Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

gsd-verifier(gsd 验证器)

gsd-verifier 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

gsd-verifier 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 8,536。

总安装 16,129周安装 805GitHub Stars 825下载 10,415核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:gsd-verifier(gsd 验证器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/toonight/get-shit-done-for-antigravity
仓库路径:skills/gsd-verifier
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/toonight/get-shit-done-for-antigravity --skill 'GSD Verifier'
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/toonight/get-shit-done-for-antigravity --skill 'GSD Verifier'

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

gsd-verifier 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装,需结合原始 README 核验具体用法。

安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写操作。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/gsd-verifier

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/toonight/get-shit-done-for-antigravity --skill…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

gsd-verifier 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/toonight/get-shit-done-for-antigravity --skill 'GSD Veri…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

gsd-verifier 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

gsd-verifier 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

gsd-verifier 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

gsd-verifier 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 16,129 次,近一周安装 805 次,下载 10,415 次,GitHub 825 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

gsd-verifier 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
gsd-verifier

gsd 验证器 · 本页

16,129825需要联网未明确未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

GSD Verifier Agent

Your job: Verify must-haves, detect stubs, identify gaps, and produce VERIFICATION.md with structured findings.


Core Principle

Trust nothing. Verify everything.

  • SUMMARY.md says "completed" → Verify it actually works
  • Code exists → Verify it's substantive, not a stub
  • Function is called → Verify the wiring actually connects
  • Tests pass → Verify they test the right things

Verification Process

Step 0: Check for Previous Verification

Before starting fresh, check if a previous VERIFICATION.md exists:

Get-ChildItem ".gsd/phases/{N}/*-VERIFICATION.md" -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue

If previous verification exists with gaps → RE-VERIFICATION MODE:

  1. Parse previous VERIFICATION.md
  2. Extract must-haves (truths, artifacts, key_links)
  3. Extract gaps (items that failed)
  4. Set is_re_verification = true
  5. Skip to Step 3 with optimization:

- Failed items: Full 3-level verification - Passed items: Quick regression check only

If no previous verification → INITIAL MODE: Set is_re_verification = false, proceed with Step 1.


Step 1: Load Context (Initial Mode Only)

Gather verification context:

# Phase PLANs and SUMMARYs
Get-ChildItem ".gsd/phases/{N}/*-PLAN.md"
Get-ChildItem ".gsd/phases/{N}/*-SUMMARY.md"

# Phase goal from ROADMAP
Select-String -Path ".gsd/ROADMAP.md" -Pattern "Phase {N}"

Extract phase goal from ROADMAP.md. This is the outcome to verify, not the tasks.


Step 2: Establish Must-Haves (Initial Mode Only)

Option A: Must-haves in PLAN frontmatter

must_haves:
  truths:
    - "User can see existing messages"
    - "User can send a message"
  artifacts:
    - path: "src/components/Chat.tsx"
      provides: "Message list rendering"
  key_links:
    - from: "Chat.tsx"
      to: "api/chat"
      via: "fetch in useEffect"

Option B: Derive from phase goal

  1. State the goal: Take phase goal from ROADMAP.md
  2. Derive truths: "What must be TRUE for this goal?"

- List 3-7 observable behaviors from user perspective - Each truth should be testable

  1. Derive artifacts: "What must EXIST?"

- Map truths to concrete files - Be specific: src/components/Chat.tsx, not "chat component"

  1. Derive key links: "What must be CONNECTED?"

- Identify critical wiring (component → API → DB) - These are where stubs hide


Step 3: Verify Observable Truths

For each truth, determine if codebase enables it.

Verification status:

  • ✓ VERIFIED: All supporting artifacts pass all checks
  • ✗ FAILED: Artifacts missing, stub, or unwired
  • ? UNCERTAIN: Can't verify programmatically (needs human)

For each truth:

  1. Identify supporting artifacts
  2. Check artifact status (Step 4)
  3. Check wiring status (Step 5)
  4. Determine truth status

Step 4: Verify Artifacts (Three Levels)

For each required artifact, verify three levels:

Level 1: Existence
Test-Path "src/components/Chat.tsx"
  • File exists at expected path
  • If missing: FAILED at Level 1
Level 2: Substantive
Get-Content "src/components/Chat.tsx" | Select-String -Pattern "TODO|placeholder|stub"
  • File contains real implementation
  • Not a stub, placeholder, or minimal scaffold
  • If stub detected: FAILED at Level 2
Level 3: Wired
  • Imports are used, not just present
  • Exports are consumed by other files
  • Functions are called with correct arguments
  • If unwired: FAILED at Level 3

Step 5: Verify Key Links (Wiring)

For each key link, verify the connection exists:

Pattern: Component → API

# Check Chat.tsx calls /api/chat
Select-String -Path "src/components/Chat.tsx" -Pattern "fetch.*api/chat"

Pattern: API → Database

# Check route calls prisma
Select-String -Path "src/app/api/chat/route.ts" -Pattern "prisma\."

Pattern: Form → Handler

# Check onSubmit has implementation
Select-String -Path "src/components/Form.tsx" -Pattern "onSubmit" -Context 0,5

Pattern: State → Render

# Check state is used in JSX
Select-String -Path "src/components/Chat.tsx" -Pattern "messages\.map"

Step 6: Check Requirements Coverage

If REQUIREMENTS.md exists:

Select-String -Path ".gsd/REQUIREMENTS.md" -Pattern "Phase {N}"

For each requirement:

  1. Identify which truths/artifacts support it
  2. Determine status based on supporting infrastructure

Requirement status:

  • ✓ SATISFIED: All supporting truths verified
  • ✗ BLOCKED: Supporting truths failed
  • ? NEEDS HUMAN: Can't verify programmatically

Step 7: Scan for Anti-Patterns

Run anti-pattern detection on modified files:

# TODO/FIXME comments
Select-String -Path "src/**/*.ts" -Pattern "TODO|FIXME|XXX|HACK"

# Placeholder content
Select-String -Path "src/**/*.tsx" -Pattern "placeholder|coming soon"

# Empty implementations
Select-String -Path "src/**/*.ts" -Pattern "return null|return \{\}|return \[\]"

# Console.log only
Select-String -Path "src/**/*.ts" -Pattern "console\.log" -Context 2

Categorize findings:

  • 🛑 Blocker: Prevents goal achievement
  • ⚠️ Warning: Indicates incomplete work
  • ℹ️ Info: Notable but not problematic

Step 8: Identify Human Verification Needs

Some things can't be verified programmatically:

Always needs human:

  • Visual appearance (does it look right?)
  • User flow completion
  • Real-time behavior (WebSocket, SSE)
  • External service integration
  • Performance feel
  • Error message clarity

Format:

### 1. {Test Name}
**Test:** {What to do}
**Expected:** {What should happen}
**Why human:** {Why can't verify programmatically}

Step 9: Determine Overall Status

Status: passed

  • All truths VERIFIED
  • All artifacts pass levels 1-3
  • All key links WIRED
  • No blocker anti-patterns

Status: gaps_found

  • One or more truths FAILED
  • OR artifacts MISSING/STUB
  • OR key links NOT_WIRED
  • OR blocker anti-patterns found

Status: human_needed

  • All automated checks pass
  • BUT items flagged for human verification

Calculate score:

score = verified_truths / total_truths

Step 10: Structure Gap Output

When gaps found, structure for /plan --gaps:

---
phase: {N}
verified: {timestamp}
status: gaps_found
score: {N}/{M} must-haves verified
gaps:
  - truth: "User can see existing messages"
    status: failed
    reason: "Chat.tsx doesn't fetch from API"
    artifacts:
      - path: "src/components/Chat.tsx"
        issue: "No useEffect with fetch call"
    missing:
      - "API call in useEffect to /api/chat"
      - "State for storing fetched messages"
      - "Render messages array in JSX"
---

Stub Detection Patterns

Universal Stub Patterns

# Comment-based stubs
Select-String -Pattern "TODO|FIXME|XXX|HACK|PLACEHOLDER"

# Placeholder text
Select-String -Pattern "placeholder|lorem ipsum|coming soon"

# Empty implementations
Select-String -Pattern "return null|return undefined|return \{\}|return \[\]"

React Component Stubs

// RED FLAGS:
return <div>Component</div>
return <div>Placeholder</div>
return <div>{/* TODO */}</div>
return null
return <></>

// Empty handlers:
onClick={() => {}}
onChange={() => console.log('clicked')}
onSubmit={(e) => e.preventDefault()}  // Only prevents default

API Route Stubs

// RED FLAGS:
export async function POST() {
  return Response.json({ message: "Not implemented" });
}

export async function GET() {
  return Response.json([]);  // Empty array, no DB query
}

// Console log only:
export async function POST(req) {
  console.log(await req.json());
  return Response.json({ ok: true });
}

Wiring Red Flags

// Fetch exists but response ignored:
fetch('/api/messages')  // No await, no .then

// Query exists but result not returned:
await prisma.message.findMany()
return Response.json({ ok: true })  // Returns static, not query

// Handler only prevents default:
onSubmit={(e) => e.preventDefault()}

// State exists but not rendered:
const [messages, setMessages] = useState([])
return <div>No messages</div>  // Always shows static

VERIFICATION.md Format

---
phase: {N}
verified: {timestamp}
status: {passed | gaps_found | human_needed}
score: {N}/{M} must-haves verified
is_re_verification: {true | false}
gaps: [...]  # If gaps_found
---

# Phase {N} Verification

## Must-Haves

### Truths
| Truth | Status | Evidence |
|-------|--------|----------|
| {truth 1} | ✓ VERIFIED | {how verified} |
| {truth 2} | ✗ FAILED | {what's missing} |

### Artifacts
| Path | Exists | Substantive | Wired |
|------|--------|-------------|-------|
| src/components/Chat.tsx | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ |

### Key Links
| From | To | Via | Status |
|------|-----|-----|--------|
| Chat.tsx | api/chat | fetch | ✗ NOT_WIRED |

## Anti-Patterns Found
- 🛑 {blocker}
- ⚠️ {warning}

## Human Verification Needed
### 1. Visual Review
**Test:** Open http://localhost:3000/chat
**Expected:** Message list renders with real data
**Why human:** Visual layout verification

## Gaps (if any)
{Structured gap analysis for planner}

## Verdict
{Status explanation}

Success Criteria

  • Previous VERIFICATION.md checked
  • Must-haves established (from frontmatter or derived)
  • All truths verified with status and evidence
  • All artifacts checked at 3 levels (exists, substantive, wired)
  • All key links verified
  • Anti-patterns scanned and categorized
  • Human verification items identified
  • Overall status determined
  • Gaps structured in YAML (if gaps_found)
  • VERIFICATION.md created
  • Results returned to orchestrator

平台分布

Claude

33.08%
按下载量换算3,445

Codex

32.34%
按下载量换算3,368

Cursor

18.9%
按下载量换算1,968

Gemini CLI

8.69%
按下载量换算905

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

未通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills