Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

litestar-exception-handling(litestar 异常处理)

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

litestar-exception-handling 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 17,985。

总安装 367周安装 15GitHub Stars 5下载 118核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:litestar-exception-handling(litestar 异常处理)
来源仓库:https://github.com/alti3/litestar-skills
仓库路径:skills/litestar-exception-handling
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/alti3/litestar-skills --skill litestar-exception-handling
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/alti3/litestar-skills --skill litestar-exception-handling

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。适合编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免误改真实逻辑。涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。安装方式:通过 GitHub 仓库添加,需确认权限与操作边界。

来源仓库内路径:skills/litestar-exception-handling

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/alti3/litestar-skills --skill litestar-excepti…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

litestar-exception-handling 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/alti3/litestar-skills --skill litestar-exception-handlin…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

litestar-exception-handling 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

litestar-exception-handling 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

litestar-exception-handling 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

litestar-exception-handling 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 367 次,近一周安装 15 次,下载 118 次,GitHub 5 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

litestar-exception-handling 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
litestar-exception-handling

litestar 异常处理 · 本页

3675需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Exception Handling

Execution Workflow

  1. Separate startup and configuration failures from request-time failures.
  2. Decide whether the failure should be represented by raising HTTPException or by mapping another exception type through an exception handler.
  3. Choose the narrowest layer that should own the handler: app, router, controller, or route handler.
  4. Keep the outbound error contract stable: status code, payload shape, media type, and safe detail level.
  5. Register app-level handlers for 404 Not Found and 405 Method Not Allowed when those responses must be customized.
  6. Verify validation and server-failure paths separately so sensitive details do not leak unintentionally.

Core Rules

  • Distinguish configuration/startup exceptions from request-handling exceptions.
  • Use HTTPException or its subclasses when the handler should raise an HTTP-aware error directly.
  • Use exception handlers to translate domain or library exceptions into transport-safe responses.
  • Keep error payload schemas stable across handlers and layers.
  • Keep documented error behavior aligned with litestar-openapi route metadata and security docs.
  • Redact or replace validation and internal error details when exposing raw messages would leak implementation details.
  • Prefer specific exception mappings over broad catch-alls that hide root causes.
  • Keep handler registration close to the layer that owns the behavior, except for 404 and 405, which must be handled at app scope.

Decision Guide

  • Raise HTTPException subclasses directly for clear HTTP semantics such as 401, 403, 404, 429, or 503.
  • Map domain exceptions with exception_handlers when business logic should stay transport-agnostic.
  • Map by exception class when the exception type is the stable contract.
  • Map by status code when multiple exceptions should share one response format for the same HTTP status.
  • Use app-level defaults for generic 500 handling and lower-level overrides only where behavior genuinely differs.

Reference Files

Read only the sections you need:

  • For exception taxonomy, built-in subclasses, HTTPException constructor behavior, validation warnings, headers, extra, and websocket-related exceptions, read references/built-in-exceptions.md.
  • For handler registration patterns, plain-text vs JSON responses, status-code mappings, layered overrides, and the app-only 404/405 rule, read references/handler-patterns.md.

Recommended Defaults

  • Standardize one JSON error envelope unless a route intentionally serves another media type.
  • Treat ValidationException.extra as potentially user-visible diagnostic data.
  • Keep 500 responses generic for clients and detailed in logs.
  • Prefer class-based mappings for business exceptions and app-level status-code mappings for generic fallback behavior.
  • Keep middleware and dependency failures covered by the same top-level error strategy as route handlers.

Anti-Patterns

  • Returning raw exception text for internal server errors in production APIs.
  • Exposing validation internals or stack-trace-like details to clients without intent.
  • Registering a catch-all handler that collapses every failure into the same 400 response.
  • Splitting identical error envelopes across many handlers without a clear reason.
  • Trying to customize 404 or 405 below the app layer.
  • Encoding authorization policy inside generic exception handlers instead of security layers.

Validation Checklist

  • Confirm expected exception classes map to the intended status codes.
  • Confirm app startup and configuration errors are not treated as request-time API responses.
  • Confirm 404 and 405 customization is registered on the Litestar app instance.
  • Confirm payload shape is consistent across handlers, routes, and layers.
  • Confirm documented error responses and raised exceptions match the real contract.
  • Confirm validation failures do not leak more detail than intended.
  • Confirm unhandled exceptions still surface as 500 responses and remain observable in logs.
  • Confirm route-specific overrides do not accidentally shadow broader app policy.
  • Confirm middleware and dependency exceptions follow the same contract as handler-raised exceptions.

Cross-Skill Handoffs

  • Use litestar-authentication or litestar-security for auth-specific 401 and 403 strategy.
  • Use litestar-responses when the main task is response formatting rather than exception mapping.
  • Use litestar-testing for exhaustive failure-path assertions and override coverage.
  • Use litestar-openapi when documented error responses or security-related failure docs need to match runtime behavior.
  • Use litestar-logging when exception observability, redaction, or structured logging is part of the task.

Litestar References

平台分布

Codex

38.29%
按下载量换算45

Claude

26.71%
按下载量换算32

Cursor

20.1%
按下载量换算24

Gemini CLI

9.36%
按下载量换算11

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills