Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 待分类

health-score-monitor(健康评分监测器)

health-score-monitor 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

health-score-monitor 是待分类类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在待分类类的 11,209 个 Skill 里排第 1,875。

总安装 2,138周安装 90GitHub Stars 85下载 749核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:health-score-monitor(健康评分监测器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills
仓库路径:skills/health-score-monitor
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill health-score-monitor
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill health-score-monitor

这个 Skill 是做什么的

这个 Skill 的分类还没最终确定,用法以来源仓库的说明为准。

用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue 和 Pull Request 协作信息。适合围绕代码变更、仓库状态或协作事项进行整理。可结合项目上下文理解技术细节和开发流程。使用前需确认权限和操作边界,避免越权访问。health-score-monitor 属于待分类类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/health-score-monitor

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill health-sco…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

health-score-monitor 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills --skill health-score-monitor。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

health-score-monitor 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

health-score-monitor 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

health-score-monitor 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

health-score-monitor 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 2,138 次,近一周安装 90 次,下载 749 次,GitHub 85 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

health-score-monitor 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理待分类类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

待分类类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
infsh-cli

infsh CLI · Codex、Claude

4,374,576382权限未标注未明确未收录
ai-video-generation

AI 视频生成 · Codex、Claude

4,313,376382调用外部服务未明确有提醒
lark-openapi-explorer

云雀 OpenAPI 浏览器 · Codex、Claude

2,064,1209,011需要联网未明确有提醒
lark-workflow-standup-report

Lark 工作流程站立报告 · Codex、Claude

2,041,6328,978需要联网未明确通过
use-my-browser

使用我的浏览器 · Codex、Claude

1,848,49140操作浏览器未明确未通过
health-score-monitor

健康评分监测器 · 本页

2,13885只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Health Score Monitor

Build systematic customer health monitoring with composite scores, trend tracking, and automated alerting for proactive customer success.

When to Use This Skill

  • Designing health score frameworks
  • Setting up monitoring dashboards
  • Creating alert thresholds
  • Analyzing health trends across portfolio
  • Optimizing existing health models

Methodology Foundation

Based on Gainsight Health Score Design and Totango Customer Success metrics, focusing on:

  • Multi-dimensional scoring
  • Leading vs lagging indicators
  • Score normalization
  • Trend analysis
  • Alert prioritization

What Claude Does vs What You Decide

Claude DoesYou Decide
Designs scoring frameworkDimension weights
Calculates composite scoresAlert thresholds
Identifies trending patternsIntervention triggers
Suggests monitoring cadenceResource allocation
Recommends improvementsBusiness rule exceptions

What This Skill Does

  1. Framework design - Multi-factor health model
  2. Score calculation - Weighted composite scores
  3. Trend analysis - Direction and velocity
  4. Alert rules - When to notify teams
  5. Portfolio view - Aggregate health visibility

How to Use

Design a health score monitor for my customer portfolio:

Business Context:
- Product type: [SaaS/Platform/Service]
- Contract model: [Annual/Monthly/Multi-year]
- Key value metric: [What shows customer success?]
- CSM:Account ratio: [1:X]

Available Data Points:
- Product: [List usage metrics available]
- Support: [List support metrics available]
- Financial: [List financial signals]
- Relationship: [List engagement data]

Current Challenges:
- [What's not working with current approach?]

Instructions

Step 1: Define Health Dimensions

Standard 4-Pillar Model:

DimensionWeightWhat It Answers
Product30-40%Are they using it?
Support15-25%Are they happy?
Financial20-25%Are they paying/growing?
Relationship20-25%Are we connected?

Adjust weights based on your business:

  • High-touch: Increase Relationship
  • Usage-based pricing: Increase Product
  • Support-intensive: Increase Support

Step 2: Select Metrics per Dimension

Product Health Metrics:

MetricTypeScoring
DAU/MAULeading% of benchmark
Feature adoptionLeading% features used
Time in productLeadingMinutes vs avg
Key feature usageLeadingYes/No or frequency
Usage trendLeadingUp/Flat/Down

Support Health Metrics:

MetricTypeScoring
CSAT scoreLagging1-5 scale
Ticket volumeLeadingvs baseline
EscalationsLeadingCount (negative)
Response sentimentLeadingPositive/Neutral/Negative
Time to resolutionLaggingvs SLA

Financial Health Metrics:

MetricTypeScoring
Payment statusLaggingCurrent/Late
ExpansionLeadingPipeline/Discussion
Contract typeLaggingMulti-year bonus
Renewal dateContextDays remaining
ARR trendLaggingGrowth/Flat/Decline

Relationship Health Metrics:

MetricTypeScoring
Champion engagedLeadingActive/Passive/None
Exec sponsorLeadingYes/No
NPS/CSATLaggingScore
QBR attendanceLeadingRegular/Sporadic/None
Last touchLeadingDays since contact

Step 3: Create Scoring Rules

Example Scoring Matrix:

Product Score (0-100):
+30: DAU/MAU > 70%
+20: DAU/MAU 50-70%
+10: DAU/MAU 30-50%
+0:  DAU/MAU < 30%

+25: Feature adoption > 60%
+15: Feature adoption 40-60%
+5:  Feature adoption < 40%

+20: Usage trending up
+10: Usage stable
-10: Usage trending down

+15: Key feature used weekly
+5:  Key feature used monthly
-10: Key feature abandoned

Max: 100 (or normalize)

Step 4: Set Alert Thresholds

ConditionAlert LevelAction
Score drops >15 pts🔴 CriticalImmediate CSM review
Score below 40🟠 HighIntervention required
Score 40-60🟡 MediumProactive outreach
Renewal <60 days + <60 score🔴 CriticalSave plan
Usage drop >30% WoW🟡 MediumCheck-in call

Step 5: Define Monitoring Cadence

ActivityFrequencyOwner
Score refreshDaily/WeeklyAutomated
Alert reviewDailyCSM
Portfolio reviewWeeklyCS Manager
Model calibrationQuarterlyCS Ops

Examples

Example 1: SaaS Health Score Design

Input:

Design health score for our B2B SaaS platform:

Business Context:
- Product: Project management software
- Contract: Annual, avg $50K
- Value metric: Projects completed, team adoption
- CSM ratio: 1:40

Available Data:
- Product: Logins, projects created, tasks completed, integrations used
- Support: Zendesk tickets, CSAT, NPS
- Financial: ARR, payment status, expansion pipeline
- Relationship: Meeting attendance, email engagement

Challenges:
- Too many "yellow" accounts, can't prioritize
- Alerts are noisy, CSMs ignoring them

Output:

## Health Score Framework: Project Management SaaS

### Design Principles

Given 1:40 ratio and "alert fatigue" issue:
1. **Prioritize leading indicators** - Catch issues early
2. **Reduce noise** - Tighter alert thresholds
3. **Enable triage** - Clear Red/Yellow/Green actions

---

### Scoring Model

#### Dimension Weights
| Dimension | Weight | Rationale |
|-----------|--------|-----------|
| Product | 40% | Usage = value realization |
| Support | 15% | Lower touch model |
| Financial | 25% | Contract health critical |
| Relationship | 20% | Moderate touch needed |

---

#### Product Score (40 points max)

| Metric | Criteria | Points |
|--------|----------|--------|
| **Weekly Active Users** | | |
| | >70% of seats | 12 |
| | 50-70% | 8 |
| | 30-50% | 4 |
| | <30% | 0 |
| **Projects Created (monthly)** | | |
| | >5 per user | 10 |
| | 2-5 per user | 6 |
| | <2 per user | 2 |
| **Tasks Completed** | | |
| | >80% completion rate | 8 |
| | 50-80% | 5 |
| | <50% | 0 |
| **Integrations** | | |
| | 2+ active | 6 |
| | 1 active | 3 |
| | None | 0 |
| **Usage Trend** | | |
| | Increasing | 4 |
| | Stable | 2 |
| | Declining | -4 |

---

#### Support Score (15 points max)

| Metric | Criteria | Points |
|--------|----------|--------|
| **CSAT** | | |
| | >4.5 | 6 |
| | 4.0-4.5 | 4 |
| | 3.5-4.0 | 2 |
| | <3.5 | 0 |
| **Ticket Volume** | | |
| | Below baseline | 5 |
| | At baseline | 3 |
| | 2x+ baseline | 0 |
| **Escalations** | | |
| | None (90 days) | 4 |
| | Resolved | 2 |
| | Open | -4 |

---

#### Financial Score (25 points max)

| Metric | Criteria | Points |
|--------|----------|--------|
| **Payment Status** | | |
| | Current | 10 |
| | 30 days late | 5 |
| | 60+ days | 0 |
| **Expansion** | | |
| | Closed this year | 8 |
| | In discussion | 5 |
| | No opportunity | 2 |
| **Contract Type** | | |
| | Multi-year | 7 |
| | Annual | 4 |
| | Month-to-month | 0 |

---

#### Relationship Score (20 points max)

| Metric | Criteria | Points |
|--------|----------|--------|
| **Champion Status** | | |
| | Active advocate | 8 |
| | Engaged | 5 |
| | Passive | 2 |
| | Gone/None | 0 |
| **NPS** | | |
| | 9-10 (Promoter) | 6 |
| | 7-8 (Passive) | 4 |
| | 0-6 (Detractor) | 0 |
| **Last Touch** | | |
| | <30 days | 6 |
| | 30-60 days | 4 |
| | 60-90 days | 2 |
| | >90 days | 0 |

---

### Health Bands

| Score | Status | Count Target | CSM Action |
|-------|--------|--------------|------------|
| 80-100 | 🟢 Healthy | 60% | Quarterly touch, expansion |
| 60-79 | 🟡 Monitor | 25% | Monthly touch, watch trends |
| 40-59 | 🟠 At Risk | 12% | Bi-weekly, intervention plan |
| 0-39 | 🔴 Critical | 3% | Weekly, executive escalation |

**Target Distribution** at 1:40 ratio:
- 24 Healthy (quarterly = 8 touches/month)
- 10 Monitor (monthly = 10 touches)
- 5 At Risk (bi-weekly = 10 touches)
- 1 Critical (weekly = 4 touches)
- **Total: 32 touch points/month** (manageable)

---

### Alert Rules (Noise Reduction)

**Only Alert When:**

| Alert | Condition | Frequency |
|-------|-----------|-----------|
| 🔴 Critical New | Score drops below 40 | Immediate |
| 🔴 Renewal Risk | Score <60 AND renewal <60 days | Immediate |
| 🟠 Score Drop | Drops >15 points in 7 days | Daily digest |
| 🟡 Watch | Usage down >30% WoW | Weekly digest |

**Suppress Alerts For:**
- Accounts <30 days old (onboarding)
- Accounts in active implementation
- Known seasonal low periods
- Manual "snooze" by CSM

---

### Dashboard Views

**Portfolio Summary:**

┌─────────────────────────────────────┐ │ My Portfolio: 40 accounts │ ├─────────────────────────────────────┤ │ 🟢 24 (60%) │ 🟡 10 (25%) │ │ 🟠 5 (12%) │ 🔴 1 (3%) │ ├─────────────────────────────────────┤ │ ⚠️ 3 accounts dropped this week │ │ 📈 5 accounts improved │ └─────────────────────────────────────┘

**Account Drill-Down:**

┌─────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Account: TechCorp | Score: 62 🟡 │ ├─────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Product: 28/40 ████████░░ │ │ Support: 12/15 █████████░ │ │ Financial: 14/25 ██████░░░░ │ │ Relationship: 8/20 ████░░░░░░ │ ├─────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Trend: ↘️ -8 pts (30 days) │ │ Renewal: 90 days │ │ Action: Schedule check-in │ └─────────────────────────────────────┘

Example 2: Health Trend Analysis

Input:

Analyze health trends for my portfolio:

Q4 Scores:
- Oct: 23 Green, 12 Yellow, 4 Orange, 1 Red
- Nov: 20 Green, 14 Yellow, 5 Orange, 1 Red
- Dec: 18 Green, 13 Yellow, 7 Orange, 2 Red

Also:
- 3 accounts churned in Q4
- 2 expansions closed
- NPS survey: 42 average (was 48)

Output:

## Q4 Health Trend Analysis

### Portfolio Drift Summary

| Status | Oct | Nov | Dec | Change |
|--------|-----|-----|-----|--------|
| 🟢 Green | 23 (58%) | 20 (50%) | 18 (45%) | ↘️ -13% |
| 🟡 Yellow | 12 (30%) | 14 (35%) | 13 (33%) | → +3% |
| 🟠 Orange | 4 (10%) | 5 (13%) | 7 (18%) | ↗️ +8% |
| 🔴 Red | 1 (2%) | 1 (2%) | 2 (5%) | ↗️ +3% |

**Trend: ⚠️ Deteriorating**
- 5 accounts moved from Green to lower status
- Orange/Red grew from 12% to 23%
- Portfolio health declining month-over-month

---

### Churn Correlation

| Churned Account | Last Score | Days at Red |
|-----------------|------------|-------------|
| Account A | 28 | 45 days |
| Account B | 35 | 30 days |
| Account C | 41 | 22 days |

**Insight**: All churned accounts were Red/Orange for 20+ days
**Action**: Accounts at Orange >14 days need intervention

---

### Key Drivers of Decline

**Analyzing accounts that dropped:**

| Factor | Accounts Affected | Avg Point Drop |
|--------|-------------------|----------------|
| Usage decline | 8 | -12 pts |
| Champion change | 3 | -18 pts |
| Support issues | 4 | -8 pts |
| Payment delays | 2 | -6 pts |

**Primary Driver**: Usage decline (likely seasonal + holiday)

---

### NPS Correlation

| NPS Segment | Avg Health Score | Q4 Change |
|-------------|------------------|-----------|
| Promoters (9-10) | 78 | -3 |
| Passives (7-8) | 58 | -6 |
| Detractors (0-6) | 38 | -10 |

**Insight**: Detractor scores dropping fastest
**Action**: Prioritize intervention for Detractors

---

### Q1 Recommendations

**Immediate (Week 1):**
1. Save plan for 2 Red accounts
2. Intervention for 7 Orange accounts
3. Outreach to 3 champion-change accounts

**Short-term (Month 1):**
1. Re-engagement campaign for low-usage accounts
2. Proactive support reach-out to ticket-heavy accounts
3. NPS follow-up calls with Detractors

**Strategic (Quarter):**
1. Investigate seasonal patterns (plan for Q4 2026)
2. Champion backup program implementation
3. Revisit Orange threshold (too many?)

---

### Target for Q1

| Status | Dec | Q1 Target | Delta |
|--------|-----|-----------|-------|
| 🟢 Green | 18 | 22 | +4 |
| 🟡 Yellow | 13 | 14 | +1 |
| 🟠 Orange | 7 | 3 | -4 |
| 🔴 Red | 2 | 1 | -1 |

**Success = Move 5 accounts up at least one tier**

Skill Boundaries

What This Skill Does Well

  • Designing health frameworks
  • Calculating composite scores
  • Identifying trends and patterns
  • Setting alert thresholds

What This Skill Cannot Do

  • Access your actual data
  • Implement in your systems
  • Know your specific business rules
  • Replace data engineering

When to Escalate to Human

  • Threshold decisions
  • Weight calibration based on churn data
  • Alert rule tuning
  • Cross-functional alignment

Iteration Guide

Follow-up Prompts

  • "How should I weight these dimensions differently for enterprise vs SMB?"
  • "What metrics should I add for a usage-based pricing model?"
  • "Create alert rules that reduce noise by 50%."
  • "Design a health score for a high-touch services business."

References

  • Gainsight Health Score Best Practices
  • Totango Customer Health Methodology
  • ChurnZero Scoring Framework
  • Customer Success Benchmarks

Related Skills

  • churn-prediction - Deeper churn analysis
  • account-health - RevOps perspective
  • expansion-signals - Growth focus

Skill Metadata

  • Domain: Customer Success
  • Complexity: Advanced
  • Mode: centaur
  • Time to Value: 2-4 hours for framework design
  • Prerequisites: Data availability assessment

平台分布

Codex

33.96%
按下载量换算254

Claude

31.66%
按下载量换算237

Cursor

20.51%
按下载量换算154

Gemini CLI

9.45%
按下载量换算71

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills