Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

hej(海吉)

hej 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

hej 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 49,774。

总安装 636周安装 26GitHub Stars 2下载 204核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:hej(海吉)
来源仓库:https://github.com/jgabor/agentera
仓库路径:skills/hej
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/jgabor/agentera --skill hej
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/jgabor/agentera --skill hej

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

hej 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中快速定位候选结果。适用于关键词搜索、任务场景匹配或来源线索筛选等研究检索场景。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装并使用该技能。

安装前需确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网或文件操作。hej 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/hej

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/jgabor/agentera --skill hej;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

hej 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/jgabor/agentera --skill hej。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

hej 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

hej 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

hej 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

hej 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 636 次,近一周安装 26 次,下载 204 次,GitHub 2 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

hej 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
hej

海吉 · 本页

6362只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

HEJ

Holistic Entry Junction. Orient, Route, Activate

Single entry point to the agentera suite. Detects fresh vs returning, delivers a situational briefing, routes to the right skill. Same on first install and 100th session.

Each invocation = one orientation. Reads everything, writes nothing.


State artifacts

No artifacts of its own. Reads all suite artifacts for the briefing:

ArtifactRead for
VISION.mdProject direction, north star
DECISIONS.mdPending and recent decisions
PLAN.mdActive tasks, completion status
PROGRESS.mdRecent cycles, what shipped
TODO.mdOpen problems by severity
HEALTH.mdCodebase health grades and trends
OBJECTIVE.mdOptimization target and current value
EXPERIMENTS.mdExperiment status
DOCS.mdDocumentation coverage and artifact paths
DESIGN.mdVisual identity status
PROFILE.mdDecision profile (global: $PROFILERA_PROFILE_DIR/PROFILE.md, default: $XDG_DATA_HOME/agentera/PROFILE.md)

Artifact path resolution

Before reading any artifact, check if.agentera/DOCS.md exists. If it has an Artifact Mapping section, use the path specified for each canonical filename. If.agentera/DOCS.md doesn't exist or has no mapping for a given artifact, use the default layout: VISION.md, TODO.md, and CHANGELOG.md at the project root; all other artifacts in.agentera/. This applies to all artifact reads in this skill.

Note: PROFILE.md is global, not project-scoped. Its path is determined by profilera: $PROFILERA_PROFILE_DIR/PROFILE.md (default: $XDG_DATA_HOME/agentera/PROFILE.md). Check the profilera-determined path directly rather than falling back to the project root.

Contract

Contract values used in this skill are inlined where referenced: severity arrows ⇶/⇉/→/⇢, trend arrows ⮉/⮋, skill glyphs ⛥ ❈ ⬚ ≡ ⧉ ⎘ ⛶ ▤ ♾ ◰ ⎈ ⌂ (last one is hej's own glyph, used in the exit marker), and the plan-relative staleness heuristic (fall back to PROGRESS.md recency when no plan context exists). No upfront file read is required.

references/contract.md remains available as a full-spec reference: consult it for ambiguous cases, explicit cross-checking against SPEC.md, or when you suspect drift between these inlined values and the canonical spec.


Step 0: Detect mode

Check for suite state artifacts (respecting path resolution).

  • No artifacts found → Step 1a (first time on this project)
  • Artifacts found → Step 1b (returning to known project)

Narration voice (riff, don't script): ✗ "Fresh mode: scanning codebase." ✓ "New project. Taking a look around..." · "First time here. Let me see what we've got..."

✗ "Returning mode: reading artifacts for your briefing." ✓ "Pulling up the latest..." · "Checking in on the project..." · "Let me see where things stand..."


Step 1a: Welcome

First impression: the colleague meets a new project.

  1. Quick scan: language(s), framework(s), README.md, last 5 commits, approximate size. Fast, no deep analysis.
  2. Share what's available: lead with the 2-3 skills most relevant to what the scan revealed. Don't enumerate all eleven unless asked. Mention the rest exist and offer the full table on request. The table below is a reference, not a script: If you want to... Use ⛥ Define project direction /visionera ❈ Think through a decision /resonera ⬚ Research an external resource /inspirera ≡ Plan work with acceptance criteria /planera ⧉ Build autonomously /realisera ⎘ Optimize a metric /optimera ⛶ Audit codebase health /inspektera ▤ Create or maintain docs /dokumentera ♾ Build a decision profile /profilera ◰ Define visual identity /visualisera ⎈ Orchestrate multi-cycle plan execution /orkestrera
  3. Give your honest take: based on the scan, tell the user where you'd start and why. "If I were you, I'd start with X because Y." Use the same routing logic (no vision → /visionera, unknown quality → /inspektera, decision needed → /resonera, ready to build + has plan → /orkestrera, ready to build → /realisera, docs gaps → /dokumentera) but frame it as judgment, not a lookup table.
  4. Route: ask what they'd like to do. Invoke the chosen skill.

Step 1b: Briefing

Show where things stand.

  1. Read artifacts: VISION.md, PROGRESS.md, TODO.md, HEALTH.md, PLAN.md, DECISIONS.md

- Read in parallel. First 20 lines each. Skip absent ones. - Extract the most recent entry or summary. - If TODO.md, PLAN.md, OBJECTIVE.md, or DECISIONS.md hints at active work, keep reading. - For optimera status, inspect .agentera/optimera/<name>/ directories directly. Classify closed objectives first when the OBJECTIVE.md status line starts with **Status**: closed, including legacy prose such as **Status**: closed (date). Exclude closed objectives before recency checks; if every objective is closed, report no active objective and do not route to /optimera for completed work. - When multiple non-closed objectives exist, use EXPERIMENTS.md git recency only among those non-closed objectives. A closed objective with newer history must not outrank an older active objective. - Identify the first concrete open item or current plan task before routing. - Do not route from a heading or summary alone when an executable follow-up exists nearby.

  1. Brief them: concise status, only what exists. No empty sections. Show the agentera logo. ┌─┐┌─┐┌─┐┌┐┌┌┬┐┌─┐┬─┐┌─┐ ├─┤│ ┬├┤ │││ │ ├┤ ├┬┘├─┤ ┴ ┴└─┘└─┘┘└┘ ┴ └─┘┴└─┴ ┴ [1-2 sentence conversational opener: the colleague's read on the situation. What shipped, what's moving, what needs eyes. Interpretation, not metrics.] ─── status ───────────────────────────── ⛶ health [⮉|⮋] [grade] ([worst dimension: grade]) ⇶ issues N critical · M degraded · K normal · J annoying ≡ plan [██████▓▓░░] N/M tasks ⎘ optim [metric] [current] → [target] ♾ profile [loaded | not found] ─── attention ────────────────────────── ⇶ [critical items, triple arrow for critical] ⇉ [degraded items, double arrow for degraded] → [normal items, single arrow for normal] ⇢ [annoying items, dashed arrow for annoying] ─── next ─────────────────────────────── suggested → [glyph] /[skill] ([reason]) Output constraint: ≤120 words total briefing, ≤15 words per routing suggestion. Exit marker: after the closing code fence of the dashboard, emit ⌂ hej · <status> on its own line, followed by a one-sentence summary of what you delivered. For waiting, flagged, or stuck, add a ▸ bullet below the summary identifying what the user needs to decide or act on next. The exit marker is mandatory on every invocation regardless of mode (fresh welcome or returning briefing). Formatting rules:

- Each status line uses the skill glyph that owns that data - Severity arrows (⇶/⇉/⇢) mark attention items by urgency - Trend arrows (⮉/⮋) show health trajectory - Progress bars (█▓░) show plan completion visually - The inline separator (·) joins counts on a single line - The conversational opener precedes the status section. It's the colleague's interpretation; the dashboard below is the evidence - Omit any line whose source artifact is missing - Omit any section that would be empty (e.g., no attention items = no attention section)

  1. Attention items: priority order with severity arrows: Nothing? Say so. A clean bill of health is useful.

- ⇶ Critical issues, degrading health dimensions - ⇉ Blocked/overdue plan tasks, stale artifacts (plan-relative per contract staleness detection; fall back to PROGRESS.md recency heuristic when no plan context exists), loop guard triggers - → Standard work: features, improvements, routine tasks - ⇢ Unresolved exploratory decisions

  1. Select the concrete next action before selecting the skill. Priority order: Do not let healthy + plan complete → ⛥ override active TODO, OBJECTIVE, DECISIONS, or a newer active PLAN. A completed plan means "look for the next executable follow-up," not automatically "refresh vision."

- The routing suggestion MUST name the artifact item it would act on. - Valid objects: PLAN Task N: <title>, TODO: <item>, DECISION N follow-up, OBJECTIVE: <metric>, or VISION refresh. - A skill name without a concrete object is not a valid suggestion. - Active PLAN with pending tasks → suggest ⎈ /orkestrera for the first unblocked pending task. - Critical or degrading health → suggest ⛶ /inspektera or ⧉ /realisera for the named finding. - Active non-closed OBJECTIVE with stalled or missing metric evidence → suggest ⎘ /optimera for that metric. - TODO.md open items → suggest ⧉ /realisera for the highest-severity open item; prefer items that unlock product evidence or future plans. - Pending DECISIONS.md follow-up → suggest ❈ /resonera for the named unresolved decision. - Vision exists but no plan, objective, decision follow-up, or TODO work is active → suggest ≡ /planera. - Healthy, no executable follow-ups, and the plan is complete → suggest ⛥ /visionera to choose a new direction.

  1. Route: present one concrete suggestion and let the user choose. No coercion.

- Do not list generic skill options unless the user asks for the full menu. - The waiting bullet should ask whether to run the named action, not ask the user to pick from skills.


Step 2: Route

Narration voice (riff, don't script): ✗ "Starting /[skill]..." ✓ "Kicking off [skill]..." · "Handing off to [skill]..." · "Over to [skill]."

Invoke the skill. Hej's work is done.

Unclear mapping? Ask one clarifying question. No compound questions.


Safety rails


Exit signals

Report one of these statuses at workflow completion.

Format: emit ⌂ hej · <status> on its own line below the dashboard's closing code fence, followed by a one-sentence summary of what was delivered. For flagged, stuck, and waiting, add a ▸ bullet below the summary identifying what the user needs to decide or act on next. The exit marker is mandatory and uses hej's canonical glyph ⌂ (Unicode U+1F794).

  • complete: Briefing delivered (or welcome shown) and user successfully routed to a skill.
  • flagged: Briefing delivered but critical attention items were found: critical issues, degrading health, loop guard triggers. Each concern is listed explicitly.
  • stuck: Cannot orient: the working directory is not a code project, no readable files exist, or permissions prevent scanning.
  • waiting: Briefing or welcome delivered, suggestion made, awaiting user input on which direction to take.

Cross-skill integration

Hej is the entry point to a twelve-skill suite. It reads artifacts from the other eleven workflow skills but produces no artifacts of its own and no downstream skill depends on it.

Reads from all eleven skills:

  • visionera → VISION.md for project direction and north star
  • resonera → DECISIONS.md for pending and recent decisions
  • planera → PLAN.md for active task status and completion
  • realisera → PROGRESS.md for recent cycle history and what shipped
  • inspektera → HEALTH.md for codebase health grades and trends
  • optimera → OBJECTIVE.md and EXPERIMENTS.md for optimization status
  • dokumentera → DOCS.md for artifact path resolution and documentation coverage
  • visualisera → DESIGN.md for visual identity status
  • profilera → PROFILE.md for decision profile context
  • inspirera → no direct artifact, but routes to it when research is needed
  • orkestrera → no direct artifact, but hej routes to it for orchestrated multi-cycle plan execution

Hej's unique role: it is the only skill that reads from every other skill's output. It does not feed into any downstream skill. Its output is the ephemeral briefing and the routing decision.


Getting started

/hej                        # Start here, always
"what should I work on"     # Natural language works too
"catch me up"               # Returning to a project
"what needs attention"      # Quick status check

平台分布

Codex

36.03%
按下载量换算74

Claude

30.12%
按下载量换算61

Cursor

19.83%
按下载量换算40

Gemini CLI

9.32%
按下载量换算19

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills