Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

linear-create(Linear create 工具)

用于处理 Linear 项目、Issue、团队、周期和产品开发任务流。它适合让 Agent 辅助查询任务状态、整理需求队列、创建缺陷或汇总迭代进展。使用时需要确认 workspace、team、label、assignee 和状态流转规则;涉及批量创建或修改任务时,应先核对字段和目标团队,避免把草稿需求直接写入正式项目。

linear-create 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证信息还不明确,暂无第三方扫描结果,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 66,577。

总安装 261周安装 11GitHub Stars 2下载 92核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:linear-create(Linear create 工具)
来源仓库:https://github.com/alexanderguy/skills
仓库路径:skills/linear-create
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/alexanderguy/skills --skill linear-create
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/alexanderguy/skills --skill linear-create

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

linear-create 用于处理 Linear 项目、Issue、团队、周期和产品开发任务流,适合让 Agent 查询任务状态或汇总迭代进展。它适用于 Linear 项目管理场景,需确认 workspace、team 和状态流转规则。

安装命令为 npx skills add https://github.com/alexanderguy/skills --skill linear-create。涉及批量创建或修改任务时,应先核对字段和目标团队。

适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/linear-create

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/alexanderguy/skills --skill linear-create;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

linear-create 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/alexanderguy/skills --skill linear-create。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

linear-create 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

linear-create 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

linear-create 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

linear-create 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 261 次,近一周安装 11 次,下载 92 次,GitHub 2 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

linear-create 安全吗?

没有查到第三方扫描结果,安全性无法从公开资料判断,安装前请自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 没有第三方扫描结果,安全性只能靠自己读源码判断。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 要求有安全扫描结论才肯安装的团队。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
linear-create

Linear create 工具 · 本页

2612调用外部服务未明确未收录

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Linear Create

Use this skill to create properly structured Linear artifacts. Based on the scope of work, this skill will create the appropriate combination of issues, projects, and/or initiatives.

Prerequisites

Before doing anything else, verify the linear subagent is available by checking if it appears in your available agent types. If it is not available, inform the user:

The Linear integration is not available. Please ensure the Linear MCP server is configured and try again.

Do not proceed with any other phases until this check passes.

Phase 1: Document Discovery

When the user provides --from-doc or mentions a planning document, search for scribe-managed documents:

  1. Look for PRODUCT.md, ARCHITECTURE.md, IMPLEMENTATION.md in:

- Repository root - docs/ directory

  1. If no documents are found, ask the user: I couldn't find any planning documents. Do you have a document you'd like me to reference?
  2. When a document is found, read it and extract:

- Features or work items mentioned - Technical context and constraints - Scope indicators (timeline mentions, complexity signals)

Use extracted information to:

  • Pre-populate issue descriptions with relevant context
  • Propose appropriate artifact types based on scope
  • Ask targeted follow-up questions for gaps not covered by the document

Phase 2: Analyze Input

Determine what the user wants to create:

  1. Explicit request: User specifies artifact type ("create an issue for...", "create a project for...")
  2. From document: User provides --from-doc to extract work items from planning documents
  3. Freeform: User describes work without specifying type

For freeform input, estimate the scope:

ScopeDurationArtifact
Small1-3 daysSingle issue
Medium1-2 weeksProject with issues
LargeQuarter+Initiative with projects

Present your assessment to the user and confirm before proceeding.

Phase 3: Interview

If information is missing, ask targeted questions. Keep interviews brief and focused.

For Issues

Required information:

  • What problem does this solve or what value does it add?
  • How will we know it's done? (acceptance criteria)

Optional:

  • Are there technical constraints or dependencies?
  • Which team should own this?

For Projects

Required information:

  • What is the goal/outcome of this project?
  • What is the target timeframe?
  • Who should lead this project?

Optional:

  • What teams are involved?
  • What are the key milestones?

For Initiatives

Required information:

  • What strategic objective does this serve?
  • Who is the executive owner?
  • What projects should be included?

Phase 4: Draft Content

Create drafts following these conventions:

Issue Format

Title: Clear and actionable. Verb phrases are preferred, but sentences or noun phrases are acceptable when they provide clarity.

  • Good: "Add retry logic for failed API calls"
  • Good: "Fix race condition in transaction verification"
  • Good: "Create market validation track for "
  • Bad: "API retry" (too vague)
  • Bad: "Bug in transactions" (not actionable)

Description:

# Background

<Context and what triggered this work. Optional for simple tasks.>

# Outcome

<What success looks like, with checkboxes for specific conditions>

- [ ] <Specific, testable condition>
- [ ] <Another condition>

For simple tasks, you can omit # Background and use only # Outcome with checkboxes.

Labels and Priority:

  • Set priority based on urgency and impact
  • Apply labels for categorization (e.g., bug, feature, tech-debt) if the workspace uses them
  • Ask the user about priority and labels if not specified

When appropriate, use subsections under # Outcome to organize related items:

# Outcome

## Questions

- [ ] What are the key takeaways?
- [ ] Which parts apply to our strategy?

## Tasks

- [ ] Document findings
- [ ] Present to team

Project Format

Name: Outcome-focused description

  • Good: "User authentication with SSO support"
  • Good: "Get 10 customer leads for through direct outreach"
  • Bad: "Auth work"

Description: Goal, scope, and any constraints.

For validation or experiment projects, use the Hypothesis/Experiment/Steps pattern:

Hypothesis - <What you believe to be true>

Experiment
<Experiment name>

* <Step 1>
* <Step 2>
* <Step 3>

Milestones: Key checkpoints showing progression toward the goal. Examples:

  • Completion states: "Target list ready", "Outreach completed", "Analysis complete"
  • Phase labels: "MVP", "Full implementation", "Polish and launch"

Initiative Format

Name: Strategic objective

Description: Include as much information as needed to convey the business goal and how success will be measured. If unsure what to include, prompt the user for guidance.

Phase 5: Review and Adjust

Present the complete draft to the user:

I propose creating:

**Project**: Add user authentication
- Lead: <to be assigned>
- Target: <target-quarter>
- Milestones:
  1. Basic auth flow complete
  2. SSO integration complete

**Issues**:
1. "Set up authentication database schema"
2. "Implement login/logout flow"
3. "Integrate SSO provider"
4. "Add session management"
   - Blocked by: #2

Would you like to adjust anything before I create these?

Allow the user to:

  • Adjust titles or descriptions
  • Change the structure (e.g., "make #3 and #4 one issue")
  • Add or remove items
  • Specify assignees or teams

Phase 6: Create in Linear

Workspace Discovery

Before creating artifacts, query the Linear workspace:

  • Teams: Always query available teams and ask the user which team should own issues or projects
  • Projects: Query existing projects if the user mentions adding to an existing project
  • Initiatives: Query existing initiatives if linking to one

Example queries:

Task(description="Query Linear teams", prompt="List available teams in the workspace", subagent_type="linear")
Task(description="Query Linear projects", prompt="List active projects in team <team-name>", subagent_type="linear")
Task(description="Query Linear initiatives", prompt="List initiatives", subagent_type="linear")

Present options to the user when multiple choices exist.

Creating Artifacts

After user approval, create artifacts using the linear subagent:

  1. Create container first (initiative or project)
  2. Create issues in dependency order
  3. Set blocking relationships between issues
  4. Add issues to project (if applicable)
  5. Add projects to initiative (if applicable)

Example subagent calls:

Task(description="Create Linear project", prompt="Create a project titled 'User authentication with SSO support' with target date <target-date>, description: '<description>'", subagent_type="linear")

Task(description="Create Linear issue", prompt="Create an issue titled 'Set up authentication database schema' with description: '<desc>' and acceptance criteria: '<ac>', add to project <project-id>", subagent_type="linear")

Task(description="Set issue dependency", prompt="Set issue <issue-B-id> as blocked by <issue-A-id>", subagent_type="linear")

Report created artifacts to the user with their URLs.

Error Handling

If Linear creation fails:

  1. Report the error to the user with any details provided by the API
  2. List what was successfully created before the failure (with URLs if available)
  3. Do not proceed with dependent artifacts if a parent fails (e.g., don't create issues if project creation failed)
  4. Ask if they want to retry or adjust the request

Quality Reminders

  • Issues should be self-contained and handoff-ready at any moment
  • A single issue should take no more than 2-3 days to implement
  • Use many tickets if needed for clarity; they're cheap
  • Status updates in tickets reduce interruptions

If an issue looks like it will take more than 3 days, suggest breaking it down.

Common Patterns

Bug Report to Issue

User: "The login page crashes when you enter special characters"

Issue:
  Title: Fix login page crash on special character input
  Description:
    # Background

    Login page crashes when users enter special characters in the
    username or password field.

    Steps to reproduce:
    1. Navigate to /login
    2. Enter "user@test" in username
    3. Page crashes

    # Outcome

    - [ ] Special characters in username field do not cause crash
    - [ ] Special characters in password field do not cause crash
    - [ ] Input is properly sanitized before processing

Feature Request to Project and Issues

User: "We need to add dark mode to the application"

Project: Add dark mode theme support
  Target: 2 weeks
  Milestones:
    1. Theme infrastructure complete
    2. All components themed

Issues:
  1. "Add theme context and toggle component"
  2. "Define dark mode color palette"
  3. "Update core components for theme support"
     - Blocked by: #1, #2
  4. "Add theme persistence to user preferences"
     - Blocked by: #1

Validation Project

User: "We need to validate if customers want our new <product-name> product"

Project: Get 10 customer leads for <product-name> through direct outreach
  Lead: <to be assigned>
  Target: 2 weeks
  Description:
    Hypothesis - Teams we know and can reach out to have a need for <product-name>.

    Experiment
    Direct Outreach

    - [ ] Create list of targets
    - [ ] Create collateral if needed
    - [ ] Create strategy for outreach including any templates
    - [ ] Execute outreach
    - [ ] Conduct customer interviews
    - [ ] Analyze results

  Milestones:
    1. Target list and collateral ready
    2. Outreach completed
    3. Customer interviews recorded
    4. Analysis complete

Issues:
  1. "Create target list for <product-name> outreach"
  2. "Create outreach collateral and templates"
  3. "Execute outreach campaign"
     - Blocked by: #1, #2
  4. "Conduct and record customer interviews"
     - Blocked by: #3
  5. "Analyze results and present findings"
     - Blocked by: #4

Strategic Goal to Initiative

User: "We need to expand our platform to support enterprise customers"

Initiative: Enterprise platform expansion
  Owner: <executive-owner>
  Target: <target-quarter>

Projects:
  1. "Multi-tenant architecture" - Isolate customer data and resources
  2. "Enterprise SSO integration" - Support SAML and OIDC providers
  3. "Admin dashboard" - Self-service management for enterprise admins
  4. "Audit logging" - Compliance-ready activity tracking

Planning Document to Issues

User: "Create issues from our product doc" or "--from-doc"

[Skill searches for PRODUCT.md, ARCHITECTURE.md, IMPLEMENTATION.md]
[Finds PRODUCT.md with feature descriptions]

Skill: I found PRODUCT.md which describes the following features:
  - User authentication with SSO
  - Usage metrics dashboard
  - Export functionality

Based on the document, I propose:

**Project**: User authentication with SSO support
  (From PRODUCT.md: "Users need secure login with enterprise SSO...")

**Issues**:
  1. "Implement basic email/password authentication"
     # Background
     From PRODUCT.md: Users need secure login...

     # Outcome
     - [ ] Users can register with email/password
     - [ ] Users can log in and log out

  2. "Integrate SAML SSO provider"
     ...

Which features would you like me to create issues for?

平台分布

Codex

37.71%
按下载量换算35

Claude

31.81%
按下载量换算29

Cursor

19.09%
按下载量换算18

Gemini CLI

8.69%
按下载量换算8

安全审计

暂无安全审计结果可展示。

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills