on Any Mismatch

Use exact match assertions by default:

Strict (PREFER)Loose (AVOID unless justified)
Exact equality checkPartial/substring match
Exact length check"Has any length" check
Full object comparisonPartial object match
Exact type checkTruthy/falsy check

WARN-level assertions FORBIDDEN - test either PASS or FAIL, no warnings.

2. Expected-Based Testing for Deterministic Output

For deterministic responses (API, transformations):

  • Use snapshot/golden file testing for complex deterministic output
  • Compare actual output vs expected reference file
  • Normalize dynamic data before comparison (timestamps → fixed, UUIDs → placeholder)

3. Golden Rule

"If you know the expected value, assert the exact value."

Forbidden: Using loose assertions to "make test pass" when exact value is known.

Reference Files

  • Environment state: shared/references/environment_state_contract.md
  • Storage mode operations: shared/references/storage_mode_detection.md
  • Kanban format: docs/tasks/kanban_board.md
  • MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/research_tool_fallback.md

Version: 3.2.0 Last Updated: 2026-01-15

平台分布

Claude Code

29.86%
按下载量换算673

Gemini CLI

21.96%
按下载量换算495

Codex

16.22%
按下载量换算366

OpenCode

13.42%
按下载量换算303

Antigravity

8.2%
按下载量换算185

windsurf

3.61%
按下载量换算81

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。

继续浏览同类 Skills