Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

ralph(Ralph 助手)

ralph 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

ralph 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 68,015。

总安装 238周安装 10GitHub Stars 1下载 83核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ralph(Ralph 助手)
来源仓库:https://github.com/harrymunro/ralph-wiggum
仓库路径:skills/ralph
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/harrymunro/ralph-wiggum --skill ralph
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/harrymunro/ralph-wiggum --skill ralph

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。ralph 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。适合根据关键词快速定位候选结果或任务线索。通过 GitHub 安装,可结合来源仓库核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围和是否触发联网操作。注意核实维护状态及是否会执行文件或命令。

适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/ralph

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/harrymunro/ralph-wiggum --skill ralph;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

ralph 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/harrymunro/ralph-wiggum --skill ralph。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

ralph 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

ralph 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

ralph 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

ralph 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 238 次,近一周安装 10 次,下载 83 次,GitHub 1 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

ralph 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
ralph

Ralph 助手 · 本页

2381操作浏览器未明确未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Ralph PRD Converter

Converts existing PRDs to the prd.json format that Ralph uses for autonomous execution.


The Job

Take a PRD (markdown file or text) and convert it to prd.json in your ralph directory.


Output Format

{
  "project": "[Project Name]",
  "branchName": "ralph/[feature-name-kebab-case]",
  "description": "[Feature description from PRD title/intro]",
  "userStories": [
    {
      "id": "US-001",
      "title": "[Story title]",
      "description": "As a [user], I want [feature] so that [benefit]",
      "acceptanceCriteria": [
        "Criterion 1",
        "Criterion 2",
        "Typecheck passes"
      ],
      "priority": 1,
      "passes": false,
      "notes": ""
    }
  ]
}

Story Size: The Number One Rule

Each story must be completable in ONE Ralph iteration (one context window).

Ralph spawns a fresh Claude Code instance per iteration with no memory of previous work. If a story is too big, the LLM runs out of context before finishing and produces broken code.

Right-sized stories:

  • Add a database column and migration
  • Add a UI component to an existing page
  • Update a server action with new logic
  • Add a filter dropdown to a list

Too big (split these):

  • "Build the entire dashboard" - Split into: schema, queries, UI components, filters
  • "Add authentication" - Split into: schema, middleware, login UI, session handling
  • "Refactor the API" - Split into one story per endpoint or pattern

Rule of thumb: If you cannot describe the change in 2-3 sentences, it is too big.


Story Ordering: Dependencies First

Stories execute in priority order. Earlier stories must not depend on later ones.

Correct order:

  1. Schema/database changes (migrations)
  2. Server actions / backend logic
  3. UI components that use the backend
  4. Dashboard/summary views that aggregate data

Wrong order:

  1. UI component (depends on schema that does not exist yet)
  2. Schema change

Acceptance Criteria: MACHINE-VERIFIABLE Required

Every criterion must be MACHINE-VERIFIABLE. If Ralph cannot verify it with a command, file check, or automated test, it is not a valid criterion.

Verification Types

Each criterion should be checkable by one of these methods:

TypeHow to VerifyExample Criterion
Command exit codeRun command, check exit 0"Typecheck passes" → npm run build
File checkCheck file exists or has content"File docs/API.md exists" → ls docs/API.md
Grep/content matchSearch file for pattern"Contains 'export default'" → grep -q 'export default' file.ts
Database queryQuery returns expected result"User table has email column" → \d users shows column
Browser automationDev-browser skill verifies visually"Button is visible" → navigate and screenshot

Good criteria (verifiable):

  • "Add status column to tasks table with default 'pending'"
  • "Filter dropdown has options: All, Active, Completed"
  • "Clicking delete shows confirmation dialog"
  • "Typecheck passes"
  • "Tests pass"

FORBIDDEN Criteria

Never use these vague terms — they cannot be machine-verified:

Forbidden TermWhy It Fails
"Works correctly"What does "correctly" mean? No verification command.
"Good UX"Subjective. Cannot be automated.
"Handles edge cases"Which edge cases? Unspecified = unverifiable.
"Is performant"What threshold? No measurable target.
"User-friendly"Subjective opinion, not a testable state.
"Clean code"Style preference, not machine-checkable.
"Properly implemented"Circular definition, no verification method.

Vague to Specific Conversion

When you encounter vague requirements, convert them:

Vague (FORBIDDEN)Specific (VERIFIABLE)
"Works correctly""Returns 200 status code for valid input"
"Good UX""Form shows inline validation errors within 100ms"
"Handles edge cases""Returns 400 error when email is empty"
"Is performant""Query completes in under 100ms for 1000 rows"
"User-friendly error messages""Error div contains text 'Invalid email format'"
"Secure authentication""Password is hashed with bcrypt before storage"
"Responsive design""Component renders at 320px, 768px, and 1024px widths"

Always include as final criterion:

"Typecheck passes"

For stories with testable logic, also include:

"Tests pass"

For stories that change UI, also include:

"Verify in browser using dev-browser skill"

Frontend stories are NOT complete until visually verified. Ralph will use the dev-browser skill to navigate to the page, interact with the UI, and confirm changes work.


Conversion Rules

  1. Each user story becomes one JSON entry
  2. IDs: Sequential (US-001, US-002, etc.)
  3. Priority: Based on dependency order, then document order
  4. All stories: passes: false and empty notes
  5. branchName: Derive from feature name, kebab-case, prefixed with ralph/
  6. Always add: "Typecheck passes" to every story's acceptance criteria

Splitting Large PRDs

If a PRD has big features, split them:

Original:

"Add user notification system"

Split into:

  1. US-001: Add notifications table to database
  2. US-002: Create notification service for sending notifications
  3. US-003: Add notification bell icon to header
  4. US-004: Create notification dropdown panel
  5. US-005: Add mark-as-read functionality
  6. US-006: Add notification preferences page

Each is one focused change that can be completed and verified independently.


Example

Input PRD:

# Task Status Feature

Add ability to mark tasks with different statuses.

## Requirements
- Toggle between pending/in-progress/done on task list
- Filter list by status
- Show status badge on each task
- Persist status in database

Output prd.json:

{
  "project": "TaskApp",
  "branchName": "ralph/task-status",
  "description": "Task Status Feature - Track task progress with status indicators",
  "userStories": [
    {
      "id": "US-001",
      "title": "Add status field to tasks table",
      "description": "As a developer, I need to store task status in the database.",
      "acceptanceCriteria": [
        "Add status column: 'pending' | 'in_progress' | 'done' (default 'pending')",
        "Generate and run migration successfully",
        "Typecheck passes"
      ],
      "priority": 1,
      "passes": false,
      "notes": ""
    },
    {
      "id": "US-002",
      "title": "Display status badge on task cards",
      "description": "As a user, I want to see task status at a glance.",
      "acceptanceCriteria": [
        "Each task card shows colored status badge",
        "Badge colors: gray=pending, blue=in_progress, green=done",
        "Typecheck passes",
        "Verify in browser using dev-browser skill"
      ],
      "priority": 2,
      "passes": false,
      "notes": ""
    },
    {
      "id": "US-003",
      "title": "Add status toggle to task list rows",
      "description": "As a user, I want to change task status directly from the list.",
      "acceptanceCriteria": [
        "Each row has status dropdown or toggle",
        "Changing status saves immediately",
        "UI updates without page refresh",
        "Typecheck passes",
        "Verify in browser using dev-browser skill"
      ],
      "priority": 3,
      "passes": false,
      "notes": ""
    },
    {
      "id": "US-004",
      "title": "Filter tasks by status",
      "description": "As a user, I want to filter the list to see only certain statuses.",
      "acceptanceCriteria": [
        "Filter dropdown: All | Pending | In Progress | Done",
        "Filter persists in URL params",
        "Typecheck passes",
        "Verify in browser using dev-browser skill"
      ],
      "priority": 4,
      "passes": false,
      "notes": ""
    }
  ]
}

Archiving Previous Runs

Before writing a new prd.json, check if there is an existing one from a different feature:

  1. Read the current prd.json if it exists
  2. Check if branchName differs from the new feature's branch name
  3. If different AND progress.txt has content beyond the header:

- Create archive folder: archive/YYYY-MM-DD-feature-name/ - Copy current prd.json and progress.txt to archive - Reset progress.txt with fresh header

The ralph.sh script handles this automatically when you run it, but if you are manually updating prd.json between runs, archive first.


Checklist Before Saving

Before writing prd.json, verify:

  • Previous run archived (if prd.json exists with different branchName, archive it first)
  • Each story is completable in one iteration (small enough)
  • Stories are ordered by dependency (schema to backend to UI)
  • Every story has "Typecheck passes" as criterion
  • UI stories have "Verify in browser using dev-browser skill" as criterion
  • Acceptance criteria are verifiable (not vague)
  • No story depends on a later story

平台分布

Codex

34.63%
按下载量换算29

Claude

31.6%
按下载量换算26

Cursor

16.89%
按下载量换算14

Gemini CLI

9.18%
按下载量换算8

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

未通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills