Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

fixing-flaky-e2e-tests(修复不稳定的 e2e 测试)

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

fixing-flaky-e2e-tests 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 65,084。

总安装 288周安装 12GitHub Stars 44,429下载 96核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:fixing-flaky-e2e-tests(修复不稳定的 e2e 测试)
来源仓库:https://github.com/streamlit/streamlit
仓库路径:skills/fixing-flaky-e2e-tests
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/streamlit/streamlit --skill fixing-flaky-e2e-tests
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/streamlit/streamlit --skill fixing-flaky-e2e-tests

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

fixing-flaky-e2e-tests 用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试和回归验证。适合编写端到端测试或根据失败日志定位问题,整理测试计划。使用时需确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免误改真实逻辑。涉及浏览器或外部服务时应区分本地模拟与生产环境。

适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/fixing-flaky-e2e-tests

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/streamlit/streamlit --skill fixing-flaky-e2e-t…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

fixing-flaky-e2e-tests 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/streamlit/streamlit --skill fixing-flaky-e2e-tests。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

fixing-flaky-e2e-tests 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

fixing-flaky-e2e-tests 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

fixing-flaky-e2e-tests 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

fixing-flaky-e2e-tests 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 288 次,近一周安装 12 次,下载 96 次,GitHub 44,429 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

fixing-flaky-e2e-tests 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 来源仓库有 44,429 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
fixing-flaky-e2e-tests

修复不稳定的 e2e 测试 · 本页

28844,429操作浏览器未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Fixing flaky E2E tests

Diagnose and fix flaky Playwright E2E tests in e2e_playwright/.

When to use

  • Tests fail intermittently (pass sometimes, fail others)
  • Timeout errors (TimeoutError: wait_until timed out)
  • Snapshot mismatches with pixel differences
  • Browser-specific failures (firefox, webkit, chromium)
  • User asks to fix top flaky tests from CI

Finding top flaky tests

Run the script to identify the most flaky tests from recent CI runs:

uv run scripts/fetch_flaky_tests.py

Options:

  • --days N: Look back N days (default: 4)
  • --top N: Return top N flaky tests (default: 10)
  • --min-reruns N: Minimum total reruns to include (default: 2)
  • --json: Output as JSON for programmatic use

The script downloads playwright_test_stats artifacts from successful playwright.yml runs and aggregates tests that required reruns.

Filtering tests to fix

Skip tests already marked with @pytest.mark.flaky---these are known flaky tests being tracked separately.

# Check if a test file has the flaky marker
grep -l "pytest.mark.flaky" e2e_playwright/<test_file>.py

Investigation workflow

1. Reproduce the flakiness locally (REQUIRED)

IMPORTANT: Only attempt to fix tests that fail locally. If you cannot reproduce the flakiness after 25 runs, do NOT attempt a fix—the test may be flaky due to CI environment factors that cannot be addressed locally.

Run the test up to 25 times with the affected browser(s). The loop breaks on first failure and captures full output:

for i in {1..25}; do
  result=$(make run-e2e-test e2e_playwright/test_file.py::test_name -- --browser firefox 2>&1)
  if echo "$result" | grep -q "FAILED"; then
    echo "=== FAILURE ON RUN $i ==="
    echo "$result"
    break
  fi
  echo "Run $i: PASSED"
done

If all 25 runs pass, skip this test and move to the next one.

2. Check test artifacts

After failure, examine:

  • e2e_playwright/test-results/ - traces, screenshots, videos
  • e2e_playwright/test-results/snapshot-updates/ - actual vs expected snapshots

For persistent snapshot flakiness: If a test keeps failing due to snapshot mismatches, compare the actual vs expected images in e2e_playwright/test-results/snapshot-updates/. Look for:

  • Pixel-level differences (use an image diff tool or overlay)
  • Subtle layout shifts, font rendering variations, or timing artifacts
  • Browser-specific rendering quirks (especially Firefox subpixel issues)

This helps identify whether the flakiness is due to timing (content not loaded), animation state, or browser rendering differences.

Common causes and fixes

Timing issues (most common)

Symptom: Screenshots taken before element fully renders, animations not complete.

Fix: Add explicit waits before interactions or screenshots:

# Before
element.click()
assert_snapshot(element, name="snapshot")

# After
element.click()
expect(element).to_be_visible()  # Wait for visibility
assert_snapshot(element, name="snapshot")

For popups/modals/calendars that animate:

calendar = page.locator('[data-baseweb="calendar"]').first
expect(calendar).to_be_visible()  # Wait for animation to complete
assert_snapshot(calendar, name="calendar-snapshot")

Browser retry causing extra events

Symptom: Assertion expects exact count but gets more (e.g., assert 44 == 41).

Fix: Use >= instead of == when browsers may retry failed operations:

# Before
assert error_count == expected_count

# After - browsers may retry failed image loads
assert error_count >= expected_count

Timeout too short

Symptom: TimeoutError on slower browsers.

Fix: Increase timeout for operations that can be slow:

# Before
wait_until(app, lambda: check_condition(), timeout=10000)

# After
wait_until(app, lambda: check_condition(), timeout=20000)

Snapshot mismatch due to timing

Symptom: Snapshot mismatch for... (X pixels difference).

Causes:

  • Element still animating when screenshot taken
  • Font rendering not complete
  • Async content not loaded

Fix: Ensure element is stable before screenshot:

element = page.locator(".my-element")
expect(element).to_be_visible()
# For elements with animations, wait for specific CSS state:
expect(element).to_have_css("opacity", "1")
assert_snapshot(element, name="snapshot")

Browser-specific considerations

BrowserCommon Issues
FirefoxSlower console logging, may retry failed requests, subpixel rendering differences
WebkitMay have timing differences with layout
ChromiumGenerally most reliable, use as baseline

Firefox subpixel rendering flakiness

Symptom: Firefox screenshots flake with 1-pixel differences due to subpixel rendering variations.

Fix: Add a one-liner markdown element above the element being tested. This shifts the subpixel position to a more stable value:

# In the test app (.py file)
st.markdown("---")  # Stabilizes subpixel rendering for elements below
st.date_input("Pick a date")

This is a workaround for Firefox's subpixel rendering behavior and can reduce snapshot flakiness when other timing fixes don't help.

If you've exhausted timing fixes and the flakiness persists only on a specific browser due to known browser limitations (not test bugs), skip_browser may be appropriate as a last resort:

# Only use after confirming this is a browser-level limitation, not a fixable timing issue
@pytest.mark.skip_browser("webkit", reason="Webkit has known layout timing issues with this element")
def test_problematic_on_webkit(app: Page):
    ...

Important: Using skip_browser requires justification. Prefer fixing the underlying timing issue first. See "Rules" section for guidance on when skipping is acceptable.

Verification

After applying fix, verify with multiple runs:

# Run 10+ times to ensure stability
for i in {1..10}; do
  make run-e2e-test e2e_playwright/test_file.py::test_name -- --browser firefox 2>&1 | grep -E "(PASSED|FAILED)"
done

Target: 10/10 passes before considering fix complete.

Key utilities

From e2e_playwright.conftest:

  • wait_for_app_run(page) - Wait for Streamlit script execution
  • wait_for_app_loaded(page) - Wait for initial app load
  • wait_until(page, fn, timeout) - Poll until condition is true

From e2e_playwright.shared.app_utils:

  • expect_no_skeletons(element) - Wait for loading skeletons to disappear
  • reset_focus(page) - Click outside to trigger blur events
  • reset_hovering(locator) - Move mouse away from element

Complete workflow

  1. Fetch flaky tests: uv run scripts/fetch_flaky_tests.py --top 10
  2. Filter out marked tests: Skip tests with @pytest.mark.flaky
  3. For each remaining test:

- Read the test code to understand what it's testing - Reproduce the flakiness locally (up to 25 runs) - Skip if not reproducible: If 25 runs all pass, move to the next test - Identify the root cause (timing, browser-specific, etc.) - Apply the minimal fix - Verify with 10+ runs on affected browser(s)

  1. Run checks: make check before committing

Rules

  • Reproduce locally first: Only fix tests you can reproduce locally (up to 25 runs)
  • Minimal fixes: Smallest change that fixes the issue
  • Don't disable tests without justification: Never skip tests just to "fix" flakiness. skip_browser is acceptable only when:

1. You've exhausted all timing/wait fixes 2. The flakiness is due to a documented browser limitation (not a test bug) 3. You include a clear reason explaining why

  • Verify thoroughly: Run 10+ times on affected browser after fix
  • Preserve test intent: Understand what the test is validating
  • Document cause: Add comments explaining why waits/timeouts are needed

平台分布

Codex

35.52%
按下载量换算34

Claude

32.86%
按下载量换算32

Cursor

20.18%
按下载量换算19

Gemini CLI

9.11%
按下载量换算9

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills