Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

litestar-lifecycle-hooks(litestar 生命周期挂钩)

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

litestar-lifecycle-hooks 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 18,498。

总安装 333周安装 14GitHub Stars 5下载 116核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:litestar-lifecycle-hooks(litestar 生命周期挂钩)
来源仓库:https://github.com/alti3/litestar-skills
仓库路径:skills/litestar-lifecycle-hooks
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/alti3/litestar-skills --skill litestar-lifecycle-hooks
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/alti3/litestar-skills --skill litestar-lifecycle-hooks

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。适合编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免误改真实逻辑。涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。安装方式:通过 GitHub 仓库添加,需确认权限与操作边界。

来源仓库内路径:skills/litestar-lifecycle-hooks

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/alti3/litestar-skills --skill litestar-lifecyc…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

litestar-lifecycle-hooks 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/alti3/litestar-skills --skill litestar-lifecycle-hooks。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

litestar-lifecycle-hooks 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

litestar-lifecycle-hooks 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

litestar-lifecycle-hooks 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

litestar-lifecycle-hooks 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 333 次,近一周安装 14 次,下载 116 次,GitHub 5 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

litestar-lifecycle-hooks 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
litestar-lifecycle-hooks

litestar 生命周期挂钩 · 本页

3335需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Lifecycle Hooks

Use this skill when the requirement is specifically about the request-handler lifecycle for HTTP handlers, not application bootstrapping or whole-ASGI wrapping.

Execution Workflow

  1. Decide which stage matches the requirement: before_request, after_request, or after_response (the exact lifecycle stage needed for behavior injection).
  2. Choose the layer intentionally: app, router, controller, or handler (the layer to place the hook in).
  3. Keep hook behavior small, deterministic, and clearly cross-cutting.
  4. Implement request-state handoff or response mutation explicitly.
  5. Test normal flow, short-circuit flow, and layer-precedence behavior explicitly.

Core Rules

  • Match the hook to the lifecycle stage instead of forcing one hook to do everything.
  • Keep hooks transport-focused and cross-cutting; push domain rules into services or handlers.
  • Keep before_request return values deliberate because any non-None response-compatible value bypasses the route handler.
  • Keep after_request focused on the resolved Response; it may return the same response or a replacement response.
  • Keep after_response side effects safe to run after the response is already sent; it cannot change the response the client received.
  • Treat hook placement as behavior: Litestar lifecycle hooks are layered, and the closest layer to the handler takes precedence.
  • Use request state or other explicit request-scoped storage when before_request must pass data into the handler.

Decision Guide

  • Use before_request when you need request gating, request-state enrichment, or an early HTTP result before the handler runs.
  • Use after_request when you need response-object mutation such as reshaping content, adding headers, or swapping the response type.
  • Use after_response when you need metrics, counters, audit emission, or third-party notification after the response has already gone out.
  • Use litestar-middleware instead when the concern needs raw ASGI scope/receive/send, broad wrapping across route groups, built-in middleware, or WebSocket/lifespan coverage.
  • Use litestar-app-setup instead when the concern is before_send, after_exception, on_app_init, startup/shutdown hooks, or lifespan-managed resources.
  • Use litestar-events instead when one action should fan out into decoupled in-process side effects rather than inline lifecycle interception.

Reference Files

Read only the sections you need:

Hook Semantics

before_request

  • Runs immediately before the route handler function is called.
  • Accepts a Request as its first parameter.
  • Returns either None or any value Litestar can use as a response.
  • Returning a value bypasses the route handler for that request.
  • Best for request enrichment, conditional short-circuiting, and request-scoped flags stored on request.state.

after_request

  • Runs after the route handler has returned and Litestar has resolved a Response.
  • Accepts a Response as its first parameter.
  • Must return a Response.
  • May mutate and return the same response or replace it with a different response object.
  • Best for response normalization, response metadata, and response-type transformation after handler execution.

after_response

  • Runs after the response has been returned by the server.
  • Accepts a Request as its first parameter.
  • Returns None.
  • Cannot affect the response that the client already received.
  • Best for post-send metrics, counters, audit trails, and external notifications.

Layering Model

  • Lifecycle hooks participate in Litestar's layered architecture.
  • You can define them on the application, router, controller, or handler layer.
  • If the same lifecycle hook is defined on multiple layers, the layer closest to the handler takes precedence.
  • Do not assume hook definitions compose across layers; precedence is override-oriented, not additive.

Recommended Defaults

  • Prefer one clear responsibility per hook.
  • Store transient per-request data on request.state when before_request needs to communicate with the handler.
  • Return None from before_request unless you intentionally want to short-circuit the handler.
  • Mutate the existing response in after_request when that is sufficient; replace it only when the response contract truly changes.
  • Keep after_response idempotent enough for retries in tests and safe enough that delayed failures do not corrupt request flow assumptions.
  • Keep layer overrides narrow and documented by placement rather than comments whenever possible.

Example Pattern

from litestar import Litestar, Request, Response, get
from litestar.status_codes import HTTP_403_FORBIDDEN

async def before_request(request: Request) -> Response | None:
    tenant_id = request.headers.get("x-tenant-id")
    if tenant_id is None:
        return Response({"detail": "missing tenant"}, status_code=HTTP_403_FORBIDDEN)
    request.state.tenant_id = tenant_id
    return None

async def after_request(response: Response) -> Response:
    response.headers["x-service"] = "orders"
    return response

async def after_response(request: Request) -> None:
    request.app.state.setdefault("paths_seen", []).append(request.url.path)

@get("/orders")
async def list_orders(request: Request) -> dict[str, str]:
    return {"tenant_id": request.state.tenant_id}

app = Litestar(
    route_handlers=[list_orders],
    before_request=before_request,
    after_request=after_request,
    after_response=after_response,
)

Anti-Patterns

  • Hiding authoritative business rules in hooks instead of the handler or service layer.
  • Returning ad hoc shapes from before_request without treating them as real response contracts.
  • Doing heavy network or database work in after_request when the concern belongs in after_response, events, or a background mechanism.
  • Expecting after_response mutations to show up in the current client response.
  • Defining the same hook on multiple layers and expecting all of them to run.
  • Using lifecycle hooks as a substitute for startup/shutdown resource management.
  • Reaching for middleware when only request or response objects need light interception.

Validation Checklist

  • Confirm the chosen hook stage matches the intended timing.
  • Confirm before_request short-circuit cases bypass the handler as intended.
  • Confirm request-scoped data written by before_request is available where it is later consumed.
  • Confirm after_request always returns a valid Response.
  • Confirm after_response side effects tolerate the fact that the response is already gone to the client.
  • Confirm layer placement is intentional and tested where app/router/controller/handler overrides exist.
  • Confirm error-path behavior is tested if hooks must coexist with exception handlers or middleware.
  • Confirm the logic still belongs in hooks rather than middleware, events, or app setup.

Cross-Skill Handoffs

  • Use litestar-app-setup for startup/shutdown hooks, lifespan, before_send, after_exception, and on_app_init.
  • Use litestar-middleware when the concern must wrap the ASGI pipeline rather than request and response objects.
  • Use litestar-events for decoupled in-process side effects instead of inline hook fanout.
  • Use litestar-testing to verify short-circuit behavior, layer precedence, and post-send side effects.

Litestar References

平台分布

Codex

39.37%
按下载量换算46

Claude

28.71%
按下载量换算33

Cursor

19.96%
按下载量换算23

Gemini CLI

9%
按下载量换算10

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills